The promise of contrapuntal and intersectional methods for advancing critical interpersonal and family communication research

References

• Adams, T., & Manning, J. (2015). Autoethnography and family research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7, 350–366. doi:10.1111/jftr.12116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1919/1990). Art and answerability. In M. Holquist (Ed.), Art and answerability: Early essays by M. M. Bakhtin ( V. Liapunov, Trans., pp. 1–3). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1929/1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1975/1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin ( C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans., pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1979/1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres & other late essays ( V. W. McGee, Trans., pp. 60–102). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2004). Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00068.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Asbury, B. (2015). Critical approaches to interpersonal communication: Charting a future. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 189–202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Norwood, K. M. (2015). Relational dialectics theory: Navigating meaning from competing discourses. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 279–291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, K., & Adams, T. E. (2016). Family bullies. Journal of Family Communication, 16, 51–63. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2015.1111217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Schrodt, P., & Carr, K. (2015). Introduction: Meta-theory and theory in interpersonal communication research. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Suter, E. A., & Floyd, K. (in press). Introduction: Meta-theory and theory in family communication research. In D. O. Braithwaite, E. A. Suter, & K. Floyd (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chevrette, R. (2013). Outing heteronormativity in interpersonal and family communication: Feminist applications of queer theory “beyond the sexy streets”. Communication Theory, 23, 170–190. doi: 10.1111/comt.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, D. (2016, June 23). It’s official: Minority babies are the majority among the nation’s infants, but only just. Retrieved from the Pew Research Center website: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/23/its-official-minority-babies-are-the-majority-among-the-nations-infants-but-only-just/
   Google Scholar
• Colaner, C. W., & Rittenour, C. E. (2015). “Feminism begins at home”: The influence of mother gender socialization on daughter career and motherhood aspirations as channeled through daughter feminist identification. Communication Quarterly, 63, 81–98. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2014.965839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coontz, S. (1992). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York, NY: BasicBooks.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167. Retrieved from http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. doi: 10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Cronen, V. E. (1998). Communication theory for the twentieth-century: Cleaning up the wreckage of the psychology project. In J. S. Trent (Ed.), Communication: Views from the helm for the 21st century (pp. 18–38). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. M. (2015). The “strong Black woman collective”: A developing theoretical framework for understanding collective communication practices of Black women. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38, 20–35. doi: 10.1080/07491409.2014.953714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (2001). Conceptual foundations. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, M. J. (2010). The critical cultural turn in health communication: Reflexivity, solidarity, and praxis. Health Communication, 25, 534–539. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2010.497995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2009). Poetry as method: Reporting research through verse. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2014). Family stories, poetry and women’s work: Knit four, frog one (poems). Boston, MA: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L. (2016). Ten (the promise of arts-based, ethnographic, and narrative research in critical family communication research and praxis). Journal of Family Communication, 16, 9–15. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2015.1111218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few-Demo, A. L. (2014). Intersectionality as the “new” critical approach in feminist family studies: Evolving racial/ethnic feminisms and critical race theories. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6, 169–183. doi: 10.1111/jftr.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few-Demo, A. L., Lloyd, S. A., & Allen, K. R. (2014). It’s all about power: Integrating feminist family studies and family communication. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 85–94. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2013.864295
   Google Scholar
• Few-Demo, A. L., Moore, J., & Abdi, S. (in press). Intersectionality theory: (Re)considering family communication from within the margins. In D. O. Braithwaite, E. A. Suter, & K. Floyd (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2015). The loneliness cure: Six strategies for finding real connections in your life. Avon, MA: Adams Media.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction (R. Harley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. (2006). Diversity’s impact on defining the family: Discourse-dependence and identity. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. (2008). Just one child: Science and policy in Deng’s China. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 68–79. doi: 10.1017/S1537592707070065
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. G., & Calafell, B. M. (2012). Contesting neoliberalism through critical pedagogy, intersectional reflexivity, and personal narrative: Queer tales of academia. Journal of Homosexuality, 59, 957–981. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2012.699835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langellier, K. M., & Peterson, E. E. (2006). Narrative performance theory: Telling stories, doing family. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 99–114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lannamann, J. W. (1991). Interpersonal communication research as ideological practice. Communication Theory, 1, 179–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00014.x
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1994). Toward the development of critical health communication praxis. Health Communication, 6, 55–67. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc0601_4
   Google Scholar
• Magat, J. (2013). Spectacular embodiments: Filipina trans women and the biopolitics of performance (Unpublished master’s thesis). San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771–1800. doi: 10.1086/426800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2017). Performative face theory: A critical perspective on interpersonal identity work. Communication Monographs, 84, 258–276. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2017.1315891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. (1997). Modernism, postmodernism, and communication studies: A rereading of an ongoing debate. Communication Theory, 7, 1–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2015). How postindustrial families talk. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 87–103. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1995). The “father knows best” dynamic in dinnertime narratives. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 97–120). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2007). Translational research endeavors and the practices of communication privacy management. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 218–222. doi: 10.1080/00909880701422443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (n.d.). Practice: Translating research into practice. Retrieved from https://cpmcenter.iupui.edu/index.php/practice
   Google Scholar
• Sotirin, P. J., & Ellingson, L. L. (in press). Critical feminist family communication theories: Gender, power, and praxis. In D. O. Braithwaite, E. A. Suter, & K. Floyd (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A. (2016). Introduction: Critical approaches to family communication research: Representation, critique, and praxis. Journal of Family Communication, 16, 1–8. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2015.1111219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A. (2017). Graduate seminar in critical family communication studies (Unpublished syllabus). Department of Communication Studies, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A., & Faulkner, S. L. (2016). Critical approaches to family communication research: Representation, critique, and praxis [Special issue]. Journal of Family Communication, 16(1). doi: 10.1080/15267431.2015.1111219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A., & Norwood, K. (2017). Critical theorizing in family communication studies: (Re)reading relational dialectics theory. Communication Theory, 27, 290–308. doi: 10.1111/comt.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, V. R., & Kelley, D. L. (Producers). (2013, December 5). The forgiveness tree project [YouTube video]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WflGyKojGd8
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. K. (2015). Dialogic constructions of monogamy: The discursive struggles of mono-normativity and mono-realism (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Denver, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A. H. (2009). Racializing the glass escalator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society, 23, 5–26. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.du.idm.oclc.org/stable/20676747?seq=6#page_scan_tab_contents doi: 10.1177/0891243208323054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. T. (2008). Critical feminist theories: Giving voice and visibility to women’s experiences in interpersonal communication. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 323–334). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yep, G. A. (2010). Toward the de-subjugation of racially marked knowledges in communication. Southern Communication Journal, 75, 171–175. doi: 10.1080/10417941003613263
   Google Scholar
• Yep, G. A. (2016). Toward thick(er) intersectionalities: Theorizing, researching, and activating the complexities of communication and identities. In K. Sorrells & S. Sekimoto (Eds.), Globalizing intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 86–94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshimura, C. G., & Galvin, K. M. (in press). General systems theory: A compelling view of family life. In D. O. Braithwaite, E. A. Suter, & K. Floyd (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar