“The FEMEN body can do everything”: Generating the agentic bodies of social movement through internal and external rhetorics

References

• Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asen, R. (2017). Neoliberalism, the public sphere, and a public good. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 103(4), 329–349. doi: 10.1080/00335630.2017.1360507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, C. (2001). Reflections on criticism and bodies: Parables from public places. Western Journal of Communication, 65(3), 271–294. doi: 10.1080/10570310109374706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D. C. (2005). Counterpublicity and corporeality in HIV/AIDS Zines. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 22(5), 351–371. doi: 10.1080/07393180500342860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. K. (2005). Agency: Promiscuous and protean. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 2(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/1479142042000332134
   Google Scholar
• Carr-Gomm, P. (2010). A brief history of nakedness. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cathcart, R. S. (1972). New approaches to the study of movements: Defining movements rhetorically. Western Journal of Communication, 36(2), 82–88. doi: 10.1080/10570317209373733
   Google Scholar
• Cathcart, R. S. (1978). Movements: Confrontation as rhetorical form. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 43, 233–247. doi: 10.1080/10417947809372383
   Google Scholar
• Chávez, K. R. (2010). Border (in) securities: Normative and differential belonging in LGBTQ and immigrant rights discourse. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 7, 136–155. doi: 10.1080/14791421003763291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chávez, K. R. (2011). Counter-public enclaves and understanding the function of rhetoric in social movement coalition-building. Communication Quarterly, 59, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2010.541333
   Google Scholar
• Chávez, K. R. (2013). Queer migration politics: Activist rhetoric and coalitional possibilities. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cintron, R. (1997). Angels’ town: Chero ways, gang life, and rhetorics of the everyday. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K. M. (1999a). Image politics: The new rhetoric of environmental activism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K. M. (1999b). Unruly arguments: The body rhetoric of earth first!. Act up, and queer nation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 36(1), 9–22. doi: 10.1080/00028533.1999.11951634
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K. M., & Peeples, J. (2002). From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the ‘violence’ of Seattle. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2), 125–151. doi: 10.1080/07393180216559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eileraas, K. (2014). Sex(t)ing revolution, femen-izing the public square: Aliaa Magda Elmadhdy, nude protest, and transnational feminist body politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 40(1), 40–52. doi: 10.1086/677073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enck-Wanzer, D. (2006). Trashing the system: Social movement, intersectional rhetoric, and collective agency in the Young Lords organization’s garbage offensive. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(2), 174–201. doi: 10.1080/00335630600816920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (2011). Location matters: The rhetoric of place in protest. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97(3), 257–282. doi: 10.1080/00335630.2011.585167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. doi: 10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J., Leon, K., & Pigg, S. (2018). Fieldwork and the identification and assembling of agencies. In C. Rai, & C. G. Druschke (Eds.), Field rhetoric: Ethnography, ecology, and engagement in the places of persuasion (pp. 193–212). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, L. M. (1952). The rhetoric of historical movements. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 38, 184–188. doi: 10.1080/00335635209381762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn, J., & Cloud, D. L. (2010). Agentic orientation as magical voluntarism. Communication Theory, 20, 50–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harold, C. L. (1999). Tracking heroin chic: The abject body reconfigures the rational argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 36(2), 65–76. doi: 10.1080/00028533.1999.11951638
   Google Scholar
• Herbig, A., & Hess, A. (2012). Convergent critical rhetoric at the “rally to restore sanity”: Exploring the intersection of rhetoric, ethnography, and documentary production. Communication Studies, 63(3), 269–289. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2012.674617
   Google Scholar
• Hess, A. (2011). Critical-rhetorical ethnography: Rethinking the place and process of rhetoric. Communication Studies, 62(2), 127–152. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2011.529750
   Google Scholar
• Hess, A. (2016). Embodied judgment: A call for a phronetic orientation in rhetorical ethnography. In S. McKinnon, R. Asen, K. Chavez, & R. G. Howard (Eds.), Text + field: Innovations in rhetorical method (pp. 86–100). University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivey, C. L. (2015). Combating epistemic violence with Islamic feminism: Qahera vs. FEMEN. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38(4), 384–387. doi: 10.1080/07491409.2015.1088292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunceford, B. (2012). Naked politics: Nudity, political action, and the rhetoric of the body. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (1994). Using power/fighting power. Constellations (oxford, England), 1(1), 53–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8675.1994.tb00004.x
   Google Scholar
• Margot, A. (Director) (2015). I Am femen [Motion picture]. First Run Features.
   Google Scholar
• McAlister, J. F. (2015). The visual politics of un/veiling the female body in political protest. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38, 357–360. doi: 10.1080/07491409.2015.1103105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, M. C. (1980). ‘Social movement’: Phenomenon or meaning? Central States Speech Journal, 31), doi: 10.1080/10510978009368063
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, A., Asen, R., Chávez, K. R., & Howard, R. G. (2016). Text + field: Innovations in rhetorical method. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A., Keane, J., & Mier, P. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. London: Hutchinson Radius.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M. K., Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (2011). Articulating rhetorical field methods: Challenges and tensions. Western Journal of Communication, 75(4), 386–406. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2011.586969
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M. K., Hess, A., Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (2015). Participatory critical rhetoric: Theoretical and methodological foundations for studying rhetoric in situ. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30, 65–88. doi: 10.1057/fr.1988.42
   Google Scholar
• Noland, C. (2009). Agency & embodiment: Performing gestures/producing culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petchesky, R. P. (1995). The body as property: A feminist re-vision. In F. D. Ginsburg, & R. Rapp (Eds.), Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction (pp. 387–406). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C. (2003). Resisting “national breast cancer awareness month”: The rhetoric of counterpublics and their cultural performances. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89, 345–365. doi: 10.1080/0033563032000160981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, C., & Druschke, C. G. (2018). Field rhetoric: Ethnography, ecology, and engagement in the places of persuasion. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A., & Basow, S. A. (2004). Femininity, sports, and feminism: Developing a theory of physical liberation. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 28(3), 245–265. doi: 10.1177/0193723504266990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, H. W. (1970). Requirements, problems, and strategies: A theory of persuasion for social movements. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 56(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/00335637009382977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souweine, I. (2005). Naked protest and the politics of personalism. New Delhi: The Sarai Programme Center for the Study for Developing Societies. http://preview.sarai.net/journal/05_pdf/12/02_isaac.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, C. R. (2002). Rethinking the black public sphere: An alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres. Communication Theory, 12, 446–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, C. J. (1991). The internal rhetoric of the knights of labor. Communication Studies, 42(1), 67–82. doi: 10.1080/10510979109368321
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, C. J. (1997). The evolution of a revolution: Stokely Carmichael and the rhetoric of black power. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 83(4), 429–446. doi: 10.1080/00335639709384196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stormer, N. (1999). Embodied humanism: Performative argument for natural rights in “the solitude of self”. Argumentation and Advocacy, 36(2), 51–64. doi: 10.1080/00028533.1999.11951637
   Google Scholar
• Valente, A. C. (2015). Can women’s bare breasts disarticulate meanings? A look into FEMEN’s street protests in Paris. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, 8(57.2), 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Veneracion-Rallonza, M. L. (2014). Women’s naked body protests and the performance of resistance: Femen and Meira Paibi protests against rape. Phillipine Political Science Journal, 35(2), 251–268. doi: 10.1080/01154451.2014.965876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar