The appropriation of traditional media content in online contexts: A South Korean textbook case

References

• Ackland, R., Gibson, R., Lusoli, W., & Ward, S. (2010). Engaging with the public? Assessing the online presence and communication practices of the nanotechnology industry. Social Science Computer Review, 28(4), 443–465. doi: 10.1177/0894439310362735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 20–39. doi: 10.1177/0002716212451428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Segerberg, A. (2011). Digital media and the personalization of collective action. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 770–799. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.579141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2013). Collective action in organizations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boczkowski, P., Matassi, M., & Mitchelstein, E. (2018). How young users deal with multiple platforms: The role of meaning-making in social media repertoires. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23, 245–259. doi: 10.1093/jcmc/zmy012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Vraga, E. (2018). Studying politics across media. Political Communication, 35, 1–7. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1334730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonini, T., Caliandro, A., & Massarelli, A. (2016). Understanding the value of networked publics in radio: Employing digital methods and social network analysis to understand the Twitter publics of two Italian national radio stations. Information, Communication & Society, 19(1), 40–58. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsting, S., & Postmes, T. (2002). Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Research, 33(5), 525–554. doi: 10.1177/104649602237169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011). Predicting information credibility in time-sensitive social media. Internet Research, 23, 560–588. doi: 10.1108/IntR-05-2012-0095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (second edition). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S., & Metzger, M. (2001). The end of mass communication? Mass Communication and Society, 4, 365–379. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_3
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00137.x
   Google Scholar
• DeAndrea, D. (2014). Advancing warranting theory. Communication Theory, 24, 186–204. doi: 10.1111/comt.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delicath, J., & Deluca, K. (2003). Image events, the public sphere, and argumentative practice: The case of Radical Environmental groups. Argumentation, 17, 315–333. doi: 10.1023/A:1025179019397
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121–147. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, T., McCallum, K., & Waller, L. (2016). Indigenous voices and mediatized policy-making in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 23–39. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enli, G., & Skogerbo, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centered politics. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 757–774. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A., & Metzger, M. (2013). Trusting expert- versus user-generated ratings online: The role of information volume, valence, and consumer characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1626–1634. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh, S., & Stohl, C. (2013). From Wall Street to Wellington: Protests in an era of digital ubiquity. Communication Monographs, 80(4), 425–451. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2013.828156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghannam, J. (2011). Social media in the Arab world: Leading up to the uprisings of 2011. Washington, DC: Center for International Media Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Ghose, A., & Han, S. (2009). An empirical analysis of user content generation and usage behavior in mobile digital media. ICIS 2009 Proceedings. Paper 190. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/190
   Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011). The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Scientific Reports, 1, Article 197. doi: 10.1038/srep00197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieco, E. (2017, November 2). More Americans are turning to multiple social media sites for news. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.pewresearch.org
   Google Scholar
• Hajli, M., Sims, J., Featherman, M., & Love, P. (2015). Credibility of information in online communities. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23, 238–253. doi: 10.1080/0965254X.2014.920904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89. doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664
   Google Scholar
• Himelboim, I., Gleave, E., & Smith, M. (2009). Discussion catalysts in online political discussions: Content importers and conversation starters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 771–789. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01470.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C., Janis, I., & Kelley, H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C., & Lin, J. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45, 65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2007.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (2007). Fluidity, promiscuity and mash-ups: New concepts for the study of mobility and communication. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 408–413. doi: 10.1080/03637750701543543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (2009). The mash-up: A new archetype for communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 730–734. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jucks, R., & Thon, F. (2017). Better to have many opinions than on from an expert? Social validation by one trustworthy source versus the masses in online health forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 375–381. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsnes, B., & Larsson, A. (2018). Understanding news sharing across social media. Journalism Studies, 19, 1669–1688. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1297686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2016). Analytic activism: Digital listening and the new political strategy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpf, D. (2018). Analytic activism and its limitations. Social Media & Society, 4, 1–10. doi: 10.1177/2056305117750718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Ting, K. (2015). Media and information praxis of young activists in the Umbrella movement. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8(4), 376–392. doi: 10.1080/17544750.2015.1086399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madge, C., Meek, C., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at University: ‘it is more for socialising and taking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 141–155. doi: 10.1080/17439880902923606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M., Flanagin, A., & Medders, R. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micó, J., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2014). Political activism online: Organization and media relations in the case of 15M in Spain. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 858–871. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.830634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S., & Hintz, A. (2013). Networked collective action and the institutionalized policy debate: Bringing cyberactivism to the policy arena? Policy & Internet, 5, 7–26. doi: 10.1002/poi3.20
   Google Scholar
• Mullainathan, S., & Schleifer, A. (2005). The market for news. American Economic Review, 95, 1031–1053. doi: 10.1257/0002828054825619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngai, E., Tao, S., & Moon, K. (2015). Social media research: Theories, constructs and conceptual frameworks. International Journal of Information Management, 35, 33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, S., Lehto, X., & Park, J. (2009). Travelers’ intent to use mobile technologies as a function of effort and performance expectancy. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18, 765–781. doi: 10.1080/19368620903235795
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, J., & Loader, B. (2016). Understanding digital cultures. Information, Communication & Society, 19(1), 1–3. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1094114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R., Evans, S., Pearce, K., Sivunen, A., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. (2017). Organizational media affordances: Operationalization and associations with media use. Journal of Communication, 67, 106–130. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sams, S., & Park, H. (2014). The presence of hyperlinks on social network sites: A case study of Cyworld in Korea. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 294–307. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across Youtube, Twitter, and Facebook? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 102–113. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y. (2013). The contribution of websites and blogs to the students’ protest communication tactics during the 2010 UK University occupations. Information, Communication & Society, 16(9), 1477–1513. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.706315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–428. doi: 10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, S. (2014). Online customer engagement through blogs in India. Journal of Internet Commerce, 13, 282–301. doi: 10.1080/15332861.2014.961347
   Google Scholar
• Vraga, E., & Bode, L. (2018). I do not believe you: How providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 21, 1337–1353. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J., & Parks, M. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00312.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodly, D. (2008). New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation. Public Choice, 134, 109–123. doi: 10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook, M. (1996). The unorganized militia network: Conspiracies, computers and community. Berkeley Planning Journal, 11, 26–48. doi: 10.5070/BP311113052
   Google Scholar
• Zuniga, H., Garcia-Perdomo, V., & McGregor, S. (2015). What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication, 65, 793–815. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar