The influence of a descriptive norm label on adolescents’ persuasion knowledge and privacy-protective behavior on social networking sites

References

• Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. http://chuang.epage.au.edu.tw/ezfiles/168/1168/attach/20/pta_41176_7688352_57138.pdf
   Google Scholar
• An, S., Kang, H., & Koo, S. (2018). Sponsorship disclosures of native advertising: Clarity and prominence. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, S., & Stern, S. (2011). Mitigating the effects of advergames on children. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, S. E., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on adolescents’ risky sexual online behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(12), 753–758. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1086/209186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellur, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2014). How can we tell when a heuristic has been used? Design and analysis strategies for capturing the operation of heuristics. Communication Methods and Measures, 8(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2014.903390
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., & van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2016). Informing consumers about “hidden” advertising: A literature review of the effects of disclosing sponsored content. In P. De Pelsmacker (Ed.), Advertising in new formats and media ( Vol. 1, pp. 115–146). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78560-313-620151005
   Google Scholar
• Boush, D., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/209390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In Handbook of adolescent psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002004
   Google Scholar
• Buijzen, M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Owen, L. H. (2010). Introducing the PCMC model: An investigative framework for young people’s processing of commercialized media content. Communication Theory, 20(4), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01370.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2008). I know what you’re doing and why you’re doing it: The use of persuasion knowledge model in consumer research. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 549–573). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809570.ch21
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., Mohr, G. S., & Verlegh, P. W. J. (2013). Can disclosures lead consumers to resist covert persuasion? The important roles of disclosure timing and type of response. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Revised ed.). Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72(2), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1560-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J., & Park, D. (2015). Rethinking the persuasion knowledge model: Schematic antecedents and associative outcomes of persuasion knowledge activation for covert advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 36(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2015.1023873
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J., Phua, J., Lim, J., & Jun, H. (2017). Disclosing Instagram influencer advertising: The effects of disclosure language on advertising recognition, attitudes, and behavioral intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2017.1366885
   Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission. (2015, December 22). Native advertising: A guide for businesses. Retrieved July 27, 2017, from https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/native-advertising-guide-businesses
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1086/209380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/586910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs, S. (2015). Social norms and their influence on eating behaviours. Appetite, 86, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudders, L., Pauw, P. D., Cauberghe, V., Panic, K., Zarouali, B., & Rozendaal, E. (2017). Shedding new light on how advertising literacy can affect children’s processing of embedded advertising formats: A future research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1269303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, R. P., Mortensen, C. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2011). Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Gambino, A., Sundar, S. S., Rosson, M. B., Aritajati, C., Ge, J., & Fanning, C. (2018). Interface cues to promote disclosure and build community: An experimental test of crowd and connectivity cues in an online sexual health forum. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274359
   Google Scholar
• Kredentser, M. S., Fabrigar, L. R., Smith, S. M., & Fulton, K. (2012). Following what people think we should do versus what people actually do: Elaboration as a moderator of the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611420481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, M.-A., Dunne, Á, & Rowley, J. (2016). Young consumers’ brand communications literacy in a social networking site context. European Journal of Marketing, 50(11), 2018–2040. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2015-0395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. (2011). The co-evolution of social network ties and online privacy behavior. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 91–109). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_8
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., & Christakis, N. (2008). The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2009). Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2006). Does advertising literacy mediate the effects of advertising on children? A critical examination of two linked research literatures in relation to obesity and food choice. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 560–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00301.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangleburg, T. F., & Bristol, T. (1998). Socialization and adolescents’ skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 27(3), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1998.10673559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, M. (2011). When we do what we see: The moderating role of social motivation on the relation between subjective norms and behavior in the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(4), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.589304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnyk, V., Herpen, E., van Fischer, A. R. H., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2011). To think or not to think: The effect of cognitive deliberation on the influence of injunctive versus descriptive social norms. Psychology and Marketing, 28(7), 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (2016). Changing norms to change behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2009). Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1520–1530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montaño, D. E., & Kasprzyk, D. (2015). Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 95–124). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, M. T., Smith, L. A., & Foxcroft, D. (2009). Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in university or college students. In The Cochrane Collaboration (Ed.), Cochrane database of systematic reviews. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. W., Hong, Y., Chiu, C., & Liu, Z. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panic, K., Cauberghe, V., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2013). Comparing TV ads and advergames targeting children: The impact of persuasion knowledge on behavioral responses. Journal of Advertising, 42(2–3), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.774605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. M., & Wood, W. (2004). Forewarnings of influence appeals: Inducing resistance and acceptance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 193–213). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Raynes-Goldie, K. (2010). Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i1.2775
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A. E., & Carey, K. B. (2015). Interventions to reduce college student drinking: State of the evidence for mechanisms of behavior change. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22(3), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozendaal, E., Lapierre, M. A., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Buijzen, M. (2011). Reconsidering advertising literacy as a defense against advertising effects. Media Psychology, 14(4), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2011.620540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. R., Louis, W. R., Terry, D. J., Greenaway, K. H., Clarke, M. R., & Cheng, X. (2012). Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spottswood, E. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2017). Should I share that? Prompting social norms that influence privacy behaviors on a social networking site. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staksrud, E., & Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and online risk. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 364–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802635455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stok, F. M., de Ridder, D. T. D., de Vet, E., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2014). Don’t tell me what I should do, but what others do: The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on fruit consumption in adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility ( Vol. 73100, pp. 73–100). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Jia, H., Waddell, T. F., & Huang, Y. (2015). Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME). In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 47–86). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch3
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Kim, J., & Gambino, A. (2017). Using theory of interactive media effects (TIME) to analyze digital advertising. In S. Rodgers & E. Thorson (Eds.), Digital advertising: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 86–109). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623252-6
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Xu, Q., & Dou, X. (2012). Role of technology in online persuasion: A main model perspective. In S. Rodgers & E. Thorson (Eds.), Advertising theory (2nd ed., pp. 355–372). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203149546-35
   Google Scholar
• Utz, S., & Krämer, N. C. (2009). The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2). https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4223.
   Google Scholar
• van Reijmersdal, E. A., Boerman, S. C., Buijzen, M., & Rozendaal, E. (2017). This is advertising! Effects of disclosing television brand placement on adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(2), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0493-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarosa, M., Kison, S., Madson, M., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2016). Everyone else is doing it: Examining the role of peer influence on the relationship between social anxiety and alcohol use behaviours. Addiction Research & Theory, 24(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2015.1086758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P., & Drolet, A. (2005). Age-related differences in responses to emotional advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1086/497545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P., Friestad, M., & Boush, D. M. (2005). The development of marketplace persuasion knowledge in children, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.2005.24.2.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Q., & Sundar, S. S. (2014). Lights, camera, music, interaction! Interactive persuasion in e-commerce. Communication Research, 41(2), 282–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212439062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Privacy protection strategies on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.777757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., de Pauw, P., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., Poels, K., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2019). Considering children’s advertising literacy from a methodological point of view: Past practices and future recommendations. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 40(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2018.1503109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., Poels, K., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2018). “You talking to me?” The influence of peer communication on adolescents’ persuasion knowledge and attitude towards social advertisements. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(5), 502–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1458903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & Poels, K. (2017). “Do you like cookies?” Adolescents’ skeptical processing of retargeted Facebook-ads and the moderating role of privacy concern and a textual debriefing. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1998). A heuristic-systematic processing analysis of the effectiveness of product warning labels. Psychology and Marketing, 15(7), 621–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199810)15:7<621::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar