A dynamic network perspective on the evolution of the use of multiple mobile instant messaging apps

References

• Acerbi, A. (2020). Cultural evolution in the digital age. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(1), 47–97. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, G. A. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of the international telecommunication network, 1978–1996. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1638–1655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764201044010007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, J. B., Triệu, P., & Ellison, N. B. (2020). Social media elements, ecologies, and effects. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, R. A., & Shennan, S. J. (2005). Random copying and cultural evolution. Science, 309(5736), 877–879. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.309.5736.877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boczkowski, P. J., Matassi, M., & Mitchelstein, E. (2018). How young users deal with multiple platforms: The role of meaning-making in social media repertoires. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(5), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W. (2019). From frontier to field: Old and new theoretical directions in mobile communication studies. Communication Theory, 29(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W. (2020). Cutting the cord: Social and scholarly revolutions as CMC goes mobile. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centola, D. (2018). How behavior spreads: The science of complex contagions. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christner, C., Urman, A., Adam, S., & Maier, M. (2021). Automated tracking approaches for studying online media use: A critical review and recommendations. Communication Methods and Measures, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1907841
   Google Scholar
• Dimmick, J. W. (2003). Media competition and coexistence: The theory of the niche. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Doerfel, M. L., Chewning, L. V., & Lai, C.-H. (2013). The evolution of networks and the resilience of interorganizational relationships after disaster. Communication Monographs, 80(4), 533–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.828157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogruel, L., & Schnauber-Stockmann, A. (2021). What determines instant messaging communication? Examining the impact of person- and situation-level factors on IM responsiveness. Mobile Media & Communication, 9(2), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920943926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). The social brain: Psychological underpinnings and implications for the structure of organizations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413517118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberse, A. (2013). Blockbusters: Hit-making, risk-taking, and the big business of entertainment. Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbert, M., Oh, P., & Monge, P. (2016). Evolution of what? A network approach for the detection of evolutionary forces. Social Networks, 47, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. O. (2019). The human network: How your social position determines your power, beliefs, and behaviors. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Kim, G. J., Park, H. W., & Rice, R. E. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1183–1207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00369.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. J., Viswanathan, V., & Lee, H. M. (2020). Platform war vs. platform synergy? A longitudinal analysis of media substitution between personal computers and mobile devices. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(2), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1718986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum, A. M. (2018). Reorganization and tie decay choices. Management Science, 64(5), 2219–2237. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivitsky, P. N., & Handcock, M. S. (2014). A separable model for dynamic networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 76(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ksiazek, T. B. (2011). A network analytic approach to understanding cross-platform audience behavior. Journal of Media Economics, 24(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2011.626985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, R., & Lai, C.-H. (2016). Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 834–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusher, D., & Robins, G. (2013). Formation of social network structure. In D. Lusher, J. Koskinen, & G. Robins (Eds.), Exponential random graph models for social networks (pp. 16–28). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mac Carron, P., Kaski, K., & Dunbar, R. (2016). Calling Dunbar’s numbers. Social Networks, 47, 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majó-Vázquez, S., Cardenal, A. S., & González-Bailón, S. (2017). Digital news consumption and copyright intervention: Evidence from Spain before and after the 2015 “link tax”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(5), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monge, P., Heiss, B. M., & Margolin, D. B. (2008). Communication network evolution in organizational communities. Communication Theory, 18(4), 449–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monge, P., & Matei, S. A. (2004). The role of the global telecommunications network in bridging economic and political divides, 1989 to 1999. Journal of Communication, 54(3), 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02642.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., Handcock, M. S., & Hunter, D. R. (2008). Specification of exponential-family random graph models: Terms and computational aspects. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(4), 1548–7660. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v024.i04
   Google Scholar
• Mukerjee, S., Majó-Vázquez, S., & González-Bailón, S. (2018). Networks of audience overlap in the consumption of digital news. Journal of Communication, 68(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences (p. 272). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. L., & Taneja, H. (2018). The small, disloyal fake news audience: The role of audience availability in fake news consumption. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3720–3737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818758715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2016). Audience currencies in the age of big data. International Journal on Media Management, 18(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2016.1166430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, Y. M. M., & Taneja, H. (2019). Mapping user-centric Internet geographies: How similar are countries in their web use patterns? Journal of Communication, 69(5), 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, T.-Q., & Zhu, J. J. H. (2020). Mobile phone use as sequential processes: From discrete behaviors to sessions of behaviors and trajectories of sessions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132–1205. https://doi.org/10.1086/421508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E. (1982). Communication networking in computer-conferencing systems: A longitudinal study of group roles and system structure. Annals of the International Communication Association, 6(1), 925–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1982.11678529
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, G., Lewis, J. M., & Wang, P. (2012). Statistical network analysis for analyzing policy networks. Policy Studies Journal, 40(3), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini, P., Stromer-Galley, J., Baptista, E. A., & Veiga de Oliveira, V. (2020). Dysfunctional information sharing on WhatsApp and Facebook: The role of political talk, cross-cutting exposure and social corrections. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820928059.
   Google Scholar
• Sheer, V. C., & Rice, R. E. (2017). Mobile instant messaging use and social capital: Direct and indirect associations with employee outcomes. Information & Management, 54(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumate, M., & Contractor, N. (2013). The emergence of multidimensional social networks. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 449–474). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shumate, M., & Palazzolo, E. T. (2010). Exponential random graph (p*) models as a method for social network analysis in communication research. Communication Methods and Measures, 4(4), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2010.527869
   Google Scholar
• Steensen, S., Ferrer-Conill, R., & Peters, C. (2020). (Against a) theory of audience engagement with news. Journalism Studies, 21(12), 1662–1680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1788414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Lou, C., & Min, V. L. H. (2019). Platform-swinging in a poly-social-media context: How and why users navigate multiple social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja, H. (2016). Using commercial audience measurement data in academic research. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 176–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja, H. (2020). The myth of targeting small, but loyal niche audiences: Double-jeopardy effects in digital-media consumption. Journal of Advertising Research, 60(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2019-037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2018). Political talk on mobile instant messaging services: A comparative analysis of Germany, Italy, and the UK. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1715–1731. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1350730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. G., Phalen, P. F., & Lichty, L. W. (2013). Ratings analysis: Audience measurement and analytics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Welles, B. F., & Contractor, N. (2015). Individual motivations and network effects: A multilevel analysis of the structure of online social relationships. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214565755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (2020). The era of antisocial social media. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/02/the-era-of-antisocial-social-media.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. (2021). Ecological influences on network tie dissolution in the evolution of affiliation networks in the International Communication Association, 2009–2015. Human Communication Research, 47(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., & Iansiti, M. (2019). Why some platforms thrive and others don’t. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/01/why-some-platforms-thrive-and-others-dont
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. J. H., Chen, H., Peng, T.-Q., Liu, X. F., & Dai, H. (2018). How to measure sessions of mobile phone use? Quantification, evaluation, and applications. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917748351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar