Indirect effects of video chat on outcomes of receiving support: Uniting theorizing about supportive communication and computer-mediated communication

References

• Arbuckle, J. L. (2019). Amos (Version 26.0) [Computer program]. IBM SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Banbury, A., Nancarrow, S., Dart, J., Gray, L., & Parkinson, L. (2018). Telehealth interventions delivering home-based support group videoconferencing: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2), e25. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilecen, B. (2012). How social support works among the best and the brightest: Evidence from international PhD students in Germany. Transnational Social Review, 2(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/21931674.2012.10820731
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg’s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., & Burleson, B. R. (2008). Explaining variations in the effects of supportive messages: A dual-process framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 32(1), 355–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2008.11679082
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., Burleson, B. R., Holmstrom, A. J., McCullough, J. D., Rack, J. J., Hanasono, L. K., & Rosier, J. G. (2011). Effects of cognitive complexity and emotional upset on processing supportive messages: Two tests of a dual-process theory of supportive communication outcomes. Human Communication Research, 37(3), 350–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01405.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., Burleson, B. R., & Jones, S. M. (2012). Explaining the relationships among supportive message quality, evaluations, and outcomes: A dual-process approach. Communication Monographs, 79(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2011.646491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken, C. C. (2005). Presence and image quality: The case of high-definition television. Media Psychology, 7(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 229–285). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Manusov, V. (2011). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 239–280). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1578–1588. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & Goldsmith, D. J. (1998). How the comforting process works: Alleviating emotional distress through conversationally induced reappraisals. In P. A. Anderson & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 245–280). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 374–424). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (2009). Understanding the outcomes of supportive communication: A dual-process approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509105519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. L., Lakey, B., Tiell, K., & Neeley, L. C. (2005). Recipient-provider agreement on enacted support, perceived support, and provider personality. Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 375–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Marshall, L. J. (2003). Persuasion as a social skill. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 479–513). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, B., Li, S., & Li, N. (2016). Is a profile worth a thousand words? How online support-seeker’s profile features may influence the quality of received support messages. Communication Research, 43(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2012). Testing the connectivity paradox: Linking teleworkers’ communication media use to social presence, stress from interruptions, and organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 79(2), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.673000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskin, J., James, M., & Lim, J. (2020). Indirect effects, AMOS plugin. Gaskination’s StatWiki. http://statwiki.gaskination.com/
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, M. E., Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Bracken, C. C., & Ditton, T. B. (1999). The role of screen size in viewer experiences of media content. Visual Communication Quarterly, 6(2), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551399909363403
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, L. K., & Floyd, K. (2006). Nonverbal communication in close relationships. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617064
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A. (2020). Relating through technology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, C., & Biocca, F. (2004). Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds measure of social presence. In M. Alcaniz & B. Rey (Eds.), Seventh Annual International Workshop: Presence 2004. Universidad Politecnica de Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• High, A. C., & Solomon, D. H. (2014). Communication channel, sex, and the immediate and longitudinal outcomes of verbal person-centered support. Communication Monographs, 81(4), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.933245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High, A. C., & Solomon, D. H. (2016). Explaining the durable effects of verbal person-centered supportive communication: Indirect effects or invisible support? Human Communication Research, 42(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High, A. (2019). Theorizing a more complete picture: Integrating interpersonal communication with computer-mediated communication. Human Communication & Technology, 1(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.17161/hct.v1i1.11977
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995–2000. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00822.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., & Guerrero, L. K. (2001). The effects of nonverbal immediacy and verbal person centeredness in the emotional support process. Human Communication Research, 27(4), 567–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2004). Putting the person into person-centered and immediate emotional support: Emotional change and perceived helper competence as outcomes of comforting in helping situations. Communication Research, 31(3), 338–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204263436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., & Wirtz, J. G. (2007). “Sad monkey see, monkey do:” Nonverbal matching in emotional support encounters. Communication Studies, 58(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970601168731
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Mobile persuasion: Can screen size and presentation mode make a difference to trust? Human Communication Research, 42(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J. (2017). Shape and size matter for smartwatches: Effects of screen shape, screen size, and presentation mode in wearable communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(3), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. S., Sellen, A., & Cao, X. (2010, February). Home video communication: Mediating ‘closeness’. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 135–144). https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718945
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Feng, B., Li, N., & Tan, X. (2015). How social context cues in online support-seeking influence self-disclosure in support provision. Communication Quarterly, 63(5), 586–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1078389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., Romano Jr, N. C., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T. (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference? Small Group Research, 37(6), 631–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406294322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 317–354). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maisel, N. C., & Gable, S. L. (2009). The paradox of received social support: The importance of responsiveness. Psychological Science, 20(8), 928–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02388.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5(114), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okada, K. I., Maeda, F., Ichikawaa, Y., & Matsushita, Y. (1994, October). Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance: MAJIC design. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative work (pp. 385–393). https://doi.org/10.1145/192844.193054
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, C., Langton, S., Anderson, A., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Bruce, V. (1996). Comparison of face-to-face and video-mediated interaction. Interacting with Computers, 8(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(96)01027-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, D. L., Clark, E. M., & Kelly, C. M. (2004). Friendship maintenance: An analysis of individual and dyad behaviors. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(3), 413–441. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.3.413.35460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priem, J. S., & Solomon, D. H. (2018). What is supportive about supportive conversation? Qualities of interaction that predict emotional and physiological outcomes. Communication Research, 45(3), 443–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215595074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., Brunner, S. R., Akers, C., Pavlich, C. A., & Tsetsi, E. (2016). The implications of computer-mediated communication (CMC) for social support message processing and outcomes: When and why are the effects of support messages strengthened during CMC? Human Communication Research, 42(4), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., Janiszewski, C. A., McGrath, M. A., Burns, C. S., & Manrai, L. A. (1988). Acquiring resources from intimates when obligation substitutes for persuasion. Human Communication Research, 14(3), 364–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppel, E. K., Burke, T. J., & Cherney, M. R. (2018). Channel complementarity and multiplexity in long-distance friends’ patterns of communication technology use. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1564–1579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817699995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samter, W., Whaley, B. B., Mortenson, S. T., & Burleson, B. R. (1997). Ethnicity and emotional support in same-sex friendship: A comparison of Asian-Americans, African-Americans, and Euro-Americans. Personal Relationships, 4(4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, C. A., Rahm, K. B., & Beigbeder, S. A. (2005). The link between the pursuit of intimacy goals and satisfaction in close same-sex friendships: An examination of the underlying processes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505049322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller, M., Park, J. H., & Mueller, A. (2003). Fear of the dark: Interactive effects of beliefs about danger and ambient darkness on ethnic stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sigelman, C. K., Friedman, S. L., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Sheehan, P. B. (2018). Supportive communication between deployed parents and children is linked to children’s adjustment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 58, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siniscarco, M. T., Love-Williams, C., & Burnett-Wolle, S. (2017). Video conferencing: An intervention for emotional loneliness in long-term care. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 41(4), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2017.1326763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492–1512. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M., Liu, Z., Qiu, J., Zhang, Z., & Sinclair, M. (2009). Active lighting for video conferencing. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 19(12), 1819–1829. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2009.2026967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchino, B. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umphrey, L. R., Wickersham, J. A., & Sherblom, J. C. (2008). Student perceptions of the instructor’s relational characteristics, the classroom communication experience, and the interaction involvement in face-to-face versus video conference instruction. Communication Research Reports, 25(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090802021954
   Google Scholar
• Walter, N., Ortbach, K., & Niehaves, B. (2015). Designing electronic feedback – Analyzing the effects of social presence on perceived feedback usefulness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 76, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2018). The emergence, convergence, and resurgence of intergroup communication theory in computer-mediated communication. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 26(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2018.1432616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerman, D., & Skalski, P. D. (2010). Computers and telepresence. In C. C. Bracken & P. D. Skalski (Eds.), Immersed in media: Telepresence in everyday life (pp. 63–86). Routledge.
   Google Scholar