Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to interability communication styles in the workplace: Perspectives of people with disabilities

References

• Allen, B. J. (2011). Difference matters: Communicating social identity. Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. E., Baldridge, D. C., Boehm, S. A., Kulkarni, M., & Colella, A. J. (2019). On the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 58(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Gulf Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019). Persons with a disability: Labor force characteristics – 2019. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/disabl.nr0.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, G. A., & Zhang, Y. B. (2020). Perceptions of interability communication in an interpersonal relationship and the reduction of intergroup prejudice. Western Journal of Communication, 84(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1636131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, G. A., Zhang, Y. B., & Gist-Mackey, A. N. (2019). Interability contact and the reduction of interability prejudice: Communication accommodation, intergroup anxiety, and relational solidarity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19865578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudry, A. M., & Asif, R. (2015). Organizational conflict and conflict management: A synthesis of literature. Journal of Business and Management Research, 9(1), 238–244. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275955013_Organizational_Conflict_and_Conflict_Management_a_synthesis_of_literature
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. H. (2013). Explaining psychological statistics. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M., Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2016). Accommodative strategies as core of the theory. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp. 36–59). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. A., & Giles, H. (1996). Interability communication: Evaluating patronizing encounters. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(3), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960153004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei, F., & Morriss, A. (2020, May-June). Begin with trust: The first step to becoming a genuinely empowering leader. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/05/begin-with-trust.
   Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., & Dragojevic, M. (2017). The effects of accumulated underaccommodation on perceptions of underaccommodative communication and speakers. Human Communication Research, 43(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2012). Effects of inferred motive on evaluations of nonaccommodative communication. Human Communication Research, 38(1), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01426.x
   Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, J., & Giles, H. (2013). Accommodating the interactional dynamics of conflict management. International Journal of Society, Culture, and Language, 1(1), 10–21. http://www.ijscl.net/article_1801_1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H. (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M. A., Guerrero, L. K., & Alberts, J. K. (2004). Perceptions of conflict strategies and communication competence in task-oriented dyads. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(3), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000240176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd edition). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M. L. (1978). The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00614.x
   Google Scholar
• Hummert, M. L., & Ryan, E. B. (1996). Toward understanding variations in patronizing talk addressed toward older adults: Psycholinguistic features of care and control. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 12(2), 149–169. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-05521-002.
   Google Scholar
• Imamura, M., Ruble, R. A., & Zhang, Y. B. (2016). English proficiency, identity, anxiety, and intergroup attitudes: US Americans’ perceptions of Chinese. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45(6), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2016.1240704
   Google Scholar
• Jammaers, E., & Zanoni, P. (2020). The identity regulation of disabled employees: Unveiling the ‘varieties of ableism’ in employers’ socio-ideological control. Organization Studies, 42(3), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619900292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J. C., & Garcia, M. A. (2009). Exploring the concept of “profession” for organizational communication research. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318908327007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, K. (2015). Workplace dignity: Communicating inherent, earned, and remediated dignity. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicotera, A. M. (1993). Beyond two dimensions: A grounded theory model of conflict-handling behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 6(3), 282–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318993006003003
   Google Scholar
• Okoro, C. A., Hollis, N. D., Cyrus, A. C., & Griffin-Blake, S. (2018). Prevalence of disabilities and health care access by disability status and type among adults – United States, 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(32), 882–887. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6732a3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, M. J., & Harwood, J. (2015). Communication accommodation competence: The nature and nurture of accommodative resources across the lifespan. Language & Communication, 41(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Raghuram, S. (2013). Identities on call: Impact of impression management on Indian call center agents. Human Relations, 66(11), 1471–1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713481069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A., & Magner, N. R. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, D., Magasi, S., Novak, C., & Harniss, M. (2016). Conducting accessible research: Including people with disabilities in public health, epidemiological, and outcomes studies. American Journal of Public Health, 106(12), 2137–2144. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritsher, J. B., Otilingham, P. G., & Grajiales, M. (2003). Internalized stigma of mental illness: Psychometric properties of a new measure. Psychiatry Research, 121(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2003.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, L., Khattar, R., & Ives-Rublee, M. (2022, February 9). COVID-19 likely resulted in 1.2 million more disabled people by the end of 2021 – workplaces and policy will need to adapt. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/covid-19-likely.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, E. B., Anas, A. P., & Gruneir, A. J. S. (2006). Evaluations of overhelping and underhelping communication: Do old age and physical disability matter? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X05284485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, E. B., Bajorek, S., Beaman, A., & Anas, A. P. (2005). “I just want you to know that ‘them’ is me”: intergroup perspectives on communication and disability. In J. Harwood, & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 117–140). Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Soliz, J., Giles, H., & Gasiorek, J. (2022). Communication accommodation theory: Converging toward an understanding of communication adaptation in interpersonal relationships. In D. Braithwaite, & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 130–142). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzberg, B. H., Canary, D. J., & Cupach, W. R. (1994). A competence-based approach to the study of interpersonal conflict. In D. Cahn (Ed.), Conflict in personal relationships (pp. 183–202). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, W. G. (2014). Intergroup anxiety: Theory, research, and practice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(3), 239–255. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314530518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, C.-C., & Bucy, E. P. (2007). Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: Psychological versus attribute-based definitions. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 397–426. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, B. M., & Gallois, C. (1999). Communication accommodation between patients and health professionals: Themes and strategies in satisfying and unsatisfying encounters. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1999.tb00170.x
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2023, March 7). Disability. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. B., Harwood, J., & Hummert, M. L. (2005). Perceptions of conflict management styles in Chinese intergenerational dyads. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775052000342535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. B., Paik, S., Xing, C., & Harwood, J. (2018). Young adults’ contact experiences and attitudes toward aging: Age salience and intergroup anxiety in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 28(5), 468–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2018.1453848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. B., & Pitts, M. J. (2019). Interpersonal accommodation. In J. Harwood, J. F. Nussbaum, C. Gallois, H. Pierson, & J. Gasiorek (Eds.), Language, communication, and intergroup relations: A celebration of the scholarship of Howard Giles (pp. 192–216). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. B., & Wiebe, T. W. (2022). Intergenerational conflict-initiating factors and management styles: U.S. Older adults’ report. Societies, 12(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar