- Osborn , Michael M. and Ehninger , Douglas . 1962 . “The Metaphor in Public Address” . Speech Monographs , XXIX August : 223 – 234 .
- Downey , June E. 1919 . “The Psychology of Figures of Speech” . The American Journal of Psychology , XXX January : 103 – 115 .
- Knapp , Robert H. and Garbutt , John T. 1958 . “Time Imagery and the Achievement Motive” . Journal of Personality , XXVI September : 426 – 434 .
- Knapp . 1960 . “A Study of Metaphor” . Journal of Projective Technique , XXIV December : 389 – 395 .
- Werner , Heinz , ed. 1955 . “ ["On the Use of Metaphor in the Description of Persons” . In On Expressive Language 29 – 38 . Worchester, Mass.
- 1958 . “The Metaphor: A Psychological Inquiry” . In Person Perception and Interpersonal Behavior 86 – 94 . Stanford
- Aristotle . 1954 . “ Rhetoric ” . In The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle Edited by: Roberts , W. Rhys . Vol. iii , 1 – 2 . 186 – 191 . New York 1410b‐1413a,
- Sutton , E. W. and Rackham , H. , eds. 1942 . De Oratore Vol. iii , 39 – 40 . 125 – 127 . Cambridge, Mass. II,
- Hubbell , H. M. , ed. 1939 . “ Orator ” . In Brutus; Orator Vol. 39 , 407 Cambridge, Mass.
- Butler , H. E. , ed. 1922 . Institutio Oratoria Vol. viii , 3 2 – 5 . Cambridge, Mass.
- Bywater , Ingram , ed. “ Poetics ” . In The Rhetoric and the Poetics of Aristotle Vol. 22 , 1459a 255
- 1963 . “Language Intensity, Social Introversion, and Attitude Change” . Speech Monographs , XXX November : 345 – 352 .
- 1964 . "Some Correlates o£ Language Intensity” . Quarterly Journal of Speech , L December : 415 – 420 .
- Bowers . “Some Correlates . . . ” . 419
- 1936 . The Philosophy of Rhetoric 92 New York
- Lindquist , E. F. 1953 . Design and Analysis of Experiments in Psychology and Education 273 – 281 . Boston
- Hewgill , Murray A. and Miller , Gerald R. 1965 . “Source Credibility and Response to Fear‐Arousing Communications” . Speech Monographs , XXXII June : 97
- Hovland , Carl I. , Janis , Irving L. and Kelley , Harold H. , eds. 1953 . “Fear‐arousing Appeals” . In Communication and Persuasion 56 – 91 . New Haven
Attitudinal effects of selected types of concluding metaphors in persuasive speeches
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.