Jurors' intuitive rules for deliberation: A structurational approach to communication injury decision making

References

• Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896).
   Google Scholar
• Bettenhausen , K.L. 1991 . Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed . Journal of Management , 17 : 345 – 381 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster , F.J. , Hunter , J.E. and Hale , J.L. 1991 . An information‐processing model of jury decision making . Communication Research , 18 : 524 – 547 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella , J.N. 1985 . “ Controlling the floor in conversation ” . In Nonverbal communication , Edited by: Siegman , A.W. and Feldstein , S. 9 – 103 . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Casper , J.D. and Benedict , K.M. 1993 . “ The influence of outcome information and attitudes on juror decision making in search and seizure cases ” . In Inside the juror , Edited by: Hastie , R. 229 – 234 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cragan , J.F. and Wright , D.W. 1980 . Small group communication research of the 1970's: A synthesis and critique . Central States Speechjoumal , 31 : 197 – 213 .
   Google Scholar
• Cragan , J.F. and Wright , D.W. 1990 . Small group communication research of the 1980s: A synthesis and critique . Communication Studies , 41 : 212 – 236 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , J.H. 1973 . Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes . Psychological Review , 80 : 97 – 125 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , J.H. 1992 . Some compelling intuitions about group consensus decisions, theoretical and empirical research, and interpersonal aggregation phenomena: Selected examples, 1950–1990 . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 52 : 3 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , J.H. , Kameda , T. , Parks , C. , Stasson , M. and Zimmerman , S. 1989 . Some social mechanics of group decision making: The distribution of opinion, polling sequence, and implications for consensus . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 57 : 1000 – 1012 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , J.H. , Kerr , N.L. , Atkin , R.S. , Holt , R. and Meek , D. 1975 . The decision processes of 6‐ and 12‐person mock juries assigned unanimous and two‐thirds majority rules . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 32 : 1 – 14 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis , D.G. and Fisher , B.A. 1994 . Small group decision making: Communication and the group process , (4th ed.) , New York : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Fisher , B.A. 1986 . “ Leadership: When does the difference make a difference? ” . In Communication and group decision‐making , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 197 – 215 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Foss , R.D. 1981 . Structural effects in simulated jury decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 40 : 1055 – 1062 .
   Google Scholar
• Frey , L.R. 1994a . “ The call of the field: Studying communication in natural groups ” . In Group communication in context , Edited by: Frey , L.R . ix – xiv . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Frey , L.R. 1994b . The naturalistic paradigm: Studying small groups in the postmodern era . Small Group Research , 25 : 551 – 557 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey , L.R. 1996 . “ Remembering and “re‐membering”: A history of theory and research on communication and group decision making ” . In Communication and group decision making , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 19 – 51 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Gouran , D.S. and Baird , J.E. 1972 . An analysis of distributional and sequential structure in problem‐solving and informal group discussions . Speech Monographs , 39 : 16 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Hans , V.P. and Vidmar , N. 1986 . Judging the jury , New York : Plenum Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hare , A.P. , Blumberg , H.H. , Davies , M.F. and Kent , M.V. 1994 . Small group research: A handbook , Norwood, NJ : Ablex .
   Google Scholar
• Hastie , R. 1993 . “ Models of juror decision making: Introduction ” . In Inside the juror , Edited by: Hastie , R. 3 – 41 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hastie , R. , Penrod , S.D. and Pennington , N. 1983 . Inside the jury , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hastings , D. 1995 . Simpson trial turns spotlight on jury system's flaws . Santa Barbara News‐Press , May 14 : 1
   Google Scholar
• James , R. 1959 . Status and competence of jurors . The American Journal of Sociology , 64 : 563 – 570 .
   Google Scholar
• Kadane , J.B. 1993 . “ Sausages and the law: Juror decisions in the much larger justice system ” . In Inside the juror , Edited by: Hastie , R. 65 – 83 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kalven , H. and Zeisel , H. 1966 . The American jury , Boston : Little, Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Kassin , S.M. , Smith , V.L. and Tulloch , W.F. 1990 . The dynamite charge: Effects on the perceptions and deliberation behavior of mock jurors . Law and Human Behavior , 14 : 537 – 550 .
   Google Scholar
• Kerr , N.L. , Atkin , R.S. , Stasser , G. , Meek , D. , Holt , R.W. and Davis , J.H. 1976 . Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 34 : 282 – 294 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr , N.L. and Bray , R.M. 1982 . The psychology of the courtroom , New York : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich .
   Google Scholar
• Kerr , N.L. and MacCoun , R.J. 1985 . The effects of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation . Journal of Personality of and Social Psychology , 48 : 349 – 363 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerwin , J. and Shaffer , D.R. 1994 . Mock jurors versus mock juries: The role of deliberations in reactions to inadmissible testimony . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 20 : 153 – 162 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larntz , K. 1975 . Reanalysis of Vidmar's data on the effects of decision alternatives on verdicts of simulated jurors . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 31 : 123 – 125 .
   Google Scholar
• Lempert , R.O. 1993 . “ Why do jury research? ” . In Inside the juror , Edited by: Hastie , R. 242 – 254 . Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Levine , A.M. and Herzberg , S. J. 1986 . “ Inside the jury room ” . In Frontline , Boston : Frontline . (Producers)
   Google Scholar
• Lipton , J.P. and Garza , R.T. 1977 . Responsibility attribution among Mexican‐American, Black, and Anglo adolescents and adults . Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology , 8 : 259 – 272 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCoun , R.J. 1989 . Experimental research on jury decision‐making . Science , 244 : 1046 – 1050 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCoun , R.J. and Kerr , N.L. 1988 . A symmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors’ bias for leniency . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 54 : 21 – 33 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller , G.R. , Fontes , N.E. , Boster , F.J. and Sunnafrank , M.J. 1983 . Methodological issues in legal communication research: What can trial simulations tell us? . Communication Monographs , 50 : 33 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerneth , C. 1986 . Differential contributions of majority vs. minority influence . Psychological Review , 93 : 23 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Ng , S.H. , Bell , D. and Brooke , M. 1993 . Gaining turns and achieving high influence ranking in small conversational groups . British Journal of Social Psychology , 32 : 265 – 275 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninth Circuit Jury Committee , ed. 1993 . Manual of model civil jury instructions for the Ninth Circuit , St. Paul, MN : West .
   Google Scholar
• Pennington , N. and Hastie , R. 1992 . Explain the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 62 : 189 – 206 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrod , S. and Hastie , R. 1979 . Models of jury decision making: A critical review . Psychological Bulletin , 86 : 462 – 492 .
   Google Scholar
• Penrod , S. and Hastie , R. 1980 . A computer simulation of jury decision making . Psychological Review , 87 : 133 – 159 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez , D.A. , Hosch , H.M. , Ponder , B. and Trejo , G.C. 1993 . Ethnicity of defendants and jurors as influences on jury decisions . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 23 : 1249 – 1262 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettus , A.N. 1990 . The verdict is in: A study of jury decision making factors, moment of personal decision, and jury deliberations—from the jurors’ point of view . Communication Quarterly , 38 : 83 – 97 .
   Google Scholar
• Poole , M.S. 1990 . Do we have any theories of group communication? . Communication Studies , 41 : 237 – 247 .
   Google Scholar
• Poole , M.S. and Hirokawa , R.Y. 1996 . “ Introduction: Communication and group decision making ” . In Communication andgroup decision making , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 3 – 18 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Poole , M.S. , Seibold , D.R. and McPhee , R.D. 1985 . Group decision‐making as a structurational process . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 71 : 74 – 102 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole , M.S. , Seibold , D.R. and McPhee , R.D. 1986 . “ A structurational approach to theory building in group decision‐making research ” . In Communication and group decision‐making , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 237 – 264 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Poole , M.S. , Seibold , D.R. and McPhee , R.D. 1996 . “ The structuration of group decisions ” . In Communication andgroup decision making , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 114 – 146 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Potter , W.J. and Levine‐Donnerstein , D. 1996 . Assessing reliability for multiple coders and multiple nominal judgments. . Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association . 1996 , Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Propp , K.M. and Kreps , G.L. 1994 . A rose by any other name: The vitality of group communication research . Communication Studies , 45 : 7 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Putnam , L.L. 1979 . Preference for procedural order in task‐oriented small groups . Communication Monographs , 46 : 193 – 218 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam , L.L. 1986 . “ Conflict in group decision‐making ” . In Communication and group decision‐making , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 175 – 196 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Putnam , L.L. and Stohl , C. 1990 . Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context . Communication Studies , 47 : 248 – 265 .
   Google Scholar
• Putnam , L.L. and Stohl , C. 1996 . “ Bona fide groups, an alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making ” . In Communication andgroup decision making , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 147 – 178 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Reifman , A. , Gusick , S.M. and Ellsworth , P.C. 1992 . Real jurors’ understanding of the law in real cases . Law and Human Behavior , 16 : 539 – 554 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonemann , P.H. 1979 . Alternative decision schemes for six‐person mock juries . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 23 : 388 – 398 .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D.R. and Meyers , R. 1986 . “ Communication and influence in group decision‐making ” . In Communication and influence in group decision‐making , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 133 – 156 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D.R. , Meyers , R. and Sunwolf . 1996 . “ Communication and influence in group decision‐making ” . In Communication and group decision making , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Hirokawa , R.Y. and Poole , M.S. 242 – 268 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Severance , L.J. and Loftus , E.F. 1982 . Improving the ability of jurors to comprehend and apply criminal jury instructions . Law and Society Review , 17 : 153 – 198 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw , M.E. 1981 . Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior , (3rd ed.) , New York : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Shimanoff , S.B. 1980 . Communication rules: Theory and research , Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Shimanoff , S.B. 1988 . “ Group interaction via communication rules ” . In Smallgroup communication , 5th ed. , Edited by: Cathcart , R.S. and Samovar , L.A. 50 – 64 . Dubuque, IA : Wm. C. Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Simon , R.J. 1967 . The Jury and the defense of insanity , Boston : Little, Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Smith v. Texas 311 U.S. 130 (1940).
   Google Scholar
• Smith , V.L. 1993 . When prior knowledge and law collide . Law and Human Behavior , 17 : 507 – 536 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith , V.L. and Kassin , S.M. 1993 . Effects of the dynamite charge on the deliberations of deadlocked mock juries . Law and Human Behavior , 17 : 625 – 643 .
   Google Scholar
• Stohl , C. 1995 . “ Facilitating bona fide groups: Practice and paradox ” . In Innovation in group facilitation: Applications in natural settings , Edited by: Frey , L.R. 325 – 332 . Cresskill, NJ : Hampton Press .
   Google Scholar
• Stohl , C. and Putnam , L.L. 1994 . “ Group communication in context: Implications for the study of bona fide groups ” . In Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups , Edited by: Frey , L.R. 285 – 292 . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Strodtbeck , F.L. , James , R.M. and Hawkins , C. 1957 . Social status in jury deliberations . American Sociological Review , 22 : 713 – 719 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strodtbeck , F.L. and Lipinski , R.M. 1985 . Becoming first among equals: Moral considerations in jury foreman selection . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 49 : 927 – 936 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strodtbeck , F.L. and Mann , R. 1956 . Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations . Sociometry , 19 : 3 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Sunwolf . 1993 . Changing the way jurors deliberate: Reshaping the individual assumptions jurors make about power and conflict. . Paper presented at the convention of the Speech Communication Association . 1993 , Miami Beach, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Sunwolf . 1994 . Communication in deadlocked juries: When cross‐sections of the community collide. . Paper presented at the convention of the Speech Communication Association . 1994 , New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes , R.E. 1990 . Imagining what we might study if we really studied small groups from a speech perspective . Communication Studies , 41 : 200 – 211 .
   Google Scholar
• Tanford , S. and Penrod , S. 1986 . Jury deliberations: Discussion content and influence processes injury decision making . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 16 : 322 – 347 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson , W.C. 1993 . “ Research on jury decision making: The state of the science ” . In Individual and group decision making: Current issues , Edited by: Castellan , N.J. 203 – 218 . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Tindale , R.S. and Davis , J.H. 1983 . “ Group decision‐making and jury verdicts ” . In Small groups and social interaction , Edited by: Blumberg , H.H. , Hare , A.P. , Kent , V. and Davies , M.F. Vol. 2 , 9 – 37 . Chichester, , UK : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Console 13 F.3d 641 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Leahy, 82 F.3d 624 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Martinez 14 F.3d 543 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Morris 977 F.2d 677 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Ortiz 942 F.2d 903 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Thai 29 F.3d 785 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Visher , C.A. 1987 . Juror decision making: The importance of evidence . Law and Human Behavior , 11 : 1 – 17 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witherspoon v. State of Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770 (1968).
   Google Scholar