The Physicochemical Characterization and In Vitro/In Vivo Evaluation of Natural Surfactants-based Emulsions as Vehicles for Diclofenac Diethylamine

REFERENCES

• Aikens P. A., Friberg S. E. Emulsifiers. Dry skin and Moisturizers, M. Lodén, H. I. Maibach. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton 2000; 183–201
   Google Scholar
• Anconturier J., Amerlic R. A. Montanov 68 PHA a glucolipid emulsifier for O/W emulsions. Proc.4th world meeting ADRITELF/APHI/APV, Florence, 2002; 1473–1474
   Google Scholar
• ICI Surfactants, (1996) Arlatone®2121 – natural emulsifier for oil-in-water milks and creams, Everberg, publication 41-5 E,
   Google Scholar
• Berardesca E. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods. Skin. Res. Tech. 1997; 3: 126–132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook W. J. Acyl lactate index; Liquid crystal gel networks. Cosmet. Toiletries 1997; 112: 69–72
   Google Scholar
• Dedern J. C., Wetzel T., Peeters H., Smits R., Davies S., Serrien G., Taelman M. C., Tadros T. Changing emulsifiers from mouth to skin: a new technology – generation for cosmetic emulsion stabilisation. Proceedings 2001 IFSCC Conference, Stockholm, 2001; 13–24
   Google Scholar
• Eccleston G. M. Functions of mixed emulsifiers and emulsifying waxes in dermatological lotions and creams. Colloid Surface A 1997; 123–124: 169–182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccleston G. M. The importance of mesomorphic (lamellar) phases in emulsion stability. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2001; 52: 142–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccleston G. M., Behan-Martin M. K., Jones G. R., Towns-Andrews E. Synchrotron X-ray investigations into the lamellar gel phase formed in pharmaceutical creams prepared with cetrimide and fatty alcohols. Int. J. Pharm. 2000; 203: 127–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erős I., Cserne A., Kövėr T., Csoka I., Abu-Eida E. Y. Cremofor surfactants – as wetting, solubilising and stabylising agents in pharmaceutical technology. Farm. Vestn. 1997; 48: 382–384
   Google Scholar
• Fairhurst C. E., Fuller S., Gray J., Holmes M. C., Tiddy G.J. Lyotropic surfactant liquid crystals. Handbook of liquid crystals, D. Demus, J. Goodby, G. W. Gray, H. W. Spiess, V. Vili. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 1998; 3: 341–392
   Google Scholar
• Farkas E., Zelko R., Torok G., Racz I., Marton S. Influence of chlorhexidine species on the liquid crystalline structure of vehicle. Int. J. Pharm. 2001; 213: 1–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas E., Zelko R., Nemeth Z., Palinkas J., Marton S., Racz I. The effect of liquid crystalline structure on chlorhexidine diacetate release. Int. J. Pharm. 2000; 193: 239–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluhr J. W., Lazzerini S., Distante F., Gloor M., Berardesca E. Effects of prolonged occlusion on stratum corneum barrier function and water holding capacity. Skin Pharmacol. Appl. Skin Physiol. 1999; 12: 193–198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georgalas C. W. A. Experience with amphiphilic gel network emulsifier chemistry. 2001 IFSCC Conference, Stockholm, 2001; 27–33
   Google Scholar
• Hadgraft J. Modulation of the barrier function of the skin. Skin Pharmacol. Appl. Skin Physiol. 2001; 14(Suppl 1)72–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Held E., Lund H., Agner T. Effect of different moisturizers on SLS-irritated human skin. Contact Dermat. 2001; 44: 229–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junginger H. E. Multiphase emulsions. Surfactants in Cosmetics, M. M. Rieger, L. D. Rhein. Marcel Dekker, New York 1997
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen M., Niskanen H., Kiesvaara J., Yliruusi J. Determination of optimal combination of surfactants in creams using rheology measurements. Int. J. Pharm. 2000; 197: 143–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen M., Lehtonen J., Hellen L., Hirvonen J., Yliruusi J. Rheological properties of three component creams containing sorbitan monoesters as surfactants. Int. J. Pharm. 2002; 247: 143–151
   Google Scholar
• Kriwet K., Müller-Goymann C. C. Binary diclofenac diethylamine water systems: micelles, vesicles and lyotropic crystals. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1993; 39: 234–238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krog N. Food Emulsions3, S. E. Friberg, K. Larson. Marcel Dekker, New York 1997; 141–188
   Google Scholar
• Levin J., Maibach H. The correlation between transepidermal water loss and percutaneous absorption: an overview. J. Control. Release 2005; 103: 291–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loll P. (1993) Liquid crystals in cosmetics emulsions. ICI Surfactants, publication RP 94/93 E, Everberg.
   Google Scholar
• Makai M., Csanyi E., Nemeth Z., Palinkas J., Erős I. Structure and drug release of lamellar liquid crystals containing glycerol. Int. J. Pharm. 2003; 256: 95–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandani K., Friberg S. E. Progr. Colloid Polym. 1971; 244: 233–239
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Goymann C. C. Drug delivery-liquid crystals. The Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology. Marcel Dekker, New York 2002; 1: 834–853
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Goymann C. C. Physicochemical characterization of colloidal drug delivery systems such as reverse micelles, vesicles, liquid crystals and nanoparticles for topical administration. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2004; 58: 343–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Goymann C. C., Frank S. G. Interaction of lidocaine and lidocaine-HCl with the liquid crystal structure of topical preparations. Int. J. Pharm. 1986; 29: 147–159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlén L. Molecular skin barrier models and some central problems for the understanding of skin barrier structure and function. Skin Pharmacol. Appl. Skin Physiol. 2003; 16: 203–211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papantoniou I., Müller-Goymann C. C. Influence of the phase transformation from reverse micellar solution into lamellar liquid crystal on sustained release. Pharm. Pharmacol. Lett. 1995; 1: 28–31
   Google Scholar
• Parsaee S., Sarbolouki N. M., Parnianpour M. In-vitro release of diclofenac diethylammonium from lipid-based formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 2002; 241: 185–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinagoda J., Tupker R. A., Agner T., Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact. Dermat. 1990; 22: 164–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts M. S., Walker M. Water: the most natural penetration enhancer. Pharmaceutical Skin Enhancement, K. A. Walters, J. Hadgraft. Marcel Dekker, New York 1993; 1–30
   Google Scholar
• Rogiers V. EEMCO Group, EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacol. Appl. Skin Physiol. 2001; 14: 117–128
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savic S., Tamburic S., Savic M., Cekic N., Milic J., Vuleta G. Vehicle-controlled effects of urea on normal and SLS-irritated skin. Int. J. Pharm. 2004; 271: 269–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybinski W. Natural surfactants. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001; 6: 146–147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savic S., Vuleta G., Daniels R., Müller-Goymann C. C. Colloidal microstructure of binary systems and model creams stabilized with an alkylpolyglucoside nonionic emulsifier. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2005; 283: 439–451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppic, 1774/GB/01/August/2001.
   Google Scholar
• Tadros, T. (1991). Future developments in cosmetic formulations, ICI Surfactants, publication RP 68/91 E, Everberg.
   Google Scholar
• Tadros T. F., Dimitrova G., Luckham M. C., Loil P. Investigations of liquid crystalline phases using microscopy, differential scanning colorimetry and rheological techniques. 18th International IFSCC Congres, Venice, 1994; 1–14
   Google Scholar
• Woolfson A. D., Malcolm R. K., Campbell K., Jones D. S., Russel J. A. Rheological, mechanical and membrane penetration properties of novel dual systems for percutaneous delivery. J. Control. Release 2000; 67: 395–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai H., Maibach H. I. Effects of skin occlusion on percutaneous absorption: an overview. Skin Pharmacol. Appl. Skin Physiol. 2001; 4: 1–10
   Google Scholar