Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane as an In Situ Biological Membrane for Pharmaceutical Formulation Development: A Review

REFERENCES

• R. G. Alany, T. Rades, J. Nicoll, I. G. Tucker, and N. M. Davies. 2006. W/O microemulsions for ocular delivery: Evaluation of ocular irritation and precorneal retention. J. Control Release 111:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Anderson, and T. Russell. 1995. The status of alternative methods in toxicology. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
   Google Scholar
• D. H. Ausprunk, D. R. Knighton, and J. Folkman. 1974. Differentiation of vascular endothelium in the chick chorioallantois: A structural and autoradiographic study. Dev. Biol 38:237–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. I. B. Beveridge, and F. M. Burnet. 1946. The cultivation of viruses and rickettsiae in the chick embryo: His Majesty's Stationery Office. (Medical Research Council Special Rep. Series No. 256). London.
   Google Scholar
• A. H. Brantner, F. Quehenberger, A. Chakraborty, J. Polligger, S. Sosa, and R. Della Loggia. 2002. HET-CAM bioassay as in vitro alternative to the croton oil test for investigating steroidal and non-steroidal compounds. Altex 19:51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. W. Chin, W. K. Lau, R. Bhuvaneswari, P. W. Heng, and M. Olivo. 2007. Chlorin e6-polyvinylpyrrolidone as a fluorescent marker for fluorescence diagnosis of human bladder cancer implanted on the chick chorioallantoic membrane model. Cancer Lett. 245:127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. H. Clothier, K. A. Atkinson, M. J. Garle, R. K. Ward, and A. Willshaw. 1995. The development and evaluation of in vitro tests by the frame alternatives laboratory. Altern. Lab Anim. 23:75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. H. Draize. 1944. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J. Pharmacol Exp. Ther. 82:377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. Hammer-Wilson, L. Akian, J. Espinoza, S. Kimel, and M. W. Berns. 1999. Photodynamic parameters in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) bioassay for topically applied photosensitizers. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 53:44–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. Hammer-Wilson, D. Cao, S. Kimel, and M. W. Berns. 2002. Photodynamic parameters in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) bioassay for photosensitizers administered intraperitoneally (IP) into the chick embryo. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 1:721–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. J. Hidalgo. 2001. Assessing the absorption of new pharmaceuticals. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 1:385–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R. Kolar. 2006. Animal experimentation. Sci. Eng. Ethics 12:111–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kunzi-Rapp, F. Genze, R. Kufer, E. Reich, R. E. Hautmann, and J. E. Gschwend. 2001. Chorioallantoic membrane assay: vascularized 3-dimensional cell culture system for human prostate cancer cells as an animal substitute model. J. Urol. 166:1502–1507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kunzi-Rapp, A. Ruck, and R. Kaufmann. 1999. Characterization of the chick chorioallantoic membrane model as a short-term in vivo system for human skin. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 291:290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Lallemand, P. Furrer, O. Felt-Baeyens, M. Gex-Fabry, J. M. Dumont, K. Besseghir, and R. Gurny. 2005. A novel water-soluble cyclosporine A prodrug: Ocular tolerance and in vivo kinetics. Int. J. Pharm. 295:7–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Lange, J. P. Ballini, G. Wagnieres, and H. van den Bergh. 2001. A new drug-screening procedure for photosensitizing agents used in photodynamic therapy for CNV. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 42:38–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. S. Lawrence, M. H. Groom, D. M. Ackroyd, and W. E. Parish. 1986. The chorioallantoic membrane in irritation testing. Food Chem. Toxicol. 24:497–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Leighton, J. Nassauer, R. Tchao, V. Gottfried, E. S. Lindenbaum, and S. Kimel. 1985. The chick embryo in toxicology: An alternative to the rabbit eye. Food Chem. Toxicol. 23:293–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. P. Luepke. 1985. Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential. Food Chem. Toxicol. 23:287–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Leng, J. M. Miller, K. V. Bilbao, D. V. Palanker, P. Huie, and M. S. Blumenkranz. 2004. The chick chorioallantoic membrane as a model tissue for surgical retinal research and simulation. Retina 24:427–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. E. Maragoudakis, M. Panoutsacopoulou, and M. Sarmonika. 1988. Rate of basement membrane biosynthesis as an index to angiogenesis. Tissue Cell 20:531–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Martins, J. Pauluhn, and L. Machemer. 1992. Analysis of alternative methods for determining ocular irritation. Food Chem Toxicol. 30:1061–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. F. McCormick, J. Nassauer, J. Bielunas, and J. Leighton. 1984. Anatomy of the chick chorioallantoic membrane relevant to its use as a substrate in bioassay systems. Scan Electron Microsc. 202:3–2030.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mysliveckova, and Z. Rychter. 1975. Electron microscopy analysis of differentiation of the wall and capillary bed of the chick embryo allantochorion. Folia Morphol. (Praha) 23:306–319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• N. J. Neumann, E. Holzle, P. Lehmann, M. Rosenbruch, A. Klaucic, and G. Plewig. 1997. Photo hen's egg test: a model for phototoxicity. Br. J. Dermatol. 136:326–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Pawar, and D. K. Majumdar. 2006. Effect of formulation factors on in vitro permeation of moxifloxacin from aqueous drops through excised goat, sheep, and buffalo corneas. AAPS PharmSciTech., 7, Article 13, DOI: 10.1208/pt070113.
   Google Scholar
• B. Pegaz, E. Debefve, J. P. Ballini, G. Wagnieres, S. Spaniol, V. Albrecht, D. V. Scheglmann, N. E. Nifantiev, H. van den Bergh, and Y. N. Konan-Kouakou. 2006. Photothrombic activity of m-THPC-loaded liposomal formulations: Pre-clinical assessment on chick chorioallantoic membrane model. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 28:134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ribatti, M. T. Conconi, B. Nico, S. Baiguera, P. Corsi, P. P. Parnigotto, and G. G. Nussdorfer. 2003. Angiogenic response induced by acellular brain scaffolds grafted onto the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane. Brain Res. 989:9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ribatti, B. Nico, L. Morbidelli, S. Donnini, M. Ziche, A. Vacca, L. Roncali, and M. Presta. 2001. Cell-mediated delivery of fibroblast growth factor-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor onto the chick chorioallantoic membrane: endothelial fenestration and angiogenesis. J. Vasc. Res. 38:389–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Ribatti, B. Nico, A. Vacca, L. Roncali, P. H. Burri, and V. Djonov. 2001. Chorioallantoic membrane capillary bed: a useful target for studying angiogenesis and anti-angiogenesis in vivo. Anat. Rec. 264:317–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D. Ribatti, B. Nico, A. Vacca, L. Roncali, and M. Presta. 1999. Endogenous and exogenous fibroblast growth factor-2 modulate wound healing in the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane. Angiogenesis 3:89–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• M. Richardson, and G. Singh. 2003. Observations on the use of the avian chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model in investigations into angiogenesis. Curr. Drug Targets Cardiovasc. Haematol. Disord. 3:155–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. L. Romanoff, and A. J. Romanoff. 1967. Biochemistry of the avian embryo: A quantitative analysis of prenatal development. New York: Interscience Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• P. Rous, and J. B. Murphy. 1911. Tumor implantations in the developing embryo. JAMA 56:741–742.
   Google Scholar
• A. Ruck, K. Akgun, K. Heckelsmiller, G. Beck, F. Genze, and R. Steiner. 1998. Confocal observation of hydrophilic and lipophilic photosensitizers in endothelial cells, lumen of the vessels, interstitium and tumor cells using the chicken chorioallantoic membrane. SPIE 3247:63–68.
   Google Scholar
• W. M. S. Russell, and R. L. Burch. 1959. The principles of humane experimental technique. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, Co.
   Google Scholar
• C. L. Saw, P. W. Heng, W. W. Chin, K. C. Soo, and M. Olivo. 2006. Enhanced photodynamic activity of hypericin by penetration enhancer N-methyl pyrrolidone formulations in the chick chorioallantoic membrane model. Cancer Lett. 238:104–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. L. Saw, M. Olivo, W. W. Chin, K. C. Soo, and P. W. Heng. 2005. Transport of hypericin across chick chorioallantoic membrane and photodynamic therapy vasculature assessment. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 28:1054–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. L. Saw, M. Olivo, W. W. Chin, K. C. Soo, and P. W. Heng. 2007. Superiority of N-methyl pyrrolidone over albumin with hypericin for fluorescence diagnosis of human bladder cancer cells implanted in the chick chorioallantoic membrane model. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 86:207–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Vargas, M. Eid, M. Fanchaouy, R. Gurny, and F. Delie. 2008. In vivo photodynamic activity of photosensitizer-loaded nanoparticles: Formulation properties, administration parameters and biological issues involved in PDT outcome. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 69:43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Vargas, B. Pegaz, E. Debefve, Y. Konan-Kouakou, N. Lange, J. P. Ballini, H. van den Bergh, R. Gurny, and F. Delie. 2004. Improved photodynamic activity of porphyrin loaded into nanoparticles: an in vivo evaluation using chick embryos. Int. J. Pharm. 286:131–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Wigglesworth. 2006. Grants proposals and animal use protocols: is the IACUC playing by the rules? A word from OLAW. Lab Anim. (NY) 35:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. I. Winternitz, J. K. Jackson, A. M. Oktaba, and H. M. Burt. 1996. Development of a polymeric surgical paste formulation for taxol. Pharm. Res. 13:368–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Wutzler, A. Sauerbrei, A. Härtl, and K. Reimer. 2003. Comparative testing of liposomal and aqueous formulations of povidone-iodine for their angioirritative potential at the chorioallantoic membrane of ex ovo cultivated chick embryos. Dermatology 207:43–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Zwilling. 1959. A modified chorioallantoic grafting procedure. Transplant. Bull. 6:115–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar