The compressibility and compactibility of different types of lactose

References

• Gohel MC, Jogani PD. (2005). A review of co-processed directly compressible excipients. J Pharm Sci, 8:76–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong NA. (2007). Tablet manufacture. In: Swarbrick J, ed. Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology, vol, 4. 3rd ed. New York: Informa Healthcare Inc., 3653.
   Google Scholar
• Shangraw RF. (1989). Compressed tablets by direct compression. In: Lieberman HA, Lachman L, Schwartz JB, eds. Pharmaceutical dosage forms: Tablets, vol, 1. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 195–246.
   Google Scholar
• Bolhuis GK, Chowhan ZT. (1996). Materials for direct compression. In: Alderborn G, Nyström C, eds. Pharmaceutical powder compaction technology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 419–500.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Weller PJ. (2003). Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. 4th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press, 323–32.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts RJ, Rower RC. (1985). Effect of punch velocity on the compaction of a variety of materials. J Pharm Pharmacol, 37:377–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerk CF. (1993). Consolidation and compaction of lactose: The application of compaction techniques as prospective functionality tests for tablets excipients. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 19:2359–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebhatu T, Alderborn G. (1999). Relationships between effective interparticulate contact area and the tensile strength of tablet of amorphous and crystalline lactose of varying particle size. Eur J Pharm Sci, 8:235–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludde KH, Kawakita K. (1966). Die Pulverkompression. Pharmazie, 21:393–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnergaard JM. (2006). Quantification of the compactibility of pharmaceutical powders. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 63:270–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckel RW. (1961). Density-pressure relationships in powder compaction. Trans Metall Soc AIME, 221:671–5.
   Google Scholar
• Walker EE. (1923). The properties of powders VI: The compressibility of powders. Trans Faraday Soc, 19:73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. (2008). OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health. Version 2.2.1. http://www.OpenEpi.com [ [updated March 6, 2008], October 16, 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Rosner B. (1995). Fundamentals of biostatistics, 4th ed. Pacific Grove (CA): Duxbury Press, 271–2.266
   Google Scholar
• Fell JT, Newton JM. (1970). Determination of tablet strength by the diametral compression test. J Pharm Sci, 59:688–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Révész P, Hódi K, Miseta M, Selmeczi B. (1991). Production of tablets by direct compressing, compressibility of active ingredients and auxiliary materials. Gyógyszerészet, 35:215–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lehto VP, Tenho M, Vähä-Heikkilä K, Harjunen P, Päällysaho M, Välisaari J, (2006). The comparison of seven different methods to quantify the amorphous content of spray-dried lactose. Powder Technol, 167:85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angberg M. (1995). Lactose and thermal analysis with special emphasis on microcalorimetry. Thermochim Acta, 248:161–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Pharmacopoeia 6th ed. (2008). Council of Europe. Strasbourg 01/2008. Lactose monohydrate (01/2008:0187) and lactose, anhydrous (01/2008:1061) monograph.
   Google Scholar
• Hausner H. (1967). Friction conditions in a mass of metal powder. Int J Powder Metall, 3:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• European Pharmacopoeia 6th ed. (2008). Council of Europe. Strasbourg 01/2008. 2.9.36. Powder flow (01/2008:20936).
   Google Scholar
• Carr RL. (1965). Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng, 72:163–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnergaard JM. (1999). A critical evaluation of the Heckel equation. Int J Pharm, 193:63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Kaushal AM, Bansal AK. (2007). Effect of particle size and compression force on compaction behavior and derived mathematical parameters of compressibility. Pharm Res, 24:111–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser DR. (1973). An investigation of some factors influencing tablet strength. In: Goldberg AS, ed. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on compaction and consolidation of particulate matter. London: Powder Advisory Centre, 149–54.
   Google Scholar
• Duberg M, Nyström C. (1985). Studies on direct compression of tablets: XII. The consolidation and bonding properties of some pharmaceutical compounds and their mixtures with Avicel 105. Int. J Pharm Tech Prod Mfr, 6:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Van Veen B, van der Voort Maarschalk K, Bolhuis GK, Zuurman K, Frijlink HW. (2000). Tensile strength of tablets containing two materials with a different compaction behaviour. Int J Pharm, 203:71–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoechel EL, Sperry CC, Lintner CJ. (1967). Instrumented rotary tablet machines. II. Evaluation and typical applications in pharmaceutical research, development and production studies. J Pharm Sci, 56:116–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees JE, Rue PJ. (1978). Work required to cause failure of tablets in diametral compression. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 4:131–56,
   Google Scholar
• Zupančič-Božič D, Dreu R, Vrečer F. (2008). Influence of dry granulation on compactibility and capping tendency of macrolide antibiotic formulation. Int J Pharm, 357:44–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton JM, Rowley G, Fell JT, Peacock DG, Ridgway K. (1971). Computer analysis of the relation between tablet strength and compaction pressure. J Pharm Pharmacol, 23:195S–201S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar