A critical review about methodologies for the analysis of mucoadhesive properties of drug delivery systems

References

• Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009;71:505–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuri S, Kesharwani P, Jain K, et al. Mucoadhesion: a promising approach in drug delivery system. React Funct Polym 2016;100:151–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabovac V, Guggi D, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Comparison of the mucoadhesive properties of various polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57:1713–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza Ferreira SB, Moço TD, Borghi-Pangoni FB, et al. Rheological, mucoadhesive and textural properties of thermoresponsive polymer blends for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;55:164–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khutoryanskiy VV. Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. Macromol Biosci 2011;11:748–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook MT, Khutoryanskiy VV. Mucoadhesion and mucosa-mimetic materials—a mini-review. Int J Pharm 2015;495:991–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerström H. Polymer gels as pharmaceutical dosage forms: rheological performance and physicochemical interactions at the gel?mucus interface for formulations intended for mucosal drug delivery. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala: Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Pharmacy, Series 293; 2003. 76 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Bruschi ML, Francisco LMB, Toledo LAS, Borghi FB. An overview of recent patents on composition of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul 2015;9:79–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mylangam CK, Beeravelli S, Medikonda J, et al. Badam gum: a natural polymer in mucoadhesive drug delivery. Design, optimization, and biopharmaceutical evaluation of badam gum-based metoprolol succinate buccoadhesive tablets. Drug Deliv 2014;7544:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Deshmane SV, Channawar MA, Chandewar AV, et al. Chitosan based sustained release mucoadhesive buccal patches containing verapamil HCl. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2009;1:216–29.
   Google Scholar
• Vishnu YV, Chandrasekhar K, Ramesh G, Madhusudan Rao Y. Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of ibuprofen. J Control Release 2004;99:73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semalty M, Semalty AA, Kumar G. Formulation and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal films of glipizide. Indian J Pharm Sci 2008;70:43–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modi J, Joshi G, Sawant K. Chitosan based mucoadhesive nanoparticles of ketoconazole for bioavailability enhancement: formulation, optimization, in vitro and ex vivo evaluation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2013;39:540–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruschi ML, Jones DS, Panzeri H, et al. Semisolid systems containing propolis for the treatment of periodontal disease: in vitro release kinetics, syringeability, rheological, textural and mucoadhesive properties. J Pharm Sci 2007;99:4215–27.
   Google Scholar
• Durrani AM, Davies NM, Thomas M, Kellaway IW. Pilocarpine bioavailability from a mucoadhesive liposomal ophthalmic drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 1992;88:409–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies NM, Farr SJ, Hadgraft J, Kellaway IW. Evaluation of mucoadhesive polymers in ocular drug delivery. II. Polymer-coated vesicles. Pharm Res 1992;9:1137–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriyama Y, Arimori K, Nakano M. Absorption characteristics of azasetron from rectal and oral routes in rabbits. Biol Pharm Bull 1997;20:701–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzarino L, Coche-Guérente L, Labbé P, et al. On the mucoadhesive properties of chitosan-coated polycaprolactone nanoparticles loaded with curcumin using quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2014;10:787–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain SK, Awasthi AM, Jain NK, Agrawal GP. Calcium silicate based microspheres of repaglinide for gastroretentive floating drug delivery: preparation and in vitro characterization. J Control Release 2005;107:300–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller RH, Jacobs C. Buparvaquone mucoadhesive nanosuspension: preparation, optimisation and long-term stability. Int J Pharm 2002;237:151–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas TK, Babbar AK, Sharma RK, et al. Preliminary brain-targeting studies on intranasal mucoadhesive microemulsions of sumatriptan. AAPS PharmSciTech 2006;7:E1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carvalho FC, Bruschi ML, Evangelista RC, Gremião MPD. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Brazil J Pharm Sci 2010;46:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kockisch S, Rees GD, Young SA, et al. A direct-staining method to evaluate the mucoadhesion of polymers from aqueous dispersion. J Control Release 2001;77:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woertz C, Preis M, Breitkreutz J, Kleinebudde P. Assessment of test methods evaluating mucoadhesive polymers and dosage forms: an overview. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2013;85:843–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57:1556–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF, et al. Design, characterization and preliminary clinical evaluation of a novel mucoadhesive topical formulation containing tetracycline for the treatment of periodontal disease. J Control Release 2000;67:357–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baloglu E, Karavana SY, Senyigit ZA, Guneri T. Rheological and mechanical properties of poloxamer mixtures as a mucoadhesive gel base. Pharm Dev Technol 2011;16:627–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nep EI, Conway BR. Grewia gum 2: mucoadhesive properties of compacts and gels. Trop J Pharm Res 2011;10:393–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivarsson D, Wahlgren M. Comparison of in vitro methods of measuring mucoadhesion: ellipsometry, tensile strength and rheological measurements. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2012;92:353–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CF, Yuen KH, Peh KK. An in-vitro method for buccal adhesion studies: importance of instrument variables. Int J Pharm 1999;180:47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan AB, Mahamana R, Pal E. Review on mucoadhesive drug delivery system: novel approaches in modern era. Rajiv Gandhi Univ Heal Sci J Pharm Sci 2015;4:128–41.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho FC, Chorilli M, Gremião MPD. Plataformas Bio (Muco) Adesivas Poliméricas Baseadas em Nanotecnologia para Liberação Controlada de Fármacos – Propriedades, Metodologias e Aplicações. Polímeros 2014;24:203–13.
   Google Scholar
• Varum FO, Basit AW, Sousa J, Veiga F. Mucoadhesion studies in the gastrointestinal tract to increase oral drug bioavailability. Braz J Pharm Sci 2008;44:535–48.
   Google Scholar
• Peppas N. Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues. J Control Release 1985;2:257–75.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz M. Gastrointestinal glycoproteins. In: Pigman W, Horowitz M, eds. The glycoconjugates: mammalian glycoproteins and glycolipids, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press; 1977:560.
   Google Scholar
• Brohede U, Bramer T, Edsman K. Electrodynamic investigations of ion transport and structural properties in drug-containing gels: dielectric spectroscopy and transient current measurements on catanionic carbopol systems. J Phys Chem B 2005;109:15250–5.
   Google Scholar
• Sudhakar Y, Kuotsu K, Bandyopadhyay AK. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery—a promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J Control Release 2006;114:15–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinkar DM, Dhake AS, Setty CM. Drug delivery from the oral cavity: a focus on mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery systems. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 2012;66:466–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boddupalli B, Mohammed Z, Nath R, Banji D. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: an overview. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2010;1:381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dodou D, Breedveld P, Wieringa PA. Mucoadhesives in the gastrointestinal tract: revisiting the literature for novel applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2005;60:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derjaguin BV, Toporov YP, Muller VM, Aleinikova IN. On the relationship between the electrostatic and the molecular component of the adhesion of elastic particles to a solid surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 1977;58:528–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edsman K, Hägerström H. Pharmaceutical applications of mucoadhesion for the non-oral routes. J Pharm Pharmacol 2005;57:3–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Leobandung W, Foss A, Peppas NA. Molecular aspects of muco- and bioadhesion: tethered structures and site-specific surfaces. J Control Release 2000;65:63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffleur F. Mucoadhesive polymers for buccal drug delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2014;9045:591–8.
   Google Scholar
• Good RJ. Surface free energy of solids and liquids: thermodynamics, molecular forces, and structure. J Colloid Interface Sci 1977;59:398–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinloch AJ. The science of adhesion – Part 1. Surface and interfacial aspects. J Mater Sci 1980;15:2141–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppas NA, Sahlin JJ. Hydrogels as mucoadhesive and bioadhesive materials: a review. Biomaterials 1996;17:1553–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee L-H. The chemistry and physics of solid adhesion. In: Lee LH, editor. Fundamentals of adhesion. New York: Plenum Press; 1991:454.
   Google Scholar
• Ahagon A, Gent AN. Effect of interfacial bonding on the strength of adhesion. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 1975;13:1285–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankar R, Jain SK. Development and characterization of gastroretentive sustained-release formulation by combination of swelling and mucoadhesive approach: a mechanistic study. Drug Des Dev Ther 2013;7:1455–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchene D, Touchard F, Peppas N. Pharmaceutical and medical aspects of bioadhesive systems for drug administration. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1988;14:283–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reineke J, Cho DY, Dingle YL, et al. Can bioadhesive nanoparticles allow for more effective particle uptake from the small intestine? J Control Release 2013;170:477–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerström H, Edsman K. Limitations of the rheological mucoadhesion method: the effect of the choice of conditions and the rheological synergism parameter. Eur J Pharm Sci 2003;18:349–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD, Kellaway IW, Worthington HE. An in-vitro investigation of mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol 1984;36:295–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramé E. The interpretation of dynamic contact angles measured by the Wilhelmy Plate Method. J Colloid Interface Sci 1997;185:245–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundke K, Uhlmann P, Gietzelt T, et al. Studies on the wetting behaviour of polymer melts on solid surfaces using the Wilhelmy balance method. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 1996;116:93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sam AP, van den Heuij JTM, Tukker JJ. Mucoadhesion of both film-forming and non-film-forming polymeric materials as evaluated with the Wilhelmy plate method. Int J Pharm 1992;79:97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasir JK, Tambwekar K, Garg S. Bioadhesive microspheres as a controlled drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 2003;255:13–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortazavi SA, Smart JD. An in-vitro method for assessing the duration of mucoadhesion. J Control Release 1994;31:207–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering DE, Mathiowitz E. Bioadhesive microspheres: I. A novel electrobalance-based method to study adhesive interactions between individual microspheres and intestinal mucosa. J Control Release 1995;34:251–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos CA, Jacob JS, Hertzog BA, et al. Correlation of two bioadhesion assays: the everted sac technique and the CAHN microbalance. J Control Release 1999;61:113–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall DJ, Khutoryanskaya OV, Khutoryanskiy VV. Developing synthetic mucosa-mimetic hydrogels to replace animal experimentation in characterisation of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Soft Matter 2011;7:9620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF. Textural, viscoelastic and mucoadhesive properties of pharmaceutical gels composed of cellulose polymers. Int J Pharm 1997;151:223–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao QR, Liu Y, Xu WJ, et al. Enhanced oral bioavailability of novel mucoadhesive pellets containing valsartan prepared by a dry powder-coating technique. Int J Pharm 2012;434:325–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Shen Y, Wang W, et al. Preparation and in vitro characterization of thermosensitive and mucoadhesive hydrogels for nasal delivery of phenylephrine hydrochloride. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2014;88:998–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerström H, Edsman K. Interpretation of mucoadhesive properties of polymer. J Pharm Pharmacol 2001;53:1589–99.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg L, Temchenko M, Alakhov V, Hatton TA. Bioadhesive properties and rheology of polyether-modified poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels. Int J Pharm 2004;282:45–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho FC, Calixto G, Hatakeyama IN, et al. Rheological, mechanical, and bioadhesive behavior of hydrogels to optimize skin delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2013;39:1750–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogias IA, Williams AC, Khutoryanskiy VV. Chitosan-based mucoadhesive tablets for oral delivery of ibuprofen. Int J Pharm 2012;436:602–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelkader H, Pierscionek B, Alany RG. Novel in situ gelling ocular films for the opioid growth factor-receptor antagonist-naltrexone hydrochloride: fabrication, mechanical properties, mucoadhesion, tolerability and stability studies. Int J Pharm 2014;477:631–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pund S, Joshi A, Vasu K, et al. Gastroretentive delivery of rifampicin: in vitro mucoadhesion and in vivo gamma scintigraphy. Int J Pharm 2011;411:106–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi-Pangoni FB, Junqueira MV, de Souza Ferreira SB, et al. Screening and in vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive thermoresponsive system containing methylene blue for local photodynamic therapy of colorectal cancer. Pharm Res 2016;33:776–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junqueira MV, Borghi-Pangoni FB, Ferreira SBS, et al. Functional polymeric systems as delivery vehicles for methylene blue in photodynamic therapy. Langmuir 2016;32:19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efremova NV, Huang Y, Peppas NA, Leckband DE. Direct measurement of interactions between tethered poly(ethylene glycol) chains and adsorbed mucin layers. Langmuir 2002;18:836–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callens C, Ceulemans J, Ludwig A, et al. Rheological study on mucoadhesivity of some nasal powder formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003;55:323–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan EE, Gallo JM. A simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin–polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm Res 1990;7:491–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshel-Green T, Bianco-Peled H. Mucoadhesive acrylated block copolymers micelles for the delivery of hydrophobic drugs. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2016;139:42–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen F, Eberth K, Smart JD. A rheological examination of the mucoadhesive/mucus interaction: the effect of mucoadhesive type and concentration. J Control Release 1998;50:167–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerström H, Paulsson M, Edsman K. Evaluation of mucoadhesion for two polyelectrolyte gels in simulated physiological conditions using a rheological method. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000;9:301–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley R, Smart J, Tsibouklis J, et al. An investigation of mucus/polymer rheological synergism using synthesised and characterised poly (acrylic acid)s. Int J Pharm 2001;217:87–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Bruschi ML, de Freitas O, et al. Rheological, mechanical and mucoadhesive properties of thermoresponsive, bioadhesive binary mixtures composed of poloxamer 407 and carbopol 974P designed as platforms for implantable drug delivery systems for use in the oral cavity. Int J Pharm 2009;372:49–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi H, Thongborisute J, Matsui Y, et al. Novel mucoadhesion tests for polymers and polymer-coated particles to design optimal mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57:1583–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keely S, Rullay A, Wilson C, et al. In vitro and ex vivo intestinal tissue models to measure mucoadhesion of poly(methacrylate) and N-trimethylated chitosan polymers. Pharm Res 2005;22:38–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Tabata Y, Bi D, Morimoto K. Evaluation of gastric mucoadhesive properties of aminated gelatin microspheres. J Control Release 2001;73:223–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhlof A, Fujimoto S, Tozuka Y, Takeuchi H. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of WGA-carbopol modified liposomes as carriers for oral peptide delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2011;77:216–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel D, Smith JR, Smith AW, et al. An atomic force microscopy investigation of bioadhesive polymer adsorption onto human buccal cells. Int J Pharm 2000;200:271–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary J, Bromberg L, Magner E. Adhesion of polyether-modified poly(acrylic acid) to mucin. Langmuir 2004;20:9755–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ducker WA, Senden TJ, Pashley RM. Measurement of forces in liquids using a force microscope. Langmuir 1992;8:1831–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binnig G, Quate CF. Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 1986;56:930–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon MP, Gurk SMC, Roberts CJ, et al. Atomic force microscopy of gastric mucin and chitosan mucoadhesive systems. Biochem J 2000;348:557–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao KVR, Buri P. A novel in situ method to test polymers and coated microparticles for bioadhesion. Int J Pharm 1989;52:265–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil S, Babbar A, Mathur R, et al. Mucoadhesive chitosan microspheres of carvedilol for nasal administration. J Drug Target 2010;18:321–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl HE, Dünnhaupt S, Waldner C, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Preactivated thiomers for vaginal drug delivery vehicles. Biomaterials 2013;34:7811–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauland AH, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Thiomers: development and in vitro evaluation of a peroral microparticulate peptide delivery system. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004;57:181–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandri G, Saporito F, Ferrari F, et al. In vitro evaluation of a protective nasal spray: measurements of mucoadhesion and reconstructive barrier properties towards a tracheobronchial reconstruct. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2015;30:368–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel C, Bonengel S, De Sousa IP, et al. Preactivated thiolated nanoparticles: a novel mucoadhesive dosage form. Int J Pharm 2016;497:123–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni AD, Bari DB, Surana SJ, Pardeshi CV. In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo performance of chitosan-based spray-dried nasal mucoadhesive microspheres of diltiazem hydrochloride. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2016;31:108–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng CLC, Ho NFH. Mechanistic studies in the simultaneous flow and adsorption of polymer-coated latex particles on intestinal mucus. I: Methods and physical model development. J Control Release 1987;6:133–49.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen LS, Schubert L, Hansen J. Bioadhesive drug delivery systems. I. Characterisation of mucoadhesive properties of systems based on glyceryl mono-oleate and glyceryl monolinoleate. Eur J Pharm Sci 1998;6:231–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikos AG, Peppas NA. Bioadhesive analysis of controlled-release systems. IV. An experimental method for testing the adhesion of microparticles with mucus. J Control Release 1990;12:31–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thongborisute J, Takeuchi H. Evaluation of mucoadhesiveness of polymers by BIACORE method and mucin-particle method. Int J Pharm 2008;354:204–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths PC, Cattoz B, Ibrahim MS, Anuonye JC. Probing the interaction of nanoparticles with mucin for drug delivery applications using dynamic light scattering. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2015;97:218–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriamornsak P, Wattanakorn N, Takeuchi H. Study on the mucoadhesion mechanism of pectin by atomic force microscopy and mucin-particle method. Carbohydr Polym 2010;79:54–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi H, Matsui Y, Yamamoto H, Kawashima Y. A novel in vitro test for mucoadhesiveness of polymers using commercially available mucin particles for development of particulate mucoadhesive systems. Proc Strateg Optim Oral Drug Deliv 1999;B-14:164.
   Google Scholar
• Joergensen L, Klösgen B, Simonsen AC, et al. New insights into the mucoadhesion of pectins by AFM roughness parameters in combination with SPR. Int J Pharm 2011;411:162–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petchsangsai M, Sajomsang W, Gonil P, et al. A water-soluble methylated N-(4-N,N-dimethylaminocinnamyl) chitosan chloride as novel mucoadhesive polymeric nanocomplex platform for sustained-release drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym 2011;83:1263–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajomsang W, Nuchuchua O, Gonil P, et al. Water-soluble β-cyclodextrin grafted with chitosan and its inclusion complex as a mucoadhesive eugenol carrier. Carbohydr Polym 2012;89:623–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Kim K, Ryu JH, Lee H. Chitosan-catechol: a polymer with long-lasting mucoadhesive properties. Biomaterials 2015;52:161–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmsten M, Lindman B. Ellipsometry studies of the adsorption of cellulose ethers. Langmuir 1990;12:357–64.
   Google Scholar
• Dedinaite A, Lundin M, Macakova L, Auletta T. Mucin–chitosan complexes at the solid–liquid interface: multilayer formation and stability in surfactant solutions. Langmuir 2005;21:9502–9.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson O, Thuresson K, Arnebrant T. Interactions between chitosan-modified particles and mucin-coated surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 2008;325:346–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmsten M, Ljusegren I, Carlstedt I. Ellipsometry studies of the mucoadhesion of cellulose derivatives. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 1994;2:463–70.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson O, Thuresson K, Arnebran T. Interactions between drug delivery particles and mucin in solution and at interfaces. Langmuir 2008;24:2573–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl TL, Leckband DE, Lasic DD, Israelachvili JN. Modulation of interaction forces between bilayers exposing short-chained ethylene oxide headgroups. Biophys J 1994;66:1479–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamczak MI, Hagesaether E, Smistad G, Hiorth M. An in vitro study of mucoadhesion and biocompatibility of polymer coated liposomes on HT29-MTX mucus-producing cells. Int J Pharm 2016;498:225–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizza L, Frasca G, Nicholls M, et al. Caco-2 cell line as a model to evaluate mucoprotective proprieties. Int J Pharm 2012;422:318–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uccello-Barretta G, Nazzi S, Balzano F, Sansò M. A nuclear magnetic resonance approach to the comparison of mucoadhesive properties of polysaccharides for ophthalmic uses. Int J Pharm 2011;406:78–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MM, Smart JD, Nevell TG, et al. Mucin/poly(acrylic acid) interactions: a spectroscopic investigation of mucoadhesion. Biomacromolecules 2003;4:1184–90.
   Google Scholar
• Chayed S, Winnik FM. In vitro evaluation of the mucoadhesive properties of polysaccharide-based nanoparticulate oral drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007;65:363–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surassmo S, Saengkrit N, Ruktanonchai UR, et al. Surface modification of PLGA nanoparticles by carbopol to enhance mucoadhesion and cell internalization. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2015;130:229–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerström H, Edsman K, Strømme M. Low-frequency dielectric spectroscopy as a tool for studying the compatibility between pharmaceutical gels and mucous tissue. J Pharm Sci 2003;92:1869–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbari E, Wisniewski N, Peppas NA. Evidence of mucoadhesion by chain interpenetration at a poly(acrylic acid)/mucin interface using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy (Vol 26, Pg 99, 1993). J Control Release 1993;27:89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiano F, Pitarresi G, Cavallaro G, et al. Evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of a, b-poly(N-hydroxyethyl)-dl-aspartamide and a, b-poly(aspartylhydrazide) using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Polymer (Guildf) 2002;43:6281–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriamornsak P, Wattanakorn N, Nunthanid J, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Mucoadhesion of pectin as evidence by wettability and chain interpenetration. Carbohydr Polym 2008;74:458–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qaqish R, Amiji M. Synthesis of a fluorescent chitosan derivative and its application for the study of chitosan–mucin interactions. Carbohydr Polym 1999;38:99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Sun Y, Hou J, et al. Preliminary investigations into surface molecularly imprinted nanoparticles for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5:577–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan QH, Le XC. Studies of protein–DNA interactions by capillary electrophoresis/laser-induced fluorescence polarization. Anal Chem 2000;72:5583–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang L, Yang B, Zhang X, et al. Enzymatic cleavage and mass amplification strategy for small molecule detection using aptamer-based fluorescence polarization biosensor. Anal Chim Acta 2015;879:91–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren D, Wang J, Wang B, You Z. Probes for biomolecules detection based on RET-enhanced fluorescence polarization. Biosens Bioelectron 2016;79:802–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennacchio A, Varriale A, Scala A, et al. A novel fluorescence polarization assay for determination of penicillin G in milk. Food Chem 2016;190:381–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber BYG, Dunn W. Rotational Brownian motion and polarization of the fluorescence of solutions. Adv Protein Chem 1953;8:415–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perrin F. Polarization of light of fluorescence, average life of molecules. J Phys Radium 1926;7:390–401.
   Google Scholar
• He PE. In vitro evaluation of the mucoadhesive properties of chitosan microspheres. Int J Pharm 1998;166:75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Ferrari F, Bonferoni MC, Caramella C. Characterization of chitosan hydrochloride–mucin interaction by means of viscosimetric and turbidimetric measurements. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000;10:251–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes M, Gonçalves IC, Nardecchia S, et al. Modulation of stability and mucoadhesive properties of chitosan microspheres for therapeutic gastric application. Int J Pharm 2013;454:116–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park K. A new approach to study mucoadhesion: colloidal gold staining. Int J Pharm 1989;53:209–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiang F, Shin HJ, Lee BJ, Han HK. Enhanced systemic exposure of fexofenadine via the intranasal administration of chitosan-coated liposome. Int J Pharm 2012;430:161–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhao H, Duan LR, et al. Preparation, characterization and evaluation of bufalin liposomes coated with citrus pectin. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 2014;444:54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Chen D, Qiao M, et al. Preparation and evaluation of lectin-conjugated PLGA nanoparticles for oral delivery of thymopentin. J Control Release 2006;116:337–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devkar TB, Tekade AR, Khandelwal KR. Surface engineered nanostructured lipid carriers for efficient nose to brain delivery of ondansetron HCl using Delonix regia gum as a natural mucoadhesive polymer. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2014;122:143–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadab MD, Khan RA, Mustafa G, et al. Bromocriptine loaded chitosan nanoparticles intended for direct nose to brain delivery: pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and scintigraphy study in mice model. Eur J Pharm Sci 2013;48:393–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernkop-Schnurch A, Steininger S. Synthesis and characterisation of mucoadhesive thiolated polymers. Int J Pharm 2000;194:239–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal J, Shahnaz G, Dünnhaupt S, et al. Preactivated thiomers as mucoadhesive polymers for drug delivery. Biomaterials 2012;33:1528–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak J, Laffleur F, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Preactivated hyaluronic acid: a potential mucoadhesive polymer for vaginal delivery. Int J Pharm 2015;478:383–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan S, Hughes H, Owens E, et al. Synthesis and characterisation of mucoadhesive thiolated polyallylamine. Int J Pharm 2016;499:368–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair AB, Kumria R, Harsha S, et al. In vitro techniques to evaluate buccal films. J Control Release 2013;166:10–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel TR, Winzor DJ, Scott DJ. Analytical ultracentrifugation: a versatile tool for the characterisation of macromolecular complexes in solution. Methods 2015;95:55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon MP, Davis SS, White RJ, et al. Are chitosan–mucin interactions specific to different regions of the stomach? Velocity ultracentrifugation offers a clue. Carbohydr Polym 1999;38:235–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiecinski PN, Metz KM, Mangham AN, et al. Gastrointestinal biodurability of engineered nanoparticles: development of an in vitro assay. Nanotoxicology 2009;3:202–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng Z, Li Y, Niu Y, et al. Cationic β-lactoglobulin nanoparticles as a bioavailability enhancer: comparison between ethylenediamine and polyethyleneimine as cationizers. Food Chem 2014;159:333–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Teng Z, Li Y, Wang Q. Solid lipid nanoparticles for oral drug delivery: chitosan coating improves stability, controlled delivery, mucoadhesion and cellular uptake. Carbohydr Polym 2015;122:221–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng Z, Luo Y, Li Y, Wang Q. Cationic beta-lactoglobulin nanoparticles as a bioavailability enhancer: effect of surface properties and size on the transport and delivery in vitro. Food Chem 2016;204:391–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh S, Wilcox M, Pearson JP, Borrs S. Optimal design for studying mucoadhesive polymers interaction with gastric mucin using a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D): comparison of two different mucin origins. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2015;96:477–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonferoni MC, Rossi S, Ferrari F, Caramella C. A modified Franz diffusion cell for simultaneous assessment of drug release and washability of mucoadhesive gels. Pharm Dev Technol 1999;4:45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandri G, Bonferoni MC, Rossi S, et al. Thermosensitive eyedrops containing platelet lysate for the treatment of corneal ulcers. Int J Pharm 2012;426:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laulicht B, Cheifetz P, Tripathi A, Mathiowitz E. Are in vivo gastric bioadhesive forces accurately reflected by in vitro experiments? J Control Release 2009;134:103–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H-S, Shin M-K, Singh B, et al. Nasal immunization with mannan-decorated mucoadhesive HPMCP microspheres containing ApxIIA toxin induces protective immunity against challenge infection with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoiae in mice. J Control Release 2016;233:114–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson JL, Whetstone J, Fisher AN, et al. Gamma-scintigraphy as a novel method to study the distribution and retention of a bioadhesive vaginal delivery system in sheep. J Control Release 1996;42:133–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säkkinen M, Marvola J, Kanerva H, et al. Are chitosan formulations mucoadhesive in the human small intestine? An evaluation based on gamma scintigraphy. Int J Pharm 2006;307:285–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Sahoo S, Sarma HD, et al. Preparation and evaluation of three mucoadhesive dosage forms using 99mTc-Ofloxacin. Appl Radiat Isot 2014;89:192–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anande NM, Jain SK, Jain NK. Con-A conjugated mucoadhesive microspheres for the colonic delivery of diloxanide furoate. Int J Pharm 2008;359:182–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorkoosh FA, Stokkel MPM, Blok D, et al. Feasibility study on the retention of superporous hydrogel composite polymer in the intestinal tract of man using scintigraphy. J Control Release 2004;99:199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Pan H, Li P, et al. The potential use of novel chitosan-coated deformable liposomes in an ocular drug delivery system. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2016;143:455–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugwoke MI, Agu RU, Vanbilloen H, et al. Scintigraphic evaluation in rabbits of nasal drug delivery systems based on carbopol 971p((R)) and carboxymethylcellulose. J Control Release 2000;68:207–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta S, Verstraelen H, Peremans K, et al. Vaginal distribution and retention of a multiparticulate drug delivery system, assessed by gamma scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Pharm 2012;426:44–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Q, Zhao J, Zhang X, Pan W. Nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) coated with chitosan oligosaccharides and its potential use in ocular drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 2011;403:185–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremser C, Albrecht K, Greindl M, et al. In vivo determination of the time and location of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems disintegration in the gastrointestinal tract. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:638–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht K, Greindl M, Kremser C, et al. Comparative in vivo mucoadhesion studies of thiomer formulations using magnetic resonance imaging and fluorescence detection. J Control Release 2006;115:78–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadros MI, Fahmy RH. Controlled-release triple anti-inflammatory therapy based on novel gastroretentive sponges: characterization and magnetic resonance imaging in healthy volunteers. Int J Pharm 2014;472:27–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu T, Chan KWY, Anonuevo A, et al. Liposome-based mucus-penetrating particles (MPP) for mucosal theranostics: demonstration of diamagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer (diaCEST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 2015;11:401–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuna Alonso MJ, Torres D. Preparation and in vivo evaluation of mucoadhesive microparticles containing amoxycillin-resin complexes for drug delivery to the gastric mucosa. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2001;51:199–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd El Azim H, Nafee N, Ramadan A, Khalafallah N. Liposomal buccal mucoadhesive film for improved delivery and permeation of water-soluble vitamins. Int J Pharm 2015;488:78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafee NA, Ismail FA, Boraie NA, Mortada LM. Mucoadhesive delivery systems. I. Evaluation of mucoadhesive polymers for buccal tablet formulation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2004;30:985–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd-Elbary A, Makky AMA, Tadros MI, Alaa-Eldin AA. Laminated sponges as challenging solid hydrophilic matrices for the buccal delivery of carvedilol microemulsion systems: development and proof of concept via mucoadhesion and pharmacokinetic assessments in healthy human volunteers. Eur J Pharm Sci 2016;82:31–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura F, Ohta R, Machida Y, Nagai T. In vitro and in vivo nasal mucoadhesion of some water-soluble polymers. Int J Pharm 1996;134:173–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetchý D, Landová H, Gajdziok J, et al. Determination of dependencies among in vitro and in vivo properties of prepared mucoadhesive buccal films using multivariate data analysis. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2014;86:498–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Ferreiro A, González Barcia M, Gil-Martínez M, et al. In vitro and in vivo ocular safety and eye surface permanence determination by direct and magnetic resonance imaging of ion-sensitive hydrogels based on gellan gum and kappa-carrageenan. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2015;94:342–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaimtrakarn S, Itoh Y, Kishimoto JI, et al. Retention and transit of intestinal mucoadhesive films in rat small intestine. Int J Pharm 2001;224:61–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICH Topic Q2 (R1) validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology. Int Conf Harmon 2005;1994:17.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen J, Meng-Lund E, Muff-Westergaard C, et al. A mechanistic based approach for enhancing buccal mucoadhesion of chitosan. Int J Pharm 2014;461:280–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madgulkar AR, Bhalekar MR, Asgaonkar KD, Dikpati AA. Synthesis and characterization of a novel mucoadhesive derivative of xyloglucan. Carbohydr Polym 2016;135:356–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao H, Xu L, Han F, et al. A novel riboflavin gastro-mucoadhesive delivery system based on ion-exchange fiber. Int J Pharm 2008;364:21–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta H, Aqil M, Khar RK, et al. Sparfloxacin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for sustained ocular drug delivery. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 2010;6:324–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin M, Jaafari MR, Tafaghodi M. Impact of chitosan coating of anionic liposomes on clearance rate, mucosal and systemic immune responses following nasal administration in rabbits. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2009;74:225–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques Y, Nguyen-Xuan T, Ionescu E, et al. In viva evaluation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic mucoadhesive semi-solid formulations containing sucralfate and lidocaine for intraoral use. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1997;43:59–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito S, Ainai A, Suzuki T, et al. The effect of mucoadhesive excipient on the nasal retention time of and the antibody responses induced by an intranasal influenza vaccine. Vaccine 2016;34:1201–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar