Filling of lactose-based formulations in a tamping-pin capsule filler

References

• Guo M, Muller FX, Augsburger LL. Evaluation of the plug formation process of silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm. 2002;233(1–2):99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Kalra G, Wilson W, et al. A prototype intelligent hybrid system for hard gelatin capsule formulation development. Pharm Technol. 2002;26:44–60.
   Google Scholar
• Augsburger LL. Hard and soft shell capsules. Drugs Pharm Sci. 2002;72:395–440.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen JS, Hahn M, Ekholm B, et al. Evaluation of conventional press-and-breathe metered-dose inhaler technique in 501 patients. J Asthma. 1994;31(3):193–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgaard B, Højsted J, Hansen R, et al. Patient’s evaluation of shape, size and colour of solid dosage forms. Capsugel. 2001;23:185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Moolchandani V, Augsburger LL, Gupta A, et al. Characterization and selection of suitable grades of lactose as functional fillers for capsule filling: part 1. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2014;9045:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Jones BE. The filling of powders into two-piece hard capsules. Int J Pharm. 2001;227(1–2):5–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BE. Manufacture and properties of two-piece hard capsules. In: Podczeck F, Jones BE, editors, Pharmaceutical capsules; London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2004. p. 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Stegemann S, Bornem C. Hard gelatin capsules today – and tomorrow. Capsugel Libr. 2002;2:2–24.
   Google Scholar
• Stegemann S. The future of the capsule market: Fette compacting. Available at: http://www.fette-compacting.com/the-future-of-the-capsule-market/ (accessed 2nd December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Moolchandani V, Augsburger LL, Gupta A, et al. To investigate the influence of machine operating variables on formulations derived from lactose types in capsule filling: Part 2. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2015;42:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besenhard MO, Faulhammer E, Fathollahi S, et al. Accuracy of micro powder dosing via a vibratory sieve-chute system. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;94:264–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besenhard MO, Karkala SK, Faulhammer E, et al. Continuous feeding of low-dose APIs via periodic micro dosing. Int J Pharm. 2016;509(1–2):123–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulhammer E, Fink M, Llusa M, et al. Low dose capsule filling of inhalation products: critical material attributes and process parameters. Int J Pharm. 2014;144:187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Faulhammer E, Llusa M, Wahl PR, et al. Development of a design space and predictive statistical model for capsule filling of low-fill-weight inhalation products. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2015;0:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Stranzinger S, Faulhammer E, Calzolari V, et al. The effect of material attributes and process parameters on the powder bed uniformity during a low-dose dosator capsule filling process. Int J Pharm. 2017;516(1–2):9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Augsburger LL. Potential application of silicified microcrystalline cellulose in direct-fill formulations for automatic capsule-filling machines. Pharm Dev Technol. 2003;8(1):47–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snick BV, Holman J, Cunningham C, et al. Continuous direct compression as manufacturing platform for sustained release tablets. Int J Pharm. 2017;529:329–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinetz MC, Rehrl J, Aigner I, et al. A continuous operation concept for a rotary tablet press using mass flow operating points. Chem-Ingen-Tech. 2017;89(8):1006–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Snick B, Holman J, Vanhoorne V, et al. Development of a continuous direct compression platform for low-dose drug products. Int J Pharm. 2017;529(1–2):329–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackshields CA, Crean AM. Continuous powder feeding for pharmaceutical solid dosage form manufacture: a short review. Pharm Dev Technol. 2018; 23:554–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner B, Brinz T, Otterbach S, et al. Automation of a dosing-disc capsule filler from the perspective of reliability and safety. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2018;44(3):502–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner B, Brinz T, Otterbach S, et al. Rapid automated process development of a continuous capsule-filling process. Int J Pharm. 2018;546(1–2):154–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner B, Cheong SF, Brinz T, et al. Deriving control parameter settings from process models to control capsule fillers integrated into continuous manufacturing. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2019;45(9):1523–1536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruisz J, Faulhammer E, Rehrl J, et al. Residence time distribution of a continuously-operated capsule filling machine: development of a measurement technique and comparison of three volume-reducing inserts. Int J Pharm. 2018; 550:180–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruisz J, Rehrl J, Faulhammer E, et al. Material tracking in a continuous direct capsule-filling process via residence time distribution measurements. Int J Pharm. 2018;550(1–2):347–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podczeck F, Newton JM. Powder filling into hard gelatine capsules on a tamp filling machine. Int J Pharm. 1999;185(2):237–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman R, Fu X. Characterisation of powder bulk, dynamic flow and shear properties in relation to die filling. Powder Metall. 2008;51(3):196–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman R. Measuring the flow properties of consolidated, conditioned and aerated powders—a comparative study using a powder rheometer and a rotational shear cell. Powder Technol. 2007;174(1–2):25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podczeck F. The development of an instrumented tamp-filling capsule machine I. Instrumentation of a Bosch GKF 400S machine and feasibility study. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2000;10(4):267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podczeck F. The development of an instrumented tamp-filling capsule machine. II. Investigations of plug development and tamping pressure at different filling stations. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;12(4):515–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heda PK, Muteba K, Augsburger LL. Comparison of the formulation requirements of dosator and dosing disc automatic capsule filling machines. Aaps J. 2002;4(3):45–16.
   Google Scholar
• Shah KB, Augsburger LL, Marshall K. An investigation of some factors influencing plug formation and fill weight in a dosing disk-type automatic capsule-filling machine. J Pharm Sci. 1986;75(3):291–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podczeck F, Jones BE (eds.). Dry filling of hard capsules. In: Pharm capsules. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2004. p. 119–138.
   Google Scholar
• European Pharmacopoeia 8.0. https://www.edqm.eu/en/eu. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Newton JM, Podczeck F, Lai S, et al. The design of an expert system to aid the development of capsule formulations. In: Formulation design of oral dosage forms. Tokyo: Yakugyo Jiho; 1998. p. 236–244.
   Google Scholar
• Fu X, Huck D, Makein L, et al. Effect of particle shape and size on flow properties of lactose powders. Particuology. 2012;10(2):203–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podczeck F, Mia Y. The influence of particle size and shape on the angle of internal friction and the flow factor of unlubricated and lubricated powders. Int J Pharm. 1996;144(2):187–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu W, Muteki K, Zhang LIN, et al. Prediction of bulk powder flow performance using comprehensive particle size and particle shape distributions. J Pharm Sci. 2011;100(1):284–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam KK, Newton JM. Influence of particle size on the adhesion behaviour of powders, after application of an initial press-on force. Powder Technol. 1992;73(2):117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott JK, Barnum RA. On powder flowability. Pharm Technol. 2000;24:60–84.
   Google Scholar
• Tan SB, Newton JM. Powder flowability as an indication of capsule filling performance. Int J Pharm. 1990;61(1–2):145–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze D. Flow properties of powders and bulk solids (fundamentals). Powder Technol. 2010;65:321–333.
   Google Scholar
• Navaneethan CV, Missaghi S, Fassihi R. Application of powder rheometer to determine powder flow properties and lubrication efficiency of pharmaceutical particulate systems. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005;6(3):E398–E404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumay G, Boschini F, Traina K, et al. Measuring the flowing properties of powders and grains. Powder Technol. 2012;224:19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg N‐O, Pålsson M, Pihl A‐C, et al. Flowability measurements of pharmaceutical powder mixtures with poor flow using five different techniques. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30(7):785–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah RB, Tawakkul MA, Khan MA. Comparative evaluation of flow for pharmaceutical powders and granules. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(1):250–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heda PK, Muller FX, Augsburger LL. Capsule filling machine simulation. I. Low-force powder compression physics relevant to plug formation. Pharm Dev Technol. 1999;4(2):209–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar