Competitive indices of wheat + compact-mustard intercropping in a 5:1 row proportion as influenced by fertilizer doses and seed rates of wheat varieties

References

• Aasim , M , Umer , E M and Karim , A . 2008 . Yield and competition indices of intercropping cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) using different planting patterns . Tar Bili Der , 14 ( 4 ) : 326 – 333 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agegnehu , G , Ghizwah , A and Sinebo , W . 2006 . Yield performance and land use effeiciency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands . Eur J Agron , 25 : 202 – 207 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banik , P , Midya , A , Sarkar , B K and Ghose , S S . 2006 . Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in additive series experiment: advantageous and weed smothering . Eur J Agron , 24 : 325 – 332 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banik , P , Sasmal , T , Ghosal , P K and Bagchi , D K . 2000 . Evaluation of mustard (Brassica campestris var. Toria) and legume intercropping under 1:1 and 2:1 row-replacement series systems . J Agron Crop Sci , 185 : 9 – 14 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bora , P C . 1999 . Competition studies in intercropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum), rapeseed (Brassica campestris) and pea (Pisum sativum) . Ind J Agron , 44 ( 3 ) : 509 – 513 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caballero , R , Goicoechea , E L and Herniaz , P J . 1995 . Forrage yield and quality of cotton vetch and oat sown at varying seed ratios and seeding rates of common vetch . Field Crops Res , 41 : 135 – 140 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , C , Westcott , M , Neill , K , Wichman , D and Knox , M . 2004 . Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley–pea intercropping in Montana . Agron J , 96 : 1730 – 1738 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit , C T . 1960 . On competition . Verslag Landbouw-Kundige Onderzoek , 66 : 1 – 28 .
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh , P K . 2004 . Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India . Field Crop Res , 88 : 227 – 237 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebsch , C K and McCollum , R E . 1987 . Area–time equivalency ratio: a method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops . Agron J , 79 : 15 – 22 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal , B K , Saha , A , Kundu , T K and Ghorai , A K . 1991 . Wheat based intercropping and the effects of irrigation and mulch on growth and yield . Ind J Agron , 36 : 23 – 29 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGilchrist , C A . 1965 . Analysis of competition experiments . Biometrics , 21 : 975 – 985 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead , R and Willey , R W . 1980 . The concept of a land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields for intercropping . Exp Agr , 16 : 217 – 228 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh , R V and Gupta , P C . 1993 . Aggressivity, competitive ratio and relative crowding coefficient of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in mixed and intercropping systems . Ind J Agr Sci , 63 : 1 – 3 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha , A K , Nathan , A K and Singh , A K . 1985 . Radiation climate and water use studies in intercropping systems . J Nucl Agr Biol , 14 : 64 – 69 .
   Google Scholar
• Snaydon , R W and Harris , P M . Interactions below ground. The use of nutrients and water . Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercropping . January 10–13 . pp. 188 – 201 . Hyderabad (India) : ICRISAT .
   Google Scholar
• SPSS . 1998 . SPSS base 8.0 user's guide and SPSS applications guide , Chicago (IL) : SPSS .
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava , R K and Bohra , J S . 2006 . Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) + Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping in relation to row ratio, Indian mustard variety and fertility levels . Ind J Agron , 51 ( 2 ) : 107 – 111 .
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava , R K , Bohra , J S and Singh , R K . 2007 . Yield advantage and reciprocity functions of wheat (Triticum aestivum) + Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping under varying row ratio, variety and fertility level . Ind J Agr Sci , 77 ( 3 ) : 139 – 144 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigter , C J and Baldy , C h . 1995 . “ Manipulation of the microclimate by intercropping: making the best of services rendered ” . In Ecophysiology of tropical intercropping , Edited by: Sinoquet , H and Cruz , P . 29 – 44 . Paris (France) : INRA .
   Google Scholar
• Tsubo , M , Mukhala , E , Ogindo , H O and Walker , S . 2003 . Productivity of maize–bean intercropping in a semi-arid region of South Africa . Water SA , 29 : 381 – 388 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willey , R W . 1979 . Intercropping – its importance and research needs. 1. Competition and yield advantages . Field Crop Abstr , 32 : 73 – 85 .
   Google Scholar
• Willey , R W . 1985 . Evaluation and presentation of intercropping advantages . Exp Agr , 21 : 119 – 133 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willey , R W and Rao , M R . 1980 . A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops . Exp Agr , 16 : 117 – 125 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang , C H , Chai , Q and Huang , G B . 2010 . Root distribution and yield responses of wheat/maize intercropping to alternate irrigation in the arid areas of northwest China . Plant Soil Environ , 56 ( 6 ) : 253 – 262 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar