Production potential and competitive indices of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) based intercropping with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris L.) under different row ratios of eastern Uttar Pradesh

References

• Abraham T, Thenua OVS, Sharma UC. 2011. Evaluation of performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping system vis-à-vis their sole crops as influenced by irrigation regimes and fertility gradients. Indian J Agric Sci. 81(8):772–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bora PC. 1999. Competition studies in intercropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum), rapeseed (Brassica campestris) and pea (Pisum sativum). Indian J Agron. 44(3):509–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caballero R, Goicoechea EL, Herniaz PJ. 1995. Forrage yield and quality of cotton vetch and oat sown at varying seed ratios and seeding rates of common vetch. Field Crops Res. 41:135–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhoudhary BL, Bhatia AK. 1992. Mixed vs. intercropping for wheat and mustard. Ann Agric Res. 13(2):141–144.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran WG, Cox GM. 1957. Experimental designs. New York: John Willey & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta H, Baroova SR, Rajkhowa DJ. 1994. Feasibility and economic profitability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. Indian J Agron. 39(3):448–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghonsikar CP, Shinde CP. 1994. Intercropping in wheat and mustard pays more than mixed cropping. Indian Farm. 44(8):7–9. 
   Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Prakash O, Singh BP. 2001. Effect of lentil based intercropping on root growth, crop yield, protein and oil production under Drylands. Indian J Pulses Res. 14(1):48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mandal BK, Dasgupta S, Ray PK. 1986. Water use by wheat, chickpea and mustard grown as sole and intercrops. Indian J Agric Sci. 56(3):187–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal BK, Singh YV, Mandal BK, Surjit BR. 1991. Yield of lentil and niger grown as sole and inter crop influenced by irrigation and mulch. Indian J Agron. 36(suppl):133–137.
   Google Scholar
• McGilchrist CA. 1965. Analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics. 21:975–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead R, Willey RW. 1980. The concept of a land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields for intercropping. Exp Agr. 16:217–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil EN, Jawale SM, Attarde DR. 1995. Intercropping of wheat and mustard under irrigated conditions. J Maharashtra Agric Univ. 20(2):315–316.
   Google Scholar
• Rathore AL, Pal AR, Sahu KK. 1998. Tillage and mulching effects on water use, root growth and yield of rainfed mustard and chickpea grown after lowland rice. J Sci Food Agric. 78:149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachan SS, Uttam SK. 1994. Intercropping of mustard (Brassica juncea) with gram (Cicer arietinum) under different planting system of eroded soils. Indian J Agron. 37(1):68–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardana V, Sidhu MS. 1997. Rapeseed-mustard based intercropping systems – a critical review. J Oilseeds Res. 14:135–152.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma KC, Singh Y, Gupta PC, Tripathi SK, Bhardwaj AK, Singh SP. 1986. Plant population and spatial arrangement in wheat – mustard intercropping. Indian J Agron. 31(2):154–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh AK, Bohra JS. 2012. Competitive indices of wheat + compact-mustard intercropping in a 5:1 row proportion as influenced by fertilizer doses and seed rates of wheat varieties. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 58(12):1399–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh DP, Rajput AL. 1996. Evaluation of mustard variety in association with lentil. Indian J Agron. 41(1):27–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh DP, Rajput AL, Singh SK. 1998. Productivity and economics of lentil (Lens culinaris) – based cropping system. Indian J Agron. 43(4):588–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh MK, Thakur R, Pal SK, Verma UN, Upasani RR. 2000. Plant density and row arrangement of lentil (Lens culinaris) and mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping for higher productivity under Bihar plateau. Indian J Agron. 45:284–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RV, Gupta PC. 1994. Production potential of wheat and mustard intercropping systems under adequate water supply conditions. Indian J Agric Sci. 28(4):219–224.
   Google Scholar
• Singh T, Rana KS, Shivay YS, Ramanjaneyulu AV, Rahal A. 2009. Productivity and sustainability of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris L.) intercropping system as affected by moisture conservation practices and fertility levels under rainfed conditions. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 55(2):183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava RK, Bohra JS. 2006. Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) + Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping in relation to row ratio, Indian mustard variety and fertility levels. Indian J Agron. 51(2):107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava RK, Bohra JS, Singh RK. 2007. Yield advantage and reciprocity functions of wheat (Triticam aestivum L.) + Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) intercropping under varying row ratio, variety and fertility level. Indian J Agric Sci. 77(3):139–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigter CJ, Boldy CM. 1993. Manipulation of the microclimate by intercropping: making the best services rendered. In: Sinoquet H, Cruz P, editors. Ecophysiology of tropical intercropping. Paris; Guadeloupe: Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA); p. 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Wein HC, Smithson JB. 1979. The evaluation of genotypes for intercropping. In: Willey RW, Garver C, editors. Proceedings of International Workshop on Intercropping; Jan 10–13; Patanchuru. Andhra Pradesh (India): International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT); p. 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Willey RW. 1985. Evaluation and presentation of intercropping advantages. Exp Agr. 21:119–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar