Evaluation of infiltration models with different numbers of fitting parameters in different soil texture classes

References

• Araghi FP, Mirlatifi SM, Ghorbani Dashtaki S, Mahdian MH. 2010. Evaluating some infiltration models under different soil texture classes and land uses. Iran J Irrigation Drainage. 2:193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Argyrokastritis I, Kerkides P. 2003. A note to the variable sorptivity infiltration equation. Water Resour Manage. 17:133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchan GD, Grewal KS, Robson AB. 1993. Improved model of particle-size distribution: an illustration of model comparison techniques. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 57:901–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera J, Neuman SP. 1986. Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 1. Maximum likelihood incorporating prior information. Water Resour Res. 22:199–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Hopmans JW, Grismer ME. 1999. Parameter estimation of two-fluid capillary pressure saturation and permeability functions. Adv Water Res. 22:479–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani Dashtaki SH, Homaee M, Mahdian M, Kouchakzadeh M. 2009. Site-dependence performance of infiltration models. Water Resour Manage. 23:2777–2790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford GF. 1976. Applicability of some infiltration formula to rangeland infiltrometer data. J Hydrol. 28:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green PE, Caroll JD. 1978. Analyzing multivariate data. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Green WH, Ampt CA. 1911. Studies on soil physics, I. Flow of air and water through soils. J Agric Sci. 4:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hillel D. 1998. Environmental soil physics. New York (NY): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horton RE. 1940. Approach toward a physical interpretation of infiltration capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 5:339–417.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang S, Lee KP, Lee DS, Powers SE. 2002. Models for estimating soil particle-size distributions. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 66:1143–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jury WA, Gardner WR, Gardner WH. 1991. Soil physics. 5th ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kao CS, Hunt JR. 1996. Prediction of wetting front movement during one-dimensional infiltration into soils. Water Resour Res. 9:384–395.
   Google Scholar
• Kostiakov AV. 1932. On the dynamics of the coefficient of water percolation in soils and on the necessity for studying it from a dynamics point of view for purposes of amelioration. In: Fauser O, editor. Transactions of the Sixth Commission of International Society of Soil Science, Part A. Leiden: Martinius Nijhoff Publishers; p. 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Machiwal D, Madan Kumar JHA, Mal BC. 2006. Modelling infiltration and quantifying spatial soil variability in a watershed of Kharagpur, India. Biosyst Eng. 95:569–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallows CL. 1973. Some comments on Cp. Technometrics. 15:661–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The MathWorks, Inc. 2007. MATLAB: the language of technical computing. Version 7.5. Ismaning: The MathWorks Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mein RG, Larson CL. 1973. Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resour Res. 9:384–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minasny B, McBratney AB, Bristow KL. 1999. Comparison of different approaches to the development of pedotransfer functions for water-retention curves. Geoderma. 93:225–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra SK, Kumar SR, Singh VP. 1999. Calibration of a general infiltration model. Hydrol Process. 13:1691–1718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra SK, Tyagi JV, Singh VP. 2003. Comparison of infiltration models. Hydrol Process. 17:2629–2652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parhi PK, Mishra SK, Singh R. 2007. A modification to Kostiakov and modified Kostiakov infiltration models. Water Resour Manage. 21:1973–1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlange JY, Haverkamp R. 1989. Infiltration and ponding time. In: Morel-Seytoux HJ, editor. Unsaturated flow in hydrologic modeling, theory and practice. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic; p. 95–126.
   Google Scholar
• Philip JR. 1957. The theory of infiltration: 2. The profile at infinity. Soil Sci. 83:435–448.
   Google Scholar
• Richards LA. 1931. Capillary conduction of liquids in porous mediums. Physics. 1:318–333.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla K, Lal R, Unkefer P. 2003. Experimental evaluation of infiltration models for different land use and soil management systems. Soil Sci. 168(3):178–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RE. 1972. The infiltration envelope: results from a theoretical infiltrometer. J Hydrol. 17:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 2003. Keys to soil taxonomy. 9th ed. Washington (DC): United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
   Google Scholar
• Swartzendruber D. 1987. A quasi-solution of Richards equation for the downward infiltration of water into soil. Water Resour Res. 23:809–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner ER. 2006. Comparison of infiltration equations and their field validation with rainfall simulation [MSc. thesis]. College Park (MD): University of Maryland; 202 pp.
   Google Scholar
• [USDA-NRCS] US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Conservation Service. 1974. National engineering handbook. Section 15, Chapter 4: Border Irrigation. Washington (DC): National Technical Information Service.
   Google Scholar
• Vereecken H, Maes J, Feyen J, Darius P. 1989. Estimating the soil moisture retention characteristic from texture, bulk density, and carbon content. Soil Sci. 148:389–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolfaghari AA, Mirzaee S, Gorji M. 2012. Comparison of different models for estimating cumulative infiltration. Int J Soil Sci. 7:108–115.
   Google Scholar