Evaluation of some rice cultivars’ response to salinity stress using resistance indices

References

• Allakhverdiev SI, Sakamoto A, Nishiyama Y, Inaba M, Murata N. 2000. Ionic and osmotic effects of NaCl-induced inactivation of photosystems I and II in Synechococcus sp. Plant Physiol. 123:1047–1056. doi:10.1104/pp.123.3.1047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagholi A, Tabatabaei SA, Fouman A. 2010. Evaluation of salinity tolerance of forage sorghum varieties with stress tolerance and susceptibility indices. Electron J Crop Prod. 3:89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Asch F, Wopereis MSC. 2001. Responses of field-grown irrigated rice cultivars to varying levels of floodwater salinity in a semi-arid environment. Field Crop Res. 70:127–137. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00128-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf M. 2004. Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants. Flora – Morphol Distribution, Funct Ecol Plants. 199:361–376. doi:10.1078/0367-2530-00165
   Google Scholar
• Babu S, Sheeba A, Yogameenakshi P, Anbumalarmathi J, Rangasamy P. 2007. Effect of salt stress in the selection of salt tolerant hybrids in rice (Oryza sativa L). under in vitro and in vivo condition. Asian J Plant Sci. 6:137–142. doi:10.3923/ajps.2007.137.142
   Google Scholar
• Bienvenido OJ. 1993. Rice in human food and nutrition. Rome and Manila: FAO with the cooperation of International Rice Research Institute; 163p.
   Google Scholar
• Chartzoulakis K, Klapaki G. 2000. Response of two greenhouse pepper hybrids to NaCl salinity during different growth stages. Sci Hortic. 86:247–260. doi:10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00151-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha-um S, Tuan KS, Phimmakong CK, Kirdmanee C. 2005. Physiological responses of rice seedling (Oryza sativa L.) to salt-stress cultured under in vitro photomixotrophic and photoautotrophic systems. Asian J Plant Sci. 4:136–143. doi:10.3923/ajps.2005.136.143
   Google Scholar
• De Lacerda CF, Cambraia J, Oliva MA, Ruiz HA. 2005. Changes in growth and in solute concentrations in sorghum leaves and roots during salt stress recovery. Environ Exp Bot. 54:69–76. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehret DL, Plant AL. 1999. Salt tolerance in crop plants. In: Dhaliwal GS, Arora R, Verma A, editors, Environmental stress in crop plants. New Delhi: Commonwealth Publishers; p. 69–120.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez GCJ. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. In: Kuo CG, editor. Proceedings of the international symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress; Aug 13–18; Tainan. Taipei (Taiwan): Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer RA, Maurer R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust J Agric Res. 29:897–907. doi:10.1071/AR9780897
   Google Scholar
• Flowers TJ. 2004. Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot. 55:307–319. doi:10.1093/jxb/erh003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers TJ, Troke PF, Yeo AR. 1977. The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 28:89–121. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.000513
   Google Scholar
• Gavuzzi P, Rizza F, Palumbo M, Campanile RG, Ricciardi GL, Borghi B. 1997. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Can J Plant Sci. 77:523–531. doi:10.4141/P96-130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudarzi M, Pakniyat H. 2008. Evaluation of wheat cultivars under salinity stress based on some agronomic and physiological traits. J Agric Soc Sci. 4:35–38.
   Google Scholar
• Greenway H, Munns R. 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 31:149–190. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.001053
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK, Bohnert HJ. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 51:463–499. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarrad S. 2013. Study of various rice genotypes to salinity stress [MSc thesis]. Gilan: University of Guilan.
   Google Scholar
• Khush GS. 1997. Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice. Plant Mol Biol. 35:25–34. doi:10.1023/A:1005810616885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Lee JH, Kwon TO. 2003. Selection of salt-tolerant doubled haploids in rice anther culture. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cul. 74:143–149. doi:10.1023/A:1023956526669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor Z, Awan TH, Safdar ME, Ali RI, Ashraf MM, Ahmad M. 2006. Effect of nitrogen levels on yield and yield components of basmati 2000. J Agric Res. 44:115–121.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi-Nejad G, Arzani A, Rezai AM, Singh RK, Gregorio GB. 2008. Assessment of rice genotypes for salt tolerance using microsatellite markers associated with the saltol QTL. Afr J Biotechnol. 7:730–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi F. 2002. Physiological characteristics of rice cultivars for salinity tolerance during vegetative and reproductive stages [PhD thesis]. Laguna : University of Philippines; 190 p.
   Google Scholar
• Motamed K, Assadi R, Rezaei M, Amiri E. 2008. Response of high yielding rice varieties to NaCl salinity in greenhouse circumstances. Afr J Biotechnol. 7:3866–3873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moumeni A, Mohammadian M, Nouri MZ. 2009. Field screening of rice genotypes for salinity tolerance in Mazandaran. Electron J Crop Prod. 2:129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Munns R, James RA, Lauchli A. 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J Exp Bot. 57:1025–1043. doi:10.1093/jxb/erj100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi Khayat P, Jamaati-e-somarin SH, Zabihi-e-mahmoodabad R, Yari A, Khayatnezhad M, Gholamin R. 2010. Screening of salt tolerance canola cultivars (Brassica napus L.) using physiological markers. World Appl Sci J. 10:817–820.
   Google Scholar
• Neves-Piestun BG, Bernstein N. 2001. Salinity-induced inhibition of leaf elongation in maize is not mediated by changes in cell wall acidification capacity. Plant Physiol. 125:1419–1428. doi:10.1104/pp.125.3.1419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panthuwan G, Fokai S, Cooper M, Rajatasereekul S, O’Toole JC. 2002. Yield response of rice genotypes to different types of drought under rainfed lowlands. I. Grain yield and yield components. Field Crop Res. 41:45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Pervaiz Z, Afzal M, Xiao Y, Ancheng L. 2003. Mechanism of salt tolerance in selected wheat cultivars. Int. J Agric Biol. 5:141–144.
   Google Scholar
• Raja Babu C, Vijayalakshmi C, Mohandass S. 2005. Evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for salt tolerance. J Food Agric Environ. 3:190–194.
   Google Scholar
• Rosielle AA, Hamblin J. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Sci. 21:943–946. doi:10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabouri H, Biabani A. 2009. Toward the mapping of agronomic characters on a rice genetic map: quantitative trait loci analysis under saline condition. Biotechnol. 8:144–149. doi:10.3923/biotech.2009.144.149
   Google Scholar
• Sabouri H, Sabouri A. 2009. New evidence of QTLs attributed to salinity tolerance in rice. Afr J Biotechnol. 7:4376–4383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sio-Se Mardeh A, Ahmadi A, Poustini K, Mohammadi V. 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crop Res. 98:222–229. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebi R, Fayaz F, Naji AM. 2009. Effective selection criteria for assessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Gen Appl Plant Physiol. 35:64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Theerakulpisut P, Bunnag S, Kong-ngern K. 2005. Genetic diversity, salinity tolerance and physiological responses to NaCl of six rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Asian J Plant Sci. 4:562–573. doi:10.3923/ajps.2005.562.573
   Google Scholar
• Zeng L, Lesch SM, Grieve CM. 2003. Rice growth and yield respond to changes in water depth and salinity stress. Agric Water Manage. 59:67–75. doi:10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00088-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar