Using expert knowledge data to validate crop models on local situation data

References

• Acutis M, Donatelli M. 2003. Soil PAR 2.00: Software to estimate soil hydrological parameters and functions. Eur J Agron. 18:373–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam M, Belhouchette H, Casellas E, Therond O, Wery J. 2009. APES an agricultural production and externalities simulator evaluated for two main crops in Midi-Pyrenee. Paper presented at: AgSAP Conference; Egmond aan Zee, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Adam M, Belhouchette H, Corbeels M, Ewert F, Perrin A, Casellas E, Celette F, Wery J. 2012. Protocol to support model selection and evaluation in a modular crop modelling framework: An application for simulating crop response to nitrogen supply. Comput Electron Agric. 86:43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam M, Ewert F, Leffelaar PA, Corbeels M, Van Keulen H, Wery J. 2010. CROSPAL, software that uses agronomic expert knowledge to assist modules selection for crop growth simulation. Environ Modell Software. 25:946–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam M, Wery J, Leffelaar PA, Ewert F, Corbeels M, Van Keulen H. 2013. A systematic approach for re-assembly of crop models: an example to simulate pea growth from wheat growth. Ecol Mod. 250:258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcamo J. 2008. Environmental futures: the practice of environmental scenario analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Becu N. 2006. Identification et modélisation des représentations des acteurs locaux pour la gestion des bassins versants [Identification and modeling representations of local stakeholders for watershed management] [dissertation]. Montpellier: University of Montpellier II.
   Google Scholar
• Belhouchette H, Braudeau E, Hachicha M, Donatelli M, Mohtar R, Wery J. 2008. Integrating spatial soil organization data with a regional agricultural management simulation model: a case study in northern Tunisia. Am Soc Agric Biol Eng. 51:1099–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belhouchette H, Louhichi K, Therond O, Mouratiadou I, Wery J, Van Ittersum MK, Flichman G. 2011. Assessing the impact of the nitrate directive on farming systems using a bio-economic modelling chain. Agric Syst. 104:135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biarnès A, Rio P, Hocheux A. 2004. Analyzing the determinants of spatial distribution of weed control practices in a Languedoc vineyard catchment. Agronomie. 24:187–196.
   Google Scholar
• Bouman BAM, Van Keulen H, Van Laar HH, Rabbinge R. 1996. The ‘School of de Wit’ crop growth simulation models: a pedigree and historical overview. Agric Syst. 52:171–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claude MJ, Ayorinde A, Olufayo B, Ruelle P. 1997. Sorghum and sunflower evapotranspiration and yield from simulated leaf area index. Agric Water Manage. 35:167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavel L, Soudais J, Baudet D, Leenhardt D. 2011. Integrating expert knowledge and quantitative information for mapping cropping systems. Land Use Policy. 28:57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corre-Hellou G, Faure M, Launay M, Brisson N, Crozat Y. 2009. Adaptation of the STICS intercrop model to simulate crop growth and N accumulation in pea–barley intercrops. Field Crops Res. 113:72–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donatelli M. 2002. Simulations with CropSyst of cropping systems in Southern France, common agricultural policy strategy for regions. Montpellier: Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Montpellier.
   Google Scholar
• Donatelli M, Russell G, Rizzoli AE, Acutis M, Adam M, Athanasiadis IN, Balderacchi M, Luca Bechini L, Belhouchette H, Bellocchi G, et al. 2010. Chapter 4, A component-based framework for simulating agricultural production and externalities. In: Brouwer F, Van Ittersum MK, editors. Environmental and agricultural modelling: integrated approaches for policy impact assessment. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 63–108.
   Google Scholar
• El Hajj M, Bégué A, Guillaume S, Martiné J-F. 2009. Integrating SPOT-5 time series, crop growth modeling and expert knowledge for monitoring agricultural practices – the case of sugarcane harvest on Reunion Island. Remote Sens Environ. 113:2052–2061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faivre R, Leenhardt D, Voltz M, Benoît M, Papy F, Dedieu G, Wallach D. 2004. Spatialising crop models. Agronomie. 24:205–217.
   Google Scholar
• Jagtap SS, Jones JW. 2002. Adaptation and evaluation of the CROPGRO-soybean model to predict regional yield and production. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 93:73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT. 2003. The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron. 18:235–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen SE. 1986. Fundamentals of ecological modelling. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 389pp.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler B, Koontz TM. 2008. Citizen participation in collaborative watershed partnerships. Environ Manage. 41:143–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamanda N, Roux S, Delmotte S, Merot A, Rapidel B, Adam M, Wery J. 2012. A protocol for the conceptualisation of an agro-ecosystem to guide data acquisition and analysis and expert knowledge integration. Eur J Agron. 38:104–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launay M, Guerif M. 2005. Assimilating remote sensing data into a crop model to improve predictive performance for spatial applications. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 111:321−339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bars M, Le Grusse P. 2008. Use of a decision support system and a simulation game to help collective decision-making in water management. Comput Electron Agric. 62:182–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenhardt D, Wallach D, Le Moigne P, Guérif M, Bruand A, Casterad MA. 2006. Chapter 7, Using crop models for multiple fields. In: Wallach D, Makowski D, Jones JW, editors. Working with dynamic crop models: evaluation, analysis, parameterization, and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 209–248.
   Google Scholar
• Loague K, Green RE. 1991. Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. J Contam Hydrol. 7:51–73.
   Google Scholar
• McCown RL, Hammer GL, Hargreaves JNG, Holzworth DP, Freebairn DM. 1996. APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems research. Agric Syst. 50:255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermet L. 1991. Participation, strategies and ethics: roles of people in wetland management. Landsc Urban Plan. 20:231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middelkoop H, Janssen LLF. 1991. Implementation of temporal relationships in knowledge based classification of satellite images. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 57:937−945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolot JML, Debaeke P. 2003. Principes et outils de conception, conduite et évaluation de systèmes de culture [Principles and tools for design, conduct and evaluation of cropping systems]. Cahiers Agric. 12:1–14. (in French).
   Google Scholar
• Odum HT. 1983. Systems ecology: an introduction. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K. 1994. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science. 263:641–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power M. 1993. The predictive validation of ecological and environmental models. Ecol Model. 68:33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruget F, Brisson N, Delécoller R, Faivrer O. 2002. Sensitivity analysis of a crop simulation model, STICS, in order to choose the main parameters to be estimated. Agronomie. 22:133–158.
   Google Scholar
• Shugart HH. 1984. A theory of forest dynamics. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stöckle CO, Donatelli M, Nelson R. 2003. CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model. Eur J Agron. 18:289–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therond O, Hengsdijk H, Casellas E, Wallach D, Adam M, Belhouchette H, Oomen R, Russell G, Ewert F, Bergez J-Eet al. 2011. Using a cropping system model at regional scale: low-data approaches for crop management information and model calibration. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 142:85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utset A, Farré I, Martınez A, Cavero J. 2004. Comparing Penman–Monteith and Priestley–Taylor approaches as reference-evapotranspiration inputs for modeling maize water-use under Mediterranean conditions. Agric Water Manage. 66:205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ittersum MK, Donatelli M. 2003. Modelling cropping systems – highlights of the symposium and preface to the special issues. Eur J Agron. 18:187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ittersum MK, Ewert F, Heckelei T, Wery J, Alkan Olsson J, Andersen E, Bezlepkina I, Brouwer F, Donatelli M, Flichman Get al. 2008. Integrated assessment of agricultural systems – a component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS). Agric Syst. 96:150–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach D, Goffinet B, Tremblay M. 2002. Parameter estimation in crop models: exploring the possibility of estimating linear combinations of parameters. Agronomie. 22:171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Wery J. 1996. Production de graines et fixation d’azote par des cultures de légumineuses sous contrainte hydrique. Formation doctoral sur les bases de la production végétale [Seed production and nitrogen fixation by legumes under water stress conditions] [Doctoral training on the bases of crop production]. Languedoc-Roussillon: Montpellier 2 University of Sciences and Literature; 65pp. (in French).
   Google Scholar
• Williams JR, Jones CA, Kiniry JR, Spanel DA. 1989. The EPIC crop growth model. Trans ASAE. 32:497–511.
   Google Scholar