Differential response of soybean genotypes to two lime rates

References

• Allen SE, Terman GL, Clements LB. 1976. Greenhouse techniques for soil-plant fertilizer research. Muscle Shoals (AL): Tennessee Valley Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Cassel DK, Nielsen DR. 1986. Methods of soil analysis: physical and mineralogical methods. Madison (WI): America Society of Agronomy, Field capacity and available water capacity; p. 901–926.
   Google Scholar
• Castro GSA, Crusciol CAC. 2013. Effects of superficial liming and silicate application on soil fertility and crop yield under rotation. Geoderma. 195–196:234–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONAB (Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento). 2016. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira, 2015/2016 – Grãos. Brasília (Brazil): CONAB.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert DJ. 1987. Soil testing: sampling, correlation, calibration, and interpretation. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy, Soil test interpretations: Basic cation saturation ratios and sufficiency levels; p. 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária). 1997. Manual for methods of soil analysis [Manual de Métodos de Análise de Solo]. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): National Research Center for Soils.
   Google Scholar
• Fageria NK. 2008. Optimum soil acidity indices for dry bean production on an Oxisol in no-tillage system. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 39:845–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria NK, Baligar VC. 2001. Improving nutrient use efficiency of annual crops in Brazilian acid soils for sustainable crop production. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 32:1303–1319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria NK, Baligar VC. 2008. Ameliorating soil acidity of tropical Oxisols by liming for sustainable crop production. Adv Agron. 99:345–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria NK, Morais OP. 1987. Evaluation of rice cultivars for utilization of calcium and magnesium in the Cerrado soil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 22:667–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria NK, Moreira A, Castro C, Moraes MF. 2013. Optimal acidity indices for soybean production in Brazilian Oxisols. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 44:2941–2951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria NK, Moreira A, Coelho AM. 2012. Nutrient uptake in dry bean genotypes. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 43:2289–2302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria NK, Moreira A, Moraes LAC, Moraes MF. 2014. Influence of lime and gypsum on yield and yield components of soybean and changes in soil chemical properties. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 45:271–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr WR, Caviness CE, Burmood DT, Pennington JS. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill1. Crop Sci. 11:929–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritschi FB, Ray JD. 2007. Soybean leaf nitrogen, chlorophyll content, and chlorophyll a/b ratio. Photosynthetica. 45:92–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks CR. 1973. Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments. New York (EUA): Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Kamprath EJ. 1984. Soil acidity and liming. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy, Crop responses to lime on soils in the tropics; p. 349–368.
   Google Scholar
• Key JL, Kurtz LT, Tucker BB. 1962. Influence of ratio of exchangeable calcium-magnesium on yield and composition of soybeans and corn. Soil Sci. 93:265–270.
   Google Scholar
• Malavolta E. 2006. Manual of mineral nutrition of plants [Manual de Nutrição Mineral de Plantas]. Piracicaba (Brazil): Editora Ceres.
   Google Scholar
• Malavolta E, Vitti GC, Oliveira SA. 1997. Evaluation of nutritional status of plants; principles and application [Avaliação do Estado Nutricional das Plantas; princípios e aplicações]. Piracicaba (Brazil): Associação Brasileira para Pesquisa da Potassa e do Fosfato.
   Google Scholar
• Marschner H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. London (UK): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira A, Fageria NK. 2010. Liming influence on soil chemical properties, nutritional status and yield of alfalfa grown in acid soil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 34:1231–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira A, Moraes LAC, Fageria NK. 2015b. Variability on yield, nutritional status, soil fertility, and potassium-use efficiency by soybean cultivar in acidic soil. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 46:2490–2508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira A, Sfredo GJ, Moraes LAC, Fageria NK. 2014. Agronomic efficiency of two lime and phosphate fertilizer sources in Brazilian Cerrado soils cultivated with soybean. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 45:2319–2330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira A, Sfredo GJ, Moraes LAC, Fageria NK. 2015a. Lime and cattle manure in soil fertility and soybean seed yield cultivated in tropical soil. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 46:1157–1169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott AJ, Knott M. 1974. A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics. 30:507–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soratto RP, Crusciol CAC. 2008. Chemical soil attributes as affected by lime and phosphogypsum surface application in a recently established no-tillage system. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 32:675–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolley-Henry L, Raper Junior CD. 1986. Utilization of aluminum as a nitrogen source. Plant Physiol. 82:54–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TPS (Tecnologia de Produção de Soja). 2013. Technology of soybean yield in central region of Brazil. 2013 and 2014. Londrina (Brazil): Embrapa Soybean.
   Google Scholar
• White PJ, Broadley MR. 2003. Calcium in plants. Ann Botany. 92:487–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar