Assessment of AquaCrop model in the simulation of seed yield and biomass of Italian ryegrass

References

• Abraha MG, Savage MJ. 2008. The soil water balance of rainfed and irrigated oats, Italian ryegrass and rye using the CropSyst model. Irrigation Sci. 26:203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper, No. 56, FAO Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Araya A, Habtu S, Hadgu KM, Kebede A, Dejene T. 2010. Test of AquaCrop model in simulating biomass and yield of water deficient and irrigated barley (hordeum vulgare). Agr Water Manage. 97:1838–1846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blombäck K, Eckersten H. 1997. Simulated growth and nitrogen dynamics of a perennial ryegrass. Agr Forest Meteorol. 88:34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creighton P, Gilliland TJ, Delaby L, Kennedy E, Boland TM, O’donovan M. 2012. Effect of Lolium perenne sward density on productivity under simulated and actual cattle grazing. Grass Forage Sci. 67:526–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cukurova University. 2003. Analyses for soil properties. Adana, Turkey: Cukurova University, Department Laboratory of Soil Science.
   Google Scholar
• Cukurova University 2007. General Climate Characteristics of Cukurova Region. Available from http://adana.cukurova.edu.tr/cografya.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Duru M, Adam M, Cruz P, Martin G, Ansquer P, Ducourtieux C, Jouany C, Theau JP, Viegas J. 2009. Modelling above-ground herbage mass for a wide range of grassland community types. Ecol Model. 220:209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egnér HA, Riehm H, Domingo WR. 1960. Untersuchungen über die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. II. Chemische Extraktionsmethoden zur Phosphor-und Kaliumbestimmung. Kungliga Lantbrukshögskolans Annaler. 26:199–215.
   Google Scholar
• Farahani HJ, Gabriella I, Theib YO. 2009. Parameterization and evaluation of the Aqua Crop model for full and deficit irrigated cotton. Agron J. 101:469–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fessehazion MK, Annandale JG, Everson CS, Stirzaker RJ, Tesfamariam EH. 2014. Evaluating of soil water balance (SWB-sci) model for water and nitrogen interactions in pasture: example using annual ryegrass. Agr Water Manage. 146:238–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerts S, Raes D, Garcia M. 2010. Using AquaCrop to derive deficit irrigation schedules. Agr Water Manage. 98:213–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith SM. 2000. Changes in dry matter, carbohydrate and seed yield resulting from lodging in three temperate grass species. Ann Bot-London. 85:675–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng LK, Hsiao TC, Evett S, Howell T, Steduto P. 2009. Validating the FAO AquaCrop model for irrigated and water deficient field maize. Agron J. 101:488–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao TC, Heng L, Steduto P, Rojas-Lara B, Raes D, Fereres E. 2009. AquaCrop—the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: III. parameterization and testing for maize. Agron J. 101:448–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hydro-meteorological service of Serbia [internet]. Climatology. ; [ cited 2014]. Available from: http://www.hidmet.gov.rs.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal MA, Shen Y, Stricevic R, Pei H, Sun H, Amiri E, Penas A, Del Rio S. 2014. Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation. Agr Water Manage. 135:61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karunaratne AS, Azam-Ali SN, Izzi G, Steduto P. 2011. Calibration and validation of FAO-AquaCrop model for irrigated and water deficient bambara groundnut. Exp Agr. 47:509–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroes JG, Supit I. 2011. Impact analysis of drought, water excess and salinity on grass production in the Netherlands using historical and future climate data. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 144:370–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusvuran A. 2011. The effects of different nitrogen doses on herbage and seed yields of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum cv. caramba). Afr J Biotechnol. 10:12916–12924.
   Google Scholar
• Kusvuran A, Tansi V. 2011. The effects of different row spacing on herbage and seed yields of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum cv. caramba). Bulg J Agric Sci. 17:744–754.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarotto P, Calanca P, Fuhrer J. 2009. Dynamics of grass–clover mixtures—an analysis of the response to management with the productive GRASsland simulator (PROGRASS). Ecol Model. 220:703–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linker R, Ioslovich I, Sylaios G, Plauborg F, Battilani A. 2016. Optimal model-based deficit irrigation scheduling using AquaCrop: a simulation study with cotton, potato and tomato. Agric Water Manag. 163:236–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall DG, Bishop-Hurley GJ. 2003. A pasture growth model for use in a whole-farm dairy production model. Agr Syst. 76:1183–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkhabela MS, Bullock PR. 2012. Performance of the FAO Aqua Crop model for wheat grain yield and soil moisture simulation in Western Canada. Agr Water Manage. 110:16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raes D, Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E. 2009. AquaCrop—the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. main algorithms and software description. Agron J. 101:438–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedo M, Grub A, Rosset M, Fuhrer J. 1998. A pasture simulation model for dry matter production, and fluxes of carbon, nitrogen, water and energy. Ecol Model. 105:141–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romera AJ, Mccall DG, Lee JM, Agnusdei MG. 2009. Improving the McCall herbage growth model. New Zeal J Agr Res. 52:477–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simic A, Vuckovic S, Maletic R, Sokolovic S, Djordjevic N. 2009. Impact of seeding rate and interrow spacing on Italian ryegrass for seed in the first harvest year. Turk J Agric For. 33:425–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slewinski TL. 2012. Non-structural carbohydrate partitioning in grass stems: a target to increase yield stability, stress tolerance and biofuel production. J Exp Bot. 63:4647–4670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit HJ, Metzger MJ, Ewert F. 2008. Spatial distribution of grassland productivity and land use in Europe. Agr Syst. 98:208–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E, Raes D. 2012. Aquacrop parametrization, calibration and validation guide. Ed.. Crop yield response to water. Rome:FAO;72.
   Google Scholar
• Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Raes D, Fereres E. 2009. AquaCrop—the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. concepts and underlying principles. Agron J. 101:426–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stricevic R, Dzeletovic Z, Djurovic N, Cosic M. 2015. Application of the AquaCrop model to simulate the biomass of Miscanthus x giganteus under different nutrient supply conditions. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy. 7:1203–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornley JHM, Johnson IR. 1990. Canopy photosynthesis. In: Thornley, JHM, Johnson, IR, Eds.. plant and crop modelling—a mathematical approach to plant and crop physiology. Clarendon Press, Oxford; p. 669.
   Google Scholar
• Todorovic M, Albrizio R, Zivotic L, Abi Saab MT, Stöckle C, Steduto P. 2009. Assessment of AquaCrop, Cropsyst, and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. Agron J. 101:509–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkish state meteorological service. 2014. Meteorological district office of, record of climate data. Adana.
   Google Scholar
• Vaze J, Johnston WH, Teng J, Tuteja NK, Johnson I. 2009. Development and implementation of a generic pasture growth model (CLASS PGM). Environ Modell Softw. 24:107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan L, Zhang B, Kemp P, Li X. 2009. Modelling the abundance of three key plant species in New Zealand hill-pasture using a decision tree approach. Ecol Model. 220:1819–1825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott CJ. 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteoro. Soc. 63:1309–1313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar