309
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Geostatistical approach as a tool for estimation of field capacity and permanent wilting point in semi-arid terrestrial ecosystem

, , , &
Pages 1240-1253 | Received 09 Aug 2017, Accepted 22 Dec 2017, Published online: 20 Jan 2018

References

  • Adhikary SK, Muttil N, Yilmaz AG. 2017. Cokriging for enhanced spatial interpolation of rainfall in two Australian catchments. Hydrol Processes. 31:2143–2161.
  • Ahmed S, De Marsily G. 1987. Comparison of geostatistical methods for estimating transmission data on transsivity and specific capacity. Water Resour Res. 23:1717–1737.
  • Anderson S 2001. An evaluation of spatial interpolation methods on air temperature in Phoenix, AZ. accessed 2017 Apr 18. http://www.cobblestoneconcepts.com.
  • Bayramin İ, Kılıç Ş, Dengiz O, Başkan O, Tunçay T, Yıldırım A, Koç A, Öğütmen Ç. 2013. Radar görüntülerinin toprak etüt ve haritalama çalışmalarında kullanımı. Ankara: TUBITAK Projesi Sonuç Raporu; p. 110O729.
  • Bishop TFA, McBratney AB. 2001. A comparison of prediction methods for the creation of field-extent soil property maps. Geoderma. 103:149–160.
  • Blake GR, Hartge KH. 1986. Methods of soil analysis, Part I, Physical and mineralogical Methods. In: Bulk density and particle density. 2nd ed. Madison: ASA and SSSA Agronomy Monograph No 9; p. 363–381.
  • Bouyoucos GJ. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agron J. 43:435–438.
  • Driessen PM. 1970. Soil salinity and alkalinity in the great Konya Basin, Turkey. Agric Res Rep. 743:99. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.
  • Eldeiry A, Garcia LA. 2009. Comparison of regression kriging and cokriging techniques to estimate soil salinity using landsat images. J Irrig Drain Eng. 136:27–38.
  • Goovaerts P. 1997. Geostatistics in soil science: state of- the- art and perspectives. Geoderma. 89:1–45.
  • Goovaerts P. 2000. Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. J Hydrol. 228:113–129.
  • Hengl T, Heuvelink G, Stein A. 2004. A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression-kriging. Geoderma. 122:75–93.
  • Hengl TA. 2007. A pratical guide to geospatial mapping of environmental variables. Luxembourg: JRC, Scentific and Technical Research series, office for official Publications of European Communities; p. 143.
  • Iqbal J, Thomasson JA, Jenkins JN, Owens PR, Whisler FD. 2005. Spatial variability analysis of soil physical properties of alluvial soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 69:1338–1350.
  • Isaaks HE, Srivastava RM. 1989. An introduction to applied geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Jabro JD, Stevens WB, Evans RG, Iversen WM. 2010. Spatial variability and correlation of selected soil properties in the Ap horizon of a CRP grassland. Appl Eng Agric. 26:419–428.
  • Kalivas DP, Triantakonstantis DP, Kollias VJ. 2002. Spatial prediction of two soil properties using topographic information. Global Nest: Int J. 4:41–49.
  • Khosla R, Fleming K, Delgado JA, Shaver T, Westfall DG. 2002. Use of site-specific management zones to improve nitrogen management for precision agriculture. J Soil Water Conserv. 57:513–518.
  • Klute A. 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. In: Klute A, ed. methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Madison (WisconsIn:) SSSAJ; p. 635–662.
  • Kravchenko A, Bullock DG. 1999. A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties. Agron J. 91:393–400.
  • Lark RM. 2000. Estimating variograms of soil properties by the method of moments and maximum likelihood. Eur J Soil Sci. 51:717–728.
  • Liu D, Wang Z, Zhang B, Song K, Li X, Li J, Li F, Duan H. 2006. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon analysis of related factors in cropland of the black soil region, Northeast China. Agric Ecosystems Environ. 113:73–81.
  • Lloyd CD. 2005. Assessing the effect of integrating elevation data into the estimation of monthly precipitation in Great Britain. Hydrol J. 308:128–150.
  • Matheron G. 1969. Le krigeage universal. Vol 1. Cahiers du centre de morphologie mathematique. Fontainebleau: Ecole des Mines de Paris.
  • McBratney A, Odeh I, Bishop T, Dunbar M, Shatar T. 2000. An overview of pedometric techniques of use in soil survey. Geoderma. 97:293–327.
  • Meng Q, Borders M, Madden M. 2010. High resolution image fusion using regression kriging. Int J Remote Sens. 31:1857–1876.
  • Mesić KI. 2016. Comparison of ordinary and universal Kriging interpolation techniques on a depth variable (a case of linear spatial trend), case study of the Šandrovac Field. The Mining-Geology-Petroleum Engineering Bulletin; MGPB, p. 41–58.
  • Miháliková M, Başkan O, Dengiz O. 2015. Capability of different interpolation models and pedotransfer functions to estimate soil hydraulic properties in Büyükçay Watershed. Environ Earth Sci. 74:2425–2437.
  • Miháliková M, Matula S, Doležal F. 2014. Application of k-Nearest code to the improvement of class pedotransfer functions and countrywide Field Capacity and Wilting Point maps. Soil Water Res. 9:1–8.
  • Miháliková M, Özyazici MA, Dengiz O. 2016. Mapping soil water retention on agricultural lands in central and Eastern parts of the black sea region in Turkey. J Irrig Drain Eng. 142:05016008.
  • Minasny B, Hartemink AE. 2011. Predicting soil properties in the tropics. Earth Science Reviews. 106:52–62.
  • Mzuku M, Khosla R, Reich R, Inman D, Smith F, MacDonald L. 2005. Spatial variability of measured soil properties across site-specific management zones. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 69:1572–1579.
  • Odeh I, McBratney A, Chittleborough D. 1995. Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes: heterotopic cokriging and regression-kriging. Geoderma. 67:215–226.
  • Pachepsky YA, Rawls WJ. 2004. Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 512.
  • Pachepsky YA, Timlin DJ, Rawls WJ. 2001. Soil water retention as related to topographic variables. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 65:1787–1795.
  • Qingmin M, Zhijun L, Borders BE. 2013. Assessment of regression kriging for spatial interpolation- comparisons of seven GIS interpolation methods. Cartography and Cartogr Geogr Inf Sc. 40:28–39.
  • Richards LA 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Handbook No 60 p.109,
  • Robinson TP, Metternicht G. 2006. Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Comput Electron Agr. 50:97–108.
  • Soil Surveystaff. 2015. Illustrated Guide to Soil Taxonomy. Version 1.1. U.S. Department of Agriculture. National Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, Nebraska.
  • Sullivan DG, Shaw JN, Rickman D. 2005. IKONOS imagery to estimate surface soil property variability in two Alabama physiographies. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 69:1789–1798.
  • TİGEM. 1997. Altınova tarım işletmesi topraklarının detaylı toprak etüt ve haritalaması”, Tarım İşletmeleri Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, No: 23, 100 sayfa, Ankara (in Turkish).
  • Vergouwen L. 1981. Salt minerals and waters from soils in Konya and Kenya. PhD Thesis. Agricultural University of Wageningen, The Netherlands; p. 140.
  • Wackernagel H. 2003. Multivariate geostatistics. New York: Springer.
  • Webster R, Oliver M. 2001. Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Chichester: Statistics in Practice. John Wiley & Sons; p. 265.
  • Wösten JHM, Hoogland T, Massop H, De Vries F, Vroon HRJ, Wesseling JG. 2012. New soil physical schematization of Netherlands. Wageningen (The Netherlands): Alterra Report.
  • Wösten JHM, Pachepsky YA, Rawls WJ. 2001. Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. Hydrol J. 25:123–150.
  • WRB. 2014. World reference base for soil resources. international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. World Soil Resources Reports, no: 106, 203p.
  • Zhu Q, Lin HS. 2010. Comparing ordinary kriging and regression kriging for soil properties in contrasting landscapes. Pedosphere. 20:594–606.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.