The interactive effects of biochar and cow manure on rice growth and selected properties of salt-affected soil

References

• Abrishamkesh S, Gorji M, Asadi H, Bagheri-Marandi GH, Pourbabaee AA. 2015. Effects of rice husk biochar application on the properties of alkaline soil and lentil growth. Plant Soil Environ. 61(11):475–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acda CF, Crusciol CAC, Nascente AS, Mauad M, Garcia RA. 2017. Influence of potassium levels on root growth and nutrient uptake of upland rice cultivars. Revista Caatinga. 30:32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agegnehu G, Bass AM, Nelson PN, Muirhead B, Wright G, Bird MI. 2015. Biochar and biochar-compost as soil amendments: effects on peanut yield, soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical North Queensland, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 213(Supplement C):72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed MF, Haider MZ. 2014. Impact of salinity on rice production in the south-west region of Bangladesh. Environ Sci: Indian J. 9(4):135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar SS, Andersen MN, Liu F. 2015a. Residual effects of biochar on improving growth, physiology and yield of wheat under salt stress. Agric Water Manage. 158:61–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar SS, Andersen MN, Naveed M, Zahir ZA, Liu F. 2015b. Interactive effect of biochar and plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes on ameliorating salinity stress in maize. Funct Plant Biol. 42(8):770–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Wabel MI, Hussain Q, Usman ARA, Ahmad M, Abduljabbar A, Sallam AS, Ok YS. 2017. Impact of biochar properties on soil conditions and agricultural sustainability: A review. Land Degrad Dev. 2017;1–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2829.
   Google Scholar
• Amini S, Ghadiri H, Chen C, Marschner P. 2016. Salt-affected soils, reclamation, carbon dynamics, and biochar: a review. J Soils Sediments. 16(3):939–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar Z, Irshad M, Mahmood Q, Hafeez F, Bilal M. 2017. Nutrient uptake and growth of spinach as affected by cow manure co-composted with poplar leaf litter. Int J Recycling Org Waste Agric. 6(1):79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Arora S. 2017. Diagnostic properties and constraints of salt-affected soils. In: Arora S, Singh AK, Singh YP, editors. Bioremediation of salt affected soils: an Indian perspective. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Artiola JF, Rasmussen C, Freitas R. 2012. Effects of a biochar-amended alkaline soil on the growth of romaine lettuce and bermudagrass. Soil Sci. 177(9):561–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backer RGM, Saeed W, Seguin P, Smith DL. 2017. Root traits and nitrogen fertilizer recovery efficiency of corn grown in biochar-amended soil under greenhouse conditions. Plant Soil. 415(1):465–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman LA, Harpole WS. 2013. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy. 5(2):202–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan D, Preston N, Clayton H, Be TT 2002. An evaluation of rice-shrimp farming systems in the Mekong Delta. Report prepared under the World Bank, NACA, WWF and FAO consortium program on shrimp farming and the environment. Work in Progress for Public Discussion. Published by the Consortium. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Carter MR, Gregorich EG. 2008. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• CCAFS-SEA. 2016. Assessment Report: The drought and salinity intrusion in the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S. 2007. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Soil Research. 45(8):629–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng C-H, Lehmann J. 2009. Ageing of black carbon along a temperature gradient. Chemosphere. 75(8):1021–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai L, Tan F, Wu B, He M, Wang W, Tang X, Hu Q, Zhang M. 2015. Immobilization of phosphorus in cow manure during hydrothermal carbonization. J Environ Manage. 157(SupplementC):49–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ding Y, Liu Y, Liu S, Li Z, Tan X, Huang X, Zeng G, Zhou L, Zheng B. 2016. Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 36(2):36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Singh B, Singh BP. 2015. Effect of temperature on biochar priming effects and its stability in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 80(SupplementC):136–145.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2016. “El Niño” event in Viet Nam: agriculture, food security and livelihood needs assessment in response to drought and salt water intrusion (http://reliefweb.int/report/viet-nam/el-ni-o-event-viet-nam-agriculture-food-security-and-livelihood-needs-assessment).
   Google Scholar
• Gamage DNV, Mapa RB, Dharmakeerthi RS, Biswas A. 2016. Effect of rice-husk biochar on selected soil properties in tropical Alfisols. Soil Res. 54(3):302–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glæsner N, Donner E, Magid J, Rubæk GH, Zhang H, Lombi E. 2012. Characterization of leached phosphorus from soil, manure, and manure-amended soil by physical and chemical fractionation and diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT). Environ Sci Technol. 46(19):10564–10571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Wiedner K, Seelig S, Schmidt H-P GH. 2015. Biochar organic fertilizers from natural resources as substitute for mineral fertilizers. Agron Sustain Dev. 35(2):667–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajrasuliha S, Cassel DK, Rezainejad Y. 1991. Estimation of chloride ion concentration in saline soils from measurement of electrical conductivity of saturated soil extracts. Geoderma. 49(1):117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer EC, Forstreuter M, Rillig MC, Kohler J. 2015. Biochar increases arbuscular mycorrhizal plant growth enhancement and ameliorates salinity stress. Appl Soil Ecol. 96(SupplementC):114–121.
   Google Scholar
• Houben D, Evrard L, Sonnet P. 2013. Beneficial effects of biochar application to contaminated soils on the bioavailability of Cd, Pb and Zn and the biomass production of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Biomass Bioenergy. 57(Supplement C):196–204.
   Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Liang X, He M, Liu Y, Tian G, Shi J. 2016. Manure biochar influence upon soil properties, phosphorus distribution and phosphatase activities: A microcosm incubation study. Chemosphere. 142:128–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamara A, Kamara SH, Saimah KM. 2015. Effect of rice straw biochar on soil quality and the early growth and biomass yield of two rice varieties. Agric Sci. 6:798–806.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Kim KR, Yang JE, Ok YS, Owens G, Nehls T, Wessolek G, Kim KH. 2016. Effect of biochar on reclaimed tidal land soil properties and maize (Zea mays L.) response. Chemosphere. 142:153–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K. 2000. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects [Review]. Soil Biol Biochem. 32(11–12):1485–1498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashari MS, Liu Y, Li L, Pan W, Fu J, Pan G, Zheng J, Zheng J, Zhang X, Yu X. 2013. Effects of amendment of biochar-manure compost in conjunction with pyroligneous solution on soil quality and wheat yield of a salt-stressed cropland from Central China Great Plain. Field Crops Res. 144:113–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashari MS, Ye Y, Ji H, Li L, Kibue GW, Lu H, Zheng J, Pan G. 2015. Biochar–manure compost in conjunction with pyroligneous solution alleviated salt stress and improved leaf bioactivity of maize in a saline soil from central China: a 2-year field experiment. J Sci Food Agric. 95(6):1321–1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann J, Joseph S. 2009. Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S, editor. Biochar for environmental management.Dunstan House, London, EC1N 8XA, UK: Earthscan in the UK; p. 1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizao FJ, Petersen J, et al. 2006. Black Carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 70(5):1719–1730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang B, Wang CH, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Luizăo F, Wirick S, Skjemstad JO, Lehmann J. 2013. Oxidation is key for black carbon surface functionality and nutrient retention in amazon anthrosols. Br J Environ Clim Change. 3(1):9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Schulz H, Brandl S, Miehtke H, Huwe B, Glaser B. 2012. Short-term effect of biochar and compost on soil fertility and water status of a dystric cambisol in NE Germany under field conditions. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 175(5):698–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Xu A, Long B. 2011. Energy from combustion of rice straw: status and challenges to China. Energy and Power Eng. 3(3):325–331.
   Google Scholar
• Luu HM, Nguyen NH. 2006. Effect of decomposed rice straw at different times on rice yield. Omonrice 14. 14:58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ma X, Ambus Z, Wang S, Wang Y, Wang C 2013. Priming of soil carbon decomposition in two inner mongolia grassland soils following sheep dung addition: a study using 13c natural abundance approach. PLoS ONE. 8(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood A, Latif T, Arif Khan MA. 2009. Effect of salinity on growth, yield and yield components in basmati rice germplasm. Pak J Bot. 41(6):3035–3045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minh LQ 1996. Integrated soil and water management in acid sulphate soils: balancing agricultural production and environmental requirements in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam.” Doctor of Science Thesis, Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Munns R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25(2):239–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J, Riley JP. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta. 27:31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BT, Lehmann J. 2009. Black carbon decomposition under varying water regimes. Org Geochem. 40(8):846–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen BT, Lehmann J, Hockaday WC, Joseph S, Masiello CA. 2010. Temperature sensitivity of black carbon decomposition and oxidation. Environ Sci Technol. 44(9):3324–3331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HĐ, Nguyen KT, Bui TND. 2015. Evaluation of paddy land use in the Mekong river Delta. J Sci Dev. 13(8):1435–1441.
   Google Scholar
• Ott R, Longnecker M. 2011. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. 5th ed. Florence (KY): Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Pietikäinen J, Kiikkilä O, Fritze H. 2000. Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effect on the microbial community of the underlying humus. Oikos. 89(2):231–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman S, Matsumuro T, Miyake H, Takeoka Y. 2001. Effects of salinity stress on the seminal root tip ultrastructures of rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod Sci. 4(2):103–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy INBL, Kim B-K, Yoon I-S, Kim K-H, Kwon T-R. 2017. Salt tolerance in rice: focus on mechanisms and approaches. Rice Science. 24(3):123–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy P. 2006. World salinization with emphasis on Australia. J Exp Bot. 57(5):1017–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy P. 2010. Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils. Funct Plant Biol. 37(7):613–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saifullah DS, Naeem A, Rengel Z, Naidu R. 2017. Biochar application for the remediation of salt-affected soils: challenges and opportunities. Sci Total Environ. 625:320–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sappor DK, Osei BA, Ahmed MR. 2017. Reclaiming sodium affected soil: the potential of organic amendments. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 16(2):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Shereen A, Ansari R, Flowers TJ, Yeo AR, Ala SA. 2002. Rice cultivation in saline soils. In: Ahmad R, Malik KA, editors. Prospects for saline agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; p. 189–192.
   Google Scholar
• Silva I, Basílio JJN, Fernandes LA, Colen F, Sampaio RA, Frazão LA. 2017. Biochar from different residues on soil properties and common bean production. Scientia Agricola. 74:378–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas SC, Frye S, Gale N, Garmon M, Launchbury R, Machado N, Melamed S, Murray J, Petroff A, Winsborough C. 2013. Biochar mitigates negative effects of salt additions on two herbaceous plant species. J Environ Manage. 129:62–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran MT 2015. Vietnam soil resources. Asian soil partnership sonsultation workshop on sustainable management and protection of soil resources, Bangkok, 2015 May 13-15 http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/GSP/docs/asia_2015/Vietnam.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trupiano D, Cocozza C, Baronti S, Amendola C, Vaccari FP, Lustrato G, Di Lonardo S, Fantasma F, Tognetti R, Scippa GS. 2017. The effects of biochar and its combination with compost on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) growth, soil properties, and soil microbial activity and abundance. Int J Agron. 2017:12.
   Google Scholar
• United States Salinity Laboratory Staff. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook No. 60. Washington: US Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Wardle DA, Nilsson M-C, Zackrisson O. 2008. Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus. Science. 320(5876):629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Xu G, Shao HB. 2014. Furfural and its biochar improve the general properties of a saline soil. Solid Earth. 5(2):665–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G, Sun J, Shao H, Chang SX. 2014. Biochar had effects on phosphorus sorption and desorption in three soils with differing acidity. Ecol Eng. 62(SupplementC):54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng R, Chen Z, Cai C, Wang X, Huang Y, Xiao B, Sun G. 2013. Effect of biochars from rice husk, bran, and straw on heavy metal uptake by pot-grown wheat seedling in a historically contaminated soil. [Biochar; Heavy metal; Contaminated soil; Soil amendment; Wheat. BioResources. 8(4):5965-5982..
   Google Scholar