Fulvic acid in foliar spray is more effective than humic acid via soil in improving coffee seedlings growth

References

• Anjun SA, Wang L, Farooq M, Xue L, Ali S. 2011. Fulvic acid application improves the maize performance under well-watered and drought conditions. J Agron Crop Sci. 197:409–417. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00483.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asli S, Neumann PM. 2010. Rhizosphere humic acid interacts with root cell walls to reduce hydraulic conductivity and plant development. Plant Soil. 336:313–322. doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0483-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azcona I, Pascual I, Aguirreolea J, Fuentes M, García-Mina JM, Sáncez-Díaz M. 2011. Growth and development of pepper are affected by humic substances derived from composted sludge. J Plant Nut Soil Sci. 174:916–924. doi:10.1002/jpln.201000264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balesdent J, Chenu C, Balabane M. 2000. Relationship of soil organic matter dynamics to physical protection and tillage. Soil Till Res. 53:215–230. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00107-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boguta P, Sokołowska Z. 2016. Interactions of Zn (II) Ions with humic acids isolated from various types of soils: effect of pH, Zn concentrations and humic acids chemical properties. PLoS One. 11:e0153626. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown PH, Shelp BJ. 1997. Boron mobility in plants. Plant Soil. 193:85–101. doi:10.1023/A:1004211925160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW. 2014. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil. 383:3–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canellas LP, Olivares FL. 2014. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 1:3. doi:10.1186/2196-5641-1-3
   Google Scholar
• Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Aguiara NO, Jones DL, Nebbioso A, Mazzei P, Piccolo A. 2015. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic. 30:15–27. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013.
   Google Scholar
• Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Okorokova-Facanha AL, Facanha AR. 2002. Humic acids isolated from earthworm compost enhance root elongation, lateral root emergence, and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity in maize roots. Plant Physiol. 130:1951–1957. doi:10.1104/pp.007088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmo DLD, Silva CA, Lima JM, Pinheiro GL. 2016. Electrical conductivity and chemical composition of soil solution: comparison of solution samplers in tropical soils. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 40(40):e0140795. doi:10.1590/18069657rbcs20140795.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, De Nobili M, Aviad T. 2004. Stimulatory effects of humic substances on plant growth. In: Magdoff F, Weil RR, editors. Soil organic matter in sustainable agriculture. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; p. 103–131.
   Google Scholar
• Chotzen R, Polubesova T, Chefetz Y, Mishael G. 2016. Adsorption of soil-derived humic acid by seven clay minerals: a systematic study. Clays Clay Miner. 64:628–638. doi:10.1346/CCMN.2016.064027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemente JM, Martinez HEP, Pedrosa AW, Neves YP, Cecon PR, Jifon JL. 2018. Boron, copper, and zinc affect the productivity, cup quality, and chemical compounds in coffee beans. J Food Quality. 2018:1–14. doi:10.1155/2018/7960231.
   Google Scholar
• Fageria NK, Baligar VC. 2008. Ameliorating soil acidity of tropical Oxisols by liming for sustainable crop production. Adv Agron. 99:345–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández V, Sotiropoulos T, Brown PH. 2013. Foliar fertilization: scientific principles and field practices. Paris: International Fertilizer Industry Association.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Mina JM, Antolin MC, Sanchez-Diaz M. 2004. Metal-humic complexes and plant micronutrient uptake: a study based on different plant species cultivated in diverse soil types. Plant Soil. 258:57–68. doi:10.1023/B:PLSO.0000016509.56780.40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossnickle SC. 2004. Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forest. 30:273–294. doi:10.1007/s11056-004-8303-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern M, Bar-Tal A, Ofek M, Minz D, Muller T, Yermiyahu U. 2015. The use of biostimulants for enhancing nutrient uptake. Adv in Agron. 130:141–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartz TK, Bottoms TG. 2010. Humic substances generally ineffective in improving vegetable crop nutrient uptake or productivity. HortScience. 45:906–910. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.45.6.906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jindo K, Soares TS, Peres LEP, Azevedo IG, Aguiar NO, Mazzei P, Spaccini R, Piccolo A, Olivares FL, Canellas LP. 2016. Phosphorus speciation and high-affinity transporters are influenced by humic substances. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 179:206–214. doi:10.1002/jpln.201500228.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya M, Atak M, Khawar KM, Çiftiçi CY, Öskan S. 2005. Effect of pre-sowing seed treatment with zinc and foliar spray of humic acids on yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Int J Agric Biol. 7:875–878.
   Google Scholar
• Keren R, Communar G. 2009. Boron transport in soils as affected by dissolved organic matter in treated sewage effluent. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 73:1988–1994. doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaled H, Fawy HA. 2011. Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil Wat Res. 6:21–29. doi:10.17221/4/2010-SWR.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemarchand E, Schott J, Gaillardet J. 2005. Boron isotopic fractionation related to boron sorption on humic acid and the structure of surface complexes formed. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 69:3519–3533. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2005.02.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes AS, Guilherme LRG. 2016. A career perspective on soil management in the cerrado region of Brazil. Adv Agron. 137:1–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschner P, Rengel Z. 2012. Nutrient availability in soils. In: Marchner P, editor. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; p. 315–330.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez HEP, Poltronieri Y, Farah A, Perrone D. 2013. Zinc supplementation, production and quality of coffee beans. Ceres. 60:293–299. doi:10.1590/S0034-737X2013000200020.
   Google Scholar
• Mokany K, Raison RJ, Prokushkin AS. 2006. Critical analysis of root: shootratio in terrestrial biomass. Global Change Biol. 12:84–96. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001043.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi P, Pasari B, Fayyaz F. 2017. The effects of fulvic acid application on seed and oil yield of safflower cultivars. J Central Europ Agric. 18:584–597. doi:10.5513/JCEA01/18.3.1933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A, Vianello A. 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biol Biochem. 34:1527–1536. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00174-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novais RF, Neves JCL, Barros NF. 1991. Ensaio em ambiente controlado [Experiments in controlled environment]. In: Oliveira AJ, editor. Métodos de pesquisa em fertilidade do solo [Search methods in soil fertility]. Brasilia: Embrapa-SEA; p. 189–253.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez PA, Pimentel A, Almonte I, Sotomayor-Ramírez D, Martínez N, Pérez A, Céspedes CM. 2011. Soil fertility evaluation of coffee (Coffea Spp.) production systems and management recommendations for the Barahona Province, Dominican Republic. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 11:127–140. doi:10.4067/S0718-95162011000100010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GV, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, et al. 2015. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version [accessed 2018 Jun 20]: 285p. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
   Google Scholar
• Olaetxea M, Hita D, Garcia CA, Fuentes M, Baigorri R, Mora V, Garnica M, Urrutia O, Erro J, Zamarreño AM, et al. 2017. Hypothetical framework integrating the main mechanisms involved in the promoting action of rhizospheric humic substances on plant root- and shoot-growth. Appl Soil Ecol. 123:521–537. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmgren MG. 2001. Plant plasma membrane H+-ATPases: powerhouses for nutrient uptake. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 52:817–845. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose T, Patti AF, Little KR, Brown AL, Jackson WR, Cavagnaro TR. 2014. A meta-analysis and review of plant growth response to humic substances; practical implications for agriculture. Adv Agron. 124:37–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauvé S, Hendershot W, Allen HE. 2000. Solid-solution partitioning of metals in contaminated soils: dependence on pH, total metal burden, and organic matter. Environ Sci Technol. 34:1125–1131. doi:10.1021/es003515z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson FJ. 1994. Humus chemistry. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Suh HY, Yoo KS, Suh SG. 2014. Effect of foliar application of fulvic acid on plant growth and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Hort Environ Biotechnol. 55:455–461. doi:10.1007/s13580-014-0004-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift RS. 1996. Organic matter characterization. In: Sparks DL, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America; p. 1018–1020.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira PC, Donagemma GK, Fontana A, Teixeira WG. 2017. Manual de métodos de análise de solo [Manual of soil analysis methods]. 3rd ed. Brasília: Embrapa; p. 573 p.
   Google Scholar
• Wang K, Xing B. 2004. Structural and sorption characteristics of adsorbed humic acid on clay minerals. J Environ Qual. 34:342–349. doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Michel FM, Choi Y, Eng PJ, Levard C, Siebner H, Gu B, Bargar JR, Brown GE. 2016. Pb, Cu, and Zn distributions at humic acid-coated metal-oxide surfaces. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 188:407–423. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2016.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu D, Peak D. 2007. Adsorption of boric acid on pure and humic acid coated am-Al(OH)3: A boron K-edge XANES study. Environ Sci Technol. 41:903–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zancani M, Bertolini A, Petrussa E, Krajnáková J, Piccolo A, Spaccini R, Vianello A. 2011. Fulvic acid affects proliferation and maturation phases in Abies cephalonica embryogenic cells. J Plant Phys. 168:1226–1233. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2011.01.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar