Soil quality index for paddy fields based on standard scoring functions and weight allocation method

References

• Andrews SS, Karlen DL, Mitchell JP. 2002. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agri Ecosyst Environ. 90:25–45. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00174-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan N, Rai K. 2004. Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process. New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Birkeland PW. 1999. Soil and Geomorphology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blacke GR, Hartge KH. 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd. Agronomy; Vol. 9, p. 363–382.
   Google Scholar
• Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS. 1982. Nitrogen total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors. Methods of soil analysis, part II: chemical and microbiological properties. Madison (WI): ASA; p. 595–625.
   Google Scholar
• Bunting ES 1981. Assessments of the effects on yield of variations in climate and soil characteristics for twenty crop species. Bogor (Indonesia): Centre for Soil Research. UNDP/FAO, AGOF/INS/78/006 Technical Note, No: 12.
   Google Scholar
• De Datta SK. 1981. Principles and practices of rice production. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dengiz O. 2010. Morphology, physico-chemical properties and classification of soils on terraces of the Tigris River in the South-East Anatolia Region of Turkey. Tarim Bilimleri Derg. 16(3):205–212. doi:10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengiz O. 2013. Land suitability assessment for rice cultivation based on GIS modeling. Turkish J Agric For. 37:326–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengiz O, Özyazıcı MA, Sağlam M. 2015. Multi-criteria assessment and geostatistical approach for determination of rice growing suitability sites in Gokirmak Catchment. Paddy Water Envirn. 13:1–10. doi:10.1007/s10333-013-0400-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DMI. 2017. Turkish state meteorological service. Turkey. Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Doran JW, Parkin TB. 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA, editors. Defining soil quality for sustainable environment. Madison (WI): SSSA and ASA; p. 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Doran JW, Jones AJ. 1996. Methods for assessing soil quality. Madison (Wisconsin, USA): Soil Science Society of America Special Publication, No: 49. Soil Science Society of America, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 1983. Guidelines. Land Evaluation for Rainfed Agriculture. Rome: FAO Soils Bulletin No. 52.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 1985. Guidelines. Land Evaluation for Irrigated Agriculture. Rome: FAO Soils Bulletin No. 55.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes JC, Gamero CA, Rodrigues JGL, Mirás-Avalos JM. 2011. Determination of the quality index of a Paleudult under sunflower culture and different management systems. Soil Tillage Res. 112:167–174. doi:10.1016/j.still.2011.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gençtan T 2009. Problems of rice production in Turkey I. National Rice Symposium Tekirdağ, Turkey. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Horuz A, Dengiz O. 2018. The relationships between some physico-chemical properties and nutrient element content of paddy raised on alluvial land in Terme region. Anadolu J Agr Sci. 33(1):58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kacar B. 2016. Physical and chemical soil analysis. Turkish: Nobel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlen DL, Andrews SS, Doran JW. 2001. Soil quality: current concepts and applications. Adv Agron. 74:1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klute A. 1986. Water retention. Laboratory methods. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy. Vol. 9.  ASS-SSA, Madison. p. 635–662.
   Google Scholar
• Landon JR. 1991. Booker tropical soil manual: A handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. Essex (UK): Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Larson WE, Pierce FJ. 1994. The dynamics of soil quality as a measure of sustainable management. In: Doran JW, editor. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. Soil science society of America Special Publication No. 35. Madison (Wisconsin, USA): Soil Science Society of America, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Li P, Zhang T, Wang X, Yu D. 2013. Development of biological soil quality indicator system for subtropical China. Soil Tillage Res. 126:112–118. doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebig MA, Varvel GE, Doran JW. 2001. A simple performance-based index for assessing multiple agroecosystem functions. Agron J. 93:313–318. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.932313x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima ACR, L. Brussaard MR, Totola W, Hoogmoed B, and De Goede RGM. 2013. A functional evaluation of three indicator sets for assessing soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol. 64:194–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Zhou W, Shen J, Li S, Ai C. 2014. Soil quality assessment of yellow clayey paddy soils with different productivity. Biol Fert Soils. 50:537. doi:10.1007/s00374-013-0864-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzaioli R, D’Ascoli R, De Pascale RA, Rutigliano FA. 2010. Soil quality in a Mediterranean area of southern Italy as related to different land use types. Appl Soil Ecol. 44:205–212. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moebius-Clune BN, Idowu OJ, Schindelbeck RR, Van Es HM, Wolfe DW, Abawi GS, Gugino BK. 2011. Developing standard protocols for soil quality monitoring and assessment. In: Bationo A, Waswa B, Okeyo JM, Maina F, editors. Innovations as key to the green revolution in Africa: exploring the scientific facts. Springer, Netherlands, p. 833–842.
   Google Scholar
• Mongkolsawat C, Thirangoon P, Kuptawutinan P. 2002. A physical evaluation of land suitability for rice: a methodological study using GIS. Khon Kaen (Thailand): Computer Centre, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Montanarella L, Lobos Alva I. 2015. Putting soils on the agenda: the three Rio Conventions and the post-2015 development agenda. Curr Opin in Envi Sust. 15:41–48. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulla DJ, McBratney AB. 2000. Soil spatial variability. In: Sumner ME, editor. Handbook of soil science. Boca Raton (FL): CRS Press; p. 321–352.
   Google Scholar
• Nath JA, Charyya TB, Ray SK, Deka J, Das A, Devi H. 2016. Assessment of rice farming management practices based on soil organic carbon pool analysis. Trop Ecol. 57:607–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan H 2004. The effect of zinc application on the concentration of zinc, phosphorus and phytic acid in grain in some rice varieties. PhD thesis. Turkish: Ankara University Faculty of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Özyazıcı MA, Dengiz O, Sağlam M. 2013. Evaluation of potential nutritional problems and fertility status of the alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L.) grown soils of Artvin province. ACU J For Fac. 14:225–238.
   Google Scholar
• Özşahin E. 2016. Land suitability assessment for rice cultivation using GIS: hayrabolu stream basin (Thrace Peninsula) case. Tarim Bilimleri Der. 22:295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page LA, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Methods. 2 nd ed. Madison (Wisconsin, USA): Soil Science Society of America, Inc.; p. 539–579.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterbaan RJ, Nijeland HJ. 1994. Determining the saturated hydraulic conductivity. In: Ritzema HP, editor editor-in-chief. Drainage Principles and Applications. The Nederland: ILRI Publication 16; p. 1125.
   Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Darilek JL, Huang B, Zhao Y, Sun W, Gu Z. 2009. Evaluating soil quality indices in an agricultural region of Jiangsu Province, China. Geoderma. 149:325–334. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavipour T, Farrokh AR. 2014. Measurement of vertical water percolation through different soil textures of paddy field during rice growth season. Int J Adv Biol Biom Res. 2:1379–1388.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei-Moghaddam K, Karami E. 2008. A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP. Environ Dev Sustain. 10:407–426. doi:10.1007/s10668-006-9072-1.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty T. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York (USA): McGraw-Hill; p. 287.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty T. 1993. The analytic hierarchy process: a 1993 overview. Cent Eur J Oper Res Econ. 2:119–137.
   Google Scholar
• Şener S, Şener E, Nas B, Karagüzel R. 2010. Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: A case study in the Lake Beyşehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Manage. 30:2037–2046. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty T, Vargas L. 2001. Methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Saglam M, Dengiz O, Saygın F. 2015. Assessment of horizontal and vertical variability of soil quality using multivariate statistics and geostatistical methods. Communi Soil Sci Plan. 46:1677–1697. doi:10.1080/00103624.2015.1045596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer İ, Dengiz O. 2014. Application of multi-criteria decision making approach for rice land suitability analysis in Turkey. Turk J Agric For. 38:926–934. doi:10.3906/tar-1405-85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 1992. Procedures for collecting soil samples and methods of analysis for soil survey. Soil Survey Invest. Washington D.C. USA: Rep. I. U.S. Gov. Print. Office.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 1993. Soil Survey Manuel. USDA Handbook. No: 18, Washington D.C: US Government Printing Office, NRCS-Soil Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 1996. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42 Version 3.0. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service National Soil Survey Center.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil Taxonomy. A Basic of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting soil Survey. USDA Handbook No: 436, Washington D.C. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sys C, Van Ranst E, Debaveye IJ, Beernaert F. 1993. Land evaluation. Part III: Crop Requirements. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Agricultural publication-No. 7, Brussels-Belgium, 199
   Google Scholar
• Van Wambeke AR. 2000. The Newhall simulation model for estimating soil moisture and temperature regimes. Ithaca (NY): Department of Crop and Soil Sciences. Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Wali E, Datta A, Shrestha RP, Shrestharn S. 2016. Development of a land suitability model for saffron (Crocus sativus L.) cultivation in Khost Province of Afghanistan using GIS and AHP techniques. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 62:921–934. doi:10.1080/03650340.2015.1101519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber GB, Gobat JM. 2006. Identification of faces models in alluvial soil formation: the Case of a Swiss Alpine Floodplain. Geomorphology. 74:181–195. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienhold BJ, Andrews SS, Karlen DL. 2004. Soil quality: a review of the science and experiences in the USA. Environ Geochem Hlth. 26:89–95. doi:10.1023/B:EGAH.0000039571.59640.3c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding LP, Bouma J, Goss DW. 1994. Impact of spatial variability on interpretive modeling. In: Bryant RB, Arnold RW, editors. Quantitative modeling of soil forming processes (Vol. 39). Madison: SSSA Special Publication; p. 65–75.
   Google Scholar