Forage quality and productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as influenced by cutting management under staggered sowing in North-West India

References

• AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th. Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Bhilare RL, Joshi YP. 2007. Productivity and quality of oats (Avena sativa L.) in relation to cutting management and nitrogen level. Indian J Agron. 22:247–250.
   Google Scholar
• Bishnoi UR, Hughes JL. 1979. Agronomic performance and protein content of fall-planted triticale, wheat and rye. Agron J. 71:359–360. doi:10.2134/agronj1979.00021962007100020032x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannell R, Jobson HT. 1968. The relationship between yield and digestibility in spring varieties of barley, oats and wheat after ear emergence. J Agric Sci. 71(337). doi:10.1017/S0021859600014842.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland LO, McDonald MB. 1995. Principles of seed science and technology. 3rd eds. 1–16. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dar NA, Singh KN, Ahmad L, Sofi JA, Bhat ME, Kotru R. 2014. Influence of dates of sowing, cultivars and different fertility levels on fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) under temperate conditions of Kashmir valley (India). Range Manage Agrofor. 35:51–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon BS, Uppal RS. 2019. Influence of cutting management on photosynthetic parameters, heat use efficiency and productivity of barley (Hordium vulgare L.) under variable sowing dates. J Agrometeorol. 21(1):51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dost M, Hussain A, Khan S, Bhatti MB. 1994. Green forage yield, dry matter yield and chemical composition of oat with advances in maturity. Pak J Sci Ind Res. 37:198–200.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles HA, Lewis TD, Holland R, Haslemort RM. 1979. Quality and quantity of forage from winter oats in Manawatu. NZ J Exp Agric. 7:337–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain A, Khan S, Mohammad D, Bhatti MB, Mufti MU. 1995. Yield and quality of fodder oat (Avena sativa) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) at various stages of harvesting. Indian J Agric Sci. 65:849–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur G 2007. Effect of row spacing and time of cutting for forage on productivity of barley varieties/genotype in dual purpose production system. M.Sc. Thesis Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur G, Singh A, Aulakh CS, Gill JS. 2013. Variation in forage yield and quality trait of dual purpose barley under different agronomic practices. Forage Res. 39(1):42–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kharub AS, Verma RPS, Kumar D, Kumar V, Selva K, Sharma I. 2013. Dual purpose barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in India: performance and potential. J Wheat Res. 5:55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Malik P, Midha LK, Arya S, Joshi UN. 2015. Effect of cutting and fertility levels on quality of oat. Forage Res. 40:257–258.
   Google Scholar
• Marten GC, Buxton DR, Barnes RF. 1988. Feeding value (forage quality). In Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement. Monograph No. 29. Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI. p. 463–491
   Google Scholar
• Mayer JH, Kleir WC, Jones LG, Hill JL. 1957. The influence of stage of maturity on feeding value of oat hay. J Anim Sci. 16:623.
   Google Scholar
• Midha LK, Panwar KS, Sharma SK. 1999. Effect of cutting frequency and time of nitrogen application on yield and quality of oats (Avena sativa L.). Forage Res. 25:99–102.
   Google Scholar
• [PAU] Punjap Agricultural University. 2017. Package of practices for rabi crops of Punjab. Ludhiana (Punjab): Punjab Agricultural University; p. 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Przulj N, Momcilovic V. 2001. Genetic variation for dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and translocation in two-rowed spring barley I. Dry matter translocation. Eur J Agron. 15:241–254. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00109-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra BN, Kumar S. 2002. Barley: text book of field crop production. In: Prashad R, editor. Directorate of Information and Publication of Agricultural. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research; p. 228.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid A, Khan RU, Marwal SK, Ali Z. 2010. Response of barley to sowing date and fertilizer application under rainfed condition. World J Agric Sci. 6:480–485.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson MA, Wedin WF. 1989. Phonological stage and herbage duality relationship in temperate grasses and legumes. Agron J. 81:864–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 2017. Version 9.4. Inc Cary (NC, USA.): SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Bhunia SR, Yadava DK. 2001. Response of oat (Avena sativa L.) to cutting management, method of sowing and nitrogen. Forage Res. 27:167–170.
   Google Scholar
• Sidhu MS, Singh A, Sharma BD. 1997. Cutting management and nitrogen requirement of oats (Avena sativa L.) for seed production. J Res Punjab Agric Univ. 34:379–383.
   Google Scholar
• Singh D, Singh DR, Nepalia V, Kumari A. 2012. Performance of dual purpose barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties for green fodder and subsequent productivity under varying seed rate and fertility management. Forage Res. 38:133–137.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan JG, Judd PA, Bellamy D 2006. The oxford book of health foods. p. 37. http://books.google.co.in/books.
   Google Scholar
• Verma RPS, Khrub AS, Sharma RK, Singh R, Mishra B. 2007. Jau anusandhan– paramparik se vayasayik upyog ki aur Directorate of Wheat Research. Karnal. Res Bull. 23:36.
   Google Scholar
• Verma SS, Singh V, Joshi YP. 1997. A short note on the seed production of wheat (VL 616) and oat (UPO-94) under different Cutting management. Forage Res. 22: 295-297
   Google Scholar
• Yadav RK, Kurchamia SP, Tiwari JP. 1995. Herbicide and fertilizer capability under normal and late sowing of wheat at different levels of nitrogen. Indian J Agric Sci. 65:265–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar