The impact of high plant density on dry matter remobilization and stalk lodging in maize genotypes with a different stay-green degree

References

• Abedon BG, Darrah LL, Tracy WF. 1999. Developmental changes associated with divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance in the MoSCSSS maize synthetic. Crop Sci. 39:108–114. doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900010017x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelana B, Milbourn G. 1972. The growth of maize. II. Dry-matter partition in three maize hybrids. J Agric Sci. 78:73–78. doi:10.1017/S0021859600087712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison J, Watson D. 1966. The production and distribution of dry matter in maize after flowering. Ann Bot. 30:365–381. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An Y, Gao Y, Ma Y. 2018. Growth performance and weed control effect in response to nitrogen supply for switchgrass after establishment in the semiarid environment. Field Crops Res. 221:175–181. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson E. 1988. Tillage and N fertilization effects on maize root growth and root: shoot ratio. Plant Soil. 108:245–251. doi:10.1007/BF02375655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonietta M, Fanello DD, Acciaresi H, Guiamet JJ. 2014. Senescence and yield responses to plant density in stay green and earlier-senescing maize hybrids from Argentina. Field Crops Res. 155:111–119. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appenzeller L, Doblin M, Barreiro R, Wang H, Niu X, Kollipara K, Carrigan L, Tomes D, Chapman M, Dhugga KS. 2004. Cellulose synthesis in maize: isolation and expression analysis of the cellulose synthase (CesA) gene family. Cellulose. 11:287–299. doi:10.1023/B:CELL.0000046417.84715.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belícuas PR, Aguiar AM, Bento D, Câmara TMM, De Souza Junior CL. 2014. Inheritance of the stay-green trait in tropical maize. Euphytica. 198:163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry P, Sterling M, Spink J, Baker C, Sylvester-Bradley R, Mooney S, Tams A, Ennos A. 2004. Understanding and reducing lodging in cereals. Adv Agron. 84:215–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomsma CR, Santini JB, Tollenaar M, Vyn TJ. 2009. Maize morphophysiological responses to intense crowding and low nitrogen availability: an analysis and review. Agron J. 101:1426–1452. doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrell AK, Mullet JE, George-Jaeggli B, Van Oosterom EJ, Hammer GL, Klein PE, Jordan DR. 2014. Drought adaptation of stay-green sorghum is associated with canopy development, leaf anatomy, root growth, and water uptake. J Exp Bot. 65:6251–6263. doi:10.1093/jxb/eru232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombi T, Kirchgessner N, Le Marié CA, York LM, Lynch JP, Hund A. 2015. Next generation shovelomics: set up a tent and REST. Plant Soil. 388:1–20. doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2379-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook M, Ennos A. 1994. Stem and root characteristics associated with lodging resistance in four winter wheat cultivars. J Agric Sci. 123:167–174. doi:10.1017/S0021859600068428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Z, Chen X, Miao Y, Zhang F, Sun Q, Schroder J, Zhang H, Li J, Shi L, Xu J. 2008. On-farm evaluation of the improved soil N min–based nitrogen management for summer maize in North China plain. Agron J. 100:517–525. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Andrea K, Otegui ME, Cirilo AG. 2008. Kernel number determination differs among maize hybrids in response to nitrogen. Field Crops Res. 105:228–239. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daynard T, Tanner J, Hume D. 1969. Contribution of stalk soluble carbohydrates to grain yield in corn (Zea mays L.) 1. Crop Sci. 9:831–834. doi:10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900060050x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Vega A, Cantore M, Sposaro M, Trápani N, Pereira ML, Hall A. 2011. Canopy stay-green and yield in non-stressed sunflower. Field Crops Res. 121:175–185. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding SY, Zhao S, Zeng Y. 2014. Size, shape, and arrangement of native cellulose fibrils in maize cell walls. Cellulose. 21:863–871. doi:10.1007/s10570-013-0147-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dordas C. 2012. Variation in dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in barley as affected by fertilization, cultivar, and source–sink relations. Eur J Agron. 37:31–42. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2011.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvick DN. 2005. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv Agron. 86:83–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennos A, Crook M, Grimshaw C. 1993. The anchorage mechanics of maize, Zea mays. J Exp Bot. 44:147–153. doi:10.1093/jxb/44.1.147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esechie H, Rodriguez V, Al-Asmi H. 2004. Comparison of local and exotic maize varieties for stalk lodging components in a desert climate. Eur J Agron. 21:21–30. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00060-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint-Garcia SA, Jampatong C, Darrah LL, Mcmullen MD. 2003. Quantitative trait locus analysis of stalk strength in four maize populations. Crop Sci. 43:13–22. doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromme DD, Spivey TA, Grichar WJ. 2019. Agronomic response of Corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids to plant populations. Int J Agron. 2019:1–8. doi:10.1155/2019/3589768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallais A, Coque M, Quilléré I, Prioul JL, Hirel B. 2006. Modelling postsilking nitrogen fluxes in maize (Zea mays) using 15N‐labelling field experiments. New Phytol. 172:696–707. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01890.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou L, Zhao M, Huang J, Zhang B, Li T, Sun R. 2008. Bending mechanical properties of stalk and lodging-resistance of maize (Zea mays L.). Zuo Wu Xue Bao. 34:653. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Guingo E, Hébert Y. 1997. Relationships between mechanical resistance of the maize root system and root morphology and their genotypic and environmental variation [Zea mays]. Maydica (Italy). 42:265–274.
   Google Scholar
• He P, Zhou W, Jin J. 2004. Carbon and nitrogen metabolism related to grain formation in two different senescent types of maize. J Plant Nutr. 27:295–311. doi:10.1081/PLN-120027655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert Y, Guingo E, Loudet O. 2001. The response of root/shoot partitioning and root morphology to light reduction in maize genotypes. Crop Sci. 41:363–371. doi:10.2135/cropsci2001.412363x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiyane R, Hiyane S, Tang AC, Boyer JS. 2010. Sucrose feeding reverses shade-induced kernel losses in maize. Ann Bot. 106:395–403. doi:10.1093/aob/mcq132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hondroyianni E, Papakosta D, Gagianas A, Tsatsarelis K. 2000. Corn stalk traits related to lodging resistance in two soils of differing salinity. Maydica. 45:125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume D, Campbell D. 1972. Accumulation and translocation of soluble solids in corn stalks. Can J Plant Sci. 52:363–368. doi:10.4141/cjps72-056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jampatong S, Darrah L, Krause G, Barry B. 2000. Effect of one-and two-eared selection on stalk strength and other characters in maize. Crop Sci. 40:605–611. doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.403605x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaack K, Schwarz KU, Brander PE. 2003. Variation in morphology, anatomy and chemistry of stems of Miscanthus genotypes differing in mechanical properties. Ind Crops Prod. 17:131–142. doi:10.1016/S0926-6690(02)00093-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamara A, Kling J, Menkir A, Ibikunle O. 2003. Association of vertical root‐pulling resistance with root lodging and grain yield in selected S1 maize lines derived from a tropical low‐nitrogen population. J Agron Crop Sci. 189:129–135. doi:10.1046/j.1439-037X.2003.00023.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamran M, Cui W, Ahmad I, Meng X, Zhang X, Su W, Chen J, Ahmad S, Fahad S, Han Q. 2018. Effect of paclobutrazol, a potential growth regulator on stalk mechanical strength, lignin accumulation and its relation with lodging resistance of maize. Plant Growth Regul. 84:317–332. doi:10.1007/s10725-017-0342-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Xie R, Wang K, Ming B, Guo Y, Zhang G, Li S. 2015. Variations in maize dry matter, harvest index, and grain yield with plant density. Agron J. 107:829–834. doi:10.2134/agronj14.0522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Liu LN, Jiang CD, Liu YJ, Shi L. 2014. Effects of mutual shading on the regulation of photosynthesis in field-grown sorghum. J Photochem Photobiol B, Biol. 137:31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.04.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebhardt W, Stangel P, Murdock T. 1968. A mechanism for premature Parenchyma breakdown in Corn (Zea mays L.) 1. Agron J. 60:496–499. doi:10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000050016x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Song F, Liu F, Zhu X, Xu H. 2012. Effect of planting density on root lodging resistance and its relationship to nodal root growth characteristics in maize (Zea mays L.). J Agric Sci. 4:182.
   Google Scholar
• Ma D, Xie R, Liu X, Niu X, Hou P, Wang K, Lu Y, Li S. 2014. Lodging-related stalk characteristics of maize varieties in China since the 1950s. Crop Sci. 54:2805–2814. doi:10.2135/cropsci2014.04.0301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchiori PE, Machado EC, Ribeiro RV. 2014. Photosynthetic limitations imposed by self-shading in field-grown sugarcane varieties. Field Crops Res. 155:30–37. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M, Russell W. 1984a. Correlated responses of yield and other agronomic traits to recurrent selection for stalk quality in a maize synthetic. Crop Sci. 24:746–750. doi:10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400040028x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M, Russell W. 1984b. Response of a maize synthetic to recurrent selection for stalk quality. Crop Sci. 24:331–337. doi:10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400020029x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoni A, Ercoli L, Mariotti M, Arduini I. 2007. Post-anthesis accumulation and remobilization of dry matter, nitrogen and phosphorus in durum wheat as affected by soil type. Eur J Agron. 26:179–186. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2006.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning P, Li S, Yu P, Zhang Y, Li C. 2013. Post-silking accumulation and partitioning of dry matter, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in maize varieties differing in leaf longevity. Field Crops Res. 144:19–27. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norberg O, Mason S, Lowry S. 1988. Ethephon influence on harvestable yield, grain quality, and lodging of corn. Agron J. 80:768–772. doi:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000050015x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novacek M, Mason S, Galusha T, Yaseen M. 2013. Twin rows minimally impact irrigated maize yield, morphology, and lodging. Agron J. 105:268–276. doi:10.2134/agronj2012.0301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen JF, Vogel KP, Funnell DL. 2005. Impact of reduced lignin on plant fitness. Crop Sci. 45:812–819. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellerin S, Trendel R, Duparque A. 1990. Relationship between morphological characteristics and lodging susceptibility of maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomie. 10:439–446. doi:10.1051/agro:19900601.
   Google Scholar
• Peng D, Chen X, Yin Y, Lu K, Yang W, Tang Y, Wang Z. 2014. Lodging resistance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): lignin accumulation and its related enzymes activities due to the application of paclobutrazol or gibberellin acid. Field Crops Res. 157:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinthus MJ. 1967. Spread of the root system as indicator for evaluating lodging resistance of wheat. Crop Sci. 7:107–110. doi:10.2135/cropsci1967.0011183X000700020005x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poorter H, Fiorani F, Pieruschka R, Wojciechowski T, Van Der Putten WH, Kleyer M, Schurr U, Postma J. 2016. Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field. New Phytol. 212:838–855. doi:10.1111/nph.14243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi W, Chen X, Liu P, Liu HH, Li G, Shao LJ, Wang FF, Dong ST, Zhang JW, Zhao B. 2013. Characteristics of dry matter, accumulation and distribution of N, P and K of super-high-yield summer maize. Plant Nutr Fertil Sci. 19:26–36. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Rajkumara S. 2008. Lodging in cereals-a review. Agric Rev. 29:55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson DJ, Julias M, Lee SY, Cook DD. 2017. Maize stalk lodging: morphological determinants of stalk strength. Crop Sci. 57:926–934. doi:10.2135/cropsci2016.07.0569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson DJ, Smith S, Gardunia B, Cook D. 2014. An improved method for accurate phenotyping of corn stalk strength. Crop Sci. 54:2038–2044. doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.11.0794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setter TL, Meller VH. 1984. Reserve carbohydrate in maize stem: [14C] glucose and [14C] sucrose uptake characteristics. Plant Physiol. 75:617–622. doi:10.1104/pp.75.3.617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao H, Shi D, Shi W, Ban X, Chen Y, Ren W, Chen F, Mi G. 2019. Genotypic difference in the plasticity of root system architecture of field-grown maize in response to plant density. Plant Soil. 439(1–2):201–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao H, Xia T, Wu D, Chen F, Mi G. 2018. Root growth and root system architecture of field-grown maize in response to high planting density. Plant Soil. 430:395–411. doi:10.1007/s11104-018-3720-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sher A, Khan A, Ashraf U, Liu HH, Li JC. 2018. Characterization of the effect of increased plant density on canopy morphology and stalk lodging risk. Front Plant Sci. 9. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sher A, Khan A, Cai L, Ahmad M, Asharf U, Jamoro S. 2017. Response of maize grown under high plant density; performance, issues and management-a critical review. Adv Crop Sci Tech. 5(3). doi:10.4172/2329-8863.
   Google Scholar
• Shi D, Li Y, Zhang J, Liu P, Zhao B, Dong S. 2016. Effects of plant density and nitrogen rate on lodging-related stalk traits of summer maize. Plant Soil Environ. 62:299–306. doi:10.17221/720/2015-PSE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 1998. Keys to soil taxonomy. Washington (DC): United States Department of Agriculture: Natural Resources Conservation Service; p. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Stamp P, Kiel C. 1992. Root morphology of maize and its relationship to root lodging. J Agron Crop Sci. 168:113–118. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.1992.tb00987.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subudhi P, Rosenow D, Nguyen H. 2000. Quantitative trait loci for the stay green trait in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench): consistency across genetic backgrounds and environments. Theor Appl Genet. 101:733–741. doi:10.1007/s001220051538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetio-Kagho F, Gardner F. 1988a. Responses of maize to plant population density. I. Canopy development, light relationships, and vegetative growth. Agron J. 80:930–935. doi:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000060018x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetio-Kagho F, Gardner F. 1988b. Responses of maize to plant population density. II. Reproductive development, yield, and yield adjustments. Agron J. 80:935–940. doi:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000060019x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas H, Ougham H. 2014. The stay-green trait. J Exp Bot. 65:3889–3900. doi:10.1093/jxb/eru037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokatlidis I, Koutroubas S. 2004. A review of maize hybrids’ dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Res. 88:103–114. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2003.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widstrom N, Carr M, Bagby M, Black L. 1988. Distribution of sugar and soluble solids in the maize stalk. Crop Sci. 28:861–863. doi:10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800050032x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu C, Gao Y, Tian B, Ren J, Meng Q, Wang P. 2017. Effects of EDAH, a novel plant growth regulator, on mechanical strength, stalk vascular bundles and grain yield of summer maize at high densities. Field Crops Res. 200:71–79. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue J, Gou L, Shi ZG, Zhao YS, Zhang WF. 2017. Effect of leaf removal on photosynthetically active radiation distribution in maize canopy and stalk strength. J Integr Agric. 16:85–96. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61394-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue J, Gou L, Zhao Y, Yao M, Yao H, Tian J, Zhang W. 2016. Effects of light intensity within the canopy on maize lodging. Field Crops Res. 188:133–141. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue J, Xie RZ, Zhang WF, Wang KR, Peng H, Bo M, Ling G, Shaokun L. 2017. Research progress on reduced lodging of high-yield and-density maize. J Integr Agric. 16:2717–2725. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61785-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue J, Zhao Y, Gou L, Shi Z, Yao M, Zhang W. 2016. How high plant density of maize affects basal internode development and strength formation. Crop Sci. 56:3295–3306. doi:10.2135/cropsci2016.04.0243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao M, Shi Z, Xue J, Yang Z, Gou L, Zhang W. 2013. The effects of different planting densities on the cortex structure of stem and lodging resistance in Maize. Xinjiang Agri Sci. 50:2006–2014. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar