Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer types and rates on cotton leaf senescence, yield and soil inorganic nitrogen

References

• Agegnehu G, Nelson PN, Bird MI. 2016. The effects of biochar, compost and their mixture and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of barley grown on a Nitisol in the highlands of Ethiopia. Sci Total Environ. 569:869–879. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alan JF, John AS. 2013. Soil-profile distribution of inorganic N during 6 years of integrated crop-livestock management. Soil Till Res. 134:83–89. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyub CM, Wasim Haidar M, Zulfiqar F, Abideen Z, Wright SR. 2019. Potato tuber yield and quality in response to different nitrogen fertilizer application rates under two split doses in an irrigated sandy loam soil. J Plant Nutr. 42(15):1850–1860. doi:10.1080/01904167.2019.1648669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggs JL, Tsegaye TD, Coleman TL, Reddy KC, Fahsi A. 2003. Relationship between hyperspectral reflectance, soil nitrate-nitrogen, cotton leaf chlorophyll, and cotton yield: a step toward precision agriculture. J Sustain Agr. 22(3):5–16. doi:10.1300/J064v22n03_03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron KC, Di HJ, Moir JL. 2013. Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review. Ann Appl Biol. 162:145–173. doi:10.1111/aab.12014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chebotarev NT, Yudin AA, Konkin PI, Oblizov AV. 2017. Efficiency of using organic and mineral fertilizers in fodder crop rotation on northern soddy podzols. Russian Agricul Sci. 43(2):162–166. doi:10.3103/S1068367417020045.
   Google Scholar
• Chen L, Ji T, Mu L, Zhu J. 2017. Cotton fabric derived hierarchically porous carbon and nitrogen doping for sustainable capacitor electrode. Carbon. 111:839–848. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Dong H. 2014. Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: achievements, challenges and countermeasures. Field Crops Res. 155:99–110. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels MB, Sharpley A, Robertson B. 2019. Nutrients in runoff from cotton production in the Lower Mississippi River Basin: an on-farm study. Agrosystems Geosci Environ. 2:1. doi:10.2134/age2019.05.0033.
   Google Scholar
• Demir M, Martell TF, Wang J. 2019. The trilogy of China cotton markets: the lead–lag relationship among spot, forward, and futures markets. J Future Market. 39(4):522–534. doi:10.1002/fut.21981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong HZ, Li WJ, Eneji AE, Zhang DM. 2012. Nitrogen rate and plant density effects on yield and late-season leaf senescence of cotton raised on a saline field. Field Crops Res. 126:137–144. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas LA, Riazi A, Smith CJ. 1980. A semi-micro method for determining total nitrogen in soils and plant material containing nitrite and nitrate. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 44(2):431–433. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400020047x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du X, Chen B, Zhang Y, Zhao W, Shen T, Zhou Z, Meng Y. 2016. Nitrogen use efficiency of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as influenced by wheat-cotton cropping systems. Eur J Agron. 75:72–79. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2016.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erisman JW, Bleeker A, Galloway J, Sutton MS. 2007. Reduced nitrogen in ecology and the environment. Environ Pollut. 150(1):140–149. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Z, Zhu L. 2017. Impact of biochar on soil N2O emissions under different biochar-carbon/fertilizer-nitrogen ratios at a constant moisture condition on a silt loam soil. Sci Total Environ. 584:776–782. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng J, Ma Q, Chen J, Zhang M, Li C, Yang Y, Liu Z. 2016. Effects of polymer coated urea and sulfur fertilization on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and leaf senescence of cotton. Field Crops Res. 187:87–95. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves DB, Bakken LB, Jensen MB, Ingels R. 2019. Plasma activated organic fertilizer. Plasma Chem Plasma P. 39(1):1–19. doi:10.1007/s11090-018-9944-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski K, Neill C, Davidson EA, Macedo MN, Costa C, Galford GL, McHorney R. 2018. Deep soils modify environmental consequences of increased nitrogen fertilizer use in intensifying Amazon agriculture. Sci. Rep. 8(1):1–11. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31175-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan A, Tan DKY, Afridi MZ, Luo H, Tung SA, Ajab M, Fahad S. 2017. Nitrogen fertility and abiotic stresses management in cotton crop: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24(17):14551–14566. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-8920-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Woo HR, Nam HG. 2016. Toward systems understanding of leaf senescence: an integrated multi-omics perspective on leaf senescence research. Mol Plant. 9(6):813–825. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2016.04.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Dong H, Liu A, Liu J, Sun M, Li Y. 2017a. Effects of nitrogen rate and split application ratio on nitrogen use and soil nitrogen balance in cotton field. Pedosphere. 27(4):127–135. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60303-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Lu J, Hou W, Pan Y, Wang Y, Khan MR, Ren T, Cong R, Li X. 2017b. Reducing nitrogen losses through ammonia volatilization and surface runoff to improve apparent nitrogen recovery of double cropping of late rice using controlled release urea. Environ Sci Pollution Res. 24(12):11722–11733. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-8825-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Tao R, Ling N, Chu G. 2017c. Chemical, organic and bio-fertilizer management practices effect on soil physicochemical property and antagonistic bacteria abundance of a cotton field: implications for soil biological quality. Soil Till Res. 167:30–38. doi:10.1016/j.still.2016.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Wang S, Shangguan Z. 2019. Combined biochar and nitrogen fertilization at appropriate rates could balance the leaching and availability of soil inorganic nitrogen. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 276:21–30. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2019.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Schichtel BA, Walker JT, Schwede DB, Chen X, Lehmann CM, Collett JL. 2016. Increasing importance of deposition of reduced nitrogen in the United States. P Natl A Sci. 113(21):5874–5879. doi:10.1073/pnas.1525736113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim PO, Kim HJ, Gil Nam H. 2007. Leaf senescence. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 58:115–136. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Wan LB, Zhang M, Cao YP, Xu QM, Chen HK, Yang Y. 2009. State standard of the People’s Republic of China-slow release fertilizer (GB/T 23348–2009). In: General administration of quality supervision inspection (In Chinese). Beijing: China Standard Press; p. 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Liu T, Huang J, Chai K, Cao C, Li C. 2018. Effects of N fertilizer sources and tillage practices on NH3 volatilization, grain yield, and N use efficiency of rice fields in Central China. Front Plant Sci. 9:385. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Z, Liu H, Li W, Zhao Q, Dai J, Tian L, Dong H. 2018. Effects of reduced nitrogen rate on cotton yield and nitrogen use efficiency as mediated by application mode or plant density. Field Crops Res. 218:150–157. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TTN, Xu CY, Tahmasbian I, Che R, Xu Z, Zhou X, Bai SH. 2017. Effects of biochar on soil available inorganic nitrogen: a review and meta-analysis. Geoderma. 288:79–96. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinehardt JM, Edmisten KL, Wells R, Faircloth JC. 2004. Response of ultra–narrow and conventional spaced cotton to variable nitrogen rates. Turk J Plant Nutr. 27(4):743–755. doi:10.1081/PLN-120030379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowhani P, Lobell DB, Linderman M, Ramankutty N. 2011. Climate variability and crop production in Tanzania. Agr Forest Meteorol. 151(4):449–460. doi:10.1081/PLN-120030379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainju UM, Whitehead WF, Singh BP, Wang S. 2006. Tillage, cover crops, and nitrogen fertilization effects on soil nitrogen and cotton and sorghum yields. Eur J Agro. 25:372–382. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2006.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy. In: Soil Survey Staff, editor. A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Washington (DC): 2nd U.S. Gov. Print. Office; p. 163–167.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatiadis S, Tsadilas C, Samaras V, Schepers JS, Eskridge K. 2016. Nitrogen uptake and N-use efficiency of Mediterranean cotton under varied deficit irrigation and N fertilization. Euro J Agron. 73:144–151. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian X, Li C, Zhang M, Li T, Lu Y, Liu L. 2018. Controlled release urea improved crop yields and mitigated nitrate leaching under cotton-garlic intercropping system in a 4-year field trial. Soil Till Res. 175:158–167. doi:.10.1016/j.still.2017.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart J, Grassini P, Cassman KG. 2013. Impact of derived global weather data on simulated crop yields. Global Change Biol. 19(12):3822–3834. doi:10.1111/gcb.12302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Wu L, Cheng M, Fan J, Zhang F, Zou Y. 2018. Coupling effects of water and fertilizer on yield, water and fertilizer use efficiency of drip-fertigated cotton in northern Xinjiang, China. Field Crops Res. 219:169–179. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts DB, Runion GB, Balkcom KS. 2017. Nitrogen fertilizer sources and tillage effects on cotton growth, yield, and fiber quality in a coastal plain soil. Field Crops Res. 201:184–191. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolz KJ, Branham BE, DeLucia EH. 2018. Reduced nitrogen losses after conversion of row crop agriculture to alley cropping with mixed fruit and nut trees. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 258:172–181. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo HR, Chung KM, Park JH, Oh SA, Ahn T. 2001. ORE9, an F-box protein that regulates leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 13:1779–1790. doi:10.2307/3871318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo HR, Kim HJ, Lim PO, Nam HG. 2019. Leaf senescence: systems and dynamics aspects. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 70. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-095859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Du M, Tian X, Eneji AE, Li Z. 2016. Cotton yield and potassium use efficiency as affected by potassium fertilizer management with stalks returned to field. Crop Sci. 56(2):740–746. doi:10.2135/cropsci2015.03.0136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XY, Geng JB, Li CL, Zhang M, Chen BC, Tian XF, Zheng WK, Liu ZG, Wang C. 2016b. Combined application of polymer coated potassium chloride and urea improved fertilizer use efficiencies, yield and leaf photosynthesis of cotton on saline soil. Field Crops Res. 197:63–73. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XY, Geng JB, Li CL, Zhang M, Tian XF. 2016a. Cumulative release characteristics of controlled-release nitrogen and potassium fertilizers and their effects on soil fertility, and cotton growth. Sci Rep. 6:39030. doi:10.1038/srep39030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetilmezsoy K, Ilhan F, Kocak E, Akbin HM. 2017. Feasibility of struvite recovery process for fertilizer industry: A study of financial and economic analysis. J Clean Prod. 152:88–102. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang DM, Li WJ, Xin CS, Eneji AE, Tang W, Dong HZ. 2012. Lint yield and nitrogen use efficiency of field-grown cotton vary with soil salinity and nitrogen application rate. Field Crops Res. 138:63–70. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Chan Z, Gao J, Xing L, Cao M, Yu C, Gong Y. 2016. ABA receptor PYL9 promotes drought resistance and leaf senescence. P Natl A Sci. 113(7):1949–1954. doi:10.1073/pnas.1522840113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Sui C, Liu Z, Geng J, Tian X, Yang X, Zhang M. 2016a. Long-term effects of controlled-release urea on crop yields and soil fertility under wheat-corn double cropping systems. Agron J. 108(4):1703–1716. doi:10.2134/agronj2015.0581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Zhang M, Liu Z, Zhou H, Lu H, Zhang W, Chen B. 2016b. Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system. Field Crops Res. 197:52–62. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Yin X. 2018. Assessing nitrogen nutritional status, biomass and yield of cotton with ndvi, spad and petiole sap nitrate concentration. Exp Agr. 54(4):531–548. doi:10.1017/S0014479717000229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou YP, Tian CY, Wang P. 2010. Effect of different water and nitrogen treatments on cotton nitrogen absorption, and N-(min) residual in soil profile. Arid Land Geogr (In Chinese). 33:725–731. doi:10.1061/41139(387)92.
   Google Scholar