Uptake, translocation, transformation and physiological effects of nanoparticles in plants

References

• Abdel-Aziz HMM, Hasaneen MNA, Aya MO. 2018. Foliar application of nano chitosan NPK fertilizer improves the yield of wheat plants grown on two different soils. Egypt J Exp Biol (Bot). 14(1):63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed B, Rizvi A, Ali K, Lee J, Zaidi A, Khan MS, Musarrat J. 2021. Nanoparticles in the soil–plant system: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 19(1):1–65. doi:10.1007/s10311-020-01129-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshaal T, El-Ramady H. 2017. Foliar application: from plant nutrition to biofortification. Environ Biodivers Soil Secur. 1:71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ananda S, Shobha G, Shashidhara KS, Mahadimane V. 2019. Nano-cuprous oxide enhances seed germination and seedling growth in Lycopersicum esculentum plants. J Drug Deliv Ther. 9(2):296–302. doi:10.22270/jddt.v9i2.2554.
   Google Scholar
• Armin M, Sadegh A, Saaeid M. 2014. Effect of time and concentration of nano-Fe foliar application on yield and yield components of wheat. Int J Biosci. 4(9):69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Avellan A, Schwab F, Masion A, Chaurand P, Borschneck D, Vidal V, Rose J, Santaella C, and Levard C. 2017. Nanoparticle uptake in plants: gold nanomaterial localized in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana by X-ray computed nanotomography and hyperspectral imaging. Environ Sci Technol. 51(15):8682–8691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avellan A, Yun J, Morais BP, Clement ET, Rodrigues SM, Lowry GV. 2021. Critical review: role of inorganic nanoparticle properties on their foliar uptake and in planta translocation. Environ Sci Technol. 55(20):13417–13431. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala R, Kalia A, Dhaliwal SS. 2019. Evaluation of efficacy of ZnO nanoparticles as remedial zinc nanofertilizer for rice. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 19(2):379–389. doi:10.1007/s42729-019-00040-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee K, Pramanik P, Maity A, Joshi DC, Wani SH, and Krishnan P. 2019. Methods of using nanomaterials to plant systems and their delivery to plants (Mode of entry, uptake, translocation, accumulation, biotransformation and barriers). Adv Phytonanotechnol. 123–152. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-815322-2.00005-5
   Google Scholar
• Barriere C, Piettre K, Latour V, Margeat O, Turrin CO, Chaudret B, Fau P. 2012. Ligand effects on the air stability of copper nanoparticles obtained from organometallic synthesis. J Mater Chem. 22(5):279–2285. doi:10.1039/C2JM14963J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beig B, Niazi MBK, Sher F, Jahan Z, Malik US, Khan MD, Américo-Pinheiro JHP, Vo DVN. 2022. Nanotechnology-based controlled release of sustainable fertilizers. A review. Environ Chem Lett. 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender RR, Haegele JW, Below FE. 2015. Nutrient uptake, partitioning, and remobilization in modern soybean varieties. Agron J. 107(2):563–573. doi:10.2134/agronj14.0435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisht S, Sharma V, Kumari N. 2022. Biosynthesized magnetite nanoparticles from Polyalthia longifolia leaves improve photosynthetic performance and yield of Trigonella foenum-graecum under drought stress. Plant Stress. 5:100090. doi:10.1016/j.stress.2022.100090.
   Google Scholar
• Cornu JY, Bussiere S, Coriou C, Robert T, Maucourt M, Deborde C, Moing A, Nguyen C. 2020. Changes in plant growth, Cd partitioning and xylem sap composition in two sunflower cultivars exposed to low Cd concentrations in hydroponics. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 205:111145. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui J, Liu T, Li F, Yi J, Liu C, Yu H. 2017. Silica nanoparticles alleviate cadmium toxicity in rice cells: mechanisms and size effects. Environ Pollut. 228:363–369. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui J, Li Y, Jin Q, Li F. 2020. Silica nanoparticles inhibit arsenic uptake into rice suspension cells via improving pectin synthesis and the mechanical force of the cell wall. Environ Sci: Nano. 7(1):162–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cruz TN, Savassa SM, Montanha GS, Ishida JK, de Almeida E, Tsai SM, Lavres Junior J, Pereira de Carvalho HW. 2019. A new glance on root-to-shoot in vivo zinc transport and time-dependent physiological effects of ZnSO4 and ZnO nanoparticles on plants. Sci Rep. 9(1):1–12. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46796-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de la Rosa G, Vázquez-Núñez E, Molina-Guerrero C, Serafín-Muñoz AH, Vera-Reyes I. 2021. Interactions of nanomaterials and plants at the cellular level: current knowledge and relevant gaps. Nanotechnol Environ Eng. 6(1):1–19. doi:10.1007/s41204-020-00100-1.
   Google Scholar
• De Schepper V, De Swaef T, Bauweraerts I, Steppe K. 2013. Phloem transport: a review of mechanisms and controls. J Exp Bot. 64(16):4839–4850. doi:10.1093/jxb/ert302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimkpa CO, Latta DE, McLean JE, Britt DW, Boyanov MI, Anderson AJ. 2013. Fate of CuO and ZnO nano and micro particles in the plant environment. Environ Sci Technol. 4(9):4734–4742. doi:10.1021/es304736y.
   Google Scholar
• Eichert T, Kurtz A, Steiner U, Goldbach HE. 2008. Size exclusion limits and lateral heterogeneity of the stomatal foliar uptake pathway for aqueous solutes and water‐suspended nanoparticles. Physiol Plant. 134(1):151–160. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01135.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Metwally IM, Doaa MR, Abo-Basha AE-A, ME. 2018. Response of peanut plants to different foliar applications of nano- iron, manganese and zinc under sandy soil conditions. J Middle East Appl Sci. 8(2):474–482.
   Google Scholar
• Faizan M, Bhat JA, Chen C, Alyemeni MN, Wijaya L, Ahmad P, Yu F. 2021a. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) induce salt tolerance by improving the antioxidant system and photosynthetic machinery in tomato. Plant Physiol Biochem. 161:122–130. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faizan M, Sehar S, Rajput VD, Faraz A, Afzal S, Minkina T, Sushkova S, Adil MF, Yu F, Alatar AA, et al. 2021b. Modulation of cellular redox status and antioxidant defense system after synergistic application of zinc oxide nanoparticles and salicylic acid in rice (Oryza sativa) plant under arsenic stress. Plants. 10(11):2254. doi:10.3390/plants10112254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Cao X, Zhou H, Hao L, Dong W, He C, Xu M, Wu H, Wang L, Chang Z, et al. 2020. Carbon dioxide fertilization effect on plant growth under soil water stress associates with changes in stomatal traits, leaf photosynthesis, and foliar nitrogen of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Environ Exp Bot. 179:104203. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatemi H, Zaghdoud C, Nortes PA, Carvajal M, Martínez-Ballesta MD. 2020. Differential aquaporin response to distinct effects of two Zn concentrations after foliar application in pak choi (Brassica rapa L.) plants. Agronomy. 10(3):450. doi:10.3390/agronomy10030450.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez V, Bahamonde HA, Javier Peguero-Pina J, Gil-Pelegrín E, Sancho-Knapik D, Gil L, Goldbach HE, Eichert T. 2017. Physico-chemical properties of plant cuticles and their functional and ecological significance. J Exp Bot. 68(19):5293–5306. doi:10.1093/jxb/erx302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao M, Zhou J, Liu H, Zhang W, Hu Y, Liang J, Zhou J. 2018. Foliar spraying with silicon and selenium reduces cadmium uptake and mitigates cadmium toxicity in rice. Sci Total Environ. 631:1100–1108. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Gómez C, Obrador A, González D, Babín M, Fernández MD. 2018. Comparative study of the phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles and Zn accumulation in nine crops grown in a calcareous soil and an acidic soil. Sci Total Environ. 644:770–780. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler-Lee J, Wang Q, Yao Y, Zhang W, Geisler M, Li K, Huang Y, Chen Y, Kolmakov A, Ma X. 2012. Phytotoxicity, accumulation and transport of silver nanoparticles by Arabidopsis thaliana. Nanotoxicology. 7(3):323–337. doi:10.3109/17435390.2012.658094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasaneen MN, Abdel-aziz HM, Omer AM. 2016. Effect of foliar application of engineered nanomaterials: carbon nanotubes NPK and chitosan nanoparticles NPK fertilizer on the growth of French bean plant. Biochem Biotechnol Res. 4(4):68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanuzzaman M, Alam MM, Nahar K, Ahamed KU, Fujita M. 2014. Exogenous salicylic acid alleviates salt stress-induced oxidative damage in Brassica napus by enhancing the antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Aust J Crop Sci. 8(4):631–639.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Castillo-Michel H, Andrews JC, Cotte M, Rico C, Peralta-Videa JR, Ge Y, Priester JH, Holden PA, Gardea-Torresdey JL. 2013. In situ synchrotron X-ray fluorescence mapping and speciation of CeO2 and ZnO nanoparticles in soil cultivated soybean (Glycine max). ACS Nano. 7(2):1415–1423. doi:10.1021/nn305196q.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holz M, Leue M, Ahmed MA, Benard P, Gerke HH, Carminati A. 2018. Spatial distribution of mucilage in the rhizosphere measured with infrared spectroscopy. Front Environ Sci. 6:87. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2018.00087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Peralta-Videa JR, Rico C, Sahi S, Viveros MN, Bartonjo J, Zhao L, Gardea-Torresdeym JL. 2014. Evidence of translocation and physiological impacts of foliar applied CeO2 nanoparticles on cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants. Environ Sci Technol. 48(8):4376–4385. doi:10.1021/es404931g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Wang C, Wagner DC, Gardea-Torresdey JL, He F, Rico CM. 2021. Foliar application of nanoparticles: mechanisms of absorption, transfer, and multiple impacts. Environ Sci: Nano. 8(5):1196–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Li Y, Xu W, Chai Y. 2021. Effect of nano potassium fertilizer on cucumber amino acid component, volatile metabolite components and GLN family genes expression. Wirel Pers Commun. 15:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhao L, Keller AA. 2017. Interactions, transformations, and bioavailability of nano-copper exposed to root exudates. Environ Sci Technol. 51(17):9774–9783. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b02523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain B, Lin Q, Hamid Y, Sanaullah M, Di L, Khan MB, He Z, Yang X. 2020. Foliage application of selenium and silicon nanoparticles alleviates Cd and Pb toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sci Total Environ. 712:136497. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein MM, Abou-Baker NH. 2018. The contribution of nano zinc to alleviate salinity stress on cotton plants. R Soc Open Sci. 5(8):171809. doi:10.1098/rsos.171809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalali M, Ghanati F, Modarres-Sanavi AM. 2016. Effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and iron chelate on the antioxidant capacity and nutritional value of soil-cultivated maize (Zea mays) plants. Crop Pasture Sci. 67(6):621–628. doi:10.1071/CP15271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkow R, Pokluda R, Sękara A, Kalisz A. 2020. Impact of foliar application of some metal nanoparticles on antioxidant system in oakleaf lettuce seedlings. BMC Plant Biol. 20(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s12870-020-02490-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Isobe T, Chang KH, Amano A, Maneja RH, Zamora PB, Siringan FP, Tanabe S. 2011. Levels and distribution of organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in fishes from Manila Bay, the Philippines. Environ Pollut. 159(12):3653–3659. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KM, Kim HM, Lee WJ, Lee CW, Kim T, Lee JK, Jeong J, Paek SM, Oh JM. 2014. Surface treatment of silica nanoparticles for stable and charge-controlled colloidal silica. Int J Nanomed. 9:29–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottegoda N, Sandaruwan C, Priyadarshana G, Siriwardhana A, Rathnayake UA, Arachchige DMB, Kumarasinghe AR, Dahanayake D, Karunaratne V, Amaratunga GAJ. 2017. Urea-hydroxyapatite nanohybrids for slow release of nitrogen. ACS Nano. 11(2):1214–1221. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b07781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranjc E, Mazej D, Regvar M, Drobne D, Remškar M. 2018. Foliar surface free energy affects platinum nanoparticle adhesion, uptake, and translocation from leaves to roots in arugula and escarole. Environ Sci: Nano. 5(2):520–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurepa J, Paunesku T, Vogt S, Arora H, Rabatic BM, Lu J, Wanzer MB, Woloschak GE, and Smalle JA. 2010. Uptake and distribution of ultrasmall Anatase TiO2 Alizarin red S Nanoconjugates in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nano Lett. 10(7):2296–2302. doi:10.1021/nl903518f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larue C, Veronesi G, Flank AM, Surble S, Herlin-Boime N, Carrière M. 2012. Comparative uptake and impact of TiO2 nanoparticles in wheat and rapeseed. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A. 75(13–15):722–734. doi:10.1080/15287394.2012.689800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li RW, Sun TL, Zhou SL, Ma YK, Shi QS, Xie XB, Huang XM. 2017. A comparative analysis of antibacterial activity, dynamics, and effects of silver ions and silver nanoparticles against four bacterial strains. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 123:304–310. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Zhang P, Adeel M, Guo Z, Chetwynd AJ, Ma C, Bai T, Hao Y, Rui Y. 2021. Physiological impacts of zero valent iron, Fe3O4 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles in rice plants and their potential as Fe fertilizers. Environ Pollut. 269:116134. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian J, Zhao L, Wu J, Xiong H, Bao Y, Zeb A, Tang J, Liu W. 2020. Foliar spray of TiO2 nanoparticles prevails over root application in reducing Cd accumulation and mitigating Cd-induced phytotoxicity in maize (Zea mays L.). Chemosphere. 239:124794. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv J, Christie P, Zhang S. 2019. Uptake, translocation, and transformation of metal-based nanoparticles in plants: recent advances and methodological challenges. Environ Sci: Nano. 6(1):41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, He X, Zhang P, Zhang Z, Ding Y, Zhang J, Wang XC, Luo W, Zhang J, Zheng L. 2017. Xylem and phloem-based transport of CeO2 nanoparticles in hydroponic cucumber plants. Environ Sci Technol. 51(9):5215–5221. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Yan J. 2018. Plant uptake and accumulation of engineered metallic nanoparticles from lab to field conditions. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 6:16–20. doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2018.07.008.
   Google Scholar
• Moazzami Farida SH, Karamian R, Albrectsen BR. 2020. Silver nanoparticle pollutants activate oxidative stress responses and rosmarinic acid accumulation in sage. Physiol Plant. 170(3):415–432. doi:10.1111/ppl.13172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller O, Cohu CM, Stewart JJ, Protheroe JA, Demmig‐Adams B, Adams IIIWW. 2014. Association between photosynthesis and contrasting features of minor veins in leaves of summer annuals loading phloem via symplastic versus apoplastic routes. Physiol Plant. 152(1):174–183. doi:10.1111/ppl.12155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek E, Somasundaran P, Klaessig F, Castranova V, Thompson M. 2009. Understanding biophysiochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface. Nat Mater. 8(7):543–557. doi:10.1038/nmat2442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogunkunle CO, Odulaja DA, Akande FO, Varun M, Vishwakarma V, Fatoba PO. 2020. Cadmium toxicity in cowpea plant: effect of foliar intervention of nano-TiO2 on tissue Cd bioaccumulation, stress enzymes and potential dietary health risk. J Biotechnol. 310:54–61. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng C, Xu C, Liu Q, Sun L, Luo Y, Shi J. 2017. Fate and transformation of CuO nanoparticles in the soil-rice system during the life cycle of rice plants. Environ Sci Technol. 51:4907–4917. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-de-Luque A. 2017. Interaction of nanomaterials with plants: what do we need for real applications in agriculture? Front Environ Sci. 5:12. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2017.00012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan S, Durgam M, Mailapalli DR. 2021. Urea loaded hydroxyapatite nanocarrier for efficient delivery of plant nutrients in rice. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 67(3):371–382. doi:10.1080/03650340.2020.1732940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahale CS, Lakshmanan A, Sumithra MG, Kumar ER. 2021. Humic acid involved chelation of ZnO nanoparticles for enhancing mineral nutrition in plants. Solid State Commun. 333:114355. doi:10.1016/j.ssc.2021.114355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajput V, Minkina T, Fedorenko A, Sushkova S, Mandzhieva S, Lysenko V, Duplii N, Fedorenko G, Dvadnenko K, Ghazaryan K. 2018. Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles on spring barley (Hordeum sativum distichum). Sci Total Environ. 645:1103–1113. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raliya R, Nair R, Chavalmane S, Wang WN, and Biswas P. 2015. Mechanistic evaluation of translocation and physiological impact of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles on the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Plant. Metallomics. 7(12):1584–1594. doi:10.1039/C5MT00168D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei M, Abbasi H. 2014. Foliar application of nano chelates, and nano chelate of zinc on plant resistance physiological processes in cotton (Gossipium hirsutum L.). Iran J Plant Physiol. 4(4):1137–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Rizwan M, Ali S, Ur Rehman MZ, Adrees M, Arshad M, Qayyum MF, Ali L, Hussain A, Chatha SAS, Imran M. 2019. Alleviation of cadmium accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) by foliar spray of zinc oxide nanoparticles and biochar to contaminated soil. Environ Pollut. 248:358–367. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi L, Sharifan H, Zhang W, Schwab AP, Ma X. 2018. Mutual effects and in planta accumulation of co-existing cerium oxide nanoparticles and cadmium in hydroponically grown soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Environ Sci: Nano. 5(1):150–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffan MM, Koriem MA, El-Henawy A, El-Mahdy S, El-Ramady H, Elbehiry F, Omara AED, Bayoumi Y, Badgar K, Prokisch J. 2022. Sustainable production of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under low-quality irrigation water as affected by bio-nanofertilizers of selenium and copper. Sustainability. 14(6):3236. doi:10.3390/su14063236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab F, Zhai G, Kern M, Turner A, Schnoor JL, Wiesner MR. 2016. Barriers, pathways and processes for uptake, translocation and accumulation of nanomaterials in plants–Critical review. Nanotoxicology. 10(3):257–278. doi:10.3109/17435390.2015.1048326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schymura S, Fricke T, Hildebrand H, Franke K. 2017. Elucidating the role of dissolution in CeO2 nanoparticle plant uptake by smart radio labelling. Angew Chem Int Ed. 56(26):7411–7414. doi:10.1002/anie.201702421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servin AD, Castillo-Michel H, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Diaz BC, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL. 2012. Synchrotron micro-XRF and micro-XANES confirmation of the uptake and translocation of TiO2 nanoparticles in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants. Environ Sci Technol. 46(14):7637–7643. doi:10.1021/es300955b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servin AD, Pagano L, Castillo-Michel H, De la Torre-Roche R, Hawthorne J, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Loredo-Portales R, Majumdar S, Gardea-Torresday J, Dhankher OP, et al. 2017. Weathering in soil increases nanoparticle CuO bioaccumulation within a terrestrial food chain. Nanotoxicology. 11(1):98–111. doi:10.1080/17435390.2016.1277274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahid M, Dumat C, Khalid S, Schreck E, Xiong T, Niazi NK. 2017. Foliar heavy metal uptake, toxicity and detoxification in plants: a comparison of foliar and root metal uptake. J Hazard Mater. 325:36–58. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang H, Ma M, Liu F, Miao Z, Zhang A. 2019. Self-assembled reduced graphene oxide-TiO2 thin film for the enhanced photocatalytic reduction of Cr (VI) under simulated solar irradiation. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 19(6):3376–3387. doi:10.1166/jnn.2019.16140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi R, Mohammadi K, Rokhzadi A. 2016. Effect of seed priming and foliar application with micronutrients on quality of forage corn (Zea mays). Environ Exp Biol. 14(4):151–156. doi:10.22364/eeb.14.21.
   Google Scholar
• Shi J, Ye J, Fang H, Zhang S, Xu C. 2018. Effects of copper oxide nanoparticles on paddy soil properties and components. Nanomaterials. 8(10):839. doi:10.3390/nano8100839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqi KS, Husen A. 2017. Plant response to engineered metal oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett. 12(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s11671-017-1861-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh A, Singh NB, Hussain I, Singh H, Singh SC. 2015. Plant-nanoparticle interaction: an approach to improve agricultural practices and plant productivity. Int J Pharm Sci Invent. 4(8):25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Slomberg DL, Schoenfisch MH. 2012. Silica nanoparticle phytotoxicity to Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ Sci Technol. 46(18):10247–10254. doi:10.1021/es300949f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielman-Sun E, Lombi E, Donner E, Howard D, Unrine JM, Lowry GV. 2017. Impact of surface charge on cerium oxide nanoparticle uptake and translocation by wheat (Triticum aestivum). Environ Sci Technol. 51(13):7361–7368. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielman-Sun E, Lombi E, Donner E, Avellan A, Etschmann B, Howard D, Lowry GV. 2018. Temporal evolution of copper distribution and speciation in roots of Triticum aestivum exposed to CuO, Cu (OH)2, and CuS nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol. 52(17):9777–9784. doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b02111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturikova H, Krystofova O, Huska D, Adam V. 2018. Zinc, zinc nanoparticles and plants. J Hazard Mater. 349(4):101–110. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.01.040.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su Y, Ashworth V, Kim C, Adeleye AS, Rolshausen P, Roper C, White J, Jassby D. 2019. Delivery, uptake, fate, and transport of engineered nanoparticles in plants: a critical review and data analysis. Environ Sci: Nano. 6(8):2311–2331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Song F, Zhu X, Liu S, Liu F, Wang Y, Li X. 2021. Nano-ZnO alleviates drought stress via modulating the plant water use and carbohydrate metabolism in maize. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 67(2):245–259. doi:10.1080/03650340.2020.1723003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syu YY, Hung JH, Chen JC, Chuang HW. 2014. Impacts of size and shape of silver nanoparticles on Arabidopsis plant growth and gene expression. Plant Physiol Biochem. 83:57–64. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.07.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taran N, Storozhenko V, Svietlova N, Batsmanova L, Shvartau V, Kovalenko M. 2017. Effect of zinc and copper nanoparticles on drought resistance of wheat seedlings. Nanoscale Res Lett. 12(1):1–6. doi:10.1186/s11671-017-1839-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor AF, Rylott EL, Anderson CW, Bruce NC. 2014. Investigating the toxicity, uptake, nanoparticle formation and genetic response of plants to gold. PLOS One. 9(4):e93793. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thabet SG, Sallam A, Moursi YS, Karam MA, Alqudah AM, Wu H. 2021. Genetic factors controlling nTiO2 nanoparticles stress tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare) during seed germination and seedling development. Functional Plant Biol. 48(12):1288–1301. doi:10.1071/FP21129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian L, Shen J, Sun G, Wang B, Ji R, Zhao L. 2020. Foliar application of SiO2 nanoparticles alters soil metabolite profiles and microbial community composition in the pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) rhizosphere grown in contaminated mine soil. Environ Sci Technol. 54(20):13137–13146. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c03767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi DK, Singh S, Singh VP, Prasad SM, Chauhan DK, Dubey NK. 2016. Silicon nanoparticles more efficiently alleviate arsenate toxicity than silicon in maize cultivar and hybrid differing in arsenate tolerance. Front Environ Sci. 4:46. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2016.00046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah S, Adeel M, Zain M, Rizwan M, Irshad MK, Jilani G, Hameed A, Khan A, Arshad M, Raza A, et al. 2020. Physiological and biochemical response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to TiO2 nanoparticles in phosphorus amended soil: a full life cycle study. J Environ Manag. 263:110365. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umar W, Hameed MK, Aziz T, Maqsood MA, Bilal HM, Rasheed N. 2021. Synthesis, characterization and application of ZnO nanoparticles for improved growth and Zn biofortification in maize. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 67(9):1164–1176. doi:10.1080/03650340.2020.1782893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nhan L, Ma C, Rui Y, Cao W, Deng Y, Liu L, Xing B. 2016. The effects of Fe2O3 nanoparticles on physiology and insecticide activity in non-transgenic and Bt-transgenic cotton. Front Plant Sci. 6:1263. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.01263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vankova R, Landa P, Podlipna R, Dobrev PI, Prerostova S, Langhansova L, Gaudinova A, Motkova K, Knirsch V, Vanek T. 2017. ZnO nanoparticle effects on hormonal pools in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci Total Environ. 593:535–542. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinkovic T, Novák O, Strnad M, Goessler W, Jurašin DD, Vrček PN IV. 2017. Cytokinin response in pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.) exposed to silver nanoparticles. Environ Res. 156:10–18. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Lombi E, Sun SK, Scheckel KG, Malysheva A, McKenna BA, Menzies NW, Zhao FJ, Kopittke PM. 2017. Characterizing the uptake, accumulation and toxicity of silver sulfide nanoparticles in plants. Environ Sci: Nano. 4(2):448–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhan W, Zheng K, Lian M, Zhang C, Ruan X, Li T. 2020a. Long-term stabilization of Cd in agricultural soil using mercapto-functionalized nano-silica (MPTS/nano-silica): a three-year field study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 197:110600. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Li H, Li X, Xin C, Si J, Li S, Li Y, Zheng X, Li H, Wei X, et al. 2020b. Nano-ZnO priming induces salt tolerance by promoting photosynthetic carbon assimilation in wheat. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 66(9):1259–1273. doi:10.1080/03650340.2019.1663508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Deng C, Cota-Ruiz K, Peralta-Videa JR, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Gardea-Torresdey JL. 2021a. Soil-aged nano titanium dioxide effects on full-grown carrot: dose and surface-coating dependent improvements on growth and nutrient quality. Sci Total Environ. 774:145699. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Jiang J, Dou F, Sun W, Ma X. 2021b. Simultaneous mitigation of arsenic and cadmium accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by silicon oxide nanoparticles under different water management schemes. Paddy Water Environ. 19(4):569–584. doi:10.1007/s10333-021-00855-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise JC, VanWoerkom AH, Acimovic SG, Sundin GW, Cregg BM, Vandervoort C. 2014. Trunk injection: a discriminating delivering system for horticulture crop IPM. Entomol Ornithol Herpetol. 3(2):1.
   Google Scholar
• Wu P, Cui P, Du H, Alves ME, Zhou D, Wang Y. 2021. Long-term dissolution and transformation of ZnO in soils: the roles of soil pH and ZnO particle size. J Hazard Mater. 415:125604. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie C, Ma Y, Yang J, Zhang B, Luo W, Feng S, Zhang J, Wang G, He X, Zhang Z. 2019. Effects of foliar applications of ceria nanoparticles and CeCl3 on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Environ Pollut. 250:530–536. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie C, Yang C. 2020. A review on plant high-throughput phenotyping traits using UAV-based sensors. Comput Electron Agric. 178:105731. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong T, Zhang T, Xian Y, Kang Z, Zhang S, Dumat C, Shahid M, Li S. 2021. Foliar uptake, biotransformation, and impact of CuO nanoparticles in Lactuca sativa L. var. ramosa Hort. Environ Geochem Health. 43(1):423–439. doi:10.1007/s10653-020-00734-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Cao W, Ruia Y. 2017. Interactions between nanoparticles and plants: phytotoxicity and defense mechanisms. J Plant Interact. 12(1):158–169. doi:10.1080/17429145.2017.1310944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yassen A, Abdallah E, Gabalah M, Zaghloul. 2017. Role of silicon dioxide nano fertilizer in mitigating salt stress on growth, yield and chemical composition of cucumber (CuCumis sativus L.). Int J Agric Res. 12(3):130–135. doi:10.3923/ijar.2017.130.135.
   Google Scholar
• Zahedi SM, Moharrami F, Sarikhani S, Padervand M. 2020. Selenium and silica nanostructure-based recovery of strawberry plants subjected to drought stress. Sci Rep. 10(1):1–8. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74273-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra Z, Waseem N, Zahra R, Lee H, Badshah MA, Mehmood A, Choi HK, Arshad M. 2017. Growth and metabolic responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivated in phosphorus-deficient soil amended with TiO2 nanoparticles. J Agricult Food Chem. 65(28):5598–5606. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai GS, Walters KS, Peate DW, Alvarez PJJ, Schnoor JL. 2014. Transport of gold nanoparticles through plasmodesmata and precipitation of gold ions in woody poplar. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 1(2):146–151. doi:10.1021/ez400202b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Ma YH, Zhang ZY, He X, Guo Z, Tai RZ, Ding YY, Zhao YL, Chai ZF. 2012. Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate/bulk Yb 2 O 3 and YbCl 3 to cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Environ Sci Technol. 46(3):1834–1841. doi:10.1021/es2027295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Guo Z, Zhang Z, Fu H, White JC, Lynch I. 2020. Nanomaterial transformation in the soil–plant system: implications for food safety and application in agriculture. Small. 16(21):2000705. doi:10.1002/smll.202000705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Peralta-Videa JR, Varela-Ramirez A, Castillo-Michel H, Li C, Zhang J, Aguilera RJ, Keller AA, Gardea-Torresdey JL. 2012a. Effect of surface coating and organic matter on the uptake of CeO2 NPs by corn plants grown in soil: insight into the uptake mechanism. J Hazard Mater. 225:131–138. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao LJ, Peng B, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Rico C, Sun YP, Peralta-Videa JR, Tang XL, Niu GH, Jin LX, Varela-Ramirez A, et al. 2012b. Stress response and tolerance of zea mays to CeO 2 nanoparticles: cross talk among H 2 O 2, heat shock protein, and lipid peroxidation. ACS Nano. 6(11):9615–9622. doi:10.1021/nn302975u.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Ortiz C, Adeleye AS, Hu Q, Zhou H, Huang Y, Keller AA. 2016. Metabolomics to detect response of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) to Cu (OH)2 nanopesticides: oxidative stress response and detoxification mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol. 50(17):9697–9707. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b02763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar