Effect of reduced tillage and mulching on soil health in Sesbania alley cropping based rainfed food - fodder systems

References

• Andrews SS, Carroll CR. 2001. Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agro-ecosystem management. Ecol Appl. 11:1573–1585. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1573:DASQAT]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota EL, Kanashiro M, Colozzi-Filho A, Andrade DA, Dick RP. 2004. Soil enzyme activities under long-term tillage and crop rotations systems in subtropical agro-ecosystems. Braz J Microbiol. 35:300–306. doi:10.1590/S1517-83822004000300006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruah TC, Barthakur HP. 1999. A text book of soil analysis. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bescansa P, Imaz M, Virto I, Enrique A, Hoogmoed W. 2006. Soil water retention as affected by tillage and residue management in semiarid Spain. Soil Tillage Res. 87:19–27. doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.02.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuchat LR. 1979. Comparison of acidified and antibiotic-supplemented potato dextrose agar from three manufacturers for its capacity to recover fungi from foods. J Food Protec. 42(5):427–428. doi:10.4315/0362-028X-42.5.427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas S, Hazra GC, Purakayastha TJ, Saha N, Mitran T, Roy SS, Basak N, Mandal B. 2017. Establishment of critical limits of indicators and indices of soil quality in rice-rice cropping systems under different soil orders. Geoderma. 292:34–48. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwer H. 1986. Intake rate: cylinder infiltrometer. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil analysis, physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd, Madison: Agronomy; p. 825–844. Mono- graph No. 9, ASA & SSSA.
   Google Scholar
• Casida LEJ, Klein DA, Santaro T. 1964. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 98:371–376. doi:10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary M, Datta A, Jat HS, Yadav AK, Gathala MK, Sapkota TB, Das AK, Sharma PC, Jat ML, Singh R, et al. 2018. Changes in soil biology under conservation agriculture based sustainable intensification of cereal systems in indo-gangetic plains. Geoderma. 313:193–204. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary M, Rana KS, Meena MC, Bana RS, Jakhar P, Ghasal PC, Verma RK. 2019. Changes in physico-chemical and biological properties of soil under conservation agriculture based pearl millet–mustard cropping system in rainfed semi-arid region. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 65:911–927. doi:10.1080/03650340.2018.1538556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam RF, Mehdi BB, Burgess MSE, Madramootoo CA, Mehuys GR, Callum IR. 2005. Soil bulk density and crop yield under eleven consecutive years of corn with different tillage and residue practices in a sandy loam soil in central Canada. Soil Tillage Res. 84:41–53. doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit AK, Agrawal RK, Das SK, Sahay CS, Choudhary M, Rai AK, Kumar S, Kantwa SR, Palsaniya DR. 2019. Soil properties, crop productivity and energetics under different tillage practices in fodder sorghum + cowpea – wheat cropping system. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 65:492–506. doi:10.1080/03650340.2018.1507024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duiker SW, Lal R. 1999. Crop residues and tillage effects on carbon sequestration in a Luvisol in Central Ohio. Soil Tillage Res. 52:73–81. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00059-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA. 1988. Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 20:601–606. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(88)90141-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick GR, Heaney RK, Mullin WJ, VanEtten CH. 1983. Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants. Crit Reviews Food Sci Nutr. 18(2):123–201. doi:10.1080/10408398209527361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh PK, Palsaniya DR, Kumar TK. 2017. Resource conservation technologies for sustainable soil health management. In: Rakshit A, Abhilash PC, Singh HB, Ghosh S, editors. Adaptive soil management: from theory to practices. Singapore: Springer; p. 161–187.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh PK, Palsaniya DR, Srinivasan R. 2016. Forage research in India: issues and strategies. Agric Res J. 53(1):1–12. doi:10.5958/2395-146X.2016.00001.6.
   Google Scholar
• Guzha AC. 2004. Effect of tillage on soil micro-relief, surface depression storage and soil water storage. Soil Tillage Res. 76:105–114. doi:10.1016/j.still.2003.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwenzi W, Gotosa J, Chakanetsa S, Mutema Z. 2009. Effects of tillage systems on soil organic carbon dynamics, structural stability and crop yields in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) rotation in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 83:211–221. doi:10.1007/s10705-008-9211-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson ML. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. . New Delhi.: Prentice Hall Pvt. Ltd. 511.
   Google Scholar
• Jakhar P, Rana KS, Dass A, Choudhary AK, Choudhary M, Adhikary PP, Maharana J. 2017. Moisture conservation practices in maize-mustard cropping system: effects on productivity, water use and soil fertility. Indian J Soil Conserv. 45:288–295.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper WD, Rosenau RC. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute A, Campbell GS, Jackson RD, Mortland MM, Nielson DR, editors. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. physical and mineralogical methods. Madison: ASA and SSSA; p. 425–442.
   Google Scholar
• Libohova Z, Seybold C, Wysocki D, Wills S, Schoeneberger P, Williams C, Lindbo D, Stott D, Owens PR. 2018. Reevaluating the effects of soil organic matter and other properties on available water-holding capacity using the national cooperative soil survey characterization database. J Soil Water Conserv. 73:411–421. doi:10.2489/jswc.73.4.411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzola M, Brown J, Izzo AD, Cohen MF. 2007. Mechanism of action and efficacy of seed meal-induced pathogen suppression differ in a Brassicaceae species and time-dependent manner. Phytopathol. 97(4):454–460. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-97-4-0454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikha MM, Rice CW. 2004. Tillage and manure effects on soil and aggregate associated carbon and nitrogen. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 68:809–816. doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.8090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra RD, Ahmed M. 1987. Manual on irrigation agronomy. New Delhi (India): Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan N, Morgan MA, Herlihy M. 1998. Ultraviolet absorbance (280 nm) of compounds released from soil during chloroform fumigation as an estimate of the microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem. 30:1599–1603. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00226-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen SR, Cole CL, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Wash USDA Circular No. 939:72–75.
   Google Scholar
• Palsaniya DR, Singh R, Tewari RK, Dhyani SK, Yadav RS, Wani SP, Sachan R, Pandey SN. 2016. Sustaining farm productivity through watershed based participatory balance nutrient management: a case study from semi-arid tropics of central India. Indian J Soil Water Conserv. 44:13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Palsaniya DR, Singh R, Tewari RK, Yadav RS, Dwivedi RP, Kumar RV, Venkatesh A, Kareemulla K, Bajpai CK, Singh R, et al. 2008. Socio economic and livelihood analysis of people in Garhkundar-Dabar watershed of central India. Indian J Agrofor. 10:65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Palsaniya DR, Singh R, Tewari RK, Yadav RS, Kumar RV, Dhyani SK. 2012. Integrated watershed management for sustainable agricultural production in semi-arid tropics of India. Indian J Agron. 57:310–318.
   Google Scholar
• Palsaniya DR, Singh R, Yadav RS, Tewari RK, Dhyani SK. 2011. Now it is water all the way in Garhkundar – dabar watershed of drought prone semi arid Bundelkhand, India. Current Sci. 100:1287–1288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palsaniya DR, Singh R, Yadav RS, Tewari RK, Dwivedi RP, Kumar RV, Venkatesh A, Kareemulla K, Bajpai CK, Rajendra S, et al. 2009. Participatory agro-ecosystem analysis and identification of problems in Garhkundar-Dabar watershed of central India. Indian J Agrofor. 11:91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Parihar CM, Singh AK, Jat SL, Dey A, Nayak HS, Mandal BN, Saharawat YS, Jat ML, Yadav OP. 2020. Soil quality and carbon sequestration under conservation agriculture with balanced nutrition in intensive cereal-based system. Soil Tillage Res. 202:104653. DOI:10.1016/j.still.2020.104653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parihar CM, Yadav MR, Jat SL, Singh AK, Kumar B, Pradhan S, Chakraborty D, Jat ML, Jat RK, Saharawat YS, et al. 2016. Long term effect of conservation agriculture in maize rotations on total organic carbon, physical and biological properties of a sandy loam soil in north-western indo-gangetic plains. Soil Tillage Res. 161:116–128. DOI:10.1016/j.still.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper CS. 1950. Soil and plant analysis. Australia: The University of Adelaide. p. 286–287.
   Google Scholar
• Pittelkow C, Liang X, Linquist B, van Groenigen KJ, Lee J, Lundy ME, van Gestel N, Six J, Venterea RT, van Kessel C, et al. 2015. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature. 517:365–368. DOI:10.1038/nature13809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeplau C, Vos C, Don A. 2017. Soil organic carbon stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content. Soil. 3:61–66. DOI:10.5194/soil-3-61-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan A, Chan C, Roul PK, Halbrendt J, Sipes B. 2018. Potential of conservation agriculture (CA) for climate change adaptation and food security under rainfed uplands of India: a trans-disciplinary approach. Agric Syst. 163:27–35. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards LA. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline alkaline soils. In: USDA handbook. Washington. p. 111–112. no. 60.
   Google Scholar
• Roldan A, Caravaca F, Hernandez MT, Garcia C, Sanchez-Brito C, Velasquez M, Tiscareno M. 2003. No-tillage, crop residue additions, and legume cover cropping effects on soil quality characteristics under maize in Patzcuaro watershed (Mexico). Soil Tillage Res. 72:65–73. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00051-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Chakraborty D, Sharma AR, Tomar RK, Bhadraray S, Sen U, Behera UK, Purakayastha TJ, Garg RN, Kalra N. 2010. Effect of tillage and residue management on soil physical properties and crop productivity in maize (Zea mays)– Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) system. Indian J Agric Sci. 80:679–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla MK, Lal R, Owens LB, Unkefer P. 2003. Land use and management impacts on structure and infiltration characteristics of soils in the north Appalachian region of Ohio. Soil Sci. 168:167–177. doi:10.1097/01.ss.0000058889.60072.aa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbiah BV, Asija GL. 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Sci. 25:259–260.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. 1969. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem. 1:301–307. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 1999. Soil taxonomy-a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service. 871.
   Google Scholar
• Waksman SA. 1952. Soil microbiology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Walkley AJ, Black CA. 1934. Estimation of soil organic carbon by the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37:29–38. doi:10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Wang S, Wang R, Wang X, Li J. 2020. Conservation tillage increased soil bacterial diversity and improved soil nutrient status on the Loess Plateau in China. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 66:1509–1519. DOI:10.1080/03650340.2019.1677892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRB. 2015. IUSS working group, world reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015 international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Yodder RE. 1936. A direct method of aggregate analysis of soils and a study of the physical nature of soil erosion. J Am Soc Agron. 28:337–351. doi:10.2134/agronj1936.00021962002800050001x.
   Google Scholar