Soil health in temperate agroforestry: influence of tree species and position in the field

References

• Altieri MA, Nicholls CI, Henao A, Lana MA. 2015. Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agron Sustain Dev. 35:869–890. doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshad MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Azooz RH. 1999. Components of surface soil structure under conventional and no-tillage in northwestern Canada. Soil Tillage Res. 53:41–47. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00075-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artru S, Garré S, Dupraz C, Hiel M-P, Blitz-Frayret C, Lassois L. 2017. Impact of spatio-temporal shade dynamics on wheat growth and yield, perspectives for temperate agroforestry. European J Agron. 82:60–70. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2016.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balesdent J, Chenu C, Balabane M. 2000. Relationship of soil organic matter dynamics to physical protection and tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 53:215–230. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00107-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambrick AD, Whalen JK, Bradley RL, Cogliastro A, Gordon AM, Olivier A, Thevathasan NV. 2010. Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Agroforest Syst. 79:343–353. doi:10.1007/s10457-010-9305-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battie-Laclau P, Taschen E, Plassard C, Dezette D, Abadie J, Arnal D, Benezech P, Duthoit M, Pablo A-L, Jourdan C, et al. 2020. Role of trees and herbaceous vegetation beneath trees in maintaining arbuscular mycorrhizal communities in temperate alley cropping systems. Plant Soil. 453:153–171. DOI:10.1007/s11104-019-04181-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baveye PC. 2021. Soil health at a crossroad. Soil Use Manag. 37:215–219. doi:10.1111/sum.12703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bérard A, Ben Sassi M, Renault P, Gros R. 2012. Severe drought-induced community tolerance to heat wave. An experimental study on soil microbial processes. J Soils Sediments. 12:513–518. doi:10.1007/s11368-012-0469-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bérard A, Bouchet T, Sévenier G, Pablo AL, Gros R. 2011. Resilience of soil microbial communities impacted by severe drought and high temperature in the context of Mediterranean heat waves. European J Soil Biol. 47:333–342. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuschel R, Piepho H-P, Joergensen RG, Wachendorf C. 2019. Similar spatial patterns of soil quality indicators in three poplar-based silvo-arable alley cropping systems in Germany. Biol Fertil Soils. 55:1–14. doi:10.1007/s00374-018-1324-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boinot S, Poulmarc’h J, Mézière D, P-é L, Sarthou J-P. 2019. Distribution of overwintering invertebrates in temperate agroforestry systems: implications for biodiversity conservation and biological control of crop pests. Agricul, Ecosys Environ. 285:106630. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2019.106630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauman A, Thoumazeau A. 2020. Biofunctool® : un outil de terrain pour évaluer la santé des sols, basé sur la mesure de fonctions issues de l’activité des organismes du sol. Etude et Gestion des Sols. 27:289–303.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell CD, Chapman SJ, Cameron CM, Davidson MS, Potts JM. 2003. A rapid microtiter plate method to measure carbon dioxide evolved from carbon substrate amendments so as to determine the physiological profiles of soil microbial communities by using whole soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 69:3593–3599. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.6.3593-3599.2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinael R, Chevallier T, Barthès BG, Saby NPA, Parent T, Dupraz C, Bernoux M, Chenu C. 2015. Impact of alley cropping agroforestry on stocks, forms and spatial distribution of soil organic carbon — a case study in a Mediterranean context. Geoderma. 259–260:288–299. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinael R, Guenet B, Chevallier T, Dupraz C, Cozzi T, Chenu C. 2018. High organic inputs explain shallow and deep SOC storage in a long-term agroforestry system – combining experimental and modeling approaches. Biogeosciences. 15:297–317. doi:10.5194/bg-15-297-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinael R, Hoeffner K, Chenu C, Chevallier T, Béral C, Dewisme A, Cluzeau D. 2019. Spatial variation of earthworm communities and soil organic carbon in temperate agroforestry. Biol Fertil Soils. 55:171–183. doi:10.1007/s00374-018-1332-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congreves KA, Hayes A, Verhallen EA, van Eerd LL. 2015. Long-term impact of tillage and crop rotation on soil health at four temperate agroecosystems. Soil Tillage Res. 152:17–28. doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culman SW, Snapp SS, Freeman MA, Schipanski ME, Beniston J, Lal R, Drinkwater LE, Franzluebbers AJ, Glover JD, Grandy AS, et al. 2012. Permanganate oxidizable carbon reflects a processed soil fraction that is sensitive to management. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 76:494–504. doi:10.2136/sssaj2011.0286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Hervilly C, Marsden C, Capowiez Y, Béral C, Delapré-Cosset L, Bertrand I. 2021. Trees and herbaceous vegetation strips both contribute to changes in soil fertility and soil organism communities in an agroforestry system. Plant Soil. 463:537–553. doi:10.1007/s11104-021-04932-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Hervilly C, Marsden C, Hedde M, Bertrand I. 2020. Sown understory vegetation strips impact soil chemical fertility, associated microorganisms and macro-invertebrates in two temperate alley cropping systems. Agroforest Syst. 94:1851–1864. doi:10.1007/s10457-020-00501-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawud SM, Raulund‐Rasmussen K, Ratcliffe S, Domisch T, Finér L, Joly F-X, Hättenschwiler S, Vesterdal L. 2017. Tree species functional group is a more important driver of soil properties than tree species diversity across major European forest types. Funct Ecol. 31:1153–1162. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Herder M, Moreno G, Mosquera-Losada RM, Palma JHN, Sidiropoulou A, Santiago Freijanes JJ, Crous-Duran J, Paulo JA, Tomé M, Pantera A, et al. 2017. Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European Union. Agricul, Ecosys Environ. 241:121–132. DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollinger J, Jose S. 2018. Agroforestry for soil health. Agroforest Syst. 92:213–219. doi:10.1007/s10457-018-0223-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour L, Metay A, Talbot G, Dupraz C. 2013. Assessing light competition for cereal production in temperate agroforestry systems using experimentation and crop modelling. J Agron Crop Sci. 199:217–227. doi:10.1111/jac.12008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupraz C, Blitz-Frayret C, Lecomte I, Molto Q, Reyes F, Gosme M. 2018. Influence of latitude on the light availability for intercrops in an agroforestry alley-cropping system. Agroforest Syst. 92:1019–1033. doi:10.1007/s10457-018-0214-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duru M, Therond O, Fares M. 2015. Designing agroecological transitions; A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 35:1237–1257. doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucon M-P, Houben D, Lambers H. 2017. Plant functional traits: soil and ecosystem services. Trends Plant Sci. 20:385–394. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.01.005.
   Google Scholar
• Fox J, Weisberg S 2019. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Third. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.
   Google Scholar
• Gaba S, Lescourret F, Boudsocq S, Enjalbert J, Hinsinger P, Journet E-P, Navas M-L, Wery J, Louarn G, Malézieux E, et al. 2015. Multiple cropping systems as drivers for providing multiple ecosystem services: from concepts to design. Agron Sustain Dev. 35:607–623. DOI:10.1007/s13593-014-0272-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillot E, Bertrand I, Rumpel C, Gomez C, Arnal D, Abadie J, Hinsinger P. 2021. Spatial heterogeneity of soil quality within a Mediterranean alley cropping agroforestry system: comparison with a monocropping system. European J Soil Biol. 105:103330. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2021.103330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillot E, Hinsinger P, Dufour L, Roy J, Bertrand I. 2019. With or without trees: resistance and resilience of soil microbial communities to drought and heat stress in a Mediterranean agroforestry system. Soil Biol Biochem. 129:122–135. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães RML, Ball BC, Tormena CA. 2011. Improvements in the visual evaluation of soil structure. Soil Use Manage. 27:395–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrick JE, Whitford WG, de Soyza AG, Van Zee JW, Havstad KM, Seybold CA, Walton M. 2001. Field soil aggregate stability kit for soil quality and rangeland health evaluations. Catena. 44(1):27–35. DOI:10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00173-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen HH, Janzen DW, Gregorich EG. 2021. The ‘soil health’ metaphor: illuminating or illusory? Soil Biol Biochem. 159:108167. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos. 69:373–386. doi:10.2307/3545850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose S. 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforest Syst. 76:1–10. doi:10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattge J, Bönisch G, Diaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice IC, Leadley P, Tautenhahn S, Werner G, Aakala T, Abedi M, et al. 2020. TRY plant trait database - enhanced coverage and openaccess. Global Change Biol. 26:119–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibblewhite MG, Ritz K, Swift MJ. 2008. Soil health in agricultural systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 363:685–701. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassabatère L, Angulo-Jaramillo R, Ugalde JMS, Cuenca R, Braud I, Haverkamp R. 2006. Beerkan estimation of soil transfer parameters through infiltration experiments—BEST. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 70:521–532. doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Cadre E, Kinkondi M, Koutika L-S, Epron D, Mareschal L. 2018. Anionic exchange membranes, a promising tool to measure distribution of soil nutrients in tropical multispecific plantations. Ecol Indicators. 94:254–256. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lê S, Josse J, Husson F. 2008. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Statist Software. 25(1):1–17. DOI:10.18637/jss.v025.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann J, Bossio DA, Kögel-Knabner I, Rillig MC. 2020. The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nature Rev Earth Environ. 1:544–553. doi:10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemon P. 1956. A spherical densitometer for estimating forest overstory density. Forest Sci. 2:314 20.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden C, Martin-Chave A, Cortet J, Hedde M, Capowiez Y. 2019. How agroforestry systems influence soil fauna and their functions - a review. Plant Soil. 453:29–44. doi:10.1007/s11104-019-04322-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin AR, Isaac ME. 2018. Functional traits in agroecology: advancing description and prediction in agroecosystems. J Appl Ecol. 5:5–11. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13039.
   Google Scholar
• Mary B, Clivot H, Blaszczyk N, Labreuche J, Ferchaud F. 2020. Soil carbon storage and mineralization rates are affected by carbon inputs rather than physical disturbance: evidence from a 47-year tillage experiment. Agricul, Ecosys Environ. 299:106972. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.106972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard DG, Kalra YP. 1993. Nitrate and Exchangeable Ammonium Nitrogen. In: Carter MR, editor. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science, Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor; pp. 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nair PKR. 1985. Classification of agroforestry systems. Agroforest Syst. 3:97–128. doi:10.1007/BF00122638.
   Google Scholar
• Obriot F, Stauffer M, Goubard Y, Cheviron N, Peres G, Eden M, Revallier A, Vieublé-Gonod L, Houot S. 2016. Multi-criteria indices to evaluate the effects of repeated organic amendment applications on soil and crop quality. Agricul, Ecosys Environ. 232:165–178. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliai M, Vignozzi N, Pellegrini S. 2004. Soil structure and the effect of management practices. Soil Tillage Res. 79:131–143. doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardon P, Reubens B, Mertens J, Verheyen K, De Frenne P, De Smet G, Van Waes C, Reheul D. 2018. Effects of temperate agroforestry on yield and quality of different arable intercrops. Agricul Sys. 166:135–151. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardon P, Reubens B, Reheul D, Mertens J, De Frenne P, Coussement T, Janssens P, Verheyen K. 2017. Trees increase soil organic carbon and nutrient availability in temperate agroforestry systems. Agricul, Ecosys Environ. 247:98–111. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peichl M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Huss J, Abohassan RA. 2006. Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree-based intercropping systems, Southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforest Syst. 66:243–257. doi:10.1007/s10457-005-0361-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pheap S, Lefèvre C, Thoumazeau A, Leng V, Boulakia S, Koy R, Hok L, Lienhard P, Brauman A, Tivet F. 2019. Multi-functional assessment of soil health under conservation agriculture in Cambodia. Soil Tillage Res. 194:104349. doi:10.1016/j.still.2019.104349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powlson DS. 2021. Is “soil health” meaningful as a scientific concept or as terminology? Soil Use Manage. 37:403–405. doi:10.1111/sum.12721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian P, Schoenau JJ. 2002. Practical applications of ion exchange resins in agricultural and environmental soil reasearch. Can J Oil Sci. 82:9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Quinkenstein A, Wöllecke J, Böhm C, Grünewald H, Freese D, Schneider BU, Hüttl RF. 2009. Ecological benefits of the alley cropping agroforestry system in sensitive regions of Europe. Environ Sci Policy. 12:1112–1121. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rey F, Cécillon L, Cordonnier T, Jaunatre R, Loucougaray G. 2015. Integrating ecological engineering and ecological intensification from management practices to ecosystem services into a generic framework: a review. Agron Sustain Dev. 35:1335–1345. doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0320-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauvadet M, Saj S, Freschet GT, Essobo J-D, Enock S, Becquer T, Tixier P, Harmand J-M. 2020. Cocoa agroforest multifunctionality and soil fertility explained by shade tree litter traits. J Appl Ecol. 57:476–487. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Six J, Elliott ET, Paustian K. 1999. Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 63:1350–1358. doi:10.2136/sssaj1999.6351350x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöcker CM, Bamberg AL, Stumpf L, Monteiro AB, Cardoso JH, de Lima ACR. 2020. Short-term soil physical quality improvements promoted by an agroforestry system. Agroforest Syst. 94:2053–2064. doi:10.1007/s10457-020-00524-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoumazeau A, Bessou C, Renevier M-S, Panklang P, Puttaso P, Peerawat M, Heepngoen P, Polwong P, Koonklang N, Sdoodee S, et al. 2019a. Biofunctool®: a new framework to assess the impact of land management on soil quality. Part B: investigating the impact of land management of rubber plantations on soil quality with the Biofunctool® index. Ecol Indicators. 97:429–437. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoumazeau A, Bessou C, Renevier M-S, Trap J, Marichal R, Mareschal L, Decaëns T, Bottinelli N, Jaillard B, Chevallier T, et al. 2019b. Biofunctool®: a new framework to assess the impact of land management on soil quality. Part A: concept and validation of the set of indicators. Ecol Indicators. 97:100–110. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoumazeau A, Gay F, Alonso P, Suvannang N, Phongjinda A, Panklang P, Chevallier T, Bessou C, Brauman A. 2017. SituResp®: a time- and cost-effective method to assess basal soil respiration in the field. Appl Soil Eco. 121:223–230. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torquebiau EF. 2000. A renewed perspective on agroforestry concepts and classification. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences - Series III. Sciences de la Vie. 323:1009–1017. doi:10.1016/s0764-4469(00)01239-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torralba M, Fagerholm N, Burgess PJ, Moreno G, Plieninger T. 2016. Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis. Agricul, Ecosys Environ. 230:150–161. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsonkova P, Böhm C, Quinkenstein A, Freese D. 2012. Ecological benefits provided by alley cropping systems for production of woody biomass in the temperate region: a review. Agroforest Syst. 85:133–152. doi:10.1007/s10457-012-9494-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Törne E. 1990. Assessing feeding activities of soil-living animals. I Bait-lamina-tests Pedobiologia. 34:89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Weil RR, Islam IR, Stine MA, Gruver JB, Samson-liebig SE. 2003. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for laboratory and field use. Am J Altern Agricul. 18:3–17. doi:10.1079/AJAA2003003.
   Google Scholar