Ailanthus excelsa L. based agroforestry systems in North-West Indian dry lands: effect on yields of intercrops and soil properties

References

• Alam M, Olivier A, Paquette A, Dupras J, Reve´ret JP, Messier C. 2014. A general framework for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services of tree-based intercropping systems. Agrofor Syst. 88:679–691. doi:10.1007/s10457-014-9681-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argao LEOC, Malhi Y, Metcalfe DB, Silva-Espejo JE, Jimenez E, Navarrete D, Asquez R, Costa ACL, Salinas N, Phillips OL. 2009. Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils. Biogeosciences. 6:2759–2778. doi:10.5194/bg-6-2759-2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balooni K. 2003. Economics of wasteland afforestation in India, a review. New For. 26:101–136. doi:10.1023/A:1024494010538.
   Google Scholar
• Bhimaya CP, Kaul RN, Ganguky BN. 1963. Species suitable for afforestation of different arid habitats of Rajasthan. Ann Arid Zone. 2:162–168.
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi MD. 1956. Ardu, the tree of distinction. Indian Far. 5:32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Datta A, Basak N, Chaudhari SK, Sharma DK. 2015. Effect of horticultural land uses on soil properties and soil carbon distribution in reclaimed sodic soil. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 63(3):294–303. doi:10.5958/0974-0228.2015.00039.0.
   Google Scholar
• Dhyani SK, Ram A, Dev I. 2016. Potential of agroforestry systems in carbon sequestration in India. Indian Agric Sci. 86:1103–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans GC, Bainbridge R, Rackhan O. 1976. Light as ecological factor. Blackwells: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, 2004. Assessing carbon stocks and modelling: Win–Win scenarios of carbon sequestration through land-use changes. Rome. Food and Agriculture Organization
   Google Scholar
• Garrity DP, Akinnifesi FK, Ajayi OC, Weldesemayat SG, Mowo JG, Kalinganire A, Larwanou M, Bayala J. 2010. Evergreen Agriculture: a robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa. Food Secur. 2:197–214. doi:10.1007/s12571-010-0070-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta RK. 1980. Multipurpose trees for agroforestry systems in India. Indian J Soil Conser. 8:146–156.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta DK, Bhatt RK, Keerthika A, Noor Mohamed MB, Shukla AK, Jangid BL. 2019. Carbon sequestration potential of Hardwickia binata Roxb. based agroforestry in hot semi-arid environment of India: an assessment of tree density impact. Curr Sci. 116(1) . 112–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handa AK, Toky OP, Dhyani SK, Chavan SB. 2016. Innovative agroforestry for livelihood security in India. World Agric. 7. 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan MK, Ashraful Alam AKM. 2006. Land degradation situation in Bangladesh and Role of Agroforestry. J Agric and Rural Develop. 4(1 & 2):19–25. doi:10.3329/jard.v4i1.763.
   Google Scholar
• ISFR. 2019. Forest survey of India (Ministry of environment forest and climate change) Kaulagarh Road, P.O. In: IPE Dehradun – 16. Vol. 1. Dehradun: Allied Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MM, Kalita DC. 2015. Establishment and weed management effects on productivity and soil fertility in wetland rice (Oryza.sativa L). J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 63(3):339–346. doi:10.5958/0974-0228.2015.00044.4.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson ML. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jaimini SN, Patel NM, Patel JM, Patel SB. 2006. Potential role of ardu (Ailanthus excelsa) in agroforestry systems for sustainable rainfed agriculture in Gujarat. Indian J For. 29(4):395–397.
   Google Scholar
• Jat HS, Singh RK, Mann JS. 2011. Ardu (Ailanthus sp) in arid ecosystem: a compatible species for combating with drought and securing livelihood security of resource poor people. Indian J Traditional Knowledge. 10:102–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhorar BS, Malik RS, Dhillon RS, Mor RP, Dahiya SS, Hooda MS. 2003. Balsamand - foot prints on the sands of time 1999-2003. India: Department of Soil Science, Department of Forestry, CCS HAU, Hisar; p. 125 004.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul M, Mohren GMJ, Dadhwal VK. 2010. Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 15:489–510. doi:10.1007/s11027-010-9230-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik N, Gaur RK, Mehta K, Kumari S, Yadav PK. 2017a. Ailanthus excelsa Roxb.: an agroforestry tree species for arid and semiarid ecosystems. Indian J Agrofor. 19(1):12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik N, Kaushik RA, Kumar S, Sharma KD, Dhankhar OP. 2011. Comparative performance of some agri-silvi-horti systems with drip irrigation under arid regions. Indian J Hortic. 68(1):12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik N, Kaushik RA, Saini RS, Deswal RPS. 2002. Performance of agri-silvi-horticutural systems in arid India. Indian J Agrofor. 4(1):31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik N, Kumar V. 2003. Khejri (Prosopis cineraria)-based agroforestry system for arid Haryana, India. J Arid Environ. 55:433–440. doi:10.1016/S0140-1963(02)00289-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik N, Kumari S, Singh S, Kaushik JC. 2014. Productivity and economics of different agri-silvi-horti systems under drip irrigation. Indian J Agric Sci. 84(10):1166–1171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik N, Singh J, Kaushik RA. 2000. Performance of arable crop in the initial years under rainfed agri-silvi-horticultural system in Haryana. Range Manag Agrofor. 21(2):170–174.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik N, Tikkoo A, Yadav PK, Deswal RPS, Singh S. 2017b. Agri-silvi-horti systems for semi- arid regions of North-West India. Agric Res. 6(2):150–158. doi:10.1007/s40003-017-0247-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Tewari JC. 2009. Watershed management for fuelwood and fodder security in a traditional agroforestry system of arid western Rajasthan. J Trop For. 25:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar BM. 2006. Carbon sequestration potential of tropical homegardens. In: Kumar BM, PKR N, editors. Tropical Homegardens: a Time-Tested Example of Sustainable Agroforestry. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Springer Science; p. 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Kumar R, Rawat KS, Yadav B. 2012. Vertical distribution of physico-chemical properties under different topo-sequence in soils of Jharkhand. J Agricul Phy. 12(1):63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyah S, Dietz J, Muthuri C, van Noordwijk M, Neufeldt H. 2013. Allometry and partitioning of above-and below-ground biomass in farmed Eucalyptus species dominant in Western Kenyan agricultural landscapes. Biomass Bioenergy. 55:276–284. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwabiah AB, Stoskopf NC, Voroney RP, Palm CA. 2006. Nitrogen and Phosphorus release from decomposing leaves under sub‐humid tropical conditions. Biotropica. 33:229–240. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2001.tb00174.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lal R. 2009. Soils and Food Sufficiency: AReview. Lichtfouse E, Navarrete M, Debaeke P, Véronique S, Alberola C, eds., Sustainable Agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer. Dordrecht. 25–29. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_4 .
   Google Scholar
• Lavhale MS, Mishra SH. 2007. Nutritional and therapeutic potential of Ailanthus excelsa: a review. Pharmacog Rev. 1:105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Mangalassery S, Dayal D, Meena SL, Ram B. 2014. Carbon sequestration in agroforestry and pasture systems in arid north western India. Curr Sci. 107(8):1290–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meena LR, Mann JS, Sharma SC, Mehta RS. 2001. Performance of ardu (Ailanthus excelsa) under silvipasture system in semi-arid Area of Rajasthan. Indian J For. 7(1):32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Miah MG, Rahman MA, Haque MM, Ahmed NU, Islam MH. 2001. Crop productivity and soil fertility in Alley ropping system at different nitrogen levels in upland ecosystem. In: Haq MF, Hasan MK, Asaduzzaman SM, Ali MY, editors. National workshop on Agroforestry research and development in Bangladesh held on September. BARI (Gazipur). 1701.
   Google Scholar
• Mouat DA, Lancaster JM. 2008. Drylands in crisis—environmental change and human response. In: Liotta PH, editors Environmental change and human security: recognizing and acting on hazard impacts. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Springer Science; p. 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD. 2009. Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 172:10–23. doi:10.1002/jpln.200800030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandal DPS, Kumar R. 2010. Influence of Melia azedarach based land use systems on economics and reclamation of salt affected soil. Indian J Agrofor. 12(1):23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. 1954. Estimation of available P in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular of the United States department of agriculture 939. Washington D.C: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ong CK, Anyango S, Muthuri CW, Black CR. 2007. Water use and water productivity of agroforestry systems in the semi-arid tropics. Ann Arid Zone. 46:255–284.
   Google Scholar
• Ong CK, Black CR, Muthuri CW. 2006. Modifying forestry and agroforestry to increase water productivity in the semi-arid tropics. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science. Nutr Nat Res. 1(65):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ong CK, Kho R. 2015. A framework for quantifying the various effects of tree-crop interactions. In: Black C, Wilson J, Ong CK, editors. Tree–Crop Interactions: agroforestry in a Changing Climate,(Wallingford: CABI). p. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Patel JM, Jamini SN, Patel SB. 2008. Evaluation of neem and ardu based agri-silvi system. In: Narain P, S SMPKAK, Praveen K, editors. Diversification of Arid Farming Systems. Jodhpur (India): Arid Zone Research Association of India and Scientific Publisher (India; p. 114–118.
   Google Scholar
• Patil SJ, Mutanal SM, Patil HY. 2012. Melia azedarach based agroforestry system in transitional tract of Karnataka. Karnataka Agril Sci. 25(4):460–462.
   Google Scholar
• Paudel BR, Udawatta RP, Anderson SH. 2011. Agroforestry and grass buffer effects on soil quality parameters for grazed pasture and row-crop systems. Appl Soil Ecol. 48:125–132. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson TRH, Brown S, Ravindranath NH, 2005. Integrating carbon benefits estimates into GEF Projects, 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Puri S, Nair PKR. 2004. Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program. Agrofor Syst. 61:437–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raddad EY, Luukkanen O. 2007. The influence of different Acacia Senegal agroforestry systems on soil water and crop yields in clay soils of the Blue Nile region, Sudan. Agric Water Manag. 87:61–72. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajalingam GV, Manikandan M, Parthiban KT. 2017. Performance of green leafy vegetable crops under Ailanthus excelsa based silvihorticultural system in western zone of Tamil Nadu. Chem Sci Rev Lett. 6(24):2159–2162.
   Google Scholar
• Safriel U, Adeel Z. 2005. Dryland systems. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N, editors. Ecosystems and Human Well-being, Current State and Trends, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.editors, Vol. 1. Washington: Island Press. Washington; p. 623–662.
   Google Scholar
• Safriel U, Ezcurra E, Tegen I, Schlesinger WH, Nellemann C, Batjes NH, Dent D, Groner E, Morrison S, Resenfeld D, et al. 2006. Deserts and the planet - Linkages between deserts and non-deserts. In: Ezcurra E, editors. Global Deserts Outlook (UNEP). p. 50–72.
   Google Scholar
• Samra JS, Kareemulla K, Marwaha PS, Gena HC. 2005. Agroforestry and Livelihood Promotion by Cooperatives. Jhansi (India): National Research Centre for Agroforestry; p. 104.
   Google Scholar
• Saravanan S. 2009. Ailanthus excelsa - a potential multipurpose agroforestry species for economic upliftment of farming communities in Tamilnadu. My For. 45(4):403–409.
   Google Scholar
• Schnell S, Kleinn C, Ståhl G. 2015. Monitoring Trees Outside Forests: a Review. Environmental Monitoring Assessment. 187:600. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4817-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroth G, Fonseca GAB, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos HL, Izac AMN. 2004. Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Washington: Island Press; p. 523.
   Google Scholar
• Seth SK, Raizada MB, Khan WMA. 1962. Trees of Vana Mahotsava. F.R.I and Colleges. Dehradun: Forest Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Singh AK. 2010. Probable agricultural biodiversity heritage sites in India: VII. The arid western region. Asian J Agric Res. 14(4):337–359.
   Google Scholar
• Singh G, Bala N, Mutha S, Rathod TR, Limba NK. 2004. Biomass production of Tecomella undulata agroforestry systems in arid India. Biol Agric Hortic. 22(3):205–216. doi:10.1080/01448765.2004.9755286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G, Gupta GN, Kuppusamy V. 2000. Seasonal variations in organic carbon and nutrient availability in arid zone agroforestry systems. Trop Ecol. 41(1):17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Singh B, Sharma KN. 2012. Depthwise distribution of organic carbon and nutrients under some tree species after seventeen years of plantation. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 60(3):198–203.
   Google Scholar
• Singh B, Singh G. 2015. Biomass production and carbon stock in a silvi-horti based agroforestry system in arid region of Rajasthan. Indian For. 141(12):1237–1243.
   Google Scholar
• Singh R, Singh RS, Purohit HS, Verma TP, Garhwal RS. 2016. Productivity and suitability evaluation of Orange (Citrus reticulata) growing soils of hot and semi arid region of Rajasthan (AESR 5.2. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 64(1):46–57. doi:10.5958/0974-0228.2016.00007.4.
   Google Scholar
• Sushant Pralhad B, Rajendran P, Divya MP, Rajeswari R, Thangamani G, Ramaha C. 2020. Assessing the effect of different dgroforestry practices on soil physico-chemical properties and microbial activity. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 9(12):2802–2816. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.912.335.
   Google Scholar
• Swamy SL, Puri S, Singh AK. 2003. Growth, biomass, carbon storage and nutrient distribution in G. arborea stands on red lateritic soils in central India. Bioresour Technol. 90(2):109–126. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00120-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadesse S, Gebretsadik W, Muthuri C, Derero A, Hadgu K, Said H, Dilla A. 2021. Crop productivity and tree growth in intercropped agroforestry systems in semi-arid and sub-humid regions of Ethiopia. Agrofor Syst. 95:487–498. doi:10.1007/s10457-021-00596-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verchot LV, Van Noordwijk M, Kandji S, Tomich T, Ong C, Albrecht A, Mackensen J, Bantilan C, Anupama KV, Palm C. 2007. Climate change, Linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 12:901–918. doi:10.1007/s11027-007-9105-6.
   Google Scholar
• Walkley AJ, Black IA. 1934. An examination of degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37:29–38. doi:10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner J, Andersen SB, Wille WKM, Griepentrog HWOJM, Olsen JM. 2010. Evolutionary agroecology: the potential for cooperative, high density, weed suppressing cereals. Evol Appl. 3:473–479. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00144.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westholm L, Ostwald M. 2020. Food Production and Gender Relations in multifunctional Landscapes: a Literature Review. Agrofor Syst. 94:359–374. doi:10.1007/s10457-019-00397-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar