Shading in the late stem elongation period generate the greatest grain yield reduction in oat (Avena sativa L.)

References

• Abbate PE, Andrade FH, Culot JP. 1995. The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat. J Agric Sci. 124(3):351–360. doi:10.1017/S0021859600073317.
   Google Scholar
• Acevedo E, Silva P, Silva H. 2002. Wheat growth and physiology. In: Curtis B, Rajaram S, Gomez-Macpherson H, editors. Bread wheat, improvement and production. Rome (Rm); p. 39–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad A, Anjum FM, Zahoor T, Nawaz H, Ahmed Z. 2010. Extraction and characterization of β-glucan from oat for industrial utilization. Int J Biol Macromol. 46(3):304–309. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JW, Baird P, Davis RH, Ferreri S, Knudtson M, Koraym A, Walters V, Williams CL. 2009. Health benefits of dietary fiber. Nutr Rev. 67(4):188–205. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00189.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JW, Bridges SR. 1993. Hypocholesterolemic effects of oat bran in humans. In: Wood P, editor. Oat bran. Minnesota (US): American Association of Cereal Chemists International; p. 139–157.
   Google Scholar
• Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ. 2006. Floret development and grain setting in near isogenic two- and six-rowed barley lines (Hordeum vulgare L.). Field Crops Res. 96(2–3):466–476. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2005.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ. 2008. Critical period for grain number establishment of near isogenic lines of two- and six-rowed barley. Field Crops Res. 107(3):196–202. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2008.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderini DF, Abeledo LG, Savin R, Slafer GA. 1999. Effect of temperature and carpel size duringpre-anthesis on potential grain weight in wheat. J Agric Sci. 132(4):453–460. doi:10.1017/S0021859699006504.
   Google Scholar
• Calderini DF, Reynolds MP. 2000. Changes in grain weight as a consequence of de-graining treatments at pre and post-anthesis in synthetic hexaploid lines of wheat (Triticum durum × T. tauschii). Aust J Plant Physiol. 27:183–191.
   Google Scholar
• Denisov PV. 1974. The number of grains per ear or per panicle of cereals as the most important element in yield structure. Trudy po Prikladnoi Botanice Genetike Selektsii. 51:171–186.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz JI 2018. Características de sanidad, rendimiento y calidad en genotipos de avena en filiales avanzadas de un programa de mejoramiento. [Genetic resistance, grain yield and quality in oat genotypes in advanced landraces of a breeding program]. Trabajo final de Maestría en Protección vegetal, Universidad Nacional de La Plata. 153 pp. Sept 2021. Spanish. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/68021
   Google Scholar
• Estrada-Campuzano G, Miralles DJ, Slafer GA. 2008. Yield determination in triticale as affected by radiation in different development phases. Eur J Agron. 28(4):597–605. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2008.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2021 Food and agriculture data. Jul 2021. http://www.fao.org
   Google Scholar
• Finnan J, Burke B, Spink J. 2019. The plasticity of the oat panicle and associated changes in leaf area and grain weight. Field Crops Res. 242:107592. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer RA. 1985. Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. J Agric Sci. 105(2):447–461. doi:10.1017/S0021859600056495.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer RA. 2008. The importance of grain or kernel number in wheat: a reply to Sinclair and Jamieson. Field Crops Res. 105(1–2):15–21. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer RA, Stockman YM. 1980. Kernel Number Per Spike in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): responses to Preanthesis Shading. Funct Plant Biol. 7(2):169–180. doi:10.1071/PP9800169.
   Google Scholar
• Gallaher DD. 2000. Dietary fiber and its physiological effects. In: Schmidt M, Labuza TP, editors. Essentials of functional foods. Gaithersburg (Ga): Aspen Publishers, Inc; 271–292.
   Google Scholar
• GenStat for Windows. 2009. 12 Copyright VSN International Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• González FG, Slafer GA, Miralles DJ. 2003. Floret development and spike growth as affected by photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat. Field Crops Res. 81(1):29–38. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00196-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JA, Richards RA. 2013. Prognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major grain crops. Field Crops Res. 143:18–33. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head DS, Cenkowski S, Arntfield S, Henderson K. 2010. Superheated steam processing of oat groats. LWT Food Sci Technol. 43(4):690–694. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRAM. 2009. Norma IRAM- SAGPyA 29574:2009. Determinación del pH en suelo para uso agropecuario. [Determination of pH in soil for agricultural use].
   Google Scholar
• IRAM. 2010. Norma IRAM- SAGPyA 29570-1.Determination of extractable phosphorus in soils - Part 1 – modified Bray Kurtz Method 1 (Extraction with ammonium fluoride solution and hydrochloric acid).
   Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard JA, Hunt JR. 2011. Increasing productivity by matching farming system management and genotype in water-limited environments. J Exp Bot. 61(15):4129–4143. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar Y, Jhorar BS, Sangwan O, Singh P. 2004. Character association between grain yield and its components in oat (Avena sativa L.). National J Plant Improvement. 6:4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lexow G 2000. Número de hojas y su filocrono entre distintos órdenes de vástagos en avena y cebada: impacto sobre el rendimiento. [Number of leaves and their phyllochron among different shoot orders in oats and barley: impact on yield] Tesis de Maestría. Universidad de Buenos Aires. 132 pp. Spanish
   Google Scholar
• Mahadevan M, Calderini DF, Zwer PK, Sadras VO. 2016. The critical period for yield determination in oat (Avena sativa L.). Field Crops Res. 199:109–116. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miralles DJ, Katz SD, Colloca A, Slafer GA. 1998. Floret development in near isogenic wheat lines differing in plant height. Field Crops Res. 59(1):21–30. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00103-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nix HA. 1976. Climate and crop productivity in Australia. In: Yoshida S, editor. Climate and Rice. Philippines (Ph); p. 495–507.
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen-Sainio P. 1990. Morphological and physiological characters behind high-yielding ability of oats (Avena sativa), and their implications for breeding. Field Crops Res. 25(3–4):247–252. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(90)90007-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltonen-Sainio P. 1991a. Productive oat ideotype for northern growing conditions. Euphytica. 54(1):27–32. doi:10.1007/BF00145627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltonen-Sainio P. 1991b. High phytomass producing oats for cultivation in northern growing conditions. J Agron Crop Sci. 166(2):90–95. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.1991.tb00889.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltonen-Sainio P. 1999. Growth and development of oat with special reference to source-sink interaction and productivity (Eds. Smith CYD, Hamel C). Berlin (Be): Springer; p. 39–66.
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen-Sainio P, Kangas A, Salo Y, Jauhiainen L. 2007. Grain number dominates grain weight in temperate cereal yield determination: evidence based on 30 years of multi-location trials. Field Crops Res. 100(2–3):179–188. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltonen-Sainio P, Peltonen J. 1995. Floret set and abortion in oat and wheat under high and low nitrogen regimes. Eur J Agron. 4(2):253–262. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(14)80052-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasane P, Jha A, Sabikhi L, Kumar A, Unnikrishnan VS. 2015. Nutritional advantages of oats and opportunities for its processing as value added foods-a review. J Food Sci Technol. 52(2):662–675. doi:10.1007/s13197-013-1072-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards RA. 1996. Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regul. 20(2):157–166. doi:10.1007/BF00024012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin R, Slafer GA. 1991. Shading effects on the yield of an Argentinian wheat cultivar. J Agric Sci. 116(1):1–7. doi:10.1017/S0021859600076085.
   Google Scholar
• Sawicki J. 1984. Yield structure in cultivars and strains of oats as well as the part of its components in forming the yield of grain. Acta Agr Silv SeriesAgraria. 23:59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Serrago RA, Alzueta I, Savin R, Slafer GA. 2013. Understanding grain yield responses to source–sink ratios during grain filling in wheat and barley under contrasting environments. Field Crops Res. 150:42–51. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrago RA, Miralles DJ, Slafer GA. 2008. Floret fertility in wheat as affected by photoperiod during stem elongation and removal of spikelets at booting. Eur J Agron. 28(3):301–308. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2007.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slafer GA, Andrade FH, Satorre EH. 1990. Genetic improvement effects on pre-anthesis physiological attributes related to wheat grain yield. Field Crops Res. 23(3–4):255–263. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(90)90058-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slafer GA, Calderini DF, Miralles DJ, Dreccer MF. 1994. Preanthesis shading effects on the number of grains of three bread wheat cultivars of different potential number of grains. Field Crops Res. 36(1):31–39. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(94)90050-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slafer GA, Miralles DJ, Savin R, Whitechurch EM, González FG. 2003. Ciclo ontogénico, dinámica del desarrollo y generación del rendimiento y calidad en trigo [Ontogenic cycle, dynamics of development and generation of yield and quality in wheat. In: Pascale AJ., et al, editor. Producción de Granos: bases funcionales para su manejo. Buenos Aires (BA): Spanish; p. 101–132. Editorial FAUBA.
   Google Scholar
• Slafer GA, Savin R. 1994. Source-sink relationships and grain mass at different positions within the spike in wheat. Field Crops Res. 37(1):39–49. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(94)90080-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slafer GA, Savin R, Sadras VO. 2014. Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment. Field Crops Res. 157:71–83. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squella NF, Ormeño J. 2007. La avena como cultivo forrajero [Oats as a fodder crop]. Técnicas de producción ovina para el secano mediterráneo de la sexta región Bibliotecas del INIA San Fernando. 19–36. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Stockman YM, Fischer RA, Brittain EG. 1983. Assimilate supply and floret development within the spike of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Funct Plant Biol. 10(6):585–594. doi:10.1071/PP9830585.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne GN, Wood DW. 1987. Effects of radiation and temperature on tiller survival, grain number and grain yield in winter wheat. Ann Bot. 59(4):413–426. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020. United States department of agriculture. data and analyses. Jul 2021. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14(6):415–421. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar