Effects of fertilizer produced from agro-industrial wastes on the quality of two different soils

References

• Adam G, Duncan H. 2001. Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 33(7–8):943–951. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00244-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baćmaga M, Wyszkowska J, Kucharski J. 2021. Bacterial diversity and enzymatic activity in a soil recently treated with tebuconazole. Ecol Ind. 123:107373. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Said I, Mezghani I, Donyez F, Chaieb M, Muscolo A. 2017. Reclaimed municipal wastewater for forage production. Water Sci Technol 75 (8). 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouranis DL, Venieraki A, Chorianopoulou SN, Katinakis P. 2019. Impact of elemental sulfur on the rhizospheric bacteria of durum wheat crop cultivated on a calcareous soil. Plants (Basel). 8(10):379. doi: 10.3390/plants8100379. PMID: 31569773; PMCID: PMC6843240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouyoucos GJ. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils 1. Agron J. 54(5):464–465. doi: 10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box JD. 1983. Investigation of the Folin–ciocalteau reagent for the determination of polyphenolic substances in natural waters. Water Res. 17(5):511–525. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(83)90111-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corti C, Weindorf DC, Fernández Sanjurjo MJ, Cacovean H. 2012. Use of waste materials to improve soil fertility and increase crop quality and quantity. Appl Environ Soil Sci. 2012:1–2. doi: 10.1155/2012/204914. ID 204914, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořáčková H, Dvořáček J, Hueso González P, Vlček V, Bashir S. 2022. Effect of different soil amendments on soil buffering capacity. PloS One. 17(2):e0263456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AW. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: APHA.
   Google Scholar
• Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA. 1988. Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 20(5):601–606. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(88)90141-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbaalawy A, Abouhussie E, Tantawy M, Abd Elhafez E, Nada W. 2023. Sulphur compost properties and its amelioration effect on salt affected soil characteristics and productivity. Egypt J Soil Sci. 63(3):339–354. doi: 10.21608/ejss.2023.214737.1602.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2007. Methods of analysis for soils of arid and semi-arid regions. Food And Agricultural Organizations, Rome. 57.
   Google Scholar
• Gerke J. 2022. The central role of soil organic matter in soil fertility and carbon storage. Soil Syst. 6(2):33. doi: 10.3390/soilsystems6020033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendershot WH, Duquette M. 1986. A simple barium chloride method for determining cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 50(3):605–608. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030013x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks LC, Lajtha K, Rousk J. 2021. Nutrient limitation may induce microbial mining for resources from persistent soil organic matter. Ecology. 102(6):e03328. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminsky R, Muller WH. 1978. A recommendation against the use of alkaline soil extraction in the study of allelopathy. Plant Soil. 49(3):641–645. doi: 10.1007/BF02183288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandeler E, Gerber H. 1988. Short-term assay of soil urease activity using colorimetric determination of ammonium. Biol Fert Soils. 6(1):68–72. doi: 10.1007/BF00257924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komilis D, Kontou I, Ntougias S. 2011. A modified static respiration assay and its relationship with an enzymatic test to assess compost stability and maturity. Bioresour Technol. 102(10):5863–5872. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdi K, Aminuddin H, Mohd KY, Radziah O. 2019. Contribution of elemental sulfur to soil acidification, iron release and uptake by corn (Zea mays L.). J Bot Res. 1(1):7–12. doi:10.30564/jrb.v1i1.430
   Google Scholar
• Min K, Freeman C, Kang H, Choi SU. 2015. The regulation by phenolic compounds of soil organic matter dynamics under a changing environment. Biomed Res Int. 2015:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2015/825098. Epub 2015 Oct 1. PMID: 26495314; PMCID: PMC4606107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscolo A, Mauriello F, Marra FCP, Russo M, Ciriminna R, Pagliaro M, Pagliaro M. 2022. AnchoisFert: a New organic fertilizer from fish processing waste for sustainable agriculture. Global Chall. 6(5). 2100141. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202100141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muscolo A, Papalia T, Settineri G, Mallamaci C, Panuccio MR. 2020. Sulphur bentonite-organic-based fertilizers as tool for improving bio-compounds with antioxidant activities in red onion. J Sci Food Agric. 100(2):785–793. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscolo A, Romeo F, Marra F, Mallamaci C 2021. Transforming agricultural, municipal and industrial pollutant wastes into fertilizers for a sustainable healthy food production. J Environ Manage. 300:113771. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscolo A, Settineri G, Papalia T, Attinà E, Basile C, Panuccio MR. 2017. Anaerobic co-digestion of recalcitrant agricultural wastes: characterizing of biochemical parameters of digestate and its impacts on soil ecosystem. Sci Total Environ. 586:746–752. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikaeen M, Nafez AH, Bina B, Nabavi BF, Hassanzadeh A. 2015. Respiration and enzymatic activities as indicators of stabilization of sewage sludge composting. Waste Manage. 39:104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu Z, An F, Su Y, Liu T, Yang R, Du Z, Chen S. 2022. Effect of long-term fertilization on aggregate size distribution and nutrient accumulation in aeolian Sandy Soil. Plants. 11(7):909. doi: 10.3390/plants1107090.
   Google Scholar
• Picci G, Nannipieri P. 2003. Metodi di analisi microbiologica del suolo. Franco Angeli Editore. Milano: Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser JI. 2007. Microorganisms cycling soil nutrients and their diversity. In: Elsas J, Jansson J Trevors J, editors. Modern soil microbiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; pp. 237–261.
   Google Scholar
• Sekaran U, McCoy C, Kumar S, Subramanian S. 2021. Soil microbial community structure and enzymatic activity responses to nitrogen management and landscape positions in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Glob Change Biol Bioenergy. 11(7):836–851. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severson RC, Shacklette HT. 1988. Essential elements and soil amendments for Plants: sources and use for agriculture vol 1017. US Government Printing Office. doi: 10.3133/cir1017.
   Google Scholar
• Shang L, Wan L, Zhou X, Li S, Li X, Bhadauria T. 2020. Effects of organic fertilizer on soil nutrient status, enzyme activity, and bacterial community diversity in Leymus chinensis steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. PloS One. 15(10):e0240559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240559. PMID: 33057441; PMCID: PMC7561123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay P-E, Winder RS, Trofymow JA. 2015. Nutrient-cycling microbes in coastal Douglas-fir forests: regional-scale correlation between communities, in situ climate, and other factors. Front Microbiol. 6. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidari M, Ronzello G, Vecchio G, Muscolo A. 2008. Influence of slope aspects on soil chemical and biochemical properties in a Pinus laricio forest ecosystem of Aspromonte (southern Italy). Eur J Soil Biol. 44(4):364–372. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skwierawska M, Benedycka Z, Jankowski K, Skwierawski A, Jankowski K. 2016. Sulphur as a fertiliser component determining crop yield and quality. J Elem. 21(2):609–623. doi: 10.5601/jelem.2015.20.3.992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skwierawska M, Zawartka L, Zawadzki B 2008. The effect of different rates and forms of applied sulphur on nutrient composition of planted crops. Plant, Soil and Environment. 54(No. 5):179–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solly EF, Weber V, Zimmermann S, Walthert L, Hagedorn F, Schmidt MWI. 2020. A critical evaluation of the relationship between the effective cation exchange capacity and soil organic carbon content in Swiss forest soils. Front For Glob Change. 3. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00098. ISSN=2624-893X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vance ED, Brooke PC, Jenkinson DS. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem. 19(6):703–707. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Mersi W, Schinner F. 1991. An improved and accurate method for determining the dehydrogenase activity of soils with iodonitrotetrazolium chloride. Biol Fertil Soils. 11(3):216–220. doi: 10.1007/BF00335770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkley A, Black IA. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37(1):29–38. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
   Google Scholar
• World reference base for soil Resources (WRB) – ISRIC. 2022. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. 4th edn. Vienna, Austria: International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS).
   Google Scholar
• Yesmin R, Hossain M, Kibria MG, Jahiruddin M, Solaiman ZM, Bokhtiar SM, Hossain MB, Satter MA, Abedin MA. 2021. Evaluation of critical limit of sulphur in soils for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and mustard (Brassica napus L.). Sustainability. 13(15):8325. doi: 10.3390/su13158325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanin L, Tomasi N, Cesco S, Varanini Z, Pinton R. 2019. Humic substances contribute to plant iron nutrition acting as chelators and biostimulants. Front Plant Sci. 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2019.00675. ISSN=1664-462X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar