2,083
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Understanding Students’ and Science Educators’ Eco-Labeled Food Purchase Behaviors: Extension of Theory of Planned Behavior with Self-Identity, Personal Norm, Willingness to Pay, and Eco-Label Knowledge

ORCID Icon

References

  • Aitken, R., L. Watkins, J. Williams, and A. Kean. 2020. The positive role of labelling on consumers’ perceived behavioural control and intention to purchase organic food. Journal of Cleaner Production 255:120334–43. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120334.
  • Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  • Ajzen, I. 2002. Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32 (4):665–83. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x.
  • Arvola, A., M. Vassallo, M. Dean, P. Lampila, A. Saba, L. Lähteenmäki, and R. Shepherd. 2008. Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 50 (2–3):443–54. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.09.010.
  • Ateş, H. 2019a. Elementary school teachers’ behavioral intentions for healthy nutrition: Extending theory of planned behavior. Health Education 119 (2):133–49. doi:10.1108/HE-11-2018-0056.
  • Ateş, H. 2019b. A conceptual model of relationships among ecological worldview, fundamental values, personal norm and self-identity. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
  • Ateş, H. 2020a. Merging theory of planned behavior and value identity personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. Sustainable Production and Consumption 24:169–80. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.006.
  • Ateş, H. 2020b. Pre-service science teachers’ perceptual biases regarding sustainable food consumption: Negative footprint illusion. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, (IJRES) 6 (4):599–612. doi:10.46328/ijres.v6i4.1163.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., and Y. Yi. 2012. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (1):8–34. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x.
  • Beattie, G., and L. McGuire. 2016. Consumption and climate change: Why we say one thing but do another in the face of our greatest threat. Semiotica 2016 (213):493–538. doi:10.1515/sem-2015-0109.
  • Bougherara, D., and P. Combris. 2009. Eco-labelled food products: What are consumers paying for? European Review of Agricultural Economics 36 (3):321–41. doi:10.1093/erae/jbp023.
  • Brown, M.W. &Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen, J.S. Long, (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Bublitz, M. G., L. A. Peracchio, and L. G. Block. 2010. Why did I eat that? Perspectives on food decision making and dietary restraint. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (3):239–58. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.008.
  • Byrne, B. M. 2016. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (multivariate applications). New York: Routledge.
  • Carfora, V., C. Cavallo, D. Caso, T. Del Giudice, B. De Devitiis, R. Viscecchia, …G. Cicia. 2019. Explaining consumer purchase behavior for organic milk: Including trust and green self-identity within the theory of planned behavior. Food Quality and Preference 76:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.03.006.
  • Carfora, V., D. Caso, and M. Conner. 2016. The role of self-identity in predicting fruit and vegetable intake. Appetite 106:23–29. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.020.
  • Carmines, E. G., and R. A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and validity assessment, Vol. 17. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publications.
  • Chang, C. (2004). The interplay of product class knowledge and trial experience in attitude formation. Journal of Advertising, 33, 83–92.
  • Connor, M., and C. J. Armitage. 2002. The social psychology of food. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • De Leeuw, A., P. Valois, I. Ajzen, and P. Schmidt. 2015. Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 42: 128–38. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005.
  • Fielding, K. S., R. McDonald, and W. R. Louis. 2008. Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28 (4):318–26. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003.
  • Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2011. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Frisk, E., and K. L. Larson. 2011. Educating for sustainability: Competencies & practices for transformative action. Journal of Sustainability Education 2 (1):1–20.
  • Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., and S. Nonhebel. 2002. Consumption patterns and their effects on land required for food. Ecological Economics 42 (1–2):185–99. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00049-6.
  • Gleim, M. R., J. S. Smith, D. Andrews, and J. J. Cronin Jr. 2013. Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing 89 (1):44–61. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2012.10.001.
  • Greaves, M., L. D. Zibarras, and C. Stride. 2013. Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Environmental Psychology 34: 109–20. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.02.003.
  • Hair, J. F., Jr, G. T. M. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2016. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Hartmann, C., and M. Siegrist. 2017. Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 61: 11–25. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.006.
  • Hempel, C., and U. Hamm. 2016. How important is local food to organic-minded consumers? Appetite 96: 309–18. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.036.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1–55.
  • Jaiswal, D., and R. Kant. 2018. Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 41: 60–69. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008.
  • Jang, Y. J., W. G. Kim, and M. A. Bonn. 2011. Generation Y consumers’ selection attributes and behavioral intentions concerning green restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management 30 (4):803–11. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.12.012.
  • Joshi, Y., and Z. Rahman. 2015. Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review 3 (1–2):128–43. doi:10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001.
  • Kanchanapibul, M., E. Lacka, X. Wang, and H. K. Chan. 2014. An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. Journal of Cleaner Production 66: 528–36. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.062.
  • Koklic, M. K., U. Golob, K. Podnar, and V. Zabkar. 2019. The interplay of past consumption, attitudes and personal norms in organic food buying. Appetite 137: 27–34. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.010.
  • Kumar, B., A. K. Manrai, and L. A. Manrai. 2017. Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 34: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.09.004.
  • Lee, K. 2008. Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 26 (6):573–86. doi:10.1108/02634500810902839.
  • Littledyke, M. 2008. Science education for environmental awareness: Approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains. Environmental Education Research 14 (1):1–17. doi:10.1080/13504620701843301.
  • Littledyke, M., L. Lakin, and K. Ross. 2013. Science knowledge and the environment: A guide for students and teachers in primary education. New York: Routledge.
  • Lyon, T. P., and A. W. Montgomery. 2015. The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment 28: 223–249. doi:10.1177/1086026615575332.
  • Magnusson, M. K., A. Arvola, U. K. K. Hursti, L. Åberg, and P. O. Sjödén. 2003. Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite 40 (2):109–17. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00002-3.
  • Marchand, A., and S. Walker. 2008. Product development and responsible consumption: Designing alternatives for sustainable lifestyles. Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (11):1163–69. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.012.
  • McCluskey, J. J., and M. L. Loureiro. 2003. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for food labeling: A discussion of empirical studies. Journal of Food Distribution Research 34 (3):95–102.
  • Mohamed, Z., P. Kit Teng, G. Rezai, and J. Sharifuddin. 2014. Malaysian consumers’ willingness-to-pay toward eco-labeled food products in Klang Valley. Journal of Food Products Marketing 20 (sup1):63–74. doi:10.1080/10454446.2014.921876.
  • Mufidah, I., B. C. Jiang, S. C. Lin, J. Chin, Y. P. Rachmaniati, and S. F. Persada. 2018. Understanding the consumers’ behavior intention in using green ecolabel product through pro-environmental planned behavior model in developing and developed regions: Lessons learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. Sustainability 10 (5):1423. doi:10.3390/su10051423.
  • Nielsen, S. S. Ed. 2010. Food analysis, 139–41. New York: Springer.
  • Paul, J., and J. Rana. 2012. Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food. Journal of Consumer Marketing 29 (6):412–22. doi:10.1108/07363761211259223.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York: Academic Press.
  • Polonsky, M. J., A. Vocino, S. L. Grau, R. Garma, and A. S. Ferdous. 2012. The impact of general and carbon-related environmental knowledge on attitudes and behaviour of US consumers. Journal of Marketing Management 28 (3–4):238–63. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2012.659279.
  • Prakash, G., and P. Pathak. 2017. Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India: A study on developing nation. Journal of Cleaner Production 141:385–93. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.116.
  • Presidency of the Republic of Turkey Investment Office, 2015. Turkish food & beverage industry report. Accessed April 29, 2020. http://www.investingaziantep.gov.tr/upload/yazilar/Turkiye-Gida-Sektoru-Raporu-379778.pdf
  • Rachmatullah, A., J. K. Lee, and M. Ha. 2020. Preservice science teachers’ ecological value orientation: A comparative study between Indonesia and Korea. The Journal of Environmental Education 51 (1):14–28. doi:10.1080/00958964.2019.1633989.
  • Ramayah, T., J. W. C. Lee, and O. Mohamad. 2010. Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54 (12):1419–27. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.007.
  • Ramos, F. D. A., and T. C. Squeff. 2020. The importance of labelling food items: Information, food security and sustainable consumption. In Amaral Junior A., Almeida L., Klein Vieira L. (Eds.), Sustainable consumption, 229–47. Springer: Cham.
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2010. Regulation on the principles and implementation of organic agriculture. Accessed May 01, 2020. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/File/GeneratePdf?mevzuatNo=14217&mevzuatTur=KurumVeKurulusYonetmeligi&mevzuatTertip=5
  • Rowe, D. 2007. Education for a sustainable future. Science 317:323–24. doi:10.1126/science.1143552.
  • Schwartz, S. H. 1977. Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 10 (1):221–79.
  • Scott, L., and D. Vigar‐Ellis. 2014. Consumer understanding, perceptions and behaviours with regard to environmentally friendly packaging in a developing nation. International Journal of Consumer Studies 38 (6):642–49. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12136.
  • Siegrist, M., V. H. Visschers, and C. Hartmann. 2015. Factors influencing changes in sustainability perception of various food behaviors: Results of a longitudinal study. Food Quality and Preference 46: 33–39. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.07.006.
  • Singh, N., and K. Gupta. 2013. Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour of Indian consumers. Social Responsibility Journal 9 (1):4–18. doi:10.1108/17471111311307787.
  • Stern, N. H., S. Peters, V. Bakhshi, A. Bowen, C. Cameron, S. Catovsky, … S. L. Garbett. 2006. Stern review: The economics of climate change, Vol. 30, 2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Summers, M., G. Corney, and A. Childs. 2004. Student teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: The starting-points of geographers and scientists. Educational Research 46 (2):163–82. doi:10.1080/0013188042000222449.
  • Taufique, K. M. R., A. Vocino, and M. J. Polonsky. 2017. The influence of eco-label knowledge and trust on pro-environmental consumer behaviour in an emerging market. Journal of Strategic Marketing 25 (7):511–29. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2016.1240219.
  • Taufique, K. M. R., and S. Vaithianathan. 2018. A fresh look at understanding Green consumer behavior among young urban Indian consumers through the lens of theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production 183:46–55. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.097.
  • Terry, D. J., M. A. Hogg, and K. M. White. 1999. The theory of planned behaviour: Self‐identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology 38 (3):225–44. doi:10.1348/014466699164149.
  • Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning. 2018. Eco-labeled regulations. Accessed April 29, 2020. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/10/20181019-19.htm
  • Turkish Ministry of National Education. 2018. Science course curriculum, primary and middle school 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th grades. Ankara: Ministry of National Education.
  • Van der Werff, E., L. Steg, and K. Keizer. 2013a. The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 34: 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006.
  • Van der Werff, E., L. Steg, and K. Keizer. 2013b. It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change 23 (5):1258–65. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018.
  • Xie, B., L. Wang, H. Yang, Y. Wang, and M. Zhang. 2015. Consumer perceptions and attitudes of organic food products in Eastern China. British Food Journal 117 (3):1105–21. doi:10.1108/BFJ-09-2013-0255.
  • Xu, P., Y. Zeng, Q. Fong, T. Lone, and Y. Liu. 2012. Chinese consumers’ willingness to pay for green-and eco-labeled seafood. Food Control 28 (1):74–82. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.04.008.
  • Yadav, R., and G. S. Pathak. 2016. Intention to purchase organic food among young consumers: Evidences from a developing nation. Appetite 96: 122–28. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.017.
  • Yazdanpanah, M., and M. Forouzani. 2015. Application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict Iranian students’ intention to purchase organic food. Journal of Cleaner Production 107: 342–52. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.071.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.