Understanding the Meat-Masculinity Link: Traditional and Non-Traditional Masculine Norms Predicting Men’s Meat Consumption

References

• Adams, C. J. 1990. The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M. W., M. Wilson, N. Sik Hung, and M. Dunne. 2000. Values and beliefs of vegetarians and omnivores. Journal of Social Psychology 140 (4):405–22. doi:10.1080/00224540009600481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Institute of Cancer Research. 2024. Recommendation: Limit Consumption of Red and Processed Meat. https://www.aicr.org/cancer-prevention/recommendations/limit-consumption-of-red-and-processed-meat/#overview-top-tips.
   Google Scholar
• Angantyr, M., J. Eklund, and E. M. Hansen. 2015. A comparison of empathy for humans and empathy for animals. Anthrozoös 24 (4):369–77. doi:10.2752/175303711x13159027359764.
   Google Scholar
• Battaglia Richi, E., B. Baumer, B. Conrad, R. Darioli, A. Schmid, and U. Keller. 2015. Health risks associated with meat consumption: A review of epidemiological studies. International Journal of Vitamin and Nutrition Research 85 (1–2):70–78. doi:10.1024/0300-9831/a000224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogueva, D., D. Marinova, and R. Gordon. 2020. Who needs to solve the vegetarian men dilemma? Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 30 (1):28–53. doi:10.1080/10911359.2019.1664966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogueva, D., D. Marinova, and T. Raphaely. 2017. Reducing meat consumption: The case for social marketing. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Logistics 29 (3):477–500. doi:10.1108/apjml-08-2016-0139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunsberger, K., R. O. Flamm, and B. Buckler. 2021. The relationship between social dominance orientation and dietary/lifestyle choices. Sustainability 13 (16). doi:10.3390/su13168901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomfield, J. 2014. Gay men in the UK police services. In Sexual orientation at work: Contemporary Issues and Perspectives, ed. F. Colgan and N. Rumens, 1st ed. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203111451.
   Google Scholar
• Buerkle, C. W. 2009. Metrosexuality can stuff it: Beef consumption as (heteromasculine) fortification. Text and Performance Quarterly 29 (1):77–93. doi:10.1080/10462930802514370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilleri, L., P. R. Gill, and A. Jago. 2020. The role of moral disengagement and animal empathy in the meat paradox. Personality and Individual Differences 164:110103. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilleri, L., P. Richard Gill, J. Scarfo, and A. Jago. 2023. Resolving the masculinity dilemma: Identifying subtypes of male meat consumers with latent profile analysis. Food Quality and Preference 108:104890. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell-Arvai, V., J. Arvai, and L. Kalof. 2014. Motivating sustainable food choices: The role of nudges, value orientation, and information provision. Environment and Behavior 46 (4):453–75. doi:10.1177/0013916512469099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, L., S. Bernardes, and C. Godinho. 2020. Food as a way to convey masculinities: How conformity to hegemonic masculinity norms influences men’s and women’s food consumption. Journal of Health Psychology 25 (12):1842–56. doi:10.1177/1359105318772643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J.-A., E. M. Capel, and D. Gallegos. 2019. Meat, masculinity, and health for the “typical Aussie bloke”: A social constructivist analysis of class, gender, and consumption. American Journal of Men’s Health 13 (6):1557988319885561. doi:10.1177/1557988319885561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavazza, N., A. R. Graziani, and M. Guidetti. 2020. Impression formation via #foodporn: Effects of posting gender-stereotyped food pictures on instagram profiles. Appetite 147:104565. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.104565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caviola, L., J. A. C. Everett, and N. S. Faber. 2019. The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 116 (6):1011–29. doi:10.1037/pspp0000182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, E. Y., and N. Zlatevska. 2019a. Is meat sexy? Meat preference as a function of the sexual motivation system. Food Quality and Preference 74:78–87. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, E. Y., and N. Zlatevska. 2019b. Jerkies, tacos, and burgers: Subjective socioeconomic status and meat preference. Appetite 132:257–66. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., H. D. Cooper-Thomas, R. S. Lau, and L. C. Wang. 2023. Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J. 2020. Carnivore cure: The ultimate elimination diet to attain optimal health and heal your body. Nutrition with Judy.
   Google Scholar
• Clemens, R., and B. Flannery. 2022. Soy Boy’, ecology and the fascist imaginary. In Deleuze and Guattari and Fascism, ed. R. Braidotti and R. Dolphijn, 341–61. Edinburgh University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/75696FA3AB63E8A75AB899FA49CEAFEC.
   Google Scholar
• Corrin, T., and A. Papadopoulos. 2017. Understanding the attitudes and perceptions of vegetarian and plant-based diets to shape future health promotion programs. Appetite 109:40–47. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash, G., and J. Paul. 2021. CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173:121092. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C., J. Bryan, J. Hodgson, and K. Murphy. 2015. Definition of the Mediterranean diet: A literature review. Nutrients 7 (11):9139–53. doi:10.3390/nu7115459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Backer, C., S. Erreygers, C. De Cort, F. Vandermoere, A. Dhoest, J. Vrinten, and S. Van Bauwel. 2020. Meat and masculinities. Can differences in masculinity predict meat consumption, intentions to reduce meat and attitudes towards vegetarians? Appetite 147:104559. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.104559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defeudis, G., R. Mazzilli, A. M. Di Tommaso, V. Zamponi, F. Carlomagno, D. Tuccinardi, and D. Gianfrilli. 2022. Effects of diet and antihyperglycemic drugs on erectile dysfunction. A systematic review. Andrology 11 (2):1–13. doi:10.1111/andr.13192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, S., and E. Vossen. 2016. Meat: The balance between nutrition and health. A review. Meat Science 120:145–56. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhont, K., and G. Hodson. 2014. Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? Personality and Individual Differences 64:12–17. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon-Murray, A., A. Ward, and J. Soar. 2023. The association between selfishness, animal-oriented empathy, three meat reduction motivations (animal, health, and environment), gender, and meat consumption. Food Ethics 9 (1):1. doi:10.1007/s41055-023-00135-5.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, M., G. Hodson, K. Dhont, and C. MacInnis. 2019. Eating with our eyes (closed): Effects of visually associating animals with meat on antivegan/vegetarian attitudes and meat consumption willingness. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 22 (6):818–35. doi:10.1177/1368430219861848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estévez-Moreno, L. X., G. A. María, W. S. Sepúlveda, M. Villarroel, and G. C. Miranda-de la Lama. 2021. Attitudes of meat consumers in Mexico and Spain about farm animal welfare: A cross-cultural study. Meat Science 173:108377. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah, A., A. Mohammad-Hasani, and A. H. Colagar. 2018. Zinc is an essential element for male fertility: A review of Zn roles in men’s health, germination, sperm quality, and fertilization. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility 19 (2):69–81. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6010824/#.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., and W. Y. Tang. 2014. Sexism in online video games: The role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation. Computers in Human Behavior 33:314–20. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattario, K. H., A. Frisén, M. Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, L. A. Ricciardelli, P. C. Diedrichs, Z. Yager, L. Franko, and L. Smolak. 2015. How is men’s conformity to masculine norms related to their body image? Masculinity and muscularity across Western countries. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 16 (3):337–47. doi:10.1037/a0038494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goller, M., and F. Hilkenmeier. 2022. PLS-based structural equation modelling: An alternative approach to estimating complex relationships between unobserved constructs. InMethods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications and empirical illustrations, ed. M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, and C. Damşa, 269–92. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_12.
   Google Scholar
• Graça, J., M. M. Calheiros, and A. Oliveira. 2015. Attached to meat? (Un)willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet. Appetite 95:113–25. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graça, J., C. A. Godinho, and M. Truninger. 2019. Reducing meat consumption and following plant-based diets: Current evidence and future directions to inform integrated transitions. Trends in Food Science & Technology 91:380–90. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosso, G., S. La Vignera, R. A. Condorelli, J. Godos, S. Marventano, M. Tieri, and F. Galvano. 2022. Total, red and processed meat consumption and human health: An umbrella review of observational studies. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 73 (6):726–37. doi:10.1080/09637486.2022.2050996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., and A. Alamer. 2022. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 1 (3):100027. doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2022. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd Edition ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N. P. Danks, and S. Ray. 2021. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. 2015. Eating death. Food, Culture & Society 9 (2):155–77. doi:10.2752/155280106778606053.
   Google Scholar
• Han, X., and C. Yin. 2023. Mapping the manosphere. Categorization of reactionary masculinity discourses in digital environment. Feminist Media Studies 23 (5):1923–40. doi:10.1080/14680777.2021.1998185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, C., and M. Siegrist. 2020. Our daily meat: Justification, moral evaluation and willingness to substitute. Food Quality and Preference 80:103799. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayley, A., L. Zinkiewicz, and K. Hardiman. 2015. Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption. Predicting meat-reduced diet in Australians. Appetite 84:98–106. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holler, S., H. Cramer, D. Liebscher, M. Jeitler, D. Schumann, V. Murthy, and C. S. Kessler. 2021. Differences between omnivores and vegetarians in personality profiles, values, and empathy: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (4258). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579700.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, G. W., A. Scalco, T. Craig, S. Whybrow, and J. I. Macdiarmid. 2019. Social, temporal and situational influences on meat consumption in the UK population. Appetite 138:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isacco, A. J., and J. C. Wade. 2017. A review of selected theoretical perspectives and research in the psychology of men and masculinities. In The Psychology of Men and Masculinities, 139–68. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0000023-006.
   Google Scholar
• Jalil, A. J., J. Tasoff, and A. V. Bustamante. 2020. Eating to save the planet: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial using individual-level food purchase data. Food Policy 95:101950. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., S. Baumann, and M. Oleschuk. 2021. Capturing inequality and action in prototypes: The case of meat-eating and vegetarianism. Poetics 87:101530. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D., A. Rosenmann, and S. Shuhendler. 2017. What about nontraditional masculinities? Toward a quantitative model of therapeutic new masculinity ideology. Men and Masculinities 20 (4):393–426. doi:10.1177/1097184X16634797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, J. A., M. Benson-Rea, J. Young, and M. Seifert. 2023. Cutting down or eating up: Examining meat consumption, reduction, and sustainable food beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Food Quality and Preference 104:104718. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kildal, C. L., and K. L. Syse. 2017. Meat and masculinity in the Norwegian Armed Forces. Appetite 112:69–77. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N., and P. Hadaya. 2018. Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal 28 (1):227–61. doi:10.1111/isj.12131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, Z. A. 2011. Of meat and manhood. Washington University Law Review 89:287–322. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/walq89&id=291&men_tab=srchresults.
   Google Scholar
• Krivoshchekov, V., O. Gulevich, and M. Ostroverkhova. 2022. The conformity to masculine norms inventory-30: Validity and measurement invariance of a Russian-language version. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 23 (1):59–73. doi:10.1037/men0000379.
   Google Scholar
• Kunst, J. R., and S. M. Hohle. 2016. Meat eaters by dissociation: How we present, prepare and talk about meat increases willingness to eat meat by reducing empathy and disgust. Appetite 105:758–74. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, S. K., and J. H. Kim. 2017. Statistical data preparation: Management of missing values and outliers. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 70 (4):407–11. doi:10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapiņa, L., and J. Leer. 2016. Carnivorous heterotopias: Gender, nostalgia and hipsterness in the Copenhagen meat scene. International Journal for Masculinity Studies 11 (2):89–109. doi:10.1080/18902138.2016.1184479.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, R. B., R. MacDonnell Mesler, W. J. Montford, and J. Chernishenko. 2023. This meat or that alternative? How masculinity stress influences food choice when goals are conflicted. Frontiers in Nutrition 10. doi:10.3389/fnut.2023.1111681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennerz, B. S., J. T. Mey, O. H. Henn, and D. S. Ludwig. 2021. Behavioral characteristics and self-reported health status among 2029 adults consuming a “carnivore diet”. Current Developments in Nutrition 5 (12):1–10. doi:10.1093/cdn/nzab133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F., R. J. Hall, and T. J. Rankin. 2013. Male Role Norms Inventory-Short Form (MRNI-SF): Development, confirmatory factor analytic investigation of structure, and measurement invariance across gender. Journal of Counseling Psychology 60 (2):228–38. doi:10.1037/a0031545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F., R. J. Hall, I. K. Weigold, and E. R. McCurdy. 2016. Construct validity evidence for the male role norms inventory-short form: A structural equation modeling approach using the bifactor model. Journal of Counseling Psychology 63 (5):534–42. doi:10.1037/cou0000171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F., E. R. McCurdy, R. J. Hall, and I. K. Weigold. 2015. Construct distinctiveness and variance composition of multi-dimensional instruments: Three short-form masculinity measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology 62 (3):488–502. doi:10.1037/cou0000092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F., R. McDermott, M. C. Parent, N. Alshabani, J. R. Mahalik, and J. H. Hammer. 2020. Development and evaluation of a new short form of the conformity to masculine norms inventory (CMNI-30). Journal of Counseling Psychology 67 (5):622–36. doi:10.1037/cou0000414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F., and Y. J. Wong. 2017. The psychology of men and masculinities. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0000023-000.
   Google Scholar
• Libera, J., K. Iłowiecka, and D. Stasiak. 2021. Consumption of processed red meat and its impact on human health: A review. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 56 (12):6115–23. doi:10.1111/ijfs.15270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahalik, J. R., B. D. Locke, L. H. Ludlow, M. A. Diemer, R. P. J. Scott, M. Gottfried, and G. Freitas. 2003. Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 4 (1):3–25. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, N. J. 2018. A brief history of meat in the human diet and current health implications. Meat Science 144:169–79. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. 2018. Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods 23 (3):412–33. doi:10.1037/met0000144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, A., and L. Oberhoff. 2023. Meat-eating justification when gender identity is threatened – the association between meat and male masculinity. Food Quality and Preference 104:104731. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesler, R. M., R. B. Leary, and W. J. Montford. 2022. The impact of masculinity stress on preferences and willingness-to-pay for red meat. Appetite 171:105729. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mycek, M. K. 2018. Meatless meals and masculinity: How veg* men explain their plant-based diets. Food & foodways 26 (3):223–45. doi:10.1080/07409710.2017.1420355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S., and C. Hart. 2019. Where’s the beef? How masculinity exacerbates gender disparities in health behaviors. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 5:2378023119831801. doi:10.1177/2378023119831801.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, R. A., D. Edwards, A. Palmer, R. Ramsing, A. Righter, and J. Wolfson. 2018. Reducing meat consumption in the USA: A nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours. Public Health Nutrition 21 (10):1835–44. doi:10.1017/S1368980017004190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozbilgin, M. F., C. Erbil, S. Baykut, and R. Kamasak. 2022. Passing as resistance through a Goffmanian approach: Normalized, defensive, strategic, and instrumental passing when LGBTQ+ individuals encounter institutions. Gender, Work, & Organization. doi:10.1111/gwao.12928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, A., G. Ouvrein, A. Dhoest, and C. De Backer. 2022. It’s not just meat, mate! The importance of gender differences in meat consumption. Food, Culture & Society 26 (5):1193–214. doi:10.1080/15528014.2022.2125723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiler, T. M., and B. Egloff. 2020. Personality and eating habits revisited: Associations between the big five, food choices, and body mass index in a representative Australian sample. Appetite 149:104607. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohlmann, A. 2022. The taste of compassion: Influencing meat attitudes with interhuman and interspecies moral appeals. Appetite 168:105654. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., A. Çidam, A. L. Stewart, F. B. Zeineddine, R. Foels, M. Aranda, and K. E. Henkel. 2013. Social dominance in context and in Individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science 4 (5):587–99. doi:10.1177/1948550612473663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., S. Wende, and J. M. Becker. 2024. SmartPLS 4 (Version 4.1.0.1) [ computer software]. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S., and S. Wescott. 2024. To quell the problem, we must name the problem: The role of social media ‘manfluencers’ in boys’ sexist behaviours in school settings. Educational and Developmental Psychologist 1–4. doi:10.1080/20590776.2024.2329083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochelle, T. L. 2019. Cross-cultural differences in the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and health behaviour among men in Hong Kong. British Journal of Health Psychology 24 (1):159–74. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrmann, S., K. Overvad, H. B. Bueno-de-Mesquita, M. U. Jakobsen, R. Egeberg, A. Tjønneland, and J. Linseisen. 2013. Meat consumption and mortality - results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. BMC Medicine 11 (1):63. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenfeld, D. L. 2018. The psychology of vegetarianism: Recent advances and future directions. Appetite 131:125–38. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, D. L. 2023. Masculinity and men’s resistance to meat reduction. Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations 2:2. doi:10.5964/phair.9645.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, D. L., and A. J. Tomiyama. 2021. Gender differences in meat consumption and openness to vegetarianism. Appetite 166:105475. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H. 2013. Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 14 (4):363–75. doi:10.1037/a0030379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H., and D. L. Rosenfeld. 2021. Meat-related cognitive dissonance: The social psychology of eating animals. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 15 (5):e12592. doi:10.1111/spc3.12592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., J. M. Hormes, M. S. Faith, and B. Wansink. 2012. Is meat male? A quantitative multimethod framework to establish metaphoric relationships. Journal of Consumer Research 39 (3):629–43. doi:10.1086/664970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, M. B. 2012. Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study. Appetite 58 (1):141–50. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, M. B., and S. J. Heine. 2011. Meat, morals, and masculinity. Appetite 56 (2):447–50. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saladino, P. 2020. The carnivore code: Unlocking the secrets to optimal health by returning to our ancestral diet. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Salmen, A., and K. Dhont. 2023. Animalizing women and feminizing (vegan) men: The psychological intersections of sexism, speciesism, meat, and masculinity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 17 (2):e12717. doi:10.1111/spc3.12717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samani, S. A. 2016. Steps in research process (partial least square of structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)). International Journal of Social Science and Business 1 (2):55–66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318760440_Steps_in_Research_Process_Partial_Least_Square_of_Structural_Equation_Modeling_PLS-SEM_A_Review.
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair. 2021. Partial least squares structural equation modeling. InHandbook of market research, 587–632. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. 2012. An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology & Culture 2 (1):1–20. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
   Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G., M. Sarstedt, J. F. Hair, J.-H. Cheah, H. Ting, S. Vaithilingam, and C. M. Ringle. 2019. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing 53 (11):2322–47. doi:10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobal, J. 2006. Men, meat, and marriage: Models of masculinity. Food and Foodways 13 (1–2):135–58. doi:10.1080/07409710590915409.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, S. K., C. Day, and P. M. Brown. 2023. Masculinity matters for meat consumption: An examination of self-rated gender typicality, meat consumption, and veg*nism in Australian men and women. Sex Roles 88 (3):187–98. doi:10.1007/s11199-023-01346-0.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll-Kleemann, S., and U. J. Schmidt. 2017. Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: A review of influence factors. Regional Environmental Change 17 (5):1261–77. doi:10.1007/s10113-016-1057-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2018. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education 48 (6):1273–96. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timeo, S., and C. Suitner. 2018. Eating meat makes you sexy: Conformity to dietary gender norms and attractiveness. Psychology of Men and Masculinity 19 (3):418–29. doi:10.1037/men0000119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Horst, H., A. Sällylä, and Y. Michielsen. 2023. Game changers for meat and masculinity? Male athletes’ perspectives on mixed and plant-based diets. Appetite 187:106585. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2023.106585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., C. A. Eaton, and J. L. Fava. 2000. Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. InProblems and Solutions in Human Assessment, ed. R. D. Goffin and E. Helmes, 41–71. Boston, MA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4397-8_3.
   Google Scholar
• Veser, P., K. Taylor, and S. Singer. 2015. Diet, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and predisposition to prejudice. British Food Journal 117 (7):1949–60. doi:10.1108/BFJ-12-2014-0409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. L., S. R. Heimerdinger-Edwards, J. H. Hammer, and A. Hubbard. 2011. “Boys don’t cry”: Examination of the links between endorsement of masculine norms, self-stigma, and help-seeking attitudes for men from diverse backgrounds. Journal of Counseling Psychology 58 (3):368–82. doi:10.1037/a0023688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wescott, S., S. Roberts, and X. Zhao. 2024. The problem of anti-feminist ‘manfluencer’ Andrew Tate in Australian schools: Women teachers’ experiences of resurgent male supremacy. Gender and Education 36 (2):167–82. doi:10.1080/09540253.2023.2292622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting, S., P. Klimentou, and I. Rogers. 2019. We’re just normal dudes’: Hegemonic masculinity, Australian identity, and Parkway Drive. InAustralian Metal Music: Identities, Scenes, and Cultures, ed. C. Hoad, 55–70. Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/978-1-78769-167-420191014.
   Google Scholar
• Willaby, H. W., D. S. J. Costa, B. D. Burns, C. MacCann, and R. D. Roberts. 2015. Testing complex models with small sample sizes: A historical overview and empirical demonstration of what Partial Least Squares (PLS) can offer differential psychology. Personality and Individual Differences 84:73–78. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Y. J., M. H. R. Ho, S. Y. Wang, and I. S. K. Miller. 2017. Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology 64 (1):80–93. doi:10.1037/cou0000176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Cancer Research Fund International. n.d. Limit Red and Processed Meat. https://www.wcrf.org/diet-activity-and-cancer/cancer-prevention-recommendations/limit-red-and-processed-meat/.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., Y. Li, A. Satija, A. Pan, M. Sotos-Prieto, E. Rimm, and F. B. Hu. 2019. Association of changes in red meat consumption with total and cause specific mortality among US women and men: Two prospective cohort studies. BMJ: British Medical Journal 365:l2110. doi:10.1136/bmj.l2110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzmann, M., S. Faber, and E. Nieschlag. 2006. Association of specific symptoms and metabolic risks with serum testosterone in older men. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 91 (11):4335–43. doi:10.1210/jc.2006-0401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar