Comparison of primary productivity (¹⁴C) per unit biomass between phytoplankton and periphyton in the Ottawa River near Ottawa, Canada

References

• Allen, H. L., 1971: Primary productivity, chemo-organotrophy, and nutritional interactions of epiphytic algae and bacteria on macrophytes in the littoral of a lake. — Ecol. Monogr. 41, 97–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Public Health Assoc., 1971: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 13th ed. — 874 p., Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Beak Consultants, 1972: Environmental survey of the Ottawa River July 1972, a report for Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 78 p.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, R. W., 1940: Studies on the ecology of rivers IV. Observations on the growth and distribution of the sessile algae in the River Hull, Yorkshire. — J. Ecol. 28, 210–23.
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, C. E., 1967: Periphyton productivity and radionuclide accumulation in the Columbia River, Washington, U.S.A. — Hydrobiologia 29, 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Ermolaev, V. I., 1973: The phytoplankton productivity in the Pyasina River near Tareya Village (Western Taimyr.). — Gidrobiol. Zh. 8 (6), 97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Findenegg, I., 1965: Relationship between standing crop and primary productivity. — In: C. R. Goldman (ed.), Primary Productivity in Aquatic Environments. Mem. Ist. Ital. Idrobiol., 18 Suppl. 271–290. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, C. R., 1963: The measurement of primary productivity and limiting factors in freshwater with carbon-14. — In: Proc. of the Conf. on Prim. Prod. Meas.; Marine and Freshwater. Aug.—Sept. 1961, M. S. Doty (ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Knöpp, H., 1960: Untersuchungen über das Sauerstoff-Produktions-Potential von Flußplankton. — Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 22, 152–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kutkuhn, J. H., 1958: Notes on the precision of numerical and volumetric plankton estimates from small-sample concentrates. — Limnol. Oceanogr. 3, 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmahon, J. W., 1973: Membrane filter retention — a source of error in the 14C method of measuring primary production. — Limnol. Oceanogr. 18 (2), 319–324.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W., 1972: Composition and structure of algal communities in a tributary stream of Lake Ontario. — Can. J. Bot. 50 (8), 1663–1674.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, B., 1967: Algae of two Somersetshire pools; standing crops of phytoplankton and epipelic algae as measured by cell numbers and chlorophyll a. — J. Phycol. 5, 158–168.
   Google Scholar
• Nalewajko, C., 1966: Dry weight, ash and volume data for some freshwater planktonic algae. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 23 (8), 1285–1288.
   Google Scholar
• Nalewajko, C. & Lean, D. R. S., 1972: Retention of dissolved compounds by membrane filters as an error in the 14C method of primary production measurement. — J. Phycol. 8, 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Rodhe, W., Vollenweider, R. A. & Nauwerck, A., 1958: The primary production of lakes: some results and restrictions of the 14C method. — Rapp. Cons. Explor. Mer 144, 122–128.
   Google Scholar
• Rosemarin, A. S., 1974: Seasonal variation in primary productivity and biomass of the phytoplankton and periphyton in the Ottawa River near Ottawa, Canada. — M. Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Ottawa, 99 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. W. & Holmgren, S. K., 1971: Primary productivity and phytoplankton in the ELA, northwestern Ontario, and other low carbonate waters and a liquid scintillation method for determining 14C activity in photosynthesis. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 28, 189–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. W., Schmidt, R. V. & Reid, R. A., 1972: Acidification and bubbling as an alternative to filtration in determing phytoplankton by the 14C method. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 27, 1627–1631.
   Google Scholar
• Seilheimer, J. A., 1963: A comparison of algal growth in cultures exposed and unexposed to solar radiation. — Trans. Amer. Microscop. Soc. 82 (1), 78–83.
   Google Scholar
• Straškraba, M., 1963: The share of the littoral region in the productivity of two ponds in southern Bohemia. — Rozpr. čsl. Akad. Věd. (mat. prirod.) 73 (13), 1–63.
   Google Scholar
• Vollenweider, R. A. (ed.), 1969: A manual on methods for measuring primary production in aquatic environments. — IBP Manual 12, 213 p. (Burgess and Son, Abingdon).
   Google Scholar
• Vollenweider, R. A., Munawar, M. & Stadelmann, P., 1974: A comparative review of phytoplankton and primary production in the Laurentian Great Lakes. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 31 (5), 739–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallen, D. G. & Geen, G. H., 1968: Loss of radioactivity during storage of 14C-labelled phytoplankton on membrane filters. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 25, 2219–2224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E. B., Emery, R. M., Matsuda, R. I. & Dawson, W. A., 1972: The relation of periphyton and planktonic algal growth in an estuary to hydrographic factors. — Limnol. Oceanogr. 17 (5), 731–737.
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel, R. G., 1963: Primary productivity of periphyton. — Nature 197, 1026–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel, R. G., 1964: A comparative study of the primary productivity of higher aquatic plants, periphyton and phytoplankton in a large, shallow lake. — Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 49, 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. J., Berman, T. & Holm-Hansen, O., 1972: Potential sources of error in the measurement of low rates of planktonic photosynthesis and excretion. — Nature New Biol, 263, 91–92.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, W., 1965: Primary production measurements in the Upper Ohio River. — Spec. Publs. Pymatuning Lab. Fld. Biol. 3, 66–78.
   Google Scholar