Organism — substrate relationship in a small Dutch lowland stream. Preliminary results

References

• Csoknya, M. & Halasy, K., 1974: Data on the distribution of mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera). — Tiscia 9: 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, K. W., 1962: An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic waters. — Amer. Midl. Nat. 67 (2): 477–504.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, K. W., 1964: Factors limiting the microdistribution of larvae of the caddisflies Pycnopyche slepida (Hagen) and Pycnopsyche guttifer (Walker) in a Michigan stream (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). — Ecol. Monogr. 34 (3): 271–295.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, K. W., 1966: A review of stream ecology with special emphasis on organism-substrate relationships. — In: Cummins, K. W., Tyron, C. A. & Hartman, R. T. (eds.), Organism-substrate relationships in streams. Spec. Publ. Pym. Lab. Ecol., Univ. Pittsburg 4: 2–51.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, K. W. & Laufe, G. H., 1969: The influence of substrate particle size on the microdistribution of stream macrobenthos. — Hydrobiologia 34 (2): 145–181.
   Google Scholar
• Doeglas, D. J., 1968: Grain-size indices, classification and environment. — Sedimentology 10: 83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egglishaw, H. J., 1969: The distribution of benthic invertebrates on substrata in fast flowing streams. — J. Anim. Ecol. 38: 19— 33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. H., 1964: The influence of respiration and substrate upon the distribution of burrowing mayfly naiads. — Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 15: 903–911.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. H., 1966: Benthic invertebrates and some substrate-current-oxygen interrelationships. — See Cummins (1966): Spec. Puhl. Pym. Lab. Ecol. 4: 98–115.
   Google Scholar
• Hansell, M. H., 1968: The selection of house building materials by the caddis fly larva Agapetus fuscipes (Curtis). — Rev. Comp. Animal 2: 90–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hildrew, A. G. & Townsend, C. R., 1976: The distribution of two predators and their prey in an iron rich stream. — J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, H. B. N., 1970: The ecology of running waters. — Liverpool Univ. Press, 555 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Keetch, D. P. & Moran, V. C., 1966: Observations on the biology of nymphs of Paragomphus cognatus (RAMBUR) (Odonata: Gomphidae). I. Habitat selection in relation to substrate particle size. — Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 41: (7— 9): 116–122.
   Google Scholar
• Lindegaard-Petersen, C., 1972: An ecological investigation of the Chironomidae (Diptera) from a Danish lowland stream (Linding A). — Arch. Hydrobiol. 69 (4): 465–507.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, R. J., 1969: Aquatic insect communities of a small stream on Mont St. Hilaire, Quebec. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 26 (5): 1157–1183.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, B. L., 1968: The distribution of nymphs of Brachyptera risi MORT. and Nemoura flexuosa AUB. (Plecoptera) in relation to oxygen. — Oikos 19: 304–310.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, C., 1976: Habitat relationships in the larvae of three Trichoptera species. — Arch. Hydrobiol. 77 (4): 505–517.
   Google Scholar
• Percival, E. & Whitehead, H., 1926: Observations on the biology of the mayfly Ephemera danica MÜLL. — Proc. Leeds Phil. Soc. (Sci. Sect.) 1 (3): 136–148.
   Google Scholar
• Percival, E. & Whitehead, H., 1930: Biological survey of the River Warfe. II. Report on the invertebrate fauna. — J. Ecol. 18: 286–302.
   Google Scholar
• Sprules, Wm. M., 1947: An ecological investigation of stream insects in Algonquin Park, Ontario. — Publ. Ont. Fish. Res. Lab. 69, 81 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tolkamp, H. H., in prep.: The microdistribution of the benthos in lowland streams in relation to the substrate composition and distribution. — Thesis, Agric. Univ. Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, I. D., 1977: A key to larvae and pupae of Sericostoma personatum (Spence) and Notidobia ciliaris (Linné) (Sericostomatidae: Trichoptera). — Freshwat. Biol. 7 (1): 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, C. A., 1939: The function of the gills of mayfly nymphs from different habitats. — J. Exp. Biol. 16: 363–373.
   Google Scholar