Using several indices for biological assessment of water quality in running water

References

• Armitage, P. D., Moss, D., Wright, J. F. & Furse, M. T., 1983: The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running water sites. — Water Research 17 (3): 333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. R., 1970: A biological approach to water quality management. — Wat. Pollut. Control 4: 415–422.
   Google Scholar
• Gardeniers, J. J. P. & Tolkamp, H. H., 1976: Hydrobiologiselle kartering, waardering en schade aan de beekfauna in Achterhoekse beken. — In: Th. V. D. Nes (ed.), Modelonderzoek '71–'74. Comm. Best. Waterhuish. Gld.: 26–29, 106–114, 294–296.
   Google Scholar
• Ghetti, P. F. & Bonazzi, G., 1980: 3rd Technical Seminar — Biological Water Assessment Methods. Parma 1978. Final Report 2. Comm. Europ. Communities, Brussels, 39 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Illies, J. & Schmitz, W., 1980: Die Verfahren der biologischen Beurteilung des Gütezustandes der Fließgewässer (systematisch-kritische Übersicht). — Studien zum Gewässerschutz 5, Karlsruhe, 125 pp.
   Google Scholar
• ISO-BMWP, 1979: Assessment of the biological quality of rivers by a macroinvertebrate score. — Internat. Stand. Org. ISO/TC147/SC5/WG6/N5, 18 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kothé, P., 1962: Der „Artenfehlbetrag”, ein neues Gütekriterium und seine Anwendung bei biologischen Vorfluteruntersuchungen. — Deutsche Gewässerkundl. Mitt. 6: 60–62.
   Google Scholar
• LWA-NW, 1982: Wasserwirtschaft Nordrhein-Westfalen — Fließgewässer. Richtlinie für die Ermittlung der Gewässergüteklasse. — Landesamt für Wasser und Abfall NW, 6 pp. + app.
   Google Scholar
• Moller Pillot, H. K. M., 1971: Faunistische beoordeling van de verontreiniging in laag- landbeken. — Proefschrift, Pillot standaardboekhandel, Tilburg, 286 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, W., 1975: Gütezustand der Gewässer in Baden-Württemberg 2. — Landesanst. f. Umweltschutz, Inst. f. Wasser u. Abfall, Karlsruhe, 47 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sládeček, V., 1973: System of water quality from the biological point of view. — Arch. Hydrobiol., Beih. Ergebn. Limnol. 7: 1–218.
   Google Scholar
• Tittizer, T., 1975: Comparison of biological procedures for assessments of water quality: a comparative study of water assessments methods — practical demonstration on the River Main, F. R. G. — In: Principles and Methods for Determining Ecological Criteria on Hydrobiocenoses: 401–463, Proc. Europ. Sc. Coll., Luxembourg 1975. Pergamon Press, Oxford/New York.
   Google Scholar
• Tolkamp, H. H. & Gardeniers, J. J. P., 1977: Hydrobiological survey of lowland streams in the Achterhoek (The Netherlands) by means of a system for the assessment of water quality and stream character based on macroinvertebrates. — Mitt. Inst. Wasserwirtschaft, Hydrologie u. Landwirtschaftl. Wasserbau, T. U. Hannover 41: 215–235.
   Google Scholar
• Tuffery, G. & Verneaux, J., 1967: Méthode de détermination de la qualité biologique des eaux courantes. Exploitation codifée des inventaires de la faune de fond. — Trav. Sect. P. et P., Cerafer, Paris, 23 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Verneaux, J. & Faessel, B., 1976: Note preliminaire à la proposition de nouvelles méthodes de determination de la qualité des eaux courantes. — Ronéo, 8 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Woodiwiss, F. S., 1964: The biological system of stream classification used by the Trent River Board. — Cbem. Ind.: 443–447.
   Google Scholar
• Woodiwiss, F. S. 1978: The Trent Index. Macroinvertebrates in biological surveillance. — In: Lund, J. W. G. & Vinberg, G. G. (eds.), Elaboration of the scientific basis for monitoring the quality of surface water by hydrobiological indicators. Report of the first U.K./USSR Seminar at Valdai, USSR, 12–14 July 1976, p. 58–81.
   Google Scholar
• Woodiwiss, F. S. 1980 a: Biological monitoring of surface water quality. Summary Report. — Comm. Europ. Commun., Brussels, 45 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Woodiwiss, F. S. 1980 b: Technical Seminar — Biological Water Assessment Methods. Nottingham 26th Sept.—1st Oct. 1976. — Comm. Europ. Commun., Brussels, 241 pp. Report to members of working group.
   Google Scholar