Publication Cover
SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010
Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen
Volume 24, 1991 - Issue 2
2
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
III. Lakes. 2. Europe

Changes in community structure and growth limitation of phytoplankton due to top-down food-web manipulation

Pages 773-778 | Published online: 01 Dec 2017

References

  • Bergquist, A. M., Carpenter, S. R. & Latino, J. C., 1985: Shifts in phytoplankton size, structure and community composition during grazing by contrasting zooplankton assemblages. — Limnol. Oceanogr. 30: 1037–1046.
  • Donk, E. van, Gulati, R. D. & Grimm, M. P., 1989: Food-web manipulation in Lake Zwemlust: positive and negative effects during the first two years. — Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 19–35.
  • Donk, E. van, Veen, A. & Ringelberg, J., 1988: Natural community bioassays to determine the abiotic factors that control phytoplankton growth and succession. — Freshwat. Biol. 20: 199–210.
  • Edmondson, W. T. & Abella, S. E. B., 1988: Unplanned biomanipulation in Lake Washington. — Limno- logica (Berlin) 19: 73–79.
  • Grimm, M. P., 1989: Northern pike (Esox lucius L.) and aquatic vegetation, tools in the management of fisheries and water quality in shallow waters. — Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 59–65.
  • Guillard, R. R. L., 1975: Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. — In: Smith, W. L. & Chanley, M. H. (Eds.): Culture of marine invertebrate animals. — Plenum Press, New York: 26–60.
  • Gulati, R. D., 1989: Structure and feeding activity of zooplankton community in lake Zwemlust, in the two years after biomanipulation. — Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 35–49.
  • Gulati, R. D. & Donk, E. van, 1989: Biomanipulation in The Netherlands: applications in fresh waters ecosystems and estuarine water- and introduction. — Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 1–5.
  • Hosper, S. H., 1989: Biomanipulation, new perspective for restoring shallow, eutrophic lakes in The Netherlands. — Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 11–19.
  • Klaveness, D., 1988: Ecology of the Cryptomonadina: a first review. — In: Sandgren, C. D. (Ed.): Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton: 105–134. — Cambridge University Press.
  • Leah, R. T., Moss, B. & Forrest, D. E., 1980: The role of predation in causing major changes in the limnology of a hyper-eutrophic lake. — Int. Revue, ges. Hydrobiol. 65: 223–247.
  • Lehman, J. T., 1988: Selective herbivory and its role in the evolution of phytoplankton growth strategies. — In: Sandgren, C. D. (Ed.): Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton: 369–388. — Cambridge University Press.
  • Meijer, M.-L., Raat, A. J. P. & Doef, R. W., 1989: Restoration by biomanipulation of the Dutch shallow, eutrophic Lake Bleiswijkse Zoom: first results. — Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 49–59.
  • Ozimek, T., Gulati, R. D. & Donk, E. van, 1990: Can macrophytes be useful in biomanipulation of lakes? The Lake Zwemlust example. Hydrobiologia (in press).
  • Porter, K. G., 1977: The plant-animal interface in fresh water ecosystems. — American Scientist 65: 159–170.
  • Reinertsen, H. & Olson, Y., 1984: Effects of fish elimination on the phytoplankton community of a eutrophic lake. — Verb. Intemat. Verein. Limnol. 22: 649–657.
  • Reynolds, C. S., 1988: Functional morphology of the adaptive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. — In: Sandgren, C. D. (ED.): Growth and Reproductive Strategies of Freshwater Phytoplankton: 388–434. — Cambridge University Press.
  • Shapiro, J. & Wright, D. J., 1984: Lake restoration by biomanipulation: Round Lake, Minnesota, the first two years. — Fresbwat. Biol. 14: 371–383.
  • Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J., 1969: Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. — Freeman, W. M. & Comp., San Francisco.
  • Turpin, D. H., 1988: Physiological mechanisms in phytoplankton resource competition. — In: Sandgren, C. D. (Ed.): Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton: 316–369. — Cambridge University Press.
  • Vanni, M. J., 1987: Effects of nutrients and zooplankton size on the structure of a phytoplankton community. — Ecology 68: 624–635.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.