A system for evaluating rivers for conservation (“SERCON”): An outline of the underlying principles

References

• Barfield, T., Woods, N., Williams, C., Ditchburn, M., Price, P. & Ward, R., 1983: Conservation Potential of Streams in Herefordshire. — Herefordshire & Radnorshire Nature Trust, Hereford, England.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, J. D., 1983: Rapid stream survey to assess conservation value and habitats available for invertebrates. — In: Myers, K., Margules, C. R. & Musto, I. (eds.): Survey Methods for Nature Conservation. Proceedings of a Workshop held at Adelaide University, 31 Aug.-2 Sept. 1983, 1: 343–375. — CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, P. J., 1991: The role of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) in the conservation of British rivers. — Freshwater Forum 1: 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, P. J., 1992: Essential elements in the case for river conservation. — In: Boon, P. J., Calow, P. & Petts, G. E. (eds.): River Conservation and Management: 11–33. — John Wiley, Chichester, England.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, P. J., Calow, P. & Petts, G. E. (Eds.), 1992: River Conservation and Management. — John Wiley, Chichester, England.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, M. P., 1982: Conservation of Wildlife in River Corridors. Part. 1. Methods of survey and classification. Joint report by UWIST, Welsh Water Authority, RSPB, The Otter Haven Project, NCC. — Welsh Water Authority, Brecon, Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, R. W., 1933: Studies on the ecology of rivers. 1. On the distribution of macrophytic vegetation in the rivers of Britain. — J. Ecol. 21: 58–91.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, K. J. & McColl, R. H. S., 1992: Assessing the natural value of New Zealand rivers. — In: Boon, P. J., Calow, P. & Petts, G. E. (eds.): River Conservation and Management: 195–211. — John Wiley, Chichester, England.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D., 1981: Conservation surveys — what do we need and how do we put it across? — In: Harper, D. (ed.): Assessing the Conservation Value of Rivers: 21–31. — Dept. of Adult Education, University of Leicester, Leicester, England.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, N. T. H., 1983: Typing British Rivers According to their Flora. Focus on Nature Conservation No. 4. — Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, England.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, N. T. H., 1989: British rivers — a working classification. — Brit. Wildlife 1: 20–36.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R. E., 1945: Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. — Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 56: 275–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huet, M., 1954: Biologie, profils en long et en travers des eaux courantes. — Bull. Fr. Piscic. 175: 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Illies, J. & Botosaneanu, L., 1963: Problèmes et methodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes considerées surtout due point de vue faunistique. — Mitt. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 12: 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, L. A., 1983: A method for identifying small streams of high conservation status. — In: Myers, K., Margules, C. R. & Musto, I. (eds.): Survey Methods for Nature Conservation. Proceedings of a Workshop held at Adelaide University, 31 Aug-2 Sept 1983, 1: 319–342. — CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Naiman, R. J., Lonzarich, D. G., Beechie, T. J. & Ralph, S. C., 1992: General principles of classification and the assessment of conservation potential in rivers. — In: Boon, P. J., Calow, P. & Petts, G. E. (eds.): River Conservation and Management: 93–123. — John Wiley, Chichester, England.
   Google Scholar
• Nature Conservancy Council, 1989: Guidelines for Selection of Biological SSSIs. — Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, England.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe, J. H., 1989: Conserving rivers in southern Africa. — Biol. Conserv. 49: 255–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe, J. H., Danilewitz, D. B. & Bradshaw, J. A., 1987: An “expert system” approach to the assessment of the conservation status of rivers. — Biol. Conserv. 40: 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe, J. H., Davies, B. R., King, J. M. & Skelton, P. H., 1989: The conservation status of southern African rivers. — In: Huntley, B. J. (ed.): Biotic Diversity in Southern Africa — Concepts and Conservation: 266–289. — Oxford University Press, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Percival, E. & Whitehead, H., 1929: A quantitative study of the fauna of some types of stream-bed. — J. Ecol. 17: 282–314.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, R. C., 1992: The RCE: a riparian, channel, and environmental inventory for small streams in the agricultural landscape. — Freshwater Biol. 27: 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe, F. W. & Savage, N. L., 1979: A methodology for the selection of aquatic natural areas. — Biol. Conserv. 15: 291–300.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, D. A. (Ed.), 1977: A Nature Conservation Review. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, A. L., 1968: Species diversity and longitudinal succession in stream fishes. — Ecology 49: 193–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. N., 1952: Hypsometrie (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. — Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 63: 1117–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. F., Armitage, P. D., Furse, M. T. & Moss, D., 1989: Prediction of invertebrate communities using stream measurements. — Regul. Riv. 4: 147–155.
   Google Scholar