Towards a holistic view of nutrient dynamics in fluvial ecosystems

References

• Aumen, N. G., Hawkins, C. P. & Gregory, S. V., 1990: Influence of woody debris on nutrient retention in catastrophi- cally disturbed streams. — Hydrobiologia 190: 183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butturini, A. & Sabater, F., 1998: Ammonium and phosphate retention in a Mediterranean stream: hydrological versus temperature control. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 1938–1945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deangelis, D. L., 1992: Dynamics of nutrient cycling and food webs. — Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Deangeus, D. L., Mulholland, P. J., Elwood, J. W., Palumbo, A. V. & Steinman, A. D., 1990: Biogeochemical cycling constraints on stream ecosystem recovery. — Environ. Manage. 14: 685–697.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J. W., Newbold, J. D., O'neill, R. V. & Van Winkle, W., 1983: Resource spiraling: an operational paradigm for analyzing lotic ecosystems. — In: Fontaine, T. D. & Bartell, S. M. (eds): The dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems: 3–27. — Ann Arbor Science, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. G., Gray, L. J., Grimm, N. B. & Busch, D. E., 1982: Temporal succession in a desert stream ecosystem following flash flooding. — Ecol. Monogr. 52: 93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, B. T., Freeman, P. & Mckelvie, I. D., 1992: Whole- stream phosphorus release studies: variation in uptake length with initial phosphate concentration. — Hydrobiologia 235/236: 573–584.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, L. B. & Maddock, T., 1954: The flood Control Controversy. — Ronald, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Margalef, R., 1991: Teoría de los sistemas ecológicos. — Publicacions de la Universität de Barcelona, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, E. & Sabater, F., 1996: High variability in temporal and spatial nutrient retention in Mediterranean streams. — Ecology 77: 854–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí, E., Grimm, N. B. & Fisher, S. G., 1997: Pre- and post- flood retention efficiency of nitrogen in a Sonoran Desert stream. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 16: 805–819.
   Google Scholar
• May, R. M., 1973: Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. — Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Minshall, G. W., Petersen, R. C., Cummins, K. W, Bott, T. L., Sedell, J. R., Cushing, C. E. & Vannote, R. L., 1983: Interbiome comparison of stream ecosystem dynamics. — Ecol. Monogr. 53: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulholland, P. J., Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. W., Ferren, L. A. & Webster, J. R., 1985: Phosphorus spiralling in woodland streams: seasonal variations. — Ecology 66: 1012–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold, J. D., 1992: Cycles and spirals of nutrients. — In Calow, P. & Petts, G. E. (eds): The Rivers Handbook: 379–408. — Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Newbold, J. D., Elwood, J. D., O'neill, R. V. & Van Winkle, W., 1981: Measuring nutrient spiralling in streams. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 860–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odum, E. P., 1985: Trends expected in stressed ecosystems. — Bioscience 35: 419–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, L. B. M. & Petersen Jr., R. C., 1991: Short term retention properties of channelized and natural streams. — Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 24: 1756–1759.
   Google Scholar
• Resh, V. H., Brown, A. V., Covich, A. P., Gurtz, M. E., Li, H. W., Minshall, G. W., Reice, S. R., Sheldon, A. L., Wallace, J. B. & Wissmar, R. C., 1988: The role of disturbance in stream ecology. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 503–524.
   Google Scholar
• Stream Solute Workshop, 1990: Concepts and methods for assessing solute dynamics in stream ecosystems. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 9: 95–119.
   Google Scholar
• Vannote, R. L, Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R. & Cushing, C. E., 1980: The river continuum concept. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. R. & Patten, B. C., 1979: Effects of watershed perturbation on stream potassium and calcium dynamics. — Ecol. Monogr. 49: 51–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar