Shortcomings and advantages of using rapid biological assessment techniques for the purpose of characterizing rivers in South Africa

References

• Barber-James, H. M. & De Moor, F. C., 1995 Sept: An exploratory survey of the macroinvertebrate fauna of the Mpofana and Lions Rivers, KwaZulu-Natal, to assess the possible impact of a proposed inter-basin transfer from the Mooi River to the Mgeni River system. — Albany Museum Internal Report. 33 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, P. A. J., Kemp, P. H., Oliff, W. D. & Pretorius, S. J., 1967: Water quality and abatement of pollution in Natal Rivers. Part III. The Tugela River and its tributaries. — Natal Town Reg. Planning Rep. 13(3): 1–92.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. & King, J. M., 2000: Environmental Assessments for Rivers: a Summary of the Drift Process. — Southern Waters Information Report No.01/00.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, J. & Pratt, J. R., 1993: A history of biological monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. — In: Rosenberg, D. M. & Resh, V. H. (eds): Freshwater Biomonitoring and Freshwater invertebrates. 10–27. — Chapman & Hall, New York. 488 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Chutter, F. M., 1998: Research on the Rapid Biological Assessment of Water Quality Impacts in Streams and Rivers. — Water Research Commission Report No. 422/1/98. — Pretoria 29 pp. Append. A-H.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. R., Boon, P. J. & Petts, G. E., 2000: River conservation: a global imperative. Introduction. — In: Boon, P. J., Davies, B. R. & Petts, G. E. (eds): Gbbal Perspectives on River Conservation: Science, Policy and Practice, xi–xvi. — John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. 548 pp.
   Google Scholar
• De Moor, F. C., 1995: A survey and synthesis of previous surveys conducted along the Mooi and Klein Mooi Rivers to advise on instream flow requirements of the aquatic biota with particular reference to the macroinvertebrates. — Albany Museum Internal Report 40 pp.
   Google Scholar
• De Moor, F. C., 1999: The use of Trichoptera to assess biodiversity and conservation status of South African river systems. 237–244. — In: Malicky, H. (ed.): Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Trichoptera. — Chiang Mai. 479 pp.
   Google Scholar
• De Moor, F. C. & Barber-James, H. M., 1998: A survey of the macroinvertebrate diversity at the proposed sites for Springrove Dam (Mooi River) and Dartington Dam (Little Mooi and Hlatikulu Rivers) to advise on which dam site would cause the least ecological disturbance. — Albany Museum Internal Report. 48 pp.
   Google Scholar
• De Moor, F. C., Barber-James, H. M., & Mangold, S. J., 1998: A survey and synthesis of previous surveys conducted along the Mkomazi and Mkomazana Rivers to advise on instream flow and ecological requirements of the aquatic biota with particular reference to the macroinvertebrates. — Albany Museum Internal Report. 92 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Growns, I. O., 1998: Methods addressing the flow requirements of aquatic invertebrates — In: Arthington, A. H. & Zalucki, J. M. (eds): Comparative Evaluation of Environmental Fbw Assessment Techniques: Review of Methods. 115–140. — Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation Occasional Paper No. 27/98. — Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hannaford, M. L. & Resh, V. H., 1995: Variability in rapid-bioassessment surveys and habitat assessments in a Northern California stream. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 14: 430–439.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett, R., 2000: Implications of taxonomic resolution and sample habitat for stream classification at a broad geographic scale. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 352–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illies, J. & Botosaneanu, L., 1963: Problèmes et méthodes de classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux couramtes, considerées surtout du point de vue faunistique. — Mitt. Int. Verein. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 12: 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Karr, J. R., Allan, J. D. & Benke, A. C., 2000: River conservation in the United States and Canada. — In: Boon, P. J., Davies, B. R. & Petts, G. E. (eds): Global Perspectives on River Conservation: Science, Policy and Practice. 3–39. — John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. 548 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, P. H., Chutter, F. M. & Coetzee, D. J., 1976: Water Quality and Abatement of Pollution in Natal Rivers. Part V. The Rivers of Southern Natal. — Natal Town and Regional Planning Commission. 100 pp.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. M. & Louw, D., 1998: Instream flow assessments for regulated rivers in South Africa, using the Building Block Methodology. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manage., I: 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Mccafferty, W. P. & Gillies, M. T., 1979: The African Ephemeridae (Ephemeroptera). — Aquat. Insects 1(3): 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• Ne, T. R., 1993: Angels on a pin: dimensions of the crisis in invertebrate conservation. — Am. Zool. 33: 623–630.
   Google Scholar
• O'keeffe, J. H. & De Moor, F. C., 1988: Changes in the physico-chemistry and benthic invertebrates of the Great Fish River, South Africa, following an interbasin transfer of water. — Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 2: 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Oliff, W. D., 1960: Hydrobiological studies on the Tugea River System, Part I. The main Tugela River. — Hydrobiologia 14(3–4): 281–385.
   Google Scholar
• Oliff, W. D., 1964: Hydrobiological studies on the Tugela River System, Part IV. The Mooi River. — Hydrobiologia 24(4): 567–583.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, R. W. & De Moor, F. C., 1998: Annotated records of blackfly (Diptera: Simuliidae) distribution in southern Africa. — Afr. Entomol. 6(2): 223–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharme, R. E. & King. J. M., 1998: Development of the Building Block Methodology for Instream Flow Assessment and Supporting Research on the Effects of Different Magnitude Flows on Riverine Ecosystems. — Water Research Commission Report No. 576/1/98. — Pretoria 452 pp.
   Google Scholar