The development and testing of biological objectives for the protection of rivers and streams in Victoria, Australia

References

• ANZECC, 1992: Australian Water Quality Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Waters. — Australian & New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, M. T., Plafkin, J. L., Bradley, B. P., Graves, C. G. & Wisseman, R. W., 1992: Evaluation of EPA's rapid bioassessment benthic metrics: metric redundancy and variability among reference stream sites. — Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 11: 437–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barmuta, L. A., Chessman, B. C. & Hart, B. T. H., 1997: Intetyretation of the Outputs from AUSRIVAS. — Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Chessman, B. C., 1995: Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: A procedure based on habitat-specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index. — Aust. J. Ecol. 20: 122–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, W. S. & Simon, T. P., 1995: Biological Assessment and Criteria — CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• EPA, 2000: Protecting the Waters of Western Port and Catchment — Draft — A summary of the Western Port and its catchment Schedule (F8) to State Environment Protection Policy (Waters of Victoria) Publication 706. — Melbourne, Australia, Environment Protection Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Government Of Victoria, 1999: Variation of the State Environment Protection Policy (Waters of Victoria) — Insertion of Schedule F7. Waters of the Yarra Catchment. — Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Hellawell, J. M., 1977: Change in natural and managed ecosystems: detection, measurement and assessment. — Proc. R. Soc. London 197: 31–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hellawell, J. M., 1986: Biological Indicators of Freshwater Pollution and Environmental Management. — Elsevier Applied Science, London & New York.
   Google Scholar
• Karr, J. & Dudley, D., 1981: Ecological perspectives on water quality goals. — Environ. Manage. 5: 55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson, A., Doolan, J., White, L., Metzeling, L. & Robinson, D., 1995: Index of stream condition as a tool to aid management of rivers. Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Hobart May 21–24. — Inst. Eng. Aust. 325–331.
   Google Scholar
• Linke, S., 2000: New methods in predictive bioassessment. — M.Sc. dissertation, University of Konstanz, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant, R., Wells, F. & Newall, P., 2000: Assessment of an ecoregion approach for classifying macroinvertebrate assemblages from streams in Victoria, Australia. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 497–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. L., 1997: Stream health: incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 16: 439–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newall, P. R. & Magnuson, J. J., 1999: The importance of ecoregion versus drainage area on fish distributions in the St. Croix River and its Wisconsin tributaries. — Am. Chem. Soc. Environ. Biol. Fishes 55: 245–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newall, P. and Wells, F., 2000: Potential for delineating indicator-defined regions for streams in Victoria, Australia. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 557–571.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, R. H. & Thoms, M. C., 1999: What is river health? — Freshwater Biol. 41: 197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. & Norris, R. H., 1996: The effect of habitatspecific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model. — Freshwater Biol. 36: 419–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plafkin, J. L., Barbour, M. T., Porter, K. D., Gross, S. K. & Hughes, R. M., 1989: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish — U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA/444/4-89001).
   Google Scholar
• Reynoldson, T. B., Norris, R. H., Resh, V. H., Day, K. E. & Rosenberg, D. M., 1997: The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 16: 833–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D. M. & Resh, V. H., 1993: Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates — Chapman & Hall, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, N. J. & Davies, P. E., 1996: Measuring the health of our rivers. — Water (Australia) 23: 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. & Norris, R. H., 2000: Biological assessment of water quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. — In: Wright, J.F. et al. (Eds) RIVPACS and similar techniques for assessing the biological quality of freshwaters. — Freshwater Biological Association and Environment Agency, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.
   Google Scholar
• Tiller, D. & Metzeling, L., 1998: Rapid Bioassessment of Victorian Streams. Publication 604 — Environment Protection Authority, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, F., Metzeling, L. & Newall, P., 2002: Macroinvertebrate regionalisation for use in the management of aquatic ecosystems in Victoria, Australia. — Environ. Monit. Assess. 74: 271–294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright, J. F., Moss, D., Armitage, P. D. & Furse, M. T., 1984: A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. — Freshwater Biol. 14: 221–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. F., Furse, M. T. & Armitage, P. D., 1993: RIVPACS — a technique for evaluating the biological quality of rivers in the U.K. — Eur. Water Pollut. Control 3(4): 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, C. O. & Rankin, E. T., 1998: The role of biological indicators in a state water quality management process. — Environ. Monit. Assess. 51: 61–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar