Periphyton biomass and composition of British Columbia salmonid rivers in relation to nutrient and discharge levels

References

• Basu, B.K. & Pick, F.R., 1996: Factors regulating phytoplankton and zooplankton development in temperate rivers. — Limnol. Oceanogr. 41: 1570–1577.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F., 1988: Artificial substrate exposure times for periphyton biomass estimates in rivers. — N.Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 22: 507–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F., 1995: The contribution of flood disturbance, catchment geology and land use to the habitat template of periphyton in stream ecosystems. — Freshwat. Biol. 33: 419–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F., 1996: Patterns of benthic algae in streams. — In: Stevenson, R.J., Bothwell, M.L. & Lowe, R.L. (Eds.): Algal Ecology: Freshwater benthic ecosystems: 31–55. Academic Press, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F., 2000: New Zealand periphyton guideline: detecting, monitoring and managing enrichment of streams. — Ministry for the Environm., Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F. & Close, M.E., 1989: Periphyton biomass dynamics in gravel bed rivers: the relative effects of flows and nutrients. — Freshwat. Biol. 22: 209–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F. & Price, G.M., 1987: A survey of filamentous algal proliferations in New Zealand rivers. — N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 21: 175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F. & Gerbeaux, P., 1993: Periphyton development in relation to macro-scale (geology) and micro-scale (velocity) limiters in two gravel-bed rivers, New Zealand. — N.Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 27: 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, E.M., 1996: Hydrogeochemistry of the Fraser River, British Columbia: seasonal variation in major and minor components. — J. Hydrol. 182: 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChÉTelat, J., Pick, F.R., Morin, A. & Hamilton, P., 1999: Periphyton biomass and community composition in rivers of different nutrient status. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 560–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChÉTelat, J., Pick, F.R. & Morin, A., 2000: Patterns of periphyton biomass in three eastern Ontario rivers ranging in trophic status. — Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 27:3148–3153.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, B. & Biggs, B.J., 1997: Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams. — Freshw. Biol. 38: 327–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coste, M., Bosca, C. & Dauta, A., 1991: Use of algae for monitoring rivers in France. — In: Whitton, B.A., Rott, E. & Friedrich, G. (Eds.): Use of algae for monitoring rivers: 75–88. Inst. f. Bot., Univ. Innsbruck, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, E.J., 1996: Identification of Freshwater Diatoms from Live Material. — Chapman & Hall, 158 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, W.K., Jones, J.R. & Welch, E.B., 1998: Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distribution of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus. — Water Res. 32: 1455–1462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment Canada, 1979: Analytical methods manual. — Inland Water Directorate, Water Quality Branch, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gosselain, V & Hamilton, P.B., 2000: Algamica: revisions to a key-based computerized counting program for free-living, attached, and benthic algae. — Hydrobiologia 438: 139–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, B.H., Willingham, W.T., Parrish, L.P. & Mcfarland, B.H., 2000: Periphyton community responses to elevated metal concentrations in a Rocky Mountain stream. — Hydrobiologia 428: 161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes, N.B.N., 1970: The ecology of running waters. — Univ. of Toronto Press, Canada, 555 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kociolek, J.P. & Spaulding, S.A., 2003: Symmetrical naviculoid diatoms. — In: Wehr, J.D. & Sheath, R.G. (Eds.): Freshwater Algae of North America: 637–668. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, R.L. & Pan, Y., 1996: Benthic algal communities as biological monitors. — In: Stevenson, R.J., Bothwell, M.L. & Lowe, R.L. (Eds.): Algal Ecology: Freshwater benthic ecosystems: 705–733. Academic Press, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Mccormick, P.V & Cairns, J., 1994: Algae as indicators of environmental change. — J. Appl. Phycol. 6: 509–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcintire, C.D., Gregory, S.V., Steinman, A.D. & Lamberti, G.A., 1996: Modeling benthic algal communities: an example from stream ecology. — In: STEVENSON, R.J., BOTHWELL, M.L. & LOWE, R.L. (Eds.): Algal Ecology: Freshwater benthic ecosystems: 669–704. Academic Press, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Northcote, T.G. & Larkin, P.A., 1989: The Fraser River: a major salmonine production system. — In: DODGE, D.P. (Ed.): Proceedings of the International large River Symposium. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 106: 172–203.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., Stevenson, R.J., Hill, B.H., Herlihy, A.T. & Collins, G.B., 1996: Using diatoms as indicators of ecological conditions in lotic systems: a regional assessment. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 15: 481–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott, G.W., 1973: Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area. Revised Edition. — Otto Koeltz Science Publishers, Koenigstein, 977 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Prygiel, J. & Coste, M., 1993: The assessment of water quality in the Artois-Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. — Hydrobiologia 269: 343–349.
   Google Scholar
• Rott, E., Duthie, H.C. & Pipp, E., 1998: Monitoring organic pollution and eutrophication in the Grand River, Ontario, by means of diatoms. — Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 1443–1453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round, F.E., Crawford, R.M. & Mann, D.G., 1990: The Diatoms. — Cambridge Univ. Press. New York, 757 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Soballe, D.M. & Kimmel B.L., 1987: A large-scale comparison of factors influencing phytoplankton abundance in rivers, lakes and impoundments. — Ecology 68: 1943–1954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G.M., 1950: The freshwater algae of the United States. — McGraw-Hill, New York, 719 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Spaulding, S.A., Gretz, M.R., Beeson, D. & Hermann, K., 2005: Expansion in ecological and geographical range of Didyosphenia geminata. — 18^th North American Diatom Symposium, Mobile, Alabama 1–4 Nov., 2005 (Abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Stelzer, R.S. & Lamberti, G.A., 2001: Effects of N:P ratio and total nutrient concentration on stream periphyton community structure, biomass and elemental composition. — Limnol. Oceangr. 46: 356–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Braak, C.J.F. & Smilaue, P., 1998: Canoco Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows. Microcomputer Poer, Ithaca, U.S.A., 352 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Wehr, J.D. & Sheath, R.G., 2003: Freshwater algae of North America ecology and classification. — Academic Press. San Diego, California, 918 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, J.G. & Duthie, H.C., 2000: Epilithic diatoms as indicators of stream total N and total P concentration. — J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 32–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar