Phytoplankton growth and assembly in relation to nutrient supply and other environmental factors in the White River Basin, Indiana (U.S.)

References

• Academy or Natural Sciences Of Philadelphia. 1999. Standard Operating Procedures for the Identification and Enumeration of Algae in Samples Collected for the National Water-Quality Assessment Program of the U. S. Geological Survey, p. 13–39 and 13–69. Diatoms and Soft Aigae in Quantitative Samples.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R.B., R. A. Smith & G.E, Schwarz. 2000. Effect of stream size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403: 758–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, N.T. & J. W. Frey. 1997. Fish community and habitat data at selected sites in the White River Basin, Indiana, 1993–1995. U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96–653A.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F.. R.J. Stevenson & R.L. Lowe. 1998. A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton. Arch. Hydrobiol. 143: 21–56.
   Google Scholar
• Birks. H.J.B.. J.M. Line, S. Juggins, A.C. Stevenson & C, J.F. Ter Braak. 1990. Diatoms and pH reconstruction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 327: 263–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. M., R.E, Broshears, R.P. Hooper & D. A. Goolsby. 2002. Evaluating the influence of source basins on downstream water quality in the Mississippi River. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 38: 803–818.
   Google Scholar
• Cleave, M.L., D.B. Porcella & V.D. Adams. 1981, The application of batch bioassay techniques to the study of salinity toxicity to freshwater phytoplankton. Water Res. 15: 573–584.
   Google Scholar
• Cloern, J. F. 1987. Turbidity as a control on phytoplankton biomass and productivity in estuaries. Cont. Shelf Res. 7: 1367–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, T. A., D.L. Caulder, E.J. Gilroy, L.D. Zynjuk & R.M. Summers. 1992. The validity of a simple statistical model for estimating fluvial constituent loads: An empirical study involving nutrient loads entering Chesapeake Bay. Water Resour. Res. 28: 2353–2363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, C.G. 1991. Estimation of suspended-sediment rating curves and mean suspended-sediment loads. J. Hydrology 129: 331–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, K. S., C, A. Mayer & L. M. Page. 1991. Survey of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Unionidae) of the Wabash Drainage. Phase III: White River and selected tributaries. Center for Biodiversity Technical Report 1991(3). Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruyter Van Stfveninck, E.D., W. Admiraal, G.M. Breebaart, J. Tubbing & B. Van Zanten, 1992. Plankton in the River Rhine: structural and functional changes during downstream transport. J. Plankton Res. 14: 1351–1368.
   Google Scholar
• Descy, J. P. 1987. Phytoplankton composition and dynamics in the river Meuse (Belgium). Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl.78: 225–245.
   Google Scholar
• Dokulil. M.T. 1994. Environmental control of phytoplankton productivity in turbulent turbid systems. Hydrobiologia 289: 65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenelon, J.M., K, F. Bobay. I. K. Greeman, M.E. Hoover, D. A. Cohen, K.K. Fowler, M.C. Woodfield. P.K. Doss & J.M Durbin. 1994. Hydrogeologie atlas of aquifers in Indiana. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 92–4142.
   Google Scholar
• Fisiiman, M.J. & L.C, Friedman [Eds.] 1989. Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations. Book 5, Chapter Al.
   Google Scholar
• Garnier, J., G. Billen & M. Coste. 1995. Seasonal succession of diatoms and Chlorophyceae in the drainage network of the Seine River: Observations and modeling. Limnol. Oceanogr. 40: 750–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselain, V., J.R Descy & E. Everbecq. 1994. The phytoplankton community of the River Meuse, Belgium: seasonal dynamics (1992) and the possible incidence of zooplankton grazing. Hydrobiologia 289: 179–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt, F. 1930–1966. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz, 7(1): pp. 1–920, 7(2): pp. 1–845, 7(3): pp. 1–816. In L. Rabenhorst [ed.] Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Juggins, S. & C.J.F. Ter Braak. 1993. CALIBRATE — A program for species-environment calibration by [weighted-averaging] partial least squares regression. Unpubl. computer program, Environmental Change Research Center, University College London. 20 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, F. A. & J. F. Wilson, Jr. 1989. Measurement of time of travel in streams by dye tracing, U. S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigations. Book 3, Chapter A9.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, K.T. & A. Schmidt. 1998. Changes in the Chlorophyta species in the phytoplankton of the Hungarian section of the Danube River during the last decades (1961–1997), Biologia (Bratisl.) 53: 509–518.
   Google Scholar
• KÖHler, J. 1994. Growth, production, and losses of phytoplankton in the lowland River Spree. I. Population dynamics. J. Plankton Res, 15: 335–349.
   Google Scholar
• KÖHler, J. & J. Gelbreciit. 1998. Interactions between phytoplankton dynamics and nutrient supply along the lowland river Spree, Germany. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 26: 1045–1049.
   Google Scholar
• Leland, H. V. 1995. Distribution of phylobenthos in the Yakima River basin, Washington, in relation to geology, land use, and other environmental factors. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 1108–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J.D., C.G. Crawford, J.W. Frey & G.A. Hodgkins. 1996. Water-quality assessment of the White River Basin, Indiana: analysis of selected information on nutrients, 1980–1992. U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96–4192.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, B., H. Balls, I. Booker, K. Manson & M. Timms. 1984. The River Bure, United Kingdom: Patterns of change in chemistry and phytoplankton in a slow-flowing fertile river. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 22: 1959–1964.
   Google Scholar
• Omernik, J.M. 1987. Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States. Map (scale 1: 7,500,000). Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr, 77: 118–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, R. & C.W. Reimer. 1966. The diatoms of the United States exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii. Vol. 1, Monographs, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia 13: 688 p.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, R. & C.W. Reimer. 1975. The diatoms of the United States Exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii. Vol. 2, Part 1, Monographs, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia 13: 213 p.
   Google Scholar
• Potapova, M. & D.F. Charles. 2003. Distribution of benthic diatoms in U. S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshw. Biol. 48: 1311–1328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. S. 1988. Functional morphology and the adaptive strategics of freshwater phytoplankton, p. 388–433. In C.D. Sandgren [ed.], Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C.S. 1993. Scales of disturbance and their role in plankton ecology. Hydrobiologia 249: 157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C.S. & J.P. Descy. 1996. The production, biomass and structure of phytoplankton in large rivers. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 113: 161–187.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C.S. 1997. Vegetation processes in the pelagic: A model for ecosystem theory, p. 371. In O. Kinne [ed.], Excellence in ecology series. Ecology Institute, Ohlendorf, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Riseng, C. M..M.J. Wiley & R.J. Stevenson. 2004. Hydrologic disturbance and nutrient effects on benthic community structure in midwestern U.S. streams: A covariance structure analysis. J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 23: 309–326.
   Google Scholar
• Round, F.E., R.M. Crawford & D.J. Mann. 1990. The Diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnoebelen, D.J., J.M. Fenelon, N.T. Baker, J.D. Martin, E, R. Bayless, D. V. Jacques & C. G. Crawford. 1998. Environmental setting and natural factors and human influences affecting water quality in the White River Basin, Indiana. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 97–4260.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, L, R. 1994. Field guide for collecting and processing streamwater samples for the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94–455.
   Google Scholar
• Sournia, A. 1978. Phytoplankton manual. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Paris. France.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Braak, C.J.F. 1990. CANOCO: a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by (partial) (detrended) (canonical) correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis. Update notes: CANOCO version 3.1. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Braak, C.J.F. & P.F.M. Verdonschot. 1995. Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat. Sci. 57: 255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikkanen, T. 1986. Kasviplanktonopas. Suomen Luonmonsuojelun Tuki Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman, D.S., S.S. Kilham & P. Kilham. 1982. Phytoplankton community ecology: the role of limiting nutrients. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 349–372.
   Google Scholar
• [U. S. Epa] U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual: rivers and streams. EPA-822-B-00-002.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey. 2000. Time of travel in the White River. Accessed on September 26, 2007 at http://in.water.usgs.gov/nawqa/wr09000.htm
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey. 2007. National Water Quality Laboratory, Accessed on September 26, 2007 at http://nwql.usgs.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Wehr, J. D. & J. H. Thorp. 1997. Effects of navigation dams, tributaries, and littoral zones on phytoplankton communities in the Ohio River. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 378–395.
   Google Scholar
• Wehr, J.D. & J. P. Descy. 1998. Use of phytoplankton in large river management. J. Phycol. 34: 741–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L.G. 1972. Plankton diatom species biomasses and the quality of American rivers and the Great Lakes. Ecology 53: 1038–1050.
   Google Scholar