References
- Abrams, P. A. & L. R. Ginzburg. 2000. The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 337–341.
- Ambler, J.W. 2002. Zooplankton swarms: characteristics, proximal cues and proposed advantages. Hydrobiologia 480: 155–164.
- Arditi, R. & L. R. Ginzburg. 1989. Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. J. Theor. Biol. 139: 311–326.
- Bollens, S.M., B.W. Frost & J.R. Cordell. 1994. Chemical, mechanical and visual cues in the vertical migration behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Acartia hudsonica. J. Plankton Res. 16: 555–564.
- Fussmann, G. F. & B. Blasius. 2005. Community response to enrichment is highly sensitive to model structure. Biol. Lett. 1: 9–12.
- Fussmann, G.E., G. Weithoff & T. Yoshida. 2005. A direct, experimental test of resource vs. consumer dependence. Ecology 86: 2924–2930.
- Fussmann, G.F., G. Weithoff & T. Yoshida. 2007. A direct, experimental test of resource vs. consumer dependence: reply. Ecology 88: 1603–1604.
- Ginzburg, L. & M. Colyvan. 2004. Ecological orbits. Oxford University Press.
- Gliwicz, M.Z. 1986. Predation and the evolution of vertical migration in zooplankton. Nature 320: 746–748.
- Hansson, S., B.T. De Stasio, E. Gorokhova & M.A. Mohammaden. 2001. Ratio-dependent functional responses — tests with the zooplanktivore Mysis mixta. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 216: 181–189.
- Holling, C. S. 1959. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European Pine Sawfly. Can. Entomol. 91: 293–320.
- Jensen, C. X. J. & L. R. Ginzburg. 2005. Paradoxes or theoretical failures? The jury is still out. Ecol. Model. 188: 3–14.
- Jensen, C. X. J., J. M. Jeschke & L. R. Ginzburg. 2007. A direct, experimental test of resource vs. consumer dependence: comment. Ecology 88: 1600–1602.
- Jeschke, J. M., M. Kopp & R. Tollrian. 2002. Predator functional responses: Discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecol. Monogr. 72: 95–112.
- Kreutzer, C. & W. Lampert. 1999. Exploitative competition in differently sized Daphnia species: A mechanistic explanation. Ecology 80: 2348–2357.
- Lass, S. & P. Spaak. 2003. Chemically induced anti-predator defences in plankton: a review. Hydrobiologia 491: 221–239.
- Lürling, M., F. Roozen, E. Van Donk & B. Goser. 2003. Response of Daphnia to substances released from crowded congeners and conspecifics. J. of Plankton Research 25: 967–978.
- Reeve, J. D. 1997. Predation and bark beetle dynamics. Oecologia 112: 48–54.
- Schenk, D., L.F. Bersier & S. Bacher. 2005. An experimental test of the nature of predation: neither prey-nor ratio-dependent. J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 86–91.
- Skalski, G.T. & J.F. Gilliam. 2001. Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling Type II model. Ecology 82: 3083–3092.
- Tschanz, B., L. F. Bersier & S. Bacher. 2007. Functional responses: A question of alternative prey and predator density. Ecology 88: 1300–1308.
- Williams, R. J. & N. D. Martinez. 2004. Stabilization of chaotic and non-permanent food-web dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. B 38: 297–303.