Publication Cover
SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010
Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen
Volume 30, 2009 - Issue 5
15
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison of the macroinvertebrate communities of seepage and lake-fed headwater streams

Pages 685-689 | Published online: 01 Dec 2017

References

  • Baars, J.-R., C. Bradley & M. Kelly-Quinn. 2004. Macroinvertebrate assemblages of Irish ‘headwaters’ and the preliminary evaluation of their biological status. Report to The Heritage Council.
  • Cummins, K.W. 1992. Catchment characteristics and river ecosystems, p. 125–135. In P.J. Boon, P. Calow & G.E. Petts [eds.], River conservation and management. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  • Dufrêne, M. & P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67: 345–366.
  • Friberg, N., A.M. Milner, L.M. Svendsen, C. Lindgaard & S.E. Larsen. 2001. Macroinvertebrates stream communities along regional and physico-chemical gradients in Western Greenland. Freshw. Biol. 46: 1753–1764.
  • Furse, M.T. 2000. The application of RIVPACS procedures in headwater streams — an extensive and important national resource, p. 79–91. In J.F. Wright, D.W. Sutcliffe & M.T. Furse [eds.], Assessing the biological quality of freshwaters, RIVPACS and other techniques. Freshw. Biol. Assoc., Cumbria.
  • Hieber, M., C.T. Robinson, U. Uelinger & J.V. Ward. 2002. Are alpine lake outlets less harsh than other alpine streams? Arch. Hydrobiol. 154: 199–223
  • Heino, J., T. Muotka, H. Mykra, R. Paavola, H. Hamalainen & E. Koskenniemi. 2003. Defining macroinvertebrate assemblage types of headwater streams: implications for bio- assessment and conservation. Ecol. Appi. 13: 842–852.
  • Hill, M.O. & P.R. Minchin. 1997. TWINSPAN: Divisive classification program. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.
  • Kavanagh, P., R. Walsh & A. Walsh. 2006. Further characterisation of small streams and development of a new small stream risk score (SSRS) project output report. ESB International Limited.
  • Malmqvist, B. & C. Brönmark. 1984. Functional aspects of a lake outlet versus a springfed stream ecosystem. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 22: 1992–1996.
  • Malmqvist, B. & C. Brönmark. 1985. Reversed trends in the benthic community structure in two confluent streams; one spring-fed, the other lake-fed. Hydrobiologia. 124: 65–71.
  • Malmqvist, B. & A. Eriksson. 1995. Benthic insects in Swedish lake-outlet streams: patterns in species richness and assemblage structure. Freshw. Biol. 34: 285–296.
  • Meyer, J.L., D.L. Strayer, J.B. Wallace, S.L. Eggert, G.S. Helfman & N.E. Leonard. 2007. The contribution of headwater streams to biodiversity in river networks. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 43: 86–103.
  • Milner, A.M. & G.E. Petts. 1994. Glacial rivers: physical habitat and ecology. Freshw. Biol. 32: 295–307.
  • Murphy, J. & P.S. Giller. 2000. Seasonal dynamics of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the benthos and associated with detritus packs in two low order streams with different riparian vegetation. Freshw. Biol. 43: 617–631.
  • Nijboer, R.C., R.K. Johnson, P.F.M. Verdonschot, M. Sommerhauser & A. Buffagni. 2004. Establishing reference conditions for European streams. Hydrobiologia 516: 91–105.
  • Richardson, J.S. & R.J. Mackey. 1991. Lake oulets and the distribution of filter feeders: an assessment of hypotheses. Oikos. 62: 370–380.
  • Sorsensen, T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant society based on similarity of species content. Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. 5: 1–34.
  • Ventura, M. & D. Harper. 1996. The impacts of acid precipitation mediated by geology and forestry upon upland stream invertebrate communities. Arch. Hydrobiol. 138: 161–173.
  • Wade, K.R., S.J. Oremerod & A.S. Gee. 1989. Classification and ordination of macroinvertebrate assemblages to predict stream acidity in upland Wales. Hydrobiologia. 171: 59–78.
  • Zimmerman, G.M., H. Goetz & P.W. Mielke. 1985. Use of an improved statistical method for group comparisons to study effects of prairie fire. Ecology 66: 606–611.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.