Epilithic diatom communities of Milltown Lake's catchment, Co. Monaghan, Ireland

References

• Bellinger, B.J., C. Cocquyt & C.M. O'Reilly. 2006. Benthic diatoms as indicators of eutrophication in tropical streams. Hydrobiologia 573: 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN 13 946. 2002. Water quality — Guidance standard for the routine sampling and pre-treatment of benthic diatoms from rivers. CEN/TC 230 — European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Coring, E., S. Schneider, A. Hamm & G. Hofmann. 1999. Durchgehendes Trophiesystem auf der Grundlage der Trophieindikation mit Kieselalgen. Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau. V, Koblenz.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council — Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Brussels, Belgium, 23 October 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gomà, J.F., R. Frédéric, J. Cambra, L. Hoffmann & L. Ector. 2005. Diatom communities and water quality assessment in Mountain Rivers of the upper Segre basin (La Cerdanya, Oriental Pyrenees). Hydrobiologia 551: 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M.O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54: 427–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karr, J.R. 1991. Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol. Appl. 1: 66–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G. 2001. Role of benthic diatoms in the implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive in the River Wear, NE England. J. Appl. Phycol. 14: 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G. 2003. Short term dynamics of diatoms in an upland stream and implications for monitoring eutrophication. Environ. Pollut. 125: 117–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G. 2004. A comparison of diatoms with other phytobenthos as indicators of ecological status in streams in northern England, p. 139–151. In A. Witkowski [ed.], Eighteenth International Diatom Symposium, Miedzyzd- roje, Poland. Biopress Limited, Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G., C. Adams, A.C. Graves, J. Jamieson, J. Krokowski, E.B. Lycett, J. Murray-Bligh, S. Pritchard & C. Wilkins. 2001. The Trophic Diatom Index: A user's manual. Revised edition. Environmental Agency, Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G., S. Juggins, R. Guthrie, S. Pritchard, J. Jamieson, B. Rippey, H. Hirst & M. Yallop. 2008. Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biol. 53: 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G, C.J. Penny & B.A. Whitton. 1995. Comparative performance of benthic diatom indices to assess river water quality. Hydrobiologia 302: 179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G. & B. Whitton. 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol. 7: 433–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G. & B. Whitton. 1998. Biological monitoring of eutrophication in rivers. Hydrobiologia 384: 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly-Quinn, M., C. Bradley, I. Dodkins, T.J. Harrington, B. Ni Chathain, M. O'Cconnor, B. Rippey & D. Trigg. 2005. Water Framework Directive — Characterisation of reference conditions and testing of typology of rivers (2002-W-LS-7). Environmental Protection Agency, Co. Wexford, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer, Ks. & H. Lange-Bertalot. 1986. Die Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2: Bacillariophyceae (Freshwater flora for central Europe: Diatoms). 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot. 1988. Die Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2: Bacillariophyceae (Freshwater flora for central Europe: Diatoms). 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surrellaceae. Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot. 1991a. Die Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2: Bacillariophyceae (Freshwater flora for central Europe: Diatoms). 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer, k. & H. Lange-Bertalot. 1991b. Die Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2: Bacillariophyceae (Freshwater flora for central Europe: Diatoms). 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae, Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. Gesamtliteraturverzeichnis Teil 1–4. Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Leira, M. & S. Sabater. 2005. Diatom assemblages distribution in catlan rivers, NE Spain, in relation to chemical and physiographical factors. Water Res. 39: 73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, R.L. & Y. Pan. 1996. Benthic algal communities as biological monitors, p. 705–739. In R.J. Stevenson, M.L. Bothwell & R.L. Lowe [eds.], Algal Ecology, Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lucey, J. 1986. Biological monitoring of rivers and streams using macroinvertebrates. p. xx–xx. In D.H.S. Richardson [ed.], Biological Indicators of Pollution, Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Chatháin, B. & T.J. Harrington. 2002. A baseline inventory of epilithic diatom diversity in lowland Irish rivers. WLD/2002/59. Heritage Council of Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Chatháin, B. & T.J. Harrington. 2008. Benthic diatoms of the River Deel: Diversity and community structure. Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. 108B: 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Chatháin, B., T.J. Harrington, J. McCarthy, M. Kelly-Quinn, C. Bradley & J.R. Baars. 2004. Preliminary results from the investigation of benthic diatoms from potential reference river sites in Ireland. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. St. 23: 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• [OECD] Organization For Economic Cooperation And Development. 1982. Eutrophication of water, monitoring, assessment and control. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, R., T. Muotka, R. Virtanen, J. Heino & P. Kreivi. 2003. Are biological classifications of headwater streams concordant across multiple taxonomic groups? Freshwater Biol. 48: 1912–1923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., R.J. Stevenson, B.H. Hill, A.T. Herlihy & G.B. Collins. 1996. Using diatoms as indicators of ecological conditions in lotic systems: a regional assessment. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 15: 481–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapova, M.G. & D.F. Charles. 2002. Benthic diatoms in the USA rivers: distributions along spatial and environmental gradients. J. Biogeogr. 29: 167–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapova, M. & D.E Charles. 2003. Distribution of benthic diatoms in U.S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshwater Biol. 48: 1311–1328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapova, M.G., D.F. Charles, K.C. Ponder & D.M. Winter. 2004. Quantifying species indicator values for trophic diatom indices: a comparison of approaches. Hydrobiologia 517: 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoermer, E.E & J.P. Smol [eds.], 1999. The diatoms: Applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Yallop, M.L. & M.G. Kelly. 2006. From pattern to process: understanding stream phytobenthic assemblages and implications for determining 'ecological status'. Nova Hedwigia 130: 357–372.
   Google Scholar