Social diversity and modal choice strategies in mixed land-use development in South Africa

References

•  Ahmad, P., Chirisa, I., Magwaro-Ndiweni, L., Michundu, M., Ndela, W., Nkonge, M., & Sachs, D. (2010). Urbanising Africa: The city centre revisited: Experiences with inner-city revitalisation from Johannesburg (South Africa), Mbabane (Swaziland), Lusaka (Zambia), Harare and Bulawayo (Zimbabwe). Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies, Rotterdam. Working Paper No. 26.
   Google Scholar
• Badoe, D. A., & Miller, E. J. (2000). Transportation–Land-use interaction: Empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 5(4), 235–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, R., Kurisu, K., & Hanaki, K. (2015). Does compact urban forms relate to good quality of life in high density cities of India? Case of Kolkata. Cities, 48(1), 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Booyens, I. (2012). Creative industries, inequality and social development: Developments, impacts and challenges in Cape Town. Urban Forum, 23(1), 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bordoloi, R., Mote, A., Sarkar, P., & Mallikarjuna, C. (2013). Quantification of land use diversity in the context of mixed land use. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104(2), 563–572.
   Google Scholar
• Breheny, M. (1997). Urban compaction: Feasible and acceptable? Cities, 14(4), 209–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cevero, R. (1996). Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey. Transportation Research A, 30(5), 361–377.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, K., Ewing, R., Knaap, G. J., & Song, Y. (2008). Quantitative analysis of urban form: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Urbanism, 1(1), 17–45.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, A. (1997). An introduction into mixed use development. In A. Coupland (Ed.), Reclaiming the city: Mixed use development (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Dewar, D. (2000). The relevance of a compact city approach: The management of growth in South African cities. In M. Jencks & R. Burgess (Eds.), Compact cities (pp. 32–59). London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2001). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R. (1995, January). Beyond density, mode-choice, and single-purpose trips. Presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, S. R., & Clifton, K. J. (2017). An activity-related land use mix construct and its connection to pedestrian travel. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317690157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geyer, H. S., Jr, & Mohammed, F. (2016). Hypersegregation and class-based segregation processes in Cape Town 2001–2011. Urban Forum, 27(1), 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J. (2002). Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1), 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J. (2007). Encouraging mixed use in practice. In G. Knaap (Ed.), Incentives, regulations and plans: The role of states and nation-states in smart growth planning (pp. 57–76). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Haar, C., & Kayden, J. (1989). Legislating aesthetics. In M. Kwartler (Ed.), In Zoning and the American dream: Promises still to keep (pp. 187–220). Chicago: Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. (2005). Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: What does the research tell us? International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 146–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herndon, J. D. (2011). Mixed-use development in theory and practice: Learning from Atlanta’s mixed experiences (Applied research paper). Georgia: Georgia Institute of Technology College of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, S. (2012). Mixed use by default: How the Europeans (Don’t) zone. Journal of Planning Literature, 27(4), 375–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppenbrouwer, E., & Louw, E. (2005). Mixed-use development: Theory and practice in Amsterdam’s Eastern Docklands. European Planning Studies, 13(7), 967–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, M., Burton, E., & Williams, K. (1996). The Compact city. London: E and FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Kackar, A., & Preuss, L. (2003). Local government commission in corporation with the Environmental Protection Agency. In A. Zukofsky, G. Molinaro, & D. Davis (Eds.), Creating great neighbourhoods: Density in your community (pp. 10–23). Chicago: National Association of Realtors.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, H., Sui, D., Tong, X., & Wang, X. (2015). Paths to mixed-use development: A case study of Southern Changping in Beijing, China. Cities, 44(1), 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Koster, H., & Rouwendal, J. (2012). The impact of mixed land use on residential property values. Journal of Regional Science, 52(5), 733–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemanski, C. (2006). Desegregation and integration as linked or distinct? Evidence from a previously ‘White’ Suburb in post-apartheid Cape Town. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), 564–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyden, K. M. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1546–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammon, N., Ewing, K., & Paterson, J. 2008. Draft. Urban challenges of inclusive cities – Toward a spatial realm for all. In N. Mammon, K. Ewing, & J. Paterson, (Eds.), Urban development component of a second economy strategy for the office of the presidency - Spatial Planning. Proceedings of conference Urban Land Mark held 24 April 2008. Gauteng: Annual Conference 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. (2011). Urban coding and planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nabil, N., & Eldayem, G. (2015). Influence of mixed land-use on realizing the social capital. HBRC Journal, 11(2), 285–298.
   Google Scholar
• Ozuduru, B. H., & Guldmann, J. M. (2013). Retail location and urban resilience: Towards a new framework for retail policy. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society, 6(1), https://journals.openedition.org/sapiens/1620.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, A. (1996). Mixed-use development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking? Planning Practice and Research, 11(1), 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sautkina, E., Bond, L., & Kearns, A. (2012). Mixed evidence on mixed tenure effects: Findings from a systematic review of UK studies, 1995–2009. Housing Studies, 27(6), 748–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Knaap, G. J. (2004). Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(6), 663–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkin, K., & Rohe, W. (1996). Neighborhood change and urban policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15(3), 159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theart, A. (2007). Smart Growth: a sustainable solution for our cities ( Doctoral dissertation). Stellenbosch University, Sustainability Institute, Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eck, J. R., & Koomen, E. (2008). Characterising urban concentration and land-use diversity in simulations of future land use. The Annals of Regional Science, 42(1), 123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2002). Change and continuity in spatial planning: Metropolitan planning in Cape Town under political transition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar